Adult-type and Pediatric-type Diffuse Gliomas : What the Neuroradiologist Should Know.

The classification of diffuse gliomas into the adult type and the pediatric type is the new basis for the diagnosis and clinical evaluation. The knowledge for the neuroradiologist should not remain limited to radiological aspects but should be based additionally on the current edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). This classification defines the 11 entities of diffuse gliomas, which are included in the 3 large groups of adult-type diffuse gliomas, pediatric-type diffuse low-grade gliomas, and pediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomas. This article provides a detailed overview of important molecular, morphological, and clinical aspects for all 11 entities, such as typical genetic alterations, age distribution, variability of the tumor localization, variability of histopathological and radiological findings within each entity, as well as currently available statistical information on prognosis and outcome. Important differential diagnoses are also discussed.

Neurotoxicity of subarachnoid Gd-based contrast agent accumulation: a potential complication of intraoperative MRI?

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative MRI with Gd-based contrast agent (GBCA) improves the extent of resection of contrast-enhancing brain tumors. Signal changes of CSF due to perioperative GBCA leakage in the subarachnoid space have been reported. However, although GBCA potentially exhibits neurotoxic effects, so far no associated complications have been described. In this case series, the authors report a single-center cohort of patients with subarachnoid GBCA extravasation after intraoperative MRI and discuss potential neurotoxic complications and potential ways of avoiding them. METHODS: All patients with CSF signal increase on unenhanced T1-weighted and FLAIR images on postoperative MRI, who had previously undergone tumor resection with use of intraoperative MRI, were retrospectively included and compared with a control cohort. The control group was matched in age, tumor characteristics, and extent of resection; comparisons were made regarding postoperative seizures and ICU stay. A subgroup with initially diagnosed malignant glioma was additionally analyzed for potential delay of initiation of adjuvant treatment and overall survival. RESULTS: Seven patients with postoperative GBCA accumulation in the subarachnoid space were identified; 5 presented with focal seizures and altered mental status postoperatively. Poor patient condition led to extended ICU stay and prolonged delay of the initiation of adjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. Overall survival was reduced compared to the matched control group. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that there might be a risk of neurotoxic complications if GBCA that is intravenously applied during neurosurgery leaks into the subarachnoid space. Patients with highly vascularized tumors with intraoperative bleeding seem to be especially at risk for GBCA accumulation and neurotoxic complications. Therefore, awareness of the potential risk of complicating GBCA leakage is mandatory in the application of intraoperative GBCA.

Invasive EEG-electrodes in presurgical evaluation of epilepsies: Systematic analysis of implantation-, video-EEG-monitoring- and explantation-related complications, and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is a diagnostic procedure for patients with refractory focal epilepsies that is performed to localize and define the epileptogenic zone. In contrast to grid electrodes, sEEG electrodes are implanted using minimal invasive operation techniques without large craniotomies. Previous studies provided good evidence that sEEG implantation is a safe and effective procedure; however, complications in asymptomatic patients after explantation may be underreported. The aim of this analysis was to systematically analyze clinical and imaging data following implantation and explantation. RESULTS: We analyzed 18 consecutive patients (mean age: 30.5 years, range: 12-46; 61% female) undergoing invasive presurgical video-EEG monitoring via sEEG electrodes (n = 167 implanted electrodes) over a period of 2.5 years with robot-assisted implantation. There were no neurological deficits reported after implantation or explantation in any of the enrolled patients. Postimplantation imaging showed a minimal subclinical subarachnoid hemorrhage in one patient and further workup revealed a previously unknown factor VII deficiency. No injuries or status epilepticus occurred during video-EEG monitoring. In one patient, a seizure-related asymptomatic cross break of two fixation screws was found and led to revision surgery. Unspecific symptoms like headaches or low-grade fever were present in 10 of 18 (56%) patients during the first days of video-EEG monitoring and were transient. Postexplantation imaging showed asymptomatic and small bleedings close to four electrodes (2.8%). CONCLUSION: Overall, sEEG is a safe and well-tolerated procedure. Systematic imaging after implantation and explantation helps to identify clinically silent complications of sEEG. In the literature, complication rates of up to 4.4% in sEEG and in 49.9% of subdural EEG are reported; however, systematic imaging after explantation was not performed throughout the studies, which may have led to underreporting of associated complications.

Bevacizumab as a last-line treatment for glioblastoma following failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine.

In previous trials, bevacizumab failed to prolong the overall survival time in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and at the first recurrence. Randomized clinical trials at the second or further recurrence following the failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine, and retrospective analyses focusing on this specific cohort, are not yet available. A total of 62 patients with glioblastoma who received bevacizumab after the failure of standard care, including radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine, were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics, previous treatment details, concomitant therapy, response based on the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times and rates were evaluated. Furthermore, the PFS and OS times and rates were analyzed for responders and non-responders. Of the patients, 54.8% (n=34) responded to treatment [complete response (CR) 3.2%, n=2; partial response (PR) 51.6%, n=32]. The median PFS time was 3.5 months and the median OS time was 7.5 months. The PFS rate at 6 months was 21.5% and the OS rate at 12 months was 11.5%. Responders (CR or PR) experienced a superior median PFS time compared with non-responders (i.e. stable or progressive disease; 5.4 vs. 1.9 months; P<0.0001) and a superior PFS rate at 6 months (34.9 vs. 7.1%; P<0.0001). The median OS time (8.6 vs. 6.4 months; P<0.0001) and OS rate at 12 months (21.3 vs. 0%; P<0.0001) were also superior in patients who exhibited a response to bevacizumab treatment. In conclusion, the objective response rate and the PFS and OS times and rates indicate that bevacizumab has activity in patients with glioblastoma following the failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide, and lomustine. A randomized trial comparing bevacizumab with best supportive care in these patients is advised.

Bevacizumab in Combination with Chemotherapy for Colorectal Brain Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are rare in patients with colorectal cancer, but the incidence is expected to rise due to prolonged survival resulting from more effective regimens including anti-EGF-receptor and anti-angiogenic antibodies. Because of the potential fear of intracranial hemorrhage, patients with colorectal brain metastases have been excluded from clinical trials involving bevacizumab or aflibercept. PATIENTS: Five patients with colorectal brain metastases treated with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy regimen following either neurosurgery, radiosurgery, or whole-brain radiotherapy were identified between 2009 and 2014. The clinicopathological data and outcomes for these patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Mean time to disease progression concerning brain metastases was 14.8 months (range 5-25). Overall survival was 26.2 months (range 7-42 months) and overall survival since diagnosis of brain metastases was 20.6 month (7-42). Best response was a partial response in two and a stable disease in three patients. Treatment-related adverse events were mild hypertension (grade 1), diarrhea (grade 1), and fatigue (grade 1). No intracranial hemorrhage was observed. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy is a feasible option for palliative treatment of patients with colorectal brain metastasis with a good safety profile.

Sustained focal antitumor activity of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relevance of bevacizumab (BEV)-induced diffusion-restricted lesions and T1-hyperintense lesions in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS: We prospectively screened 74 BEV-treated patients with recurrent glioblastoma for (1) diffusion-restricted lesions and/or, (2) lesions with a hyperintense signal on precontrast T1-weighted images. We further evaluated overall survival (OS), histopathology of the lesions, and patterns of progression. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 74 patients (34%) developed T1-hyperintense lesions, whereas diffusion-restricted lesions could be detected in 35 of 74 patients (47%). In 21 of 74 patients (28%), the lesions displayed both features ("double-positive"). OS for patients with double-positive lesions was 13.0 months; patients with neither of these lesions had an OS of 6.6 months (p < 0.005). Histologic evaluation of double-positive lesions revealed extensive calcified necrosis in 4 of 4 patients. Notably, these double-positive lesions were rarely involved in further tumor progression. However, they were associated with an increase in distant recurrences at BEV failure. CONCLUSIONS: BEV-induced double-positive MRI lesions are a predictive imaging marker associated with a substantial survival benefit and with improved local control in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Our data suggest that these lesions are the result of a sustained focal antitumor activity of BEV.

Cholecystokinin stimulates extracellular signal-regulated kinase through activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor, Yes, and protein kinase C. Signal amplification at the level of Raf by activation of protein kinase Cepsilon.

Cholecystokinin (CCK) and related peptides are potent growth factors in the gastrointestinal tract and may be important for human cancer. CCK exerts its growth modulatory effects through G(q)-coupled receptors (CCK(A) and CCK(B)) and activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2). In the present study, we investigated the different mechanisms participating in CCK-induced activation of ERK1/2 in pancreatic AR42J cells expressing both CCK(A) and CCK(B). CCK activated ERK1/2 and Raf-1 to a similar extent as epidermal growth factor (EGF). Inhibition of EGF receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase or expression of dominant-negative Ras reduced CCK-induced ERK1/2 activation, indicating participation of the EGFR and Ras in CCK-induced ERK1/2 activation. However, compared with EGF, CCK caused only small increases in tyrosine phosphorylation of the EGFR and Shc, Shc-Grb2 complex formation, and Ras activation. Signal amplification between Ras and Raf in a CCK-induced ERK cascade appears to be mediated by activation of protein kinase Cepsilon (PKCepsilon), because 1) down-modulation of phorbol ester-sensitive PKCs inhibited CCK-induced activation of Ras, Raf, and ERK1/2 without influencing Shc-Grb2 complex formation; 2) PKCepsilon, but not PKCalpha or PKCdelta, was detectable in Raf-1 immunoprecipitates, although CCK activated all three PKC isoenzymes. In addition, the present study provides evidence that the Src family tyrosine kinase Yes is activated by CCK and mediates CCK-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc. Furthermore, we show that CCK-induced activation of the EGFR and Yes is achieved through the CCK(B) receptor. Together, our data show that different signals emanating from the CCK receptors mediate ERK1/2 activation; activation of Yes and the EGFR mediate Shc-Grb2 recruitment, and activation of PKC, most likely PKCepsilon, augments CCK-stimulated ERK1/2 activation at the Ras/Raf level.