Role and fate of SP100 protein in response to Rep-dependent nonviral integration system.

Previously, we studied an AAVS1 site-specific non-viral integration system with a Rep-donor plasmid and a plasmid containing adeno-associated virus integration element. Our earlier study focused on the plasmid vector itself, but the cellular response to the system was still unknown. SP100 is a member of the promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. It is involved in many cellular processes such as transcriptional regulation and the cellular intrinsic immune response against viral infection. In this study, we revealed that SP100 inhibited the Rep-dependent nonviral integration. Conversely, transient expression of Rep78 increased the degradation of SP100. This degradation was inhibited by treatment with MG132, an inhibitor of the ubiquitin proteasome. SP100 and Rep78 are both located in the nucleolus, which provides the spatial possibility for their interaction. Rep78 was coimmunoprecipitated with the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-SP100 fusion protein but not EGFP, which verified the interaction between Rep78 and SP100. These results have enriched our knowledge about the cellular protein SP100 and Rep-dependent nonviral integration. It may lead to an improvement in the application of Rep-related transgene integration method and in the selection of target cells.

Functional differentiation between Rep-mediated site-specific integration and transcriptional repression of the adeno-associated viral p5 promoter.

The adeno-associated virus (AAV) p5 promoter controls expression of Rep68 and Rep78, which are responsible for specific integration of the viral genome into the AAVS1 site of the human genome. The p5 promoter contains a Rep-binding element (RBE) sequence that acts as a substrate of the Rep proteins for both site-specific integration of p5 itself and transcriptional suppression of the p5 promoter. To differentiate these two Rep-mediated functions, we dissected the p5 core structure TATA/RBE/YY1+1 through a series of mutations. Mutations in the TATA box or YY1+1 region of p5IEE significantly reduced Rep-mediated site-specific integration (RMSSI) and p5 promoter transcriptional activity, but only the TATA box is involved in Rep-mediated transcriptional suppression (RMTS). Point mutations at nucleotides 266, 267, 268, 270, and 273 of the GAGTGAGC motif in p5 RBE significantly reduced RMSSI efficiency. However, only p5G270T lost the affinity of Rep binding and had significant reduction of RMTS. It appears that RMTS is determined by the affinity of p5RBE for Rep whereas RMSSI requires more stringent conditions. Thus, RMTS and RMSSI can be differentiated by point mutations in the p5 promoter, which is useful in gene therapy in a helper vector to drive Rep expression, as the mutant promoters seldom integrate themselves but remain the RMTS feature for reduced cytotoxicity caused by a high level of Rep protein.