Enhanced Survival with Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphadenectomy is a cornerstone in the surgical management of resectable primary lung cancer. However, its prognostic significance in early-stage metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC) remains poorly understood. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in these patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the SEER Database for patients surgically treated for stage I MSPLC between 2004 and 2015. Propensity score-matching was employed to create comparable cohorts, and the Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival after lymphadenectomy compared to non-lymphadenectomy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Among 920 identified patients with MSPLC, 574 (62.4%) underwent lymphadenectomy. Propensity score-matching yielded 255 patients in both the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Over a median follow-up of 38 months, the 5-year overall survival probability after a diagnosis of MSPLC was 58.7% in the lymphadenectomy group and 43.9% in the non-lymphadenectomy group (HR: 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.90; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In this population-based study, lymphadenectomy is associated with prolonged overall survival in patients with stage I MSPLC. These findings suggest the potential benefit of incorporating lymphadenectomy into the surgical management of MSPLC, providing valuable guidance for thoracic surgeons in clinical decision-making.

The clinical features and prognosis of patients with mucinous breast carcinoma compared with those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: At present, the characteristics of mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) and the factors affecting its prognosis are controversial. We compared the clinical features of MBC with those of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and summarized the relevant prognostic factors. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database includes information on 10,593 patients diagnosed with MBC between 2004 and 2016. Chi-square tests and analyses were used to analyze differences in variables between the MBC and IDC groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relative impacts of risk factors on cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to assess cancer-specific mortality and were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2016, 10,593 people were diagnosed with MBC, and 402,797 were diagnosed with IDC. Patients with MBC had significantly higher 5-/10-year CSS rates (96.4%/93.4%) than those with IDC (89%/83.8%). Compared with IDC patients, MBC patients had less lymph node metastasis, an earlier stage, a higher rate of hormone receptor positivity and a lower expression rate of HER2. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that age ≥ 60 years old (HR = 1.574, 95%CI: 1.238-2.001, P < 0.001), singled status (HR = 1.676, 95%CI: 1.330-2.112, P < 0.001) and advanced TNM/SEER stage were independent prognostic risk factors for MBC. In addition, positive estrogen receptor (HR = 0.577, 95%CI: 0.334-0.997, P = 0.049), positive progesterone receptor (HR = 0.740, 95%CI: 0.552-0.992, P = 0.044), surgical treatment (HR = 0.395, 95%CI: 0.288-0.542, P < 0.001) and radiotherapy (HR = 0.589, 95%CI: 0.459-0.756, P < 0.001) were identified as protective factors. CONCLUSION: Compared with IDC, MBC has a better prognosis. For patients with MBC, we identified prognostic factors that can help clinicians better assess patient outcomes and guide individualized treatment.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of male yolk sac tumor: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program study.

INTRODUCTION: Yolk sac tumor (YST) is a rare malignant germ cell tumor, which usually affects young males. Because of the low incidence, few studies on YST have been published. In our study, we aim to investigate the clinical characteristics, survival and risk factors of male YST patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. METHODS: We identified 569 male YST patients from the SEER-18 database with additional treatment fields. Clinical characteristics, survival and prognostic factors were described in the study. Chi-square tests were applied to analyze categorical and continuous variables between different groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model were performed to assess the relative impacts of risk factors on cancer-specific survival (CSS) in YST patients. Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to analyze differences in survival that were significant. RESULTS: The major primary sites of YST were testis (74.69%), mediastinum (15.47%), retroperitoneum (2.64%) and central nervous system (1.24%). The 3-year and 5-year CSS was 70.0%, 56.5% vs. 97.2%, 96.0% for the mediastinal and testicular YST patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Primary site of mediastinum, distant SEER Summary stage were independent factors of poor prognosis (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.010 (1.094-3.695), p = 0.025; HR = 6.501 (2.294-18.424), p < 0.001, respectively). Receiving surgery was a good prognosis factor for all patients (HR = 0.495 (0.260-0.940), p = 0.032) and for the mediastinal group (p = 0.0019). Being treated with chemotherapy indicated poor outcome in all patients (HR = 3.624 (1.050-12.507), p = 0.042) and in the localized testicular YST patients (p = 0.0077). CONCLUSION: For the first time, our study revealed the primary site distribution of male YST, and summarized the clinical characteristics, survival and prognostic factors based on the SEER database, which provided important epidemiological evidence for clinical practice.

Nomograms predict survival of patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma: a SEER-based study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. Most patients with SBA are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. Due to the lack of randomized controlled trials and prospective studies, it is difficult to predict the prognosis of patients with SBA. Thus, this study aimed to establish a prognostic nomogram for evaluating the prognosis of SBA patients. METHODS: The clinical features and follow-up data of all patients diagnosed with SBA during 2004-2016 were summarized from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We separated these patients into training and validation groups. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic variables for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). According to the independent risk factors, we established nomograms and used the calibration curves to evaluate the accuracy. RESULTS: The data of 3301 patients with SBA were collected from the SEER database. The multivariate analysis showed that age, marital status, tumor site, grade, TNM stage and surgical history were associated with CSS and OS (P < 0.05). Based on these results, we established nomograms of CSS and OS that can predict the 3- and 5-year survival rates of SBA patients (C-index > 0.7). The calibration curves showed that the predicted survival was very close to the actual survival. CONCLUSION: We analyzed the independent risk factors for prognosis of SBA patients, and established nomograms to predict the 3- and 5-year survival rates of OS and CSS. These new prognostic tools can help clinicians to predict the survival of patients with SBA, further to guide treatment strategy.

Negative association of c-fos expression as a favorable prognostic indicator in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The onco-protein c-fos was previously linked to favorable prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) without further validations. The present study was designed to address the issue based on a cohort of Chinese patients. METHODS: Expression of c-fos was determined by immunohistochemical staining in specimens from 58 patients with GC who underwent surgical resection. The relationships between c-fos expression and clinicopathological and prognostic variables were further evaluated. RESULTS: Expression of c-fos in tumor epithelia was observed in 39 (67.2%) patients. The protein was also positively expressed in lymphocytes within tumors and para-tumor epithelia. Tumors with positive expression of c-fos in tumor epithelia had a smaller size and marginally earlier T stage in all patients and/or those who underwent curative resection. Univariate analysis showed that patients with positive c-fos expression in tumor epithelia had significantly prolonged overall and tumor-free survival. Cox regression analysis revealed that c-fos expression in tumor epithelia was an independent or potential independent indicator of improved prognosis in different subgroups of patients. Expression of c-fos in para-tumor epithelia and intra-tumor lymphocytes was not associated with clinicopathological variables and long-term outcomes in patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that c-fos expression was negatively associated with tumor progression and was predictive for favorable survival in patients with GC.