Quality of life and tolerance to mental pain scale in cancer patients subjected to bone scan.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of psychiatric co-morbidities on the quality of life-36 (QoL36) and tolerance to mental pain scale (TMPS) questionnaire of cancer patients administered in the Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine prior to a bone scan to rule out metastatic disease. METHODS: A group of 40 consecutive cancer patients (24 prostate, 12 breast and 4 with other cancers) were subjected to bone scan (BS) to rule out metastatic disease. Each patient received QoL36 and TMPS questionnaire prior to BS. RESULTS: There were low QoL and TMPS scores in all patient groups. The average QoL36 questionnaire score was 43,71 (23-70) (normal values considered >90). The average TMPS scores for prostate cancer patients was 55.42 (21-96), for breast cancer patients 63.42 (44-83) and for the other cancer patients 58.25 (48-68). Female patients with breast cancer had statistically higher tolerance to mental pain compared to patients with prostate cancer. Both tests were independently important for evaluation of the psychological status of the patients. There was no significant correlation of either QoL or TMPS with age, sex or disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients exhibited low QoL and TMPS, independent of sex, age, cancer type and disease duration. Multi-modality psychological support may be needed for these patients.

Cancer pain who cares? International and national patterns of evidence-based global guidelines recommendations for physicians on the Web (2011 vs. 2018).

PURPOSE: Although pain is a common event during treatment of cancer, its assessment and management remains suboptimal in everyday clinical practice at global level. METHODS: Considering both the important role of internet in daily life and that clinical guidelines are important for translating evidence in clinical practice, we performed a prospective study to scrutinize the magnitude of updated evidence-based cancer-pain guideline recommendation for physicians on the web. Changes over-time at a global level were scrutinized at two time points: 2011 for baseline and 2018 at first follow-up. Both anesthesiology and oncology societies were analyzed. RESULTS: In 2011 we scrutinized 181,00 WebPages and 370 eligible societies were identified; 364 of these were eligible for analyses both in 2011 and 2018. The magnitude of cancer pain updated and evidence-based guideline recommendations on the web for health care providers was extremely low at global level and at any time point considered: 1.1% (4/364) in 2011 and 4.7% (17/364) in 2018. Continental and intercontinental patterns, National's highest developmental index, oncology tradition and economic-geographic areas were not found to influence cancer pain web-guideline provision. In 2018, pain & supportive care societies provided the highest rate of updated evidence-based cancer-pain guidelines for clinicians. Only 3/25 medical oncology societies and 1/34 radiation oncology societies, provided own or e-link (to other societies') evidence-based guidelines in their websites. CONCLUSIONS: Major medical oncology and radiation oncology societies - at global level - fail to produce updated cancer pain recommendations for their physicians, with most of these providing no or inconsistent or outdated guidelines.

Global coverage and consistency of guideline recommendations for cancer cachexia on the Web in 2011 and 2018.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer cachexia is a common associate of cancer and has a negative impact on both patients' quality of life and overall survival. Nonetheless its management remains suboptimal in clinical practice. Provision of medical recommendations in websites is of extreme importance for medical decision making and translating evidence into clinical practice. AIM OF THE STUDY: To scrutinize the magnitude, consistency and changes over time of cancer-cachexia recommendations for physicians on the Web among oncology related societies. Intercontinental, continental, national and socioeconomic variations were further analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Web identification of oncology related societies and prospective analyses of relative Web guideline recommendations for physicians on cancer-cachexia at different time-points. RESULTS: In June 2011, we scrutinized 144,000 Web pages. We identified 275 societies, of which 270 were eligible for analyses: 67 were international (African, American, Asian, European, Oceania and Intercontinental), 109 belonged to the top 10 countries with the highest development index and 94 pertained to 10 countries with a long lasting tradition in medical oncology. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of cancer cachexia recommendations for physicians on the Web at a global level was scant both for coverage and consistency, and at any time-point considered: 3.7% (10/270) in 2011 and 8.1% (22/270) in 2018. The proportion of societies giving evidence-based and updated recommendations for cancer cachexia for physicians was only 1.1% (3/270) in 2011 and 2.96% (8/270) in 2018. Continent, national highest developmental index, oncology tradition and economic-geographic areas were not found to influence Web guideline provision.

Identification of catheter misplacement in early port CVC dysfunction.

The use of port central venous catheters (CVCs) for chemotherapeutical use has seen exponential growth over the last decades. However, port CVC misplacement may lead to catheter malfunction (such as partial or total catheter blockade), which might be complicated by thrombosis and catheter superinfections, and these in turn may lead to pulmonary embolism and bloodstream infections. The overall occurrence of port CVC misplacement is up to 6%; nonetheless, port CVC misplacement may occur in up to 67% of patients with early CVC dysfunction (occurring within three months of catheter insertion). Thereafter, the prompt evaluation of catheter position among patients with first-trimester CVC dysfunction is extremely important. The aim of the present manuscript is to support medical oncologists, haematologists, and clinicians in timely suspicion and recognition of port CVC misplacement among patients with early CVC dysfunction. Radiological educational iconographic materials that will assist a prompt estimate of port-CVC dislocation are provided.

Postoperative chemotherapy with single-agent fluoropyrimidines after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Surgical resection is the only option of cure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Risk of recurrence after metastasectomy is around 75%. Use of adjuvant chemotherapy after metastasectomy is controversial. AIM: To address whether adjuvant systemic therapy after colorectal cancer metastasectomy offers any survival benefit compared with surgery alone. METHODS: Systematic review of literature and meta-analysis of all available randomised evidence. Relative hazards (RHs) were summarised across trials and heterogeneity was assessed with the Q and I2 statistics. RESULTS: Five trials were eligible. Three trials, all using single-agent fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy, presented data valuable for analyses. 482 patients were included in the meta-analysis: 238 randomly assigned to receive postoperative chemotherapy and 244 to metastasectomy only. We found no overall survival (OS) benefit with the use of postoperative single-agent fluoropyrimidines compared with surgery alone, even if a trend for benefit was observed (relative hazard (RH)=0.781, 95% CI 0.593 to 1.030, p=0.080). Significant disease-free survival benefit with the use of postoperative chemotherapy was observed (RH=0.645, 95% CI 0.509 to 0.818, p=0.001). No quality of life (QL) data were available. All trials showed accrual delay, two stopped and one recruiting after 10 years. Long follow-up needs were evidenced since OS curves split only after 3.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: No OS benefit was documented from the use of postoperative monochemotherapy. Metastasectomy alone continues to be the standard of care. Combination chemotherapy regimens should be evaluated along with QL assessment in future trials appropriately designed for long-term accrual and follow-up.