Final analysis of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for untreated advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: The ESCORT-1st trial.

BACKGROUND: The interim analysis of the randomized phase 3 ESCORT-1st study demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for camrelizumab-chemotherapy than placebo-chemotherapy in untreated advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we present the final analysis of this study and investigate potential indicators associated with OS. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive camrelizumab (200 mg) or placebo, both in combination with up to six cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2). All treatments were administered intravenously every 3 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS assessed by the independent review committee. FINDINGS: As of April 30, 2022, the median OS was significantly longer in the camrelizumab-chemotherapy group compared to the placebo-chemotherapy group (15.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.0-18.4] vs. 12.6 months [95% CI 11.2-13.8]; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70 [95% CI 0.58-0.84]; one-sided p < 0.0001), with 3-year OS rates of 25.6% and 12.8% in the two groups, respectively. The 2-year PFS rates were 20.4% in the camrelizumab-chemotherapy group and 3.4% in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Adverse events were consistent with those reported in the interim analysis. Higher PD-L1 expression correlated with extended OS, and multivariate analysis identified sex and prior history of radiotherapy as independent indicators of OS. CONCLUSIONS: The sustained and significant improvement in efficacy with camrelizumab-chemotherapy compared to placebo-chemotherapy, along with the absence of accumulating or delayed toxicities, supports the long-term use of camrelizumab-chemotherapy as a standard therapy in untreated advanced/metastatic ESCC. FUNDING: This study was funded by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.

Short-term and Long-term Efficacy Evaluation of Drug-Loaded Osteoset Artificial Bone Grafting Fusion in the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Tuberculosis.

Objective: To analyze the short-term and long-term efficacy of Osteoset artificial bone graft fusion mixed with rifampicin for injection in the treatment of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 70 patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint tuberculosis who were admitted and underwent surgical treatment in our orthopedics department between April 2014 and May 2020. The patients were divided into three groups based on the different bone graft materials used: autogenous bone graft group (25 cases), simple lesion removal group (18 cases), and drug-loaded calcium sulfate bone graft group (27 cases). General information and surgical details of the three groups were compared. Sacroiliac X-ray and CT scans were performed at regular intervals to record pre- and post-treatment erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, bone graft fusion rates at 6, 12, and 18 months post-surgery, Majeed score for functional evaluation, and postoperative complications. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and intraoperative pus removal volume among the three groups of patients (P > .05). Postoperatively, 70 patients were followed up, and the serum levels of ESR and CRP in all three groups of patients were significantly reduced at 3 months after surgery (P < .05). In the autogenous bone graft group, the bone graft fusion rates were 24.00% (6/25) at 6 months postoperatively, 76.00% (18/25) at 12 months, and 96.00% (24/25) at 18 months. In the simple lesion removal group, the bone graft fusion rates were 16.67% (3/18) at 6 months postoperatively, 27.78% (5/18) at 12 months, and 55.56% (10/18) at 18 months. In the drug-loaded calcium sulfate bone graft group, the bone graft fusion rates were 18.52% (5/27) at 6 months postoperatively, 55.56% (15/27) at 12 months, and 81.48% (22/27) at 18 months. In the autogenous bone graft group, the postoperative Majeed score averaged (91.47±4.13) points, with 13 cases rated as excellent and 10 cases rated as good, resulting in an excellent and good rate of 92.00% (23/25). The Majeed scores at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were (67.19±4.22) points, (80.28±5.83) points, and (91.47±4.13) points, respectively. Among them, there were 4 excellent and 3 good cases at 6 months postoperatively, with an excellent and good rate of 28.00% (7/25). At 12 months postoperatively, there were 8 excellent and 10 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 72.00% (18/25). At 18 months postoperatively, there were 13 excellent and 10 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 92.00% (23/25). In the simple lesion removal group, the Majeed scores at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were (59.17±3.95) points, (69.84±5.16) points, and (76.22±8.76) points, respectively. There were 2 excellent and 2 good cases at 6 months postoperatively, with an excellent and good rate of 22.22% (4/18). At 12 months postoperatively, there were 4 excellent and 3 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 38.89% (7/18). At 18 months postoperatively, there were 5 excellent and 5 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 55.56% (10/18). In the drug-loaded calcium sulfate bone graft group, the Majeed scores at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were (63.24±4.17) points, (77.39±5.50) points, and (86.64±7.03) points, respectively. There were 3 excellent and 3 good cases at 6 months postoperatively, with an excellent and good rate of 22.22% (6/27). At 12 months postoperatively, there were 9 excellent and 7 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 59.26% (16/27). At 18 months postoperatively, there were 10 excellent and 12 good cases, with an excellent and good rate of 81.48% (22/27). The Majeed scores for all three groups of patients showed a significant increase in the three follow-up evaluations compared to pre-treatment (P < .05). Conclusion: Drug-loaded Osteoset artificial bone graft fusion is a safe and effective method for treating bone defects after the debridement of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis lesions. It has fewer postoperative complications and achieves bone graft fusion in a shorter time compared to simple lesion removal methods.

Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of MYB Gene Family and Analysis of Its Sex-Biased Expression Pattern in Spinacia oleracea L.

The members of the myeloblastosis (MYB) family of transcription factors (TFs) participate in a variety of biological regulatory processes in plants, such as circadian rhythm, metabolism, and flower development. However, the characterization of MYB genes across the genomes of spinach Spinacia oleracea L. has not been reported. Here, we identified 140 MYB genes in spinach and described their characteristics using bioinformatics approaches. Among the MYB genes, 54 were 1R-MYB, 80 were 2R-MYB, 5 were 3R-MYB, and 1 was 4R-MYB. Almost all MYB genes were located in the 0-30 Mb region of autosomes; however, the 20 MYB genes were enriched at both ends of the sex chromosome (chromosome 4). Based on phylogeny, conserved motifs, and the structure of genes, 2R-MYB exhibited higher conservation relative to 1R-MYB genes. Tandem duplication and collinearity of spinach MYB genes drive their evolution, enabling the functional diversification of spinach genes. Subcellular localization prediction indicated that spinach MYB genes were mainly located in the nucleus. Cis-acting element analysis confirmed that MYB genes were involved in various processes of spinach growth and development, such as circadian rhythm, cell differentiation, and reproduction through hormone synthesis. Furthermore, through the transcriptome data analysis of male and female flower organs at five different periods, ten candidate genes showed biased expression in spinach males, suggesting that these genes might be related to the development of spinach anthers. Collectively, this study provides useful information for further investigating the function of MYB TFs and novel insights into the regulation of sex determination in spinach.

Toripalimab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

The combination of immune-checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has generated mixed results. TORCHLIGHT is a randomized, double-blinded phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of first-line toripalimab and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) (n = 353; experimental arm) versus placebo and nab-P (n = 178; control arm) for the treatment of women with metastatic or recurrent TNBC. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by a blinded independent central review in the PD-L1-positive and intention-to-treat populations. The secondary end points included overall survival and safety. Overall, 200 and 100 patients, in the toripalimab and placebo arm respectively had PD-L1-positive TNBC. At the prespecified interim analysis, a statistically significant improvement in PFS assessed by a blinded independent central review was demonstrated in the experimental arm in the PD-L1-positive population (median PFS 8.4 versus 5.6 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.470-0.906, P = 0.0102). The median overall survival was 32.8 versus 19.5 months (HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.414-0.914, P = 0.0148). Similar incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) (99.2% versus 98.9%), grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (56.4% versus 54.3%) and fatal AEs (0.6% versus 3.4%) occurred in the experimental and control arms. The addition of toripalimab to nab-P provided a significant improvement in PFS for PD-L1-positive patients with metastatic or recurrent TNBC with an acceptable safety profile. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT03777579 .

Efficacy and safety of the proposed bevacizumab biosimilar BAT1706 compared with reference bevacizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, phase III study.

BACKGROUND: BAT1706 is a proposed biosimilar of bevacizumab (Avastin®). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of BAT1706 with that of EU-sourced reference bevacizumab (EU-bevacizumab) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to BAT1706 plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (BAT1706 arm) or EU-bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (EU-bevacizumab arm) given every 3 weeks for six cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with BAT1706 or EU-bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at week 18 (ORR18 ). Clinical equivalence was demonstrated if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the BAT1706:EU-bevacizumab ORR18 risk ratio was contained within the predefined equivalence margins of 0.75-1.33 (China National Medical Products Administration requirements), or 0.73-1.36 (US Food and Drug Administration), or if the 95% CI of the ORR18 risk difference between treatments was contained within the predefined equivalence margin of -0.12 to 0.15 (EMA requirements). RESULTS: In total, 649 randomized patients (BAT1706, n = 325; EU-bevacizumab, n = 324) received at least one cycle of combination treatment. The ORR18 was comparable between the BAT1706 and EU-bevacizumab arms (48.0% and 44.5%, respectively). The ORR18 risk ratio of 1.08 (90% CI: 0.94-1.24) and the ORR18 risk difference of 0.03 (95% CI: -0.04 to 0.11) were within the predefined equivalence margins, demonstrating the biosimilarity of BAT1706 and EU-bevacizumab. The safety profile of BAT1706 was consistent with that of EU-bevacizumab and no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, BAT1706 demonstrated clinical equivalence to EU-bevacizumab in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity.

Hyperthermic intrathoracic/intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus conventional intrapleural/intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the malignant effusion: a multi-center randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intrathoracic/intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus conventional intrapleural/intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant pleural or peritoneal effusion. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was carried out in 8 cancer centers across China. Patients with malignant pleural or peritoneal effusion were randomly assigned to the study group or control group. Patients in the study group were treated with cisplatin-based hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), while the control group was treated with conventional intrapleural or intraperitoneal chemotherapy using same chemotherapeutic regime as the study group. The objective response rate (ORR) was analyzed as primary outcome. Quality-of-life (QOL) score was recorded as secondary outcome using the questionnaire 30 (QLQ-C30) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). The efficacy and safety of the two treatments were compared. RESULTS: Total 135 patients were recruited and randomized in this study, with 67 patients in the study group and 68 patients in the control group. The ORR in the study group (80.70%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (31.03%, p < 0.001). However, neither changes of QOL scores, nor incidence rates of adverse events were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.076 and 0.197, respectively). CONCLUSION: Efficacy of HITHOC or HIPEC is superior to that of conventional modality for the treatment of malignant effusion with comparable side effects.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer without tumor PD-L1 expression in Asia.

Aim: We pooled patient-level data from three randomized controlled studies to evaluate the combination of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with untreated advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score <1% in East Asia. Methods: The analysis included 107 patients from China, Japan, Korea, Thailand and Taiwan (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 56; chemotherapy alone, n = 51). Results: For pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, median overall survival was 21.3 versus 12.6 months (HR, 0.55 [95% CI: 0.35-0.87]) and median progression-free survival was 8.4 versus 6.0 months (HR, 0.64 [95% CI: 0.43-0.96]). Conclusion: The analysis supports the use of pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for East Asian patients with PD-L1-negative, advanced NSCLC.

This analysis evaluated outcomes for East Asian patients with a type of advanced lung cancer which does not express a protein called programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). The patients received either an immunotherapy, called pembrolizumab, in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Overall survival (how long people live) and progression-free survival (how long people live without their disease getting worse) were longer for patients who received treatment with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus those who received chemotherapy alone. Side effects among East Asian patients were similar to those previously described for a global patient population. These results support the use of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy for East Asian patients with lung cancer that does not express PD-L1. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02039674; NCT02578680; NCT03950674; NCT02775435; NCT03875092 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Real-world evidence of osimertinib in Chinese patients with EGFR T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a subgroup analysis from ASTRIS study.

PURPOSE: ASTRIS study aimed the largest to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of second- or higher-line osimertinib in patients with advanced/metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the real-world setting. Here we report the results of Chinese patients in ASTRIS study. METHODS: Adults with EGFR T790M-positive advanced NSCLC pretreated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), having a WHO performance status score of 0-2 and asymptomatic, stable central nervous system (CNS) metastases were included. All patients received once-daily osimertinib 80 mg orally. The outcomes included investigator-assessed clinical response, progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 1350 patients were included. Response rate was 55.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.58). The median PFS and the median TTD were 11.7 months (95% CI 11.1-12.5) and 13.9 months (95% CI 13.1-15.2), respectively. Overall, 389 patients (28.8%) had at least one protocol-specified adverse event (AE); AEs of interstitial lung diseases/pneumonitis-like events and QT prolongation were reported in 3 (0.2%) and 59 (4.4%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Osimertinib was effective in Chinese patients with T790M-positive NSCLC who had progressed after first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI in real-word setting and the results were consistent with ASTRIS study overall population and AURA studies. No new safety signals or events were identified. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT02474355.

Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab Biosimilar QL1206 Versus Denosumab in Patients with Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors: A Randomized Phase III Trial.

BACKGROUND: Denosumab has been approved for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors. QL1206 is the first denosumab biosimilar and needs to be compared with denosumab in a phase III trial. OBJECTIVE: This phase III trial aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics between QL1206 and denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, phase III trial was conducted in 51 centers in China. Patients aged 18-80 years, with solid tumors and bone metastases, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. This study was divided into a 13-week double-blind period, a 40-week open-label period, and a 20-week safety follow-up period. In the double-blind period, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive three doses of QL1206 or denosumab (120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, each). Randomization was stratified by tumor types, previous skeletal-related events, and current systemic anti-tumor therapy. In the open-label period, up to ten doses of QL1206 could be given in both groups. The primary endpoint was percentage change in urinary N-telopeptide/creatinine ratio (uNTX/uCr) from baseline to Week 13. Equivalence margins were ± 0.135. Secondary endpoints included percentage change in uNTX/uCr at Week 25 and 53, percentage change in serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase at Week 13, 25, and 53, and time to on-study skeletal-related events. The safety profile was evaluated based on adverse events and immunogenicity. RESULTS: From September 2019 to January 2021, in the full analysis set, 717 patients were randomly assigned to receive QL1206 (n = 357) or denosumab (n = 360). Median percentage changes in uNTX/uCr at Week 13 in two groups were - 75.2% and - 75.8%, respectively. Least-squares mean difference in the natural log-transformed ratio of uNTX/uCr at Week 13 to baseline between the two groups was 0.012 (90% confidence interval - 0.078 to 0.103), within the equivalence margins. There were no differences in the secondary endpoints between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Adverse events, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab biosimilar QL1206 had promising efficacy, tolerable safety, and pharmacokinetics equivalent to denosumab and could benefit patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04550949, retrospectively registered on 16 September, 2020.

Efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib (WX-0593) in ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a single-arm, multicenter phase II study (INTELLECT).

BACKGROUND: Iruplinalkib (WX-0593) is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Here we reported the single-arm, phase II study (INTELLECT) results of the efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib for ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC patients aged ≥18 years, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. Patients received iruplinalkib 180 mg orally once daily for a 21-day cycle with a 7-day lead-in phase at 60 mg orally once daily. The primary endpoint was the independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: From August 7, 2019, to October 30, 2020, 146 patients were included. As of the data cut-off date on November 30, 2021, the median follow-up time was 18.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8-18.8). IRC-assessed ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 69.9% (95% CI 61.7-77.2%) and 96.6% (95% CI 92.2-98.9%), respectively. Investigator-assessed ORR and DCR were 63.0% (95% CI 54.6-70.8%) and 94.5% (95% CI 89.5-97.6%), respectively. Investigator-assessed median duration of response and progression-free survival (the same as median time to progression) were 13.2 months (95% CI 10.4-17.7) and 14.5 months (95% CI 11.7-20.0), respectively. Corresponding IRC-assessed results were 14.4 months (95% CI 13.1-not evaluable [NE]), 19.8 months (95% CI 14.5-NE), and NE (95% CI 14.5-NE), respectively. Investigator-assessed intracranial ORRs were 46% (41/90, 95% CI 35-56%) in patients with central nervous system metastases and 64% (27/42, 95% CI 48-78%) in patients with measurable intracranial lesions. Overall survival data were immature. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 136/146 (93.2%) patients. The most common TRAEs were aspartate aminotransferase increased (63 [43.2%]), alanine aminotransferase increased (54 [37.0%]), and blood creatine phosphokinase increased (51 [34.9%]). Dose interruption, reduction, and discontinuation due to TRAEs occurred in 21 (14.4%), 16 (11.0%), and four (2.7%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, iruplinalkib (WX-0593) demonstrated favorable efficacy and manageable safety profiles in patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC. Iruplinalkib could be a new treatment option for this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Center for Drug Evaluation of National Medical Products Administration of China: CTR20190789, registered on April 28, 2019; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04641754, registered on November 24, 2020.

[Advances in the role of extracellular vesicles in intervertebral disc degeneration].

Objective: To review the mechanism of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in treating intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD). Methods: The literature about EVs was reviewed and the biological characteristics and mechanism of EVs in the treatment of IVDD were summarized. Results: EVs are a kind of nano-sized vesicles with a double-layered lipid membrane structure secreted by many types of cells. EVs contain many bioactive molecules and participate in the exchange of information between cells, thus they play important roles in inflammation, oxidative stress, senescence, apoptosis, and autophagy. Moreover, EVs are found to slow down the process of IVDD by delaying the pathological progression of the nucleus pulposus, cartilage endplates, and annulus fibrosus. Conclusion: EVs is expected to become a new strategy for the treatment of IVDD, but the specific mechanism remains to be further studied.

A real-world study of second or later-line osimertinib in patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC: the final ASTRIS data.

Aim: Report the final analysis from ASTRIS, the largest real-world study of second-/later-line osimertinib in advanced/metastatic EGFR T790M non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients with advanced/metastatic EGFR T790M NSCLC and prior EGFR-TKI treatment, received once-daily osimertinib 80 mg. Primary end point: overall survival (OS); secondary end points: progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and response rate. Safety was also recorded. Results: In 3014 patients, median OS: 22.8 months (21.6-23.8), median PFS: 11.1 months (11.0-12.0), median TTD: 13.5 months (12.6-13.9), and response rate: 57.3% (55.5-59.2). All end points reported with 95% CIs. Numerically longer median OS was observed in patients with baseline WHO performance status <2 versus 2 (24.0 vs 11.1 months) and those without versus with brain/leptomeningeal metastases (25.4 vs 18.0 months). No new safety signals were identified. Conclusion: Second-/later-line osimertinib demonstrated real-world clinical benefit and safety in advanced/metastatic EGFR T790M NSCLC. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02474355 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Osimertinib is a drug that blocks the activity of a protein called EGFR on cancer cells, reducing their growth and spread. ASTRIS is the largest real-world study that evaluated the outcomes with osimertinib treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the EGFR T790M mutation, who had received previous treatment for their cancer. There were 3014 patients included in this study. The main aim of this study was to measure the time at which half of the patients were still alive after starting osimertinib treatment, this was 22.8 months. The study also measured the time at which half of the patients had experienced worsening (progression) of their cancer (11.1 months) and the time when half of the patients had stopped receiving osimertinib treatment (13.5 months). None of the patients experienced any unexpected side effects of the treatment. These data are consistent with those observed in comparable clinical trials with osimertinib, supporting the use of osimertinib treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC and the EGFR T790M mutation after their initial cancer treatment has stopped working.

A bioequivalence study of trifluridine/tipiracil tablets in Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer patients under fed conditions.

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Trifluridine (FTD) remained at higher concentrations longer when administered along with tipiracil (TPI) compared with FTD alone. Lonsurf® is a combination formulation consisting of FTD and TPI. This study aimed to investigate the bioequivalence of FTD/TPI formulations in Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. METHODS: In this phase I, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, four-cycle crossover study in mCRC patients, the bioequivalence of 60 mg (20 mg tablet, 3 tablets) of the test formulation and the reference formulation (Lonsurf®) was evaluated. Due to its high variability, the method of reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) was used to investigate the bioequivalence of the test and reference formulations. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled. 78.1% of the subjects were male, and the mean (standard deviation) age was 53.9 (SD = ± 9.0) years old. The time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) was almost 2.0 h post-dose. The geometric least-squares mean ratios (GMRs) (test/reference) of Cmax and AUC0-t for FTD were 95.3% and 102.9%, respectively, with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the natural log-transformed ratios of Cmax and AUC0-t of 90.0-100.9% and 99.9-105.9%, while the GMRs of Cmax and AUC0-t for TPI were 95.7% and 100.7%, respectively, with 90% CIs of 90.5-101.2% and 97.0-104.7%. In addition, the GMRs of Cmax and AUC0-t for FTD's major metabolite, trifluorothymine (FTY), were 94.8 (90% CI 90.3-99.5%) and 99.33 (90% CI 96.9-101.9%), respectively. These were in accord with the FDA bioequivalence definition interval of 80-125%. CONCLUSION: The test and reference FTD/TPI formulations were bioequivalent in Chinese mCRC patients under fed conditions.

The effectiveness and safety of the rapid titration strategy of background controlled-release oxycodone hydrochloride for patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: Oxycodone hydrochloride is a semisynthetic narcotic analgesic agent. This study aimed to explore optimal titration strategy of controlled-release (CR) oxycodone hydrochloride in patients with cancer pain. Methods: 258 patients, who used regular strong opioids (morphine and CR oxycodone hydrochloride) for cancer pain across 25 three grade class hospitals in China during January 15th 2017 to April 30th 2017, were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to treatment regimens titrated. The pain remission rate and numeric rating scale (NRS) of cancer pain was recorded at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 h after opioid titration. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) with therapy were also observed. Results: 12 h after treatment, pain remission rate of Group B, C and D was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than Group A. For the complete remission rate, there were also significant differences among the four groups (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found among four groups for pain remission rate at 24, 72 h after treatment. Multiple comparison of NRS scores showed that the both Group B and C varied significantly with Group D (P = 0.028, P = 0.05, respectively), showing superior analgesic effect over Group D. AEs were significantly different among groups (P < 0.01), with the most frequent AEs in Group A, lowest in Group B. Conclusion: The rapid titration strategy of background CR oxycodone hydrochloride was effectiveness and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain.

Long-Term Efficacy, Safety, and Subgroup Analysis of Savolitinib in Chinese Patients With NSCLCs Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Alterations.

Introduction: Savolitinib has been found to have encouraging antitumor activity and a favorable safety profile in Chinese patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma and other NSCLCs with MET exon 14 skipping alterations (MET ex14 positive) at the primary analysis of a phase 2 study. Here, we present the long-term efficacy and safety data of savolitinib, including subgroup analyses. Methods: This multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study in the People's Republic of China enrolled MET inhibitor-naive adults with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-positive NSCLC (NCT02897479). Oral savolitinib at a dose of 400 or 600 mg was administered once daily (body weight dependent). The primary objectives of the final analysis were long-term overall survival (OS) and subgroup analyses by previous systemic treatment, NSCLC subtypes, and brain metastases. Results: At the final analysis cutoff date (June 28, 2021), a total of 70 patients were enrolled and receiving savolitinib, and median follow-up was 28.4 (interquartile range: 26.2-36.3) months. The median OS was 12.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.5-21.4 [18- and 24-mo OS rates, 42.1% and 31.5%, respectively]). Median OS in pretreated or treatment-naive patients was 19.4 (95% CI: 10.5-31.3) and 10.9 (95% CI: 7.5-14.0) months, respectively; it was 10.6 months (95% CI: 4.6-14.0) in patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma, 17.3 months (95% CI: 10.6-23.6) in other NSCLC subtypes, and 17.7 months (95% CI: 10.5-not evaluable) in patients with brain metastases. No new safety signals emerged with prolonged follow-up and exposure. Conclusions: The updated results further confirm the favorable benefit and acceptable safety of savolitinib in Chinese patients with METex14-positive NSCLC.

Combining a CDK4/6 Inhibitor With Pemetrexed Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Metastasis in Human Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Background: Recent clinical trials of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in human lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) have not achieved satisfactory results. The disappointing results of single-drug treatments have prompted studies about synergistic therapies of CDK4/6i with other drugs. We aimed to test the anti-tumor effect of ribociclib (a CDK4/6i) combined with pemetrexed on LUAD and the potential mechanisms. Methods: Cell lines were exposed to ribociclib and pemetrexed at different doses. Antitumor effects were measured using growth inhibition. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis were evaluated using flow cytometry. Cell migration and invasion were measured using wound healing and transwell invasion assays, respectively. The expression levels of proteins were analyzed using western blotting. Mice xenograft models were used for validation in vivo. Results: Synergism was associated with a combination of cell cycle effects from both agents. Cell cycle analysis revealed that pemetrexed blocked cells in the S phase, whereas ribociclib arrested cells in the G1 phase. Concomitant treatment with pemetrexed and ribociclib resulted in a significantly stronger antitumor ability than treatment alone. We also found that ribociclib strongly enhanced the pro-apoptotic activity of pemetrexed via the caspase/bcl-2 signaling pathway. In addition, we report for the first time that combination treatment with ribociclib and pemetrexed significantly inhibits the migration and invasion of LUAD cells. Conclusions: Combining ribociclib and pemetrexed showed a powerful ability to inhibit cancer proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, and it holds potential as a novel effective combinative therapy for patients with LUAD.

Safety and Efficacy of Epitinib for EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases: Open-Label Multicentre Dose-Expansion Phase Ib Study.

BACKGROUND: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had poor prognosis in patients with brain metastasis. The trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of epitinib (HMPL-813), an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), for EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, dose-expansion phase Ib study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02590952) was conducted at 7 Chinese centers and enrolled patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis. Epitinib was administered at 120 mg or 160 mg, orally QD. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Between April 2015 and April 2019, 72 patients were enrolled and received epitinib at 120 mg (n = 30) or 160 mg (n = 42). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥3 occurred in 13 (43.3%) patients in 120 mg group and 21 (50.0%) in 160 mg group. The objective response rate (ORR) was 53.6% (95% CI 33.9%-72.5%) in 120 mg group and 40.5% (25.6%-56.7%) in 160 mg group. The median duration of response in the 120 mg and 160 mg groups were 7.40 months (95% CI 3.70-7.40) and 9.10 months (6.50-12.00), respectively. The median progression-free survival were 7.40 months (95% CI 5.40-9.20) and 7.40 months (5.50-10.00), respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metastasis, epitinib was well tolerable with a promising efficacy. According to the comprehensive assessment on safety and efficacy, 160 mg QD could be the recommended phase 2 dose.

Efficacy and Safety of Limertinib (ASK120067) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic EGFR Thr790Met-Mutated NSCLC: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase 2b Study.

INTRODUCTION: Limertinib (ASK120067) is a newly developed third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting both sensitizing EGFR and EGFR Thr790Met (T790M) mutations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of limertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC. METHODS: This is a single-arm, open-label, phase 2b study conducted at 62 hospitals across the People's Republic of China. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with centrally confirmed EGFR T790M mutations in tumor tissue or blood plasma who progressed after first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors or with primary EGFR T790M mutations were enrolled. Patients received limertinib 160 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent review committee per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival, and safety. Safety was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. RESULTS: From July 16, 2019, to March 10, 2021, a total of 301 patients were enrolled and started the treatment of limertinib. All patients entered the full analysis set and safety set. By the data cutoff date on September 9, 2021, 76 (25.2%) remained on treatment. The median follow-up time was 10.4 months (range: 0.3-26.3). On the basis of full analysis set, the independent review committee-assessed ORR was 68.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.2%-74.0%) and disease control rate was 92.4% (95% CI: 88.8%-95.1%). The median PFS was 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.7-12.4), median DoR was 11.1 months (95% CI: 9.6-13.8), and median OS was not reached (95% CI 19.7 months-not evaluable). Objective responses were achieved across all prespecified subgroups. For 99 patients (32.9%) with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the ORR was 64.6% (95% CI: 54.4%-74.0%), median PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI: 5.9-11.6), and median DoR was 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.1-15.2). For 41 patients who had assessable CNS lesion, the confirmed CNS-ORR was 56.1% (95% CI: 39.7%-71.5%) and median CNS-PFS was 10.6 months (95% CI: 5.6-not evaluable). In safety set, 289 patients (96.0%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), with the most common being diarrhea (81.7%), anemia (32.6%), rash (29.9%), and anorexia (28.2%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 104 patients (34.6%), with the most common including diarrhea (13.0%), hypokalemia (4.3%), anemia (4.0%), and rash (3.3%). TRAEs leading to dose interruption and dose discontinuation occurred in 24.6% and 2% of patients, respectively. No TRAE leading to death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Limertinib (ASK120067) was found to have promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT03502850.

AENEAS: A Randomized Phase III Trial of Aumolertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy for Locally Advanced or MetastaticNon-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 19 Deletion or L858R Mutations.

PURPOSE: Aumolertinib (formerly almonertinib; HS-10296) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in China. This double-blind phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of aumolertinib compared with gefitinib as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03849768). METHODS: Patients at 53 sites in China were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either aumolertinib (110 mg) or gefitinib (250 mg) once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment. RESULTS: A total of 429 patients who were naïve to treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were enrolled. PFS was significantly longer with aumolertinib compared with gefitinib (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.60; P < .0001). The median PFS with aumolertinib was 19.3 months (95% CI, 17.8 to 20.8) versus 9.9 months with gefitinib (95% CI, 8.3 to 12.6). Objective response rate and disease control rate were similar in the aumolertinib and gefitinib groups (objective response rate, 73.8% and 72.1%, respectively; disease control rate, 93.0% and 96.7%, respectively). The median duration of response was 18.1 months (95% CI, 15.2 to not applicable) with aumolertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 11.1) with gefitinib. Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 severity (any cause) were observed in 36.4% and 35.8% of patients in the aumolertinib and gefitinib groups, respectively. Rash and diarrhea (any grade) were observed in 23.4% and 16.4% of patients who received aumolertinib compared with 41.4% and 35.8% of those who received gefitinib, respectively. CONCLUSION: Aumolertinib is a well-tolerated third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that could serve as a treatment option for EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the first-line setting.

Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy and Open Fenestration Discectomy for Single-Segment Huge Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Two-year Follow-up Retrospective Study.

Purpose: Both percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and open fenestration discectomy (OFD) are effective and safe surgical procedures for the treatment of LDH. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the surgical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and OFD for single-segment huge lumbar disc herniation (HLDH). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 91 patients diagnosed with single-segment HLDH and treated with OFD or PEID. Visual analog scale (VAS), modified Japanese orthopedic association (mJOA) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to assess clinical outcomes at preoperation and postoperatively at 3, 6, 12, and 24months. Modified Macnab criteria were applied to evaluate clinically satisfaction at the final follow-up. Results: In both groups, the VAS and ODI scores at 3, 6, 12, and 24months postoperatively showed a significant decrease and the mJOA score at 3, 6, 12, and 24months postoperatively was significantly increased compared to preoperative results (P<0.001). According to Macnab criteria at the final follow-up, the overall clinically satisfactory rate was 86.67% in the OFD group and 86.96% in the PEID group. There were no significant differences in VAS, ODI, and mJOA scores between the two groups at preoperation and postoperative 3, 6, 12, and 24months, respectively. In the PEID group, the length of hospitalization and the length of incision were significantly shorter than that in the OFD group (P<0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in operative time between groups (P=0.81). Conclusion: Collectively, postoperative clinical results were equally favorable for both procedures, with no statistically significant difference between PEID and OFD at the two-year of follow-up. No serious complication was observed in two groups. Compared with the traditional surgery, PEID has the following benefits: less trauma, less bleeding, speedy recovery, and shorter hospitalization. Therefore, PEID may be a promising alternative to traditional surgery.