Interleukin-6 Family of Cytokines in Cancers.

Nine soluble ligands [interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-11 (IL-11), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), oncostatin M (OSM), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1), cardiotrophin-like cytokine, interleukin-27 (IL-27), and interleukin-31] share the ubiquitously expressed transmembrane protein-glycoprotein-130 beta-subunit (gp130) and thus form IL-6 family cytokines. Proteins that may be important for cancerogenesis, CT-1, IL-11, IL-27, LIF, OSM, and CNTF, belong to the superfamily of IL-6. Cytokines such as IL-6, IL-11, and IL-27 are better investigated in comparison with other members of the same family of cytokines, eg, CT-1. Gp130 is one of the main receptors through which these cytokines exert their effects. The clinical implication of understanding the pathways of these cytokines in oncology is that targeted therapy to inhibit or potentiate cytokine activity may lead to remission in some cases.

Midazolam and hydroxymidazolam plasma concentrations can be monitored with selected biochemical and physiological parameters of palliative care patients.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Midazolam is one of top three drugs used in palliative care. Its use increases in the last days of hospice patients' lives while safe dosage can be challenging. Equations currently used to estimate glomerular filtration rate, e.g: the Cockroft-Gault (eGFRCR) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFRMDRD) ones, do not generate precise calculations, especially in palliative patients exhibiting variations in body parameters. Our aim was to seek new relationships between mean midazolam (Mavg) and alfahydroxymidazolam (OH-Mavg) concentrations in plasma, and selected biochemical and physiological parameters of palliative patients, to enable optimal midazolam pharmacotherapy. STUDY DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: The pilot study included 11 Caucasians, aged 42-95, with advanced cancer disease, receiving midazolam in a hospice in-patient unit. We tested correlations among Mavg, BMI, eGFRMDRD, midazolam clearance (CL), OH-Mavg, bilirubin (Bil) and blood creatinine concentration (Cr). F test and leave-one out (LOO) validation was applied to verify the correlations' significance and predictive ability. RESULTS: We found ten statistically significant (p < 0.05) correlations related to midazolam pharmacokinetics and physiological factors. We formulated two equations with high degree of predictive ability, based on the eGFRMDRD→CL and the (Bil + BMI × Ln(Cr))→Mavg-(OH-Mavg) correlations. The limitations of the study mainly revolve around its pilot nature and the need to continue testing the results on a bigger population. No funding to disclose. CONCLUSIONS: The significance of correlations corresponding to the arithmetic expressions confirms that Bil, BMI, Ln(Cr) analyzed simultaneously report a series of processes on which midazolam metabolism depends. Two of ten correlations proposed came close to meet all LOO validation criteria. Current findings can help optimize midazolam treatment in palliative therapy.

Haloperidol in palliative care: Indications and risks.

Individual response to medication depends on several factors (age, gender, body weight, general clinical condition, genetics, diet, hydration status, comorbidities, co-administered drugs and their mode of administration, smoking, alcohol overuse, environmental factors, e.g. sunlight) that may contribute to adverse drug reactions even at therapeutic doses. Patients in palliative care are at increased risk of these reactions. Unwanted drug effects diminish the quality of life and may lead to a suboptimal dying process. Haloperidol is one of the three most commonly used drugs in palliative care and the most commonly employed typical antipsychotic. It has also been recommended for inclusion into the palliative care emergency kit of home care teams. As such, it is important to be fully conversant with the indications, benefits, and risks of haloperidol, especially in the context of palliative care.

Midazolam: Safety of use in palliative care: A systematic critical review.

PURPOSE: The undesired effects of midazolam can be life-threatening. This paper delineates the findings related to the pharmacokinetics, adverse effects and drug-drug interactions as well as associated therapeutic implications for safe midazolam use. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was conducted. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of midazolam depends on hepatic and renal functions, fat tissue mass, route and duration of administration, as well as potential drug-drug interactions. Palliative care patients constitute a high-risk group prone to side effects of drugs, due to polytherapy and multi-organ failure. CONCLUSION: Midazolam is one of three most frequently administered drugs in palliative care. The indications for its use include anxiety, dyspnea, seizures, vomiting refractory to treatment, agitation, myoclonus, status epilepticus, restlessness, delirium, pruritus, hiccups, insomnia, analgosedation, palliative sedation and preventing or counteracting undesired effects of ketamine.

Two is a perfect number: Patient-doctor relationship and patient attachment style in palliative care.

We tested the association between the palliative patient's attachment style and the patient-doctor relationship, by means of Revised Adult Attachment Scale and a self-designed, patient-doctor relationship questionnaire. The study included 110 (52 M, 58 F) cancer, hospice patients, aged 36-80 years. We observed 54 percent of secure, 18 percent of dismissive, 9 percent of preoccupied, and 19 percent of fearful styles. Securely attached patients developed significantly ( p < .05) better relationships with doctors than insecure patients. There was no difference in the quality of the patient-doctor relationship among dismissive versus preoccupied versus fearful patients. We argue that attachment theory should be applied in palliative care to improve patients' quality of life and dying.

Fragmentation studies of selected drugs utilized in palliative care.

The results of research on selected drugs used in palliative care are presented, including fentanyl, tramadol, metoclopramide, hyoscine butylbromide, midazolam, haloperidol, levomepromazine and clonazepam. Interpretation of their ESI mass spectra obtained by the use of a triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer is given. As a result, fragmentation pathways described in the literature are complemented and presented with more details. On their basis, transitions for quantitative analysis are selected and chromatographic conditions for the determination of the palliative care drugs are proposed as well. These results enable future studies on palliative care drugs in elderly patients including both their quantitation in body fluids and easier identification of their metabolites.

Managing metastatic bone pain: New perspectives, different solutions.

Bone metastases are the most frequent cause of cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP). Although palliative radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy conducted according to World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder are the treatment of choice for CIBP reduction, these methods are not always successful, especially with regard to alleviation of incidental pain. Antiresorptive drugs (bisphosphonates) are able to inhibit bone destruction (loss), proliferation of cancer cells and angiogenesis, but their prolonged use may lead to a spectrum of adverse effects. In this paper, types of bone metastases, their complications, as well as diagnostic and therapeutic implications are presented. Moreover, the paper discusses presently used CIBP treatment methods and research directions for future methods, with special focus on bone metastases.

Analgesic efficacy, adverse effects, and safety of oxycodone administered as continuous intravenous infusion in patients after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) causes extensive tissue damage and severe pain. This study aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy, adverse effects (AEs), and safety of continuous intravenous (iv) oxycodone infusion with ketoprofen (injected into the iv line) in patients after THA, and to assay serum oxycodone levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients, aged 59‒82 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or III, underwent THA with intrathecal analgesia and sedation induced by iv propofol. After the surgery, oxycodone (continuous iv infusion) at a dose of 1 mg/h (five patients) or 2 mg/h (nine patients) with 100 mg ketoprofen (injected into the iv line) was administered to each patient every 12 h. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS: 0 - no pain, 10 - the most severe pain) at rest and during movement. AEs, including hemodynamic unsteadiness, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, cognitive impairment, and respiratory depression, were registered during the first 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: Oxycodone (continuous iv infusion) at a dose of 2 mg/h with ketoprofen (100 mg) administered every 12 h provided satisfactory analgesia in all nine patients without the need of rescue analgesics within the first 24 h after THA. In three out of five patients, oxycodone at 1 mg/h was effective. Oxycodone did not induce drowsiness, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression, or changes in blood pressure. Bradycardia appeared in two patients, and nausea was observed in one patient. CONCLUSION: Oxycodone infusion with ketoprofen administered by iv is effective in patients after THA. Intravenous infusion of oxycodone is a predictable, stable, and safe method of drug administration.

Treatment of acute, severe epigastric/chest pain in a patient with stomach cancer following gastrectomy: A case report.

The treatment of acute chest pain can be a challenge in palliative care. Firstly, because acute chest pain is a symptom of a paucity of diseases, which makes diagnosis difficult and time consuming, while there is also a time constraint, due to the extreme suffering of the patient. Secondly, the condition of a patient with advanced cancer disease and co-morbidities does not always allow for required diagnostic procedures. The present report describes a case of acute, severe epigastric/chest pain in a patient with dynamic disease progression, who was receiving palliative care. This study also demonstrates that the pathophysiology of pain in a terminal patient may determine the treatment strategy. The patient in the present case was a 41-year-old male, who had previously undergone gastrectomy for stomach cancer, followed by postoperative chemotherapy. The patient was treated with palliative chemotherapy for metastases to the lungs, liver and lymph nodes, which led to the development of iatrogenic peripheral neuropathy. The patient was subsequently admitted to the Palliative Medicine In-patient Unit of the University Hospital of Lord's Transfiguration (Poznan, Poland) with the complaint of acute epigastric and chest pain. An electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, chest and abdomen computerized tomography scan, esophagoduodenoscopy and laboratory analyses were performed to determine the source of the pain. The patient was treated with morphine sulfate, metoclopramide, midazolam, diazepam, acetaminophen, ketamine, hyoscine butylbromide, propofol, dexamethasone and amoxycillin, and received parenteral nutrition. As the source of pain remained unclear, a second esophagoduodenoscopy was performed to determine a diagnosis, resulting in pain relief. Thus, in the present case, esophagoduodenoscopy was diagnostic and therapeutic. Furthermore, although the treatment of acute chest pain may be a challenge in palliative care, the present study indicates that pain treatment should be adjusted to anatomical, pathophysiological and pharmacological factors, and may pose risks due to the unavoidable parenteral co-administration of multiple agents with strong therapeutic effects.

Bupivacaine administered intrathecally versus rectally in the management of intractable rectal cancer pain in palliative care.

BACKGROUND: Unacceptable adverse effects, contraindications to and/or ineffectiveness of World Health Organization step III "pain ladder" drugs causes needless suffering among a population of cancer patients. Successful management of severe cancer pain may require invasive treatment. However, a patient's refusal of an invasive procedure necessitates that clinicians consider alternative options. OBJECTIVE: Intrathecal bupivacaine delivery as a viable treatment of intractable pain is well documented. There are no data on rectal bupivacaine use in cancer patients or in the treatment of cancer tenesmoid pain. This study aims to demonstrate that bupivacaine administered rectally could be a step in between the current treatment options for intractable cancer pain (conventional/conservative analgesia or invasive procedures), and to evaluate the effect of the mode of administration (intrathecal versus rectal) on the bupivacaine plasma concentration. CASES: We present two Caucasian, elderly inpatients admitted to hospice due to intractable rectal/tenesmoid pain. The first case is a female with vulvar cancer, and malignant infiltration of the rectum/vagina. Bupivacaine was used intrathecally (0.25-0.5%, 1-2 mL every 6 hours). The second case is a female with ovarian cancer and malignant rectal infiltration. Bupivacaine was adminstered rectally (0.05-0.1%, 100 mL every 4.5-11 hours). METHODS: Total bupivacaine plasma concentrations were determined using the high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method. RESULTS: Effective pain control was achieved with intrathecal bupivacaine (0.077-0.154 mg·kg(-1)) and bupivacaine in enema (1.820 mg·kg(-1)). Intrathecal bupivacaine (0.5%, 2 mL) caused a drop in blood pressure; other side effects were absent in both cases. Total plasma bupivacaine concentrations following intrathecal and rectal bupivacaine application did not exceed 317.2 ng·mL(-1) and 235.7 ng·mL(-1), respectively. Bupivacaine elimination was slower after rectal than after intrathecal administration (t½= 5.50 versus 2.02 hours, respectively). LIMITATIONS: This study reports two cases only, and there could be inter-patient variation. CONCLUSION: Bupivacaine in boluses administered intrathecally (0.25%, 2 mL) provided effective, safe analgesia in advanced cancer patients. Bupivacaine enema (100 mg·100 mL(-1)) was shown to be a valuable option for control of end-of-life tenesmoid cancer pain.

Lumbar paravertebral blockade as intractable pain management method in palliative care.

Optimal symptoms control in advanced cancer disease, with refractory to conventional pain treatment, needs an interventional procedure. This paper presents coadministration of local anesthetic (LA) via paravertebral blockade (PVB) as the alternative to an unsuccessful subcutaneous fentanyl pain control in a 71-year old cancer patient with pathological fracture of femoral neck, bone metastases, and contraindications to morphine. Bupivacaine in continuous infusion (0.25%, 5 mL · hour(-1)) or in boluses (10 mL of 0.125%-0.5% solution), used for lumbar PVB, resulted in pain relief, decreased demand for opioids, and led to better social interactions. The factors contributing to an increased risk of systemic toxicity from LA in the patient were: renal impairment; heart failure; hypoalbuminemia; hypocalcemia; and a complex therapy with possible drug-drug interactions. These factors were taken into consideration during treatment. Bupivacaine's side effects were absent. Coadministered drugs could mask LA's toxicity. Elevated plasma α1-acid glycoprotein levels were a protective factor. To evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of the PVB treatment in boluses and in constant infusion, bupivacaine serum levels were determined and the drug plasma half-lives were calculated. Bupivacaine's elimination was slower when administered in constant infusion than in boluses (t½ = 7.80 hours versus 2.64 hours). Total drug serum concentrations remained within the safe ranges during the whole treatment course (22.9-927.4 ng mL(-1)). In the case presented, lumbar PVB with bupivacaine in boluses (≤ 137.5 mg · 24 hours(-1)) was an easy to perform, safe, effective method for pain control. Bupivacaine in continuous infusion (≤150 mg · 12 hours(-1)) had an acceptable risk-benefits ratio, but was ineffective.

[Endovascular treatment, with "kissing stents" technique, of superior vena cava syndrome in patient with lung cancer]. / Zwezenie zyly glównej górnej w przebiegu raka pluca leczone wewnatrznaczyniowo technika "kissings stents".

Presented in the article an intravascular method of treatment with stents implantation was effective for symptoms relief and physical signs correction, in 63-year-old patient with advanced lung cancer and SVCS purely responsive to palliative radiotherapy, chemiotherapy (toxic haematological effects) and steroids. The treatment improved the patient's quality of life.