Proceedings of the 2023 Second Annual ASTCT-NMDP ACCESS Initiative Workshop.

Here the proceedings from the Second Annual American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) and National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) ACCESS Initiative are reviewed to inform the hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapy (CT) ecosystem about progress and direction of the collaborative. Highlights from the meeting, including updates on the progress of projects from the Awareness, Poverty, and Racial Inequity Committees, are presented. The ACCESS Initiative continues to evolve and will remain dependent on the HCT/CT ecosystem's continued dedication to reduce barriers and improve outcome disparities for all patients in need of HCT/CT.

Assessing Medicaid Coverage for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: A Project from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and the National Marrow Donor Program ACCESS Initiative.

The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) and the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) formed the ACCESS Initiative to address and reduce barriers to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapy (CT) to ensure equal access and outcomes for all patients in need. The 3 committees, addressing awareness, poverty, and racial and ethnic inequity, defined pilot projects focusing on addressing relevant barriers to HCT/CT. Because many socioeconomically disadvantaged HCT/CT recipients receive care through state Medicaid programs, the Poverty Committee conducted a Medicaid scan of all 50 US states with the following objectives: to define beneficiary coverage for allogeneic and autologous HCT and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy; to define support for travel, temporary lodging, and meals for both beneficiaries and caregivers; and to determine search and cell acquisition payment procedures. Here we summarize the results of the Medicaid scan and highlight significant variations and gaps in coverage for HCT/CT recipients. We also provide an initial roadmap for addressing gaps in Medicaid support for HCT and CAR-T therapy recipients.

Reducing barriers of access and care related to hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy: The mission-driven role of the national marrow donor program.

The treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic disorders continues to benefit from significant scientific advancement and progress in the use of hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapies. However, barriers associated with receiving these lifesaving treatments and care remain, which necessitate innovative approaches to overcome, so all persons in need can receive these therapies. This article reviews barriers to receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapies, and highlights novel approaches taken by the National Marrow Donor Program in reducing barriers for all patients in need.

Real-World Data Showing Trends and Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Report from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research.

The use of HLA-mismatched donors could enable more patients with ethnically diverse backgrounds to receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the United States. However, real-world trends and outcomes following mismatched donor HCT for diverse patients remain largely undefined. We conducted this study to determine whether the use of mismatched donor platforms have increased the access to allogeneic HCT for ethnically diverse patients, particularly through the application of novel graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens, and whether outcomes for diverse patients are comparable to those of non-Hispanic White patients. This observational cross-sectional study used real-world data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry. All patients receiving their first allogeneic HCT in the United States between 2009 and 2020 were included, with a focus on transplantations performed in 2020. Data from patients undergoing allogeneic HCT using bone marrow, peripheral blood, or cord blood from HLA-matched or mismatched related and unrelated donors were analyzed. Specifically, relative proportion of allogeneic HCT was generated as percentage of total for donor type and for patient age, disease indication, GVHD prophylaxis, and race and ethnicity. Causes of death were summarized using frequencies, and the Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for estimating overall survival. Compared to matched related donor and matched unrelated donor HCT, more ethnically diverse patients received mismatched unrelated donor, haploidentical donor, and cord blood HCT. Although matched unrelated donor remains the most common donor type, the use of haploidentical donors has increased significantly over the last 5 years. Paralleling this increase in haploidentical HCT is the increased use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as GVHD prophylaxis. Relative to previous transplantation eras, the most contemporary era is associated with the highest survival rates following allogeneic HCT irrespective of patient race and ethnicity. Nonetheless, disease relapse remains the primary cause of death for both adult and pediatric allogeneic HCT recipients by donor type and across all patient racial/ethnic groups. Ethnically diverse patients are undergoing allogeneic HCT at higher rates, largely through the use of alternative donor platforms incorporating PTCy. Maintaining access to potential life-saving allogeneic HCT using alternative donors and novel GVHD prophylaxis strategies and improving HCT outcomes, particularly disease relapse, remain urgent clinical needs.

Patient knowledge and information-seeking about personalized cancer therapy.

BACKGROUND: Understanding patients' knowledge and prior information-seeking regarding personalized cancer therapy (PCT) may inform future patient information systems, consent for molecular testing and PCT protocols. We evaluated breast cancer patients' knowledge and information-seeking behaviors regarding PCT. METHODS: Newly registered female breast cancer patients (n=100) at a comprehensive cancer center completed a self-administered questionnaire prior to their first clinic visit. RESULTS: Knowledge regarding cancer genetics and PCT was moderate (mean 8.7±3.8 questions correct out of 16). A minority of patients (27%) indicated that they had sought information regarding PCT. Higher education (p=0.009) and income levels (p=0.04) were associated with higher knowledge scores and with seeking PCT information (p=0.04). Knowledge was not associated with willingness to participate in PCT research. CONCLUSION: Educational background and financial status impact patient knowledge as well as information-seeking behavior. For most patients, clinicians are likely to be patients' initial source of information about PCT. Understanding patients' knowledge deficits at presentation may help inform patient education efforts.

Attitudes toward molecular testing for personalized cancer therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed attitudes of breast cancer patients toward molecular testing for personalized therapy and research. METHODS: A questionnaire was given to female breast cancer patients presenting to a cancer center. Associations between demographic and clinical variables and attitudes toward molecular testing were evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred eight patients were approached, and 100 completed the questionnaire (a 32% response rate). Most participants were willing to undergo molecular testing to assist in the selection of approved drugs (81%) and experimental therapy (59%) if testing was covered by insurance. Most participants were white (71%). Even if testing was financially covered, nonwhite participants were less willing to undergo molecular testing for the selection of approved drugs (54% of nonwhites vs 90% of whites, odds ratio [OR] = 0.13, P = .0004) or experimental drugs (35% vs 68%, OR = 0.26, P = .0072). Most participants (75%) were willing to undergo a biopsy to guide therapy, and 46% were willing to undergo research biopsies. Nonwhite participants were less willing to undergo research biopsies (17% vs 55%, OR = 0.17, P = .0033). Most participants wanted to be informed when research results had implications for treatment (91%), new cancer risk (90%), and other preventable/treatable diseases (87%). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were willing to undergo molecular testing and minimally invasive procedures to guide approved or experimental therapy. There were significant differences in attitudes toward molecular testing between racial groups; nonwhites were less willing to undergo testing even if the results would guide their own therapy. Novel approaches are needed to prevent disparities in the delivery of genomically informed care and to increase minority participation in biomarker-driven trials. Cancer 2015;121:243-50. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Attitudes regarding privacy of genomic information in personalized cancer therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudes regarding privacy of genomic data in a sample of patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Female patients with breast cancer (n=100) completed a questionnaire assessing attitudes regarding concerns about privacy of genomic data. RESULTS: Most patients (83%) indicated that genomic data should be protected. However, only 13% had significant concerns regarding privacy of such data. Patients expressed more concern about insurance discrimination than employment discrimination (43% vs 28%, p<0.001). They expressed less concern about research institutions protecting the security of their molecular data than government agencies or drug companies (20% vs 38% vs 44%; p<0.001). Most did not express concern regarding the association of their genomic data with their name and personal identity (49% concerned), billing and insurance information (44% concerned), or clinical data (27% concerned). Significantly fewer patients were concerned about the association with clinical data than other data types (p<0.001). In the absence of direct benefit, patients were more willing to consent to sharing of deidentified than identified data with researchers not involved in their care (76% vs 60%; p<0.001). Most (85%) patients were willing to consent to DNA banking. DISCUSSION: While patients are opposed to indiscriminate release of genomic data, privacy does not appear to be their primary concern. Furthermore, we did not find any specific predictors of privacy concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Patients generally expressed low levels of concern regarding privacy of genomic data, and many expressed willingness to consent to sharing their genomic data with researchers.