Fludarabine, busulfan, and melphalan conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with myeloid malignancies: A multicenter retrospective study.

Relapse remains the main cause of treatment failure in patients with myeloid malignancies even after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We observed a particularly low incidence of relapse in patients prepared with fludarabine, busulfan and melphalan in our previous study and this multicenter retrospective analysis aimed to confirm the feasibility of the regimen and to identify the potential prognostic factors. This study was performed using registry data from adults patients with myeloid malignancies who underwent their first allo-HSCT following fludarabine(≥100 mg/m2), busulfan (≥3.2 mg/kg) and melphalan (≥100 mg/m2) based conditioning at nine transplantation centers in China between Jan. 2020 and Mar. 2022. A total of 221 consecutive patients (AML n = 171, MDS-IB-1 or 2 n = 44, CMML n = 6) with median age of 46 were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up was 507 days for survivors. The 2-year NRM, CIR, OS and DFS were 10.6% ± 2.2%, 14.8% ± 3.3%, 79.4% ± 3.7% and 74.6% ± 3.7%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, high HCT-CI (≥3) was the only independent factor for higher NRM [hazard ratio (HR), 2.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11 to 7.90; p = 0.030] and ECOG score ≥2 was the only independent factor for inferior OS (HR, 2.43; 95%CI, 1.15 to 5.16; p = 0.020) and DFS (HR, 2.12; 95%CI, 1.13 to 4.02; p = 0.020). AML diagnosis and positive measurable residual disease (MRD) at transplantation were predictors for higher CIR (HR = 7.92, 95%CI 1.05-60.03, p = 0.045; HR = 3.64, 95%CI 1.40-9.44, p = 0.008; respectively), while post-transplantation cyclophosphamide based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was associated with lower CIR (HR = 0.24 95%CI 0.11-0.54, p = 0.001). The intensity of conditioning regimen did not impact CIR, NRM, DFS and OS. These results supported that double alkylating agents of busulfan and melphalan based conditioning regimens were associated with low relapse rate and acceptable NRM in adult patients with myeloid malignancies. The optimal dose remained to be confirmed by further prospective studies.

Efficacy and safety of stem cell mobilization with etoposide +cytarabine plus G-CSF in poor mobilizers with relapsed or refractory lymphoma.

Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a potentially curative strategy for relapse or refractory(r/r) aggressive lymphoma. However, a proportion of lymphoma patients who are at high risk of mobilization failure fail to mobilize stem cells and cannot proceed to ASCT. The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of Etoposide combined with Cytarabine (EA) plus G-CSF mobilization in poor mobilizers (PMs) with r/r aggressive lymphoma. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of chemo-mobilization based on EA (Etoposide 0.1 g/m2, qd d1~3; AraC 0.5 g/m2, q12h d1~3) in 98 patients with r/r aggressive lymphoma. Of these, 39 patients met the criteria for predicted PMs as proposed by the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo working group. Results: Of the 39 PMs, 38(97.4%) patents harvested adequate mobilization (≥2×106 CD34+ cells/kg), while 31(79.5%) patients achieved optimal mobilization (≥5×106 CD34+ cells/kg). Overall, the mean number of CD34+ cells/kg collected was 17.99(range: 1.08~83.07) ×106 with an average of 1.4 apheresis sessions, and the number was 15.86(range: 0.37~83.07) ×106 for the first apheresis, respectively. A single apheresis procedure was sufficient to reach the target yield of adequate mobilization in 35(89.7%) PMs, while 76.9% of PMs achieved optimal collection within two apheresis sessions. We observed acceptable hematological toxicity and antibiotic usage exposure in 26 patients with a mean duration of 3.6 days. No grade 4 infection or mobilization-related mortality was recorded. Most patients underwent ASCT and achieved successful hematopoietic recovery with prompt engraftment duration, except for one NK/T-cell lymphoma patient who succumbed to severe septicemia after receiving conditioning chemotherapy. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that EA plus G-CSF is an effective and tolerable CD34+ stem cell mobilization strategy for patients with r/r lymphoma, including those predicted to be PMs. This regimen could be an option for patients with r/r lymphoma, particularly those undergoing mobilization for salvage ASCT therapy.

Optimal flow of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation to prevent desaturation during sedation for bronchoscopy: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Although high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygenation is currently recommended to prevent desaturation during sedation for bronchoscopy, there is no consensus on an optimal flow rate. OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal oxygen flow rate for HFNC to effectively prevent desaturation during sedation for bronchoscopy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, and controlled study. METHODS: Patients (n = 240) scheduled for bronchoscopy were randomized to receive HFNC with propofol sedation (fraction of inspired oxygen, 100%) at one of six flow rates of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 L/min, designated as groups 1-6, respectively. RESULTS: The incidence of desaturation significantly decreased by increasing the oxygen flow rate (42.5%, 17.5%, 15%, 10%, 2.5%, and 0% for groups 1-6, respectively, p < 0.0001). The optimal oxygen flow rate for HFNC determined by probit regression to effectively prevent desaturation in 95% of patients was 43.20 (95% confidence interval, 36.43-55.96) L/min. The requirement for airway intervention was significantly decreased by increasing the oxygen flow rate. CONCLUSION: An HFNC flow rate of 50-60 L/min is recommended to prevent desaturation during sedation for bronchoscopy. REGISTRATION: NCT05298319 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygenation during bronchoscopyMany patients undergo a special test to check their airways for problems. Sometimes, doctors need to take out a small part of the area that's causing trouble to find out what's wrong. But during this test, some patients can struggle to get enough oxygen, which can even be life-threatening. To help with this, there's a device called a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). It gives patients adjustable amounts of oxygen, like a gentle breeze into their nose. But doctors weren't sure how much oxygen was best during this test. So, we studied 240 patients using HFNC at different oxygen levels­like slow, medium, and fast flows. We found that the higher the oxygen flow, the less likely patients were to have oxygen problems. For example, at the lowest flow (10 liters per minute), about 42.5% of patients had oxygen trouble, but at the highest flow (60 liters per minute), none did. And we figured out that a flow rate around 43.2 liters per minute would prevent 95% patients from having oxygen problems. So, we recommend using a flow rate between 50 and 60 liters per minute during this test to keep patients safe from oxygen issues.