Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 30(1): 13-18, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36103970

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify the relationship between patient position during surgery and time to confirmation of ureteral patency on cystoscopy. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: A total of 91 adult women undergoing laparoscopic (either conventional or robotic) hysterectomy between February 2021 and February 2022 were randomized to intervention (n = 45) or control (n = 46). Exclusion criteria included known kidney disease or urinary tract anomaly, current ureteral stent, pregnancy, malignancy, and recognized intraoperative urinary tract injury. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects in the control group were placed in a 0° supine position during cystoscopy. Subjects in the intervention group were placed in a 20° angle in reverse Trendelenburg (RT) position during cystoscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome, time to confirmation of bilateral ureteral patency, was measured at the time the second ureteral jet was viewed during intraoperative cystoscopy. There was no significant difference in mean time to confirmation (66.5 seconds in supine vs 67 seconds in RT, p = .2) nor in total cystoscopy time (111 seconds in supine vs 104.5 seconds in RT, p = .39). There were no significant differences in need for alternative modalities to aid in ureteral efflux visualization, delayed diagnosis of ureteric injury, and operative time. RT position seemed to have reduced the time to confirmation for the small group of patients with longer confirmation time (>120 seconds). CONCLUSION: RT position does not change time to confirmation of bilateral ureteral patency compared with supine position. However, there may be a benefit in position change if time to confirmation is >120 seconds.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Ureter , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Cistoscopia , Ureter/cirurgia , Ureter/lesões , Histerectomia , Posicionamento do Paciente , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 54(10): 2134-2137, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31036370

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In female infants undergoing herniorrhaphy, there is a reported incidence of 15%-20% of prolapsed adnexal structures. Our primary aim is to confirm the incidence of adnexal tissue in hernia sacs at the time of repair and to further delineate the clinical characteristics of this population at a major pediatric institution. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all cases of herniorrhaphy in female patients less than the age of 18 from June 2009 to December 2015 in a large tertiary referral children's hospital. RESULTS: The overall incidence of patients with gynecological findings during herniorrhaphy was 11.2%. For patients with positive findings, the average gestational age at birth was 34.07 weeks, the age at surgery was 0.99 years, and the rate of right-sided hernias was 43.2%. For patients with negative findings, the average gestational age at birth was 38.23 weeks, the age at surgery was 5.14 years, and the rate of right-sided hernias was 23.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of adnexal structures found in hernia sacs is comparable to previously reported figures. These patients had a significantly lower gestational age at birth, lower age at surgery, and lower rate of right-sided hernias from the general population and from those without gynecological findings during herniorrhaphy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.


Assuntos
Anexos Uterinos , Coristoma , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 68(2): 567-571, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29544995

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Radiation to the interventionalist's brain during fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGIs) may increase the incidence of cerebral neoplasms. Lead equivalent surgical caps claim to reduce radiation brain doses by 50% to 95%. We sought to determine the efficacy of the RADPAD (Worldwide Innovations & Technologies, Lenexa, Kan) No Brainer surgical cap (0.06 mm lead equivalent at 90 kVp) in reducing radiation dose to the surgeon's and trainee's head during FGIs and to a phantom to determine relative brain dose reductions. METHODS: Optically stimulated, luminescent nanoDot detectors (Landauer, Glenwood, Ill) inside and outside of the cap at the left temporal position were used to measure cap attenuation during FGIs. To check relative brain doses, nanoDot detectors were placed in 15 positions within an anthropomorphic head phantom (ATOM model 701; CIRS, Norfolk, Va). The phantom was positioned to represent a primary operator performing femoral access. Fluorography was performed on a plastic scatter phantom at 80 kVp for an exposure of 5 Gy reference air kerma with or without the hat. For each brain location, the percentage dose reduction with the hat was calculated. Means and standard errors were calculated using a pooled linear mixed model with repeated measurements. Anatomically similar locations were combined into five groups: upper brain, upper skull, midbrain, eyes, and left temporal position. RESULTS: This was a prospective, single-center study that included 29 endovascular aortic aneurysm procedures. The average procedure reference air kerma was 2.6 Gy. The hat attenuation at the temporal position for the attending physician and fellow was 60% ± 20% and 33% ± 36%, respectively. The equivalent phantom measurements demonstrated an attenuation of 71% ± 2.0% (P < .0001). In the interior phantom locations, attenuation was statistically significant for the skull (6% ± 1.4%) and upper brain (7.2% ± 1.0%; P < .0001) but not for the middle brain (1.4% ± 1.0%; P = .15) or the eyes (-1.5% ± 1.4%; P = .28). CONCLUSIONS: The No Brainer surgical cap attenuates direct X rays at the superficial temporal location; however, the majority of radiation to an interventionalist's brain originates from scatter radiation from angles not shadowed by the cap as demonstrated by the trivial percentage brain dose reductions measured in the phantom. Radiation protective caps have minimal clinical relevance.


Assuntos
Cabeça/efeitos da radiação , Chumbo , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Saúde Ocupacional , Roupa de Proteção , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação/prevenção & controle , Radiografia Intervencionista , Cirurgiões , Vestimenta Cirúrgica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Desenho de Equipamento , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Dosimetria por Luminescência Estimulada Opticamente , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Proteção , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Espalhamento de Radiação , Texas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA