Does Vaginal Cuff Creation and Avoidance of a Uterine Manipulator Improve the Prognosis of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Cervical Cancer? A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Our goal was to compare the treatment outcomes of open-abdominal radical hysterectomy (O-RH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLRH) with vaginal cuff creation and without using a uterine manipulator in stage IB1-B2 (tumor size < 4 cm) cervical cancer cases. In this retrospective multicenter analysis, 94 cervical cancer stage IB1-B2 patients who underwent O-RH or TLRH in six hospitals in Japan between September 2016 and July 2020 were included; 36 patients underwent TLRH. Propensity score matching was performed because the tumor diameter was large, and positive cases of lymph node metastases were included in the O-RH group due to selection bias. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence sites of TLRH and O-RH. PFS and OS (overall survival) were not significant in both the TLRH (n = 27) and O-RH (n = 27) groups; none required conversion to laparotomy. The maximum tumor size was <2 and ≥2 cm in 12 (44.4%) and 15 (55.6%) patients, respectively, in both groups. Reportedly, the TLRH group had lesser bleeding than the O-RH group (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 33.5 (2−65) and 41.5 (6−75) months in the TLRH and O-RH groups, respectively. PFS and OS were not significantly different between the two groups (TLRH: 92.6%, O-RH: 92.6%; log-rank p = 0.985 and 97.2%, 100%; p = 0.317, respectively). The prognosis of early cervical cancer was not significantly different between TLRH and O-RH. Tumor spillage was prevented by creating a vaginal cuff and avoiding the use of a uterine manipulator. Therefore, TLRH might be considered efficient.

[A paclitaxel-resistant case of recurrent breast cancer responded to combination therapy of capecitabine and trastuzumab].

The patient was a 72-year-old female. Under the supervision of her former doctor, this patient had an operation and adjuvant chemotherapy for progressive breast cancer. During the following period, local recurrence of breast cancer and pulmonary lymphopathia developed. Although medication with paclitaxel was attempted, the focus was resistant to this treatment, and metastasis to the brain was also observed. Due to the dyscrasia above, the patient had difficulty breathing and became bedridden. Subsequently, combination treatment of capecitabine and trastuzumab was attempted. As a result,metastasis in the brain and pulmonary lymphopathia were improved. The patient recovered enough to be discharged at one time. However, his condition took a turn for the worse after the interruption of the combination treatment by a side effect. In conclusion, the combination treatment of capecitabine and trastuzumab is thought to be effective for non-responders to paclitaxel.