A common low dimensional structure of cognitive impairment in stroke and brain tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Neuropsychological studies infer brain-behavior relationships from focal lesions like stroke and tumors. However, these pathologies impair brain function through different mechanisms even when they occur at the same brain's location. The aim of this study was to compare the profile of cognitive impairment in patients with brain tumors vs. stroke and examine the correlation with lesion location in each pathology. METHODS: Patients with first time stroke (n = 77) or newly diagnosed brain tumors (n = 76) were assessed with a neuropsychological battery. Their lesions were mapped with MRI scans. Test scores were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) to measure their correlation, and logistic regression to examine differences between pathologies. Next, with ridge regression we examined whether lesion features (location, volume) were associated with behavioral performance. RESULTS: The PCA showed a similar cognitive impairment profile in tumors and strokes with three principal components (PCs) accounting for about half of the individual variance. PC1 loaded on language, verbal memory, and executive/working memory; PC2 loaded on general performance, visuo-spatial attention and memory, and executive functions; and, PC3 loaded on calculation, reading and visuo-spatial attention. The average lesion distribution was different, and lesion location was correlated with cognitive deficits only in stroke. Logistic regression found language and calculation more affected in stroke, and verbal memory and verbal fluency more affected in tumors. CONCLUSIONS: A similar low dimensional set of behavioral impairments was found both in stroke and brain tumors, even though each pathology caused some specific deficits in different domains. The lesion distribution was different for stroke and tumors and correlated with behavioral impairment only in stroke.

Presurgical predictors of early cognitive outcome after brain tumor resection in glioma patients.

Gliomas are commonly characterized by neurocognitive deficits that strongly impact patients' and caregivers' quality of life. Surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy, and it can also cause cognitive impairment. An important clinical problem is whether patients who undergo surgery will show post-surgical cognitive impairment above and beyond that present before surgery. The relevant rognostic factors are largely unknown. This study aims to quantify the cognitive impairment in glioma patients 1-week after surgery and to compare different pre-surgical information (i.e., cognitive performance, tumor volume, grading, and lesion topography) towards predicting early post-surgical cognitive outcome. We retrospectively recruited a sample of N = 47 patients affected by high-grade and low-grade glioma undergoing brain surgery for tumor resection. Cognitive performance was assessed before and immediately after (∼1 week) surgery with an extensive neurocognitive battery. Multivariate linear regression models highlighted the combination of predictors that best explained post-surgical cognitive impairment. The impact of surgery on cognitive functioning was relatively small (i.e., 85% of test scores across the whole sample indicated no decline), and pre-operative cognitive performance was the main predictor of early post-surgical cognitive outcome above and beyond information from tumor topography and volume. In fact, structural lesion information did not significantly improve the accuracy of prediction made from cognitive data before surgery. Our findings suggest that post-surgery neurocognitive deficits are only partially explained by preoperative brain damage. The present results suggest the possibility to make reliable, individualized, and clinically relevant predictions from relatively easy-to-obtain information.