Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Surgery For Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas: Long-Term Outcomes and Management of Recurrent Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) provide improved access and operative visualization for resection of pituitary adenomas. Although the technique has gained wide acceptance, there is a paucity of data regarding late recurrence. OBJECTIVE: We aim to assess long-term outcomes of patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) who underwent EEA. METHODS: We reviewed 269 patients operated on for an NFPA between 2005 and 2015. Clinical and radiologic factors including those potentially related to higher chances of recurrence were analyzed. Progression-free survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate and multivariate survival were analyzed using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: The study included 269 patients. The gross total resection rate was 46.0% (n = 124) but cavernous sinus involvement was present in almost half the patients (n = 115). The probability of recurrence at 5 years and 10 years was 22.0% and 47.2%, respectively. The median time to recurrence was 10 years for patients without cavernous sinus involvement and 6 years for those with cavernous sinus involvement. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, cavernous sinus invasion, anterior skull base extensions, and residual tumor were significantly associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rate of NFPA remains high despite the better visualization offered by EEA, especially in those tumors involving the cavernous sinus and/or previously operated on. Repeat surgery is adequate for tumor debulking and decompression of the optic apparatus but is unlikely to achieve gross total resection if a successful previous EEA has been performed. Radiation therapy is an effective option for management of recurrent tumors.

Recurrence of Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas After Endoscopic Endonasal Resection: 10 Years' Experience in a Series of 52 Endoscopic and Transcranial Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Although the indication of endoscopic approaches for anterior skull base meningiomas (ASBM) has been progressively refined, there remains a paucity of data on recurrence rates after resection. To analyze and compare recurrence rates of ASBM resected through endoscopic endonasal (EEE) versus transcranial (TCA) approaches. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients submitted to the EEE or TCA approach for ASBM resection from May 2006 to January 2016 in our center. Clinical, radiological, and pathology data were retrieved for analysis. Tumor size, location, surgical technique, extent of resection, and tumor grade were assessed. The 2 groups were compared to identify predictors and differences regarding tumor recurrence. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (17 olfactory groove meningioma [OGM] and 35 tuberculum sellae meningioma [TSM]) were included; 26 (6 OGM and 20 TSM) underwent EEE and 26 (13 OGM and 13 TSM) TCA, with a mean follow-up of 41 months. Gross total resection was achieved in 38 (73%) patients (18 [69%] in EEE and 20 [77%] in TCA). Eight (15%) patients presented with recurrence: 5 (19%) in the EEE group and 3 (11.5%) in the TCA group without a statistical difference (P = 0.69). Among the recurrences, gross total resection had been achieved in 1 case of each group. In the EEE group, 1 patient underwent TCA for a recurrent tumor and another patient was referred for radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown an overall similar recurrence rate of ASBM regardless of the technique used. However, the analysis of larger series with longer follow-up is necessary to clearly define the indications and to fully validate the efficacy of EEE.