Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Tzu Chi Med J ; 35(4): 317-321, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38035064

RESUMO

Objectives: The aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of retrograde ureteral catheterization under local anesthesia in patients with urinary tract infections complicated by hydronephrosis caused by ureteral stone obstruction. Materials and Methods: From October 2020 to September 2021, a retrospective analysis of patients' medical records was performed. Records of past history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging investigations were reviewed. Retrograde ureteric stent (RUS) was performed under local anesthesia using cystoscopes and guided by portable fluoroscopy. Real-time fluoroscopy was used to verify the double-J stent position and confirm a smooth process. The postoperative recovery and length of admission were also recorded. Results: A total of 14 patients with ureteral stone obstruction with infective hydronephrosis received 15 total emergency RUS procedures (one bilateral). Intraoperative findings, operation times, and infection signs were recorded and analyzed. All patients met systemic infection criteria, with a mean body temperature of 38.7°C ± 1.7°C. Leukocytosis was noted in 8 (57.1%) patients. Elevated C-reactive protein (8.5 ± 6.3 mg/L) and procalcitonin (24.1 ± 22.0 ng/mL) were found in 13 (92.9%) and 9 (64.3%) patients, respectively. Mean stone size was 8.5 ± 6.3 mm, mostly localized to the upper ureter (upper: 12; middle: 0; lower: 3). Mean operation time was 14.1 ± 4.3 min. After emergency drainage, all patients improved and were discharged after infection was controlled. The average length of admission was 6.2 ± 2.2 days. Conclusion: RUS under local anesthesia is safe and effective for treating infective hydronephrosis due to ureteral stone obstruction. A randomized controlled trial with a large sample remains necessary to validate these findings.

4.
Urolithiasis ; 51(1): 1, 2022 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36454363

RESUMO

This study examined the interval between stone management and emergency percutaneous nephrostomy drainage in patients with infection and hydronephrosis secondary to ureteral calculi. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 88 patients treated for 94 stones enrolled in this study from 2005 to 2020. The mean age was 60.7 ± 15.2 years (range: 2-87 years). The average stone size was 1.51 ± 0.8 cm (range: 0.4-4 cm). The most common location was the upper ureter (n = 71, 75.5%), followed by the lower (n = 17, 18.1%) and middle (n = 6, 6.4%) ureter. The mean interval between percutaneous nephrostomy drainage and secondary stone management was 8.17 ± 11.6 days (range: 1-76 days). Most patients underwent operations within 1 week (n = 72, 81.8%). Abnormal white blood cell counts were found in most patients (58, 65.9%). Tachycardia was detected in 40 (45.5%) patients. Only 11 (12.5%) patients had fever upon emergency department arrival. Severe shock was reported in 6 (6.8%) patients. More than half of all patients (45, 51.1%) experienced acute kidney injury, and 37 (42%) patients had elevated C-reactive protein levels. Most patients (69, 73.4%) received ureteroscopic lithotripsy as stone management. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was the only significant parameter (p = 0.016) affecting the operation interval, with MAP < 60 mmHg associated with longer operation intervals (16.2 days). The timing of stone surgery depends on clinician discretion and patient recovery.


Assuntos
Hidronefrose , Nefrostomia Percutânea , Cálculos Ureterais , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Cálculos Ureterais/complicações , Cálculos Ureterais/cirurgia , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hidronefrose/etiologia , Hidronefrose/cirurgia , Drenagem/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA