Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman syndrome)-recognition of the histological spectrum allows for new insights into possible pathomechanisms.

OBJECTIVES: EF is a rare disease characterized by fibrosis and inflammation of the fascia, scleroderma-like skin indurations and optional blood eosinophilia. We aimed to expand the knowledge about its aetiology and pathogenesis. METHODS: Biopsy specimens from 16 EF patients were assessed by histology, immunohistochemistry and quantitative reverse transcription PCR in comparison with anti-Mi-2+ DM patients and non-disease controls. RESULTS: Histologically, EF shows mild to severe inflammation at the muscle-fascia interface, with frequent involvement of the underlying muscle tissue, though varying in degree. CD206+ macrophages predominate and eosinophils are detected within the fascia in the majority of cases, however in quite small numbers, and seen infrequently within the muscle. Activators of the so-called Th2-M2 pathway like STAT6 and IL-4 are upregulated leading to high expression levels of CD206. Activators of the so-called Th1-M1 pathway like STAT1 and IFN-γ (IFNG) are also upregulated, though not translating into a significant upregulation of the effector molecule COX2. Interestingly, activators or chemoattractants of eosinophils show no significant upregulation in EF compared with DM. EF shows features of perifascicular pathology comparable to DM, with upregulation of MHC class I and II; however, this is not accompanied by perifascicular atrophy or any signs of a type I IFN response or hypoxia-mediated processes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight a specific immune phenotype of leucocyte infiltrates in EF along features of perifascicular pathology similar to DM, while there is no evidence of hypoxia-mediated or type I IFN-associated processes with perifascicular fibre atrophy, indicating different pathomechanisms of muscle involvement.

[Current Recommendations for Diagnostics in Giant Cell Arteritis]. / Aktuelle Empfehlungen zur Diagnostik der Riesenzellarteriitis.

In Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), a timely diagnosis is required to avoid severe complications such as blindness or structural vascular damage. The heterogeneous symptoms are mainly due to local and systemic inflammatory processes. Diagnostics are based on increased inflammation parameters in the laboratory, imaging, in which color-coded duplex sonography (FKDS), high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computer tomography (CT) or CT angiography (CTA) and 18F fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with CT (FDG-PET-CT) have become established, as well as histopathological findings in temporal artery biopsy.

Improved adalimumab dose decision with comprehensive diagnostics data.

OBJECTIVES: Monoclonal antibodies are important in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is the first trial to monitor the effect of adalimumab dose escalation in persistently active RA. The aim of this study was to identify the response to adalimumab to improve the basis for making decision in relation to actual drug capacity in serum. METHODS: The disease activity of RA patients was assessed with CDAI and DAS28 before administration of additional 40 mg adalimumab one week after standard injection. Serum samples were analysed using the recoveryELISA technology, a combination of sandwich ELISA and competitive assay. The recoveryELISA measure the concentrations of free TNF-α, drug level, and the remaining active adalimumab in the patients' sera. An adalimumab concentration of 5.0-10.0 g/mL was defined as the targeted therapeutic window. RESULTS: Five of 8 patients achieved moderate EULAR response by dose escalation. The results of the free adalimumab and TNF-α neutralisation measurements allowed a separation of the cohort (n=17) into three groups. Group 1 represents 18% of the patients with free adalimumab level higher 30.0 µg/mL and TNF-α neutralisation above 95%. Group 2 (47%) consists of patients within the therapeutic window with balanced free adalimumab and TNF-α neutralisation values. Group 3 contains 35% of the cohort with low concentrations of free adalimumab and lowest remaining TNF-α-neutralisation capacity. Anti-drug antibodies were detected in four patients but did not prevent response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Drug and antigen monitoring using recoveryELISA may support dose decision to avoid unnecessary switch in medication or possible overtreatment.

Increased Prevalence of Diastolic Heart Failure in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Correlates with Active Disease, but Not with Treatment Type.

OBJECTIVE: Although heart failure (HF) is a major cause of premature mortality, there is little information regarding its prevalence and associated risk factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of HF in a community-based RA cohort. Further, we investigated the effect of RA activity and present treatment on HF rate and cardiac structure. METHODS: A diagnostic workup for HF according to the European Society of Cardiology recommendations was performed in 157 patients with RA fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria (68% women, age 61 ± 13 yrs) from our outpatient clinic and in 77 age- and sex-matched controls. RESULTS: The prevalence of HF in patients with RA (24%) was unexpectedly high and differed significantly from the control sample (6%, p = 0.001). Diastolic HF was the dominant type (23% vs 6%), and clinical symptoms alone were of low diagnostic value. Active RA (28-joint Disease Activity Score ≥ 2.6: OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3-9.8) was an independent risk factor of HF, as well as systemic inflammation (erythrocyte sedimentation rate > 16 mm/h: OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.1-16; C-reactive protein > 10 mg/l: OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.8-8.0) and RA duration > 10 years (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.8). HF in RA was associated with concentric hypertrophy (48% vs 17%, p < 0.001) and reduced longitudinal strain (-17.2% vs -19.7%, p < 0.001). However, the prevalence of HF was equivalent between the treatment groups [conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) 25%, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors 22%, other biological DMARD 27%]. CONCLUSION: Recognition of all diastolic HF in RA requires a complex diagnostic approach. Active rather than inactive RA places patients at a higher risk for HF, whereas influence of RA treatment on HF risk needs to be elucidated in further studies.