Ultrasonography for airway management.

Ultrasonography (USG) allows a new approach to the airway in anaesthesia and intensive care. USG visualises the airway from the mouth to the lungs. By exploring the entire airway, USG proposes new criteria (1) to assess the risk of difficult laryngoscopy, (2) to anticipate the management of a difficult airway, (3) to confirm the position of the endotracheal tube (ETT), and (4) to confirm that the lungs are effectively ventilated. Intraoperatively, USG may also help to resolve acute ventilatory problems such as pneumothorax, delayed selective bronchial intubation after patient positioning (Trendelenburg, prone or lateral position) or acute pulmonary oedema.

Impact of Chloroprocaine on the Eligibility for Hospital Discharge in Patients Requiring Ambulatory Surgery Under Spinal Anesthesia: An Observational Multicenter Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: This observational study was designed to assess the use of spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine in the context of ambulatory surgery. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, observational study was carried out among 33 private or public centers between May 2014 and January 2015 and adult patients, scheduled for a short ambulatory surgery under spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine. The primary outcomes were anesthetic effectiveness, defined as performance of the whole surgical procedure without any additional anesthetic agent, and the time to achieve eligibility for hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were the effect of chloroprocaine on motor and sensory blocks, patients' satisfaction, and the use of analgesics in the first 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: Among the 615 enrolled patients, 56% were male, the mean age was 47.2 ± 15.2 years, and most patients had an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) status of 1 (63.7%). Main surgical procedures performed were orthopedic (62.6%) and gynecologic (16.1%), and the mean duration of surgery was 26.7 ± 16.7 min. The overall anesthetic success rate was 93.8% (95% CI [91.5%; 95.6%]) for the 580 patients with available data for primary criteria. The failure rate was lower than 7% for all surgical procedures, except for gynecologic surgery (14.8%; 95% CI [8.1%; 23.9%]). The average times of eligibility for hospital discharge and effective discharge were 252.7 ± 82.7 min and 313.8 ± 109.9 min, respectively. The time of eligibility for hospital discharge is defined as the recovery of the patient's normal clinical parameters and the time of effective discharge is defined as the time for the patient to leave the hospital after surgery. Eligibility for patient's discharge was achieved more rapidly in private than public hospitals (236.3 ± 77.2 min vs. 280.9 ± 80.7 min, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed positive results on the effectiveness of chloroprocaine as a short-duration anesthetic and could be used to reduce the time to achieve eligibility for hospital discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02152293. Registered on May 6, 2014. Date of enrollment of the first participant in the trial May 7, 2014.

Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Available short-acting intrathecal anesthetic agents (chloroprocaine and prilocaine) offer an alternative to general anesthesia for short-duration surgical procedures, especially ambulatory surgeries. Factors determining the choice of anesthesia for short-duration procedures have not been previously identified. METHODS: This observational, prospective, multicenter, cohort study was conducted between July 2015 and July 2016, in 33 private or public hospitals performing ambulatory surgery. The primary objective was to determine the factors influencing the choice of anesthetic technique (spinal or general anesthesia). Secondary outcomes included efficacy of the anesthesia, time to hospital discharge, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Among 592 patients enrolled, 309 received spinal anesthesia and 283 underwent general anesthesia. In both study arms, the most frequently performed surgical procedures were orthopedic and urologic (43.3% and 30.7%, respectively); 66.1% of patients were free to choose their type of anesthesia, 21.8% chose one of the techniques because they were afraid of the other, 16.8% based their choice on the expected ease of recovery, 19.2% considered their degree of anxiety/stress, and 16.9% chose the technique on the basis of its efficacy. The median times to micturition and to unassisted ambulation were significantly shorter in the general anesthesia arm compared with the spinal anesthesia arm (225.5 [98; 560] min vs. 259.0 [109; 789] min; p = 0.0011 and 215.0 [30; 545] min vs. 240.0 [40; 1420]; p = 0.0115, respectively). The median time to hospital discharge was equivalent in both study arms. In the spinal anesthesia arm, patients who received chloroprocaine and prilocaine recovered faster than patients who received bupivacaine. The time to ambulation and the time to hospital discharge were shorter (p < 0.001). The overall success rate of spinal anesthesia was 91.6%, and no significant difference was observed between chloroprocaine, prilocaine, and bupivacaine. The patients' global satisfaction with anesthesia and surgery was over 90% in both study arms. CONCLUSIONS: Patient's choice, patient fear of the alternative technique, patient stress/anxiety, the expected ease of recovery, and the efficacy of the technique were identified as the main factors influencing patient choice of short-acting local anesthesia or general anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia with short-acting local anesthetics was preferred to general anesthesia in ambulatory surgeries and was associated with a high degree of patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02529501. Registered on June 23, 2015. Date of enrollment of the first participant July 21, 2015.

Major Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Surgery Performed With Combined Bilateral Subcostal Transversus Abdominal Plane Block and Celiac Plexus Block, Intravenous Sedation Without Tracheal Intubation: A Feasibility Study of 3 Cases.

OBJECTIVES: Major abdominal surgery usually requires general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and may be supplemented with neuraxial anesthesia to provide intraoperative and postoperative pain relief. Attempts at using only neuraxial anesthesia for major abdominal surgery have often been shown to be poorly effective. This report demonstrates that laparoscopic colonic surgical procedures can be performed with ultrasound-guided blocks (bilateral transversus abdominal plane block and celiac plexus block) and intravenous sedation, while avoiding general or neuraxial anesthesia. CASE REPORT: We report our preliminary experience in 3 patients (all American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status III) who underwent laparoscopic colonic surgery without general anesthesia. Intraoperative visceral analgesia was provided by single-injection ultrasound anterior celiac plexus block to which was added a bilateral subcostal transversus abdominal plane block to obtain parietal analgesia. Light intravenous sedation was added. Surgical exposure was satisfactory, and no patient complained of any symptom during the procedure. No adverse effect was recorded. Postoperative pain was minimal, and recovery was enhanced with mobilization and walking within hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: To date, celiac plexus block has been used almost exclusively to relieve pancreatic cancer pain. This is the first report in which it is shown that major intra-abdominal surgery can be performed almost exclusively with regional anesthesia while avoiding adverse effects and problems associated with either general or neuraxial anesthesia. In addition, prolonged postoperative pain relief facilitated early recovery.

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Pulmonary Metastasis and Thoracic Paravertebral Block Under Computed Tomographic Scan Guidance: A Case Report.

Pain during and after pulmonary percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be severe enough to require opioids. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a regional anesthetic technique that can relieve pain during and after abdominal or thoracic painful procedures. We report the use of TPVB to relieve postprocedural pain in a 50-year-old woman after RFA of lung metastasis. The TPVB was performed under computed tomographic guidance by the anesthesiologist. The patient was pain free (rest and mobilization) during the first postoperative 36 hours. TPVB may represent an easy, safe, and effective strategy to prevent or treat postoperative pain after pulmonary RFA.

Spinal anaesthesia in outpatient and conventional surgery: A point of view from experienced French anaesthetists.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the practice of spinal anaesthesia among French anaesthetists in inpatient and outpatient settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A questionnaire was sent to members of the French Association of Anaesthetists involved in regional anaesthesia during the first 4months of 2015. The questionnaire included items on the practice of spinal anaesthesia (type of needle, local anaesthetic available, puncture and disinfection techniques, etc.) and on the anaesthetic techniques usually used in 5 surgical situations eligible for outpatient surgery (knee arthroscopy, inguinal hernia, transobturator tape, haemorrhoids, varicose veins in the lower limbs). RESULTS: Responses from 703 anaesthesiologists were analysed. Spinal anaesthesia was usually performed in a sitting position (76%) using a Whitacre needle (60%) with a 25 G (57%) diameter. Ultrasound before puncture was reported in 26% of cases due to obesity or spinal abnormalities. Among the 5 surgical situations eligible for outpatient spinal anaesthesia, the technique was typically proposed in 29-49% of cases. Bupivacaine was the most used local anaesthetic. Concerns over delays in attaining readiness for hospital discharge, urine retention, operation length, and surgeon's preference were the main reasons for choosing another anaesthetic technique in these situations. DISCUSSION: New local anaesthetics are beginning to be used for outpatient spinal anaesthesia due to their interesting pharmacodynamic profile in this context. This study will provide a basis for evaluating future changes in practice.

A modified coracoid approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks using a double-stimulation technique in 300 patients.

Infraclavicular brachial plexus block is used less than other techniques of regional anesthesia for upper-limb surgery. We describe a modified coracoid approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus using a double-stimulation technique and assess its efficacy. Patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the upper limb were included in this prospective study. The landmarks used were the coracoid process and the clavicle. The needle was inserted in the direction of the top of the axillary fossa (in relation to the axillary artery), with an angle of 45 degrees. Using nerve stimulation, the musculocutaneous nerve was identified first and blocked with 10 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine. The needle was then withdrawn and redirected posteriorly and medially. The radial, ulnar, or median nerve was then blocked. The block was tested every 5 min for 30 min. The overall success rate, i.e., adequate sensory block in the 4 major nerve distributions at 30 min, was 92%, and 6% of the patients required supplementation. Five patients required general anesthesia. No major complications were observed. This modified infraclavicular brachial plexus block using a double-stimulation technique was easy to perform, had frequent success, and was safe in this cohort.