Triphasic dynamic enhanced computed tomography for differentiating cholesterol and adenomatous gallbladder polyps.

BACKGROUND: Triphasic dynamic enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired to identify cholesterol and adenomatous gallbladder (GB) polyps that were inaccurately diagnosed before surgery. PURPOSE: To evaluate the CT findings of 1.0- to 2.0-cm GB polyps for differentiating between cholesterol and adenomatous polyps. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with GB polyps were treated surgically from December 2017 to July 2020 and were retrospectively divided into 2 groups according to the postoperative pathologic results: a cholesterol group with 30 patients and an adenomatous group with 22 patients. Unenhanced and triphasic dynamic enhanced CT scans were performed for all the patients within 2 weeks before surgery. The CT image parameters were measured and analyzed by 2 senior radiologists blinded to the pathological diagnoses. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients in the adenomatous group, 77.3% were female and 22.7% were male, with a mean age of 53.5 years; among the 30 patients in the cholesterol group, 66.7% were female and 33.3% were male, with a median age of 50.1 years. The CT image parameters of all 52 patients with GB polyps were analyzed. Significant differences were found in the arterial phase CT values, portal venous phase CT values, delayed phase CT values, ∆CT1 values (portal venous phase CT minus delayed phase CT values), and ∆CT2 values (arterial phase CT minus delayed phase CT values) between the cholesterol and adenomatous polyp groups (p < 0.05). In differentiating the two groups, the ∆CT1 and ∆CT2 values were superior to the arterial, portal venous and delayed phase CT values regarding both sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: The arterial phase CT values, portal venous phase CT values, delayed phase CT values, and ∆CT values (including ∆CT1 and ∆CT2) from triphasic dynamic enhanced CT scans can differentiate the nature of gallbladder polypoid lesions, with the ∆CT values having the highest sensitivity and specificity.

Dual-energy CT to differentiate gallbladder polyps: cholesterol versus adenomatous.

BACKGROUND: Dual-energy computed tomography (DE-CT) scans were acquired to identify cholesterol and adenomatous gallbladder (GB) polyps, which have not been well evaluated before surgery. PURPOSE: To evaluate the DE-CT findings of GB polyps 1.0-2.0 cm in size and differentiate between cholesterol and adenomatous polyps. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with GB polyps were surgically treated from December 2017 to December 2019 and divided into two groups according to their postoperative pathologic results: a cholesterol group with 26 patients and an adenomatous group with 20 patients. All of these patients underwent DE-CT imaging with tube voltages of 80 kVp and 140 kVp within two weeks before surgery. Mean attenuation values were measured for every GB polyp at 80/140 kVp and at 40/140 keV. The mean attenuation value changes between 140 kVp and 80 kVp (MAVC140-80 kVp) and mean attenuation value changes between 100 keV and 40 keV (MAVC100-40 keV) were calculated. RESULTS: The CT image parameters of all 46 patients with GB polyps were analyzed. There were significant differences in MAVC140-80 kVp and MAVC100-40 keV between cholesterol and adenomatous polyps (P <0.05); these values were positive for cholesterol polyps and negative for adenomatous polyps. CONCLUSION: The unique energy spectrum information provided by DE-CT scans is helpful in differentiating between cholesterol and adenomatous polyps 1.0-2.0 cm in size.

The prognostic importance of jaundice in surgical resection with curative intent for gallbladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative jaundice is frequent in gallbladder cancer (GBC) and indicates advanced disease. Resection is rarely recommended to treat advanced GBC. An aggressive surgical approach for advanced GBC remains lacking because of the association of this disease with serious postoperative complications and poor prognosis. This study aims to re-assess the prognostic value of jaundice for the morbidity, mortality, and survival of GBC patients who underwent surgical resection with curative intent. METHODS: GBC patients who underwent surgical resection with curative intent at a single institution between January 2003 and December 2012 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients underwent surgical resection with curative intent, of whom 47 had preoperative jaundice and 145 had none. Compared with the non-jaundiced patients, the jaundiced patients had significantly longer operative time (p < 0.001) and more intra-operative bleeding (p = 0.001), frequent combined resections of adjacent organs (23.4% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.001), and postoperative complications (12.4% vs. 34%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative jaundice was the only independent predictor of postoperative complications. The jaundiced patients had lower survival rates than the non-jaundiced patients (p < 0.001). However, lymph node metastasis and gallbladder neck tumors were the only significant risk factors of poor prognosis. Non-curative resection was the only independent predictor of poor prognosis among the jaundiced patients. The survival rates of the jaundiced patients with preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) were similar to those of the jaundiced patients without PBD (p = 0.968). No significant differences in the rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses were found between the jaundiced patients with and without PBD (n = 4, 21.1% vs. n = 5, 17.9%, p = 0.787). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative jaundice indicates poor prognosis and high postoperative morbidity but is not a surgical contraindication. Gallbladder neck tumors significantly increase the surgical difficulty and reduce the opportunities for radical resection. Gallbladder neck tumors can independently predict poor outcome. PBD correlates with neither a low rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses nor a high survival rate.