Clinical benefit of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins in breast conserving surgery.

PURPOSE: Previously, we reported a nomogram for the prediction of positive resection margin (RM) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the nomogram. METHODS: Prospective patients who underwent operations using the nomogram between July 2012 and August 2013 (nomogram group; N = 260) were compared with past control patients who underwent operations between July 2010 and October 2011 and underwent frozen section biopsy (FSB) without use of the nomogram (N = 266). In the nomogram group, an intraoperative assessment of RM using FSB was only performed when the nomogram score was higher than predefined cut-off (>80). In addition, we conducted retrospective analysis of additional 181 patients who received BCS in another institute (Kyoto University Hospital). These patients did not undergo FSBs for RMs. RESULTS: Of 260 patients, 161 (61.9%) presented low nomogram scores and avoided FSB. The surgical decision to use the nomogram did not significantly increase reoperation rate due to positive RM compared with the control FSB group (4.6% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.47). The surgery time was significantly reduced by 18.1% (mean 14.7 min) in nomogram group (p < 0.001). Of 99 nomogram high-score patients, 14 presented with positive RM on FSB and 11 of them avoided reoperation. In the Kyoto cohort, the reoperation rate was significantly lower in low-score patients than in high-score patients (2.7% vs. 11.4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that our nomogram is useful to reduce FSBs without increasing reoperation rate for surgeons who perform routine FSBs. For most surgeons, it can give useful information about the possibility of tumor-positive RMs.

Identifying the potential long-term survivors among breast cancer patients with distant metastasis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a prediction model to identify long-term survivors after developing distant metastasis from breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the institution's database, we collected data of 547 patients who developed distant metastasis during their follow-ups. We developed a model that predicts the post-metastasis overall survival (PMOS) based on the clinicopathologic factors of the primary tumors and the characteristics of the distant metastasis. For validation, the survival data of 254 patients from four independent institutions were used. RESULTS: The median duration of the PMOS was 31.0 months. The characteristics of the initial primary tumor, such as tumor stage, hormone receptor status, and Ki-67 expression level, and the characteristics of the distant metastasis presentation including the duration of disease-free interval, the site of metastasis, and the presence of metastasis-related symptoms were independent prognostic factors determining the PMOS. The association between tumor stage and the PMOS was only seen in tumors with early relapses. The PMOS score, which was developed based on the above six factors, successfully identified patients with superior survival after metastasis. The median PMOS for patients with a PMOS score of <2 and for patients with a PMOS score of >5 were 71.0 and 12 months, respectively. The clinical significance of the PMOS score was further validated using independent multicenter datasets. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a novel prediction model that can classify breast cancer patients with distant metastasis according to their survival after metastasis. Our model can be a valuable tool to identify long-term survivors who can be potential candidates for more intensive multidisciplinary approaches. Furthermore, our model can provide a more reliable survival information for both physicians and patients during their informed decision-making process.

Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: Studies regarding the effects of aesthetic outcomes after breast cancer surgery on quality of life (QoL) have yielded inconsistent results. This study analyzed the aesthetic outcomes and QoL of women who underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS) or total mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (TMIR) using objective and validated methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: QoL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, BR23, and HADs) were administered at least 1 year after surgery and adjuvant therapy to 485 patients who underwent BCS, 46 who underwent TMIR, and 87 who underwent total mastectomy (TM) without reconstruction. Aesthetic results were evaluated using BCCT.core software and by a panel of physicians. Patients' body image perception was assessed using the body image scale (BIS). RESULTS: QoL outcomes, including for social and role functioning, fatigue, pain, body image, and arm symptoms, were significantly better in the BCS and TMIR groups than in the TM group (p<0.05 each). BIS was significantly better in the BCS than in the TM or TMIR group (p<0.001 each). In the BCS and TMIR groups, general QoL factors were not significantly associated with objective cosmetic outcomes, except for body image in the QLQ-BR23. In contrast, patients with poorer BIS score reported lower QoL in almost all items of the QLQ-C30, BR23, and HADS (p<0.05 each). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, BCS and TMIR enhanced QoL compared with TM. Among BCS and TMIR patients, objectively measured cosmetic results did not affect general QoL. Self-perception of body image seems to be more important for QoL after breast cancer surgery.

Clusterin as a possible predictor for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy with intermediate Gleason scores: a preliminary report.

Disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy is a major concern in prostate cancer patients. Gleason scores are useful in predicting recurrence. Low Gleason scores are usually associated with long disease-free intervals, while high Gleason scores are suggestive of early recurrence. However, prediction of recurrence has been difficult with intermediate Gleason scores. Clusterin is a ubiquitous secretory sulfated glycoprotein. It is also an antiapoptotic mediator in prostate cancer. The objective of the present study is to determine if clusterin can serve as a predictive biomarker for recurrence of prostate cancer with intermediate Gleason scores in patients following radical prostatectomy. Prostatic specimens with Gleason score of 6 (3+3) or 7 (3+4) were obtained from the archival bank. Three groups of specimens were investigated. The first group was from nine patients who developed recurrent disease according to a persistent rise of serum PSA within 3 years following radical prostatectomy. Those in the second group and the third group were from patients who showed no evidence of disease recurrence for at least 5 y (11 patients) and 10 y (eight patients), respectively following the surgery. Histological sections were subjected to immunohistochemical staining using a monoclonal antibody specific for clusterin. The staining intensity was scored as 0, 1, 2, and 3, with 0 being no staining, 1 showing less than 25% positive staining, 2 being 25-50% positive, and 3 showing greater than 75% positive staining. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. Evaluation of the scores of clusterin staining was carried out according to four specific areas in each specimen. They were (a) benign epithelial cells, (b) malignant epithelial cells (cancer epithelia), (c) stromal cells surrounding benign cells, and (d) stromal cells surrounding malignant cells (cancer stroma). Staining score in prostatic epithelial cells, benign as well as malignant, showed no significant relationship among the three patient groups. However, when staining scores in stromal cells were compared, there was a significant difference between patients with recurrent disease and those showed no evidence of disease recurrence for at least 10 y. Results of this preliminary study support the important role of clusterin in the stromal component for prostate cancer progression. Clusterin immunostaining may be useful to aid the prediction of chance of disease recurrence in patients with Gleason score 6 or 7 prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. Further studies with a large number of cases are warranted to verify this preliminary finding.