Requiring Reconsideration of Differences of Aeromonas Infections Between Extra-Intestinal and Intestinal in Hospitalized Patients.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the variations between extra-intestinal and intestinal infections of Aeromonas in terms of strain types, risk factors, drug susceptibility results, and the distribution of drug resistance and virulence genes. Patients and Methods: A total of 188 Aeromonas strains were identified to the species level using housekeeping genes (rpoD, gyrB, and gyrA). The risk factors for Aeromonas extra-intestinal and intestinal infection, as well as mortality, were retrospectively examined in this study. The broth microdilution method was used to investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Touchdown polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and DNA sequencing were employed to confirm virulence and the presence of drug resistance genes. Results: The housekeeping genes identified 188 strains into 7 species. Extra-intestinal isolates generally contained A. caviae and A. hydrophila, while intestinal were A. veronii (p=0.0001). Extra-intestinal infections (158/188) were the main type and accounted for 24/27 of all fatalities. Malignant tumors, hepatobiliary diseases, anemia, and hypoproteinemia were linked to infections. Poor results were associated with septic shock. Using the broth microdilution method, over 80% isolates were susceptible to most antimicrobials, except for ceftazidime (79.8%) and ceftriaxone (69.7%). Except for imipenem, intestinal strains were more susceptible to other medications than extra-intestinal. Using touch-down polymerase chain reaction testing and DNA sequencing, 6 strains, 31 strains, and a strain only had bla TEM, bla CphA, and bla VIM, respectively. Two Aeromonas hydrophila each possessed bla CphA+ bla CTXM-M-9, and bla CphA + bla CTX-M-1 + bla CTX-M-15-like + bla TEM; two Aeromonas caviae each possessed bla NDM + bla CTX-M-1 +bla CTX-M-15-like + bla TEM, and bla NDM + bla TEM. Thirty-four of the 42 strains mentioned above were isolated from extra-intestinal. Act, aexT, and ascF-G, were in intestinal more frequently, but alt, hlyA, ela, and lip were in extra-intestinal more frequently. Conclusion: Aeromonas inside and outside intestinal differed in their clinical characteristics, drug susceptibility, drug resistance and virulence genes.

Accurate Identification and Virulence Detection of Aeromonas: a Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Clinical Features and Outcomes Associated with Aeromonas Bacteremia in Southwestern China.

In this study, Aeromonas spp. were re-identified, and the clinical aspects associated with Aeromonas bacteremia, as well as drug resistance and virulence genes, were elucidated. A total of 188 isolates were classified into 7 Aeromonas spp. using housekeeping gene sequencing, which was the standard to assess the accuracy of the VITEK MALDI-TOF system and the VITEK2 Compact system. The VITEK MS system and housekeeping gene sequencing had a 39.89% clear coincidence rate, whereas the VITEK2 Compact system and the standard had a 2.13% coincidence rate. Aeromonas bacteremia was associated with septic shock, hematologic malignancy, and post-hepatitic cirrhosis. Hematological malignancy, hypoproteinemia, systemic steroid use, central venous catheterization, and virulence genes act and ast were linked to poor outcomes. Aeromonas bacteremia had a 37.5% mortality rate; however, differences in mortality rates among Aeromonas spp. were observed. According to the broth microdilution method, over 90% of isolates were sensitive to most antimicrobials, except ceftriaxone (83.33%) and imipenem (83.33%). Polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing verified the presence of drug resistance genes; blaCphA was detected in 3 isolates, while blaNDM-1 was found in one isolate. In summary, common methods for identifying Aeromonas spp. are ineffective. Immunocompromised patients have a higher risk of infection and mortality. Furthermore, carbapenem resistance is a serious problem.

MBLs, Rather Than Efflux Pumps, Led to Carbapenem Resistance in Fosfomycin and Aztreonam/Avibactam Resistant Elizabethkingia anophelis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk factors associated with infections and in-hospital mortality, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and carbapenem resistance mechanisms in E. anophelis. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study was conducted to reveal the risk factors associated with Elizabethkingia anophelis (E. anophelis) infection and in-hospital mortality in a university tertiary hospital in southwest China, using multivariable logistic-regression analyses. Complete 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to reconfirm the identity of all isolates. We employed the broth microdilution method to investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. The presence of resistance genes was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. Full-length resistance genes were cloned into the pET-28a vector for further functional studies. RESULTS: Our multivariate analysis indicated that coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, surgery in the past 6 months, anemia and systemic steroid use were independent risk factors for the acquisition of E. anophelis. Additionally, anemia was the only independent risk factor associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with E. anophelis infections. E. anophelis isolates showed high in-vitro susceptibility towards minocycline (100%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (71.8%), but were resistant to colistin, fosfomycin, ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam/avibactam. The PCR revealed the presence of blaGOB and blaBlaB in 37 isolates, and blaCME ß-lactamase genes in 36 isolates out of 39 E. anophelis isolates. Additionally, we showed that two metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) BlaB and GOB, were responsible for carbapenem resistance and the serine-ß-lactamase, CME, was functionally involved in resistance to cephalosporins and monobactams. Interestingly, the various putative efflux pumps in E. anophelis were not responsible for resistance. CONCLUSION: Our findings will help clinicians to identify high-risk patients and suggests that minocycline should be considered as a therapeutic option for E. anophelis infections. Additionally, carbapenem resistance in E. anophelis is mainly associated with the MBLs, BlaB and GOB, rather than various putative efflux pumps.