Establishment of a prognostic nomogram for elderly patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer receiving radiotherapy.

The present study explored the risk factors associated with radiotherapy in seniors diagnosed with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) to construct and validate a prognostic nomogram. The study retrospectively included 137 elderly patients with LS-SCLC who previously received radiotherapy. Univariate and multivariate COX analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors and determine optimal cut-off values. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and nomograms were constructed to predict survival. Calibration and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of the nomogram. Illness rating scale-geriatric (CIRS-G) score, treatment strategy, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), white blood cell-to-monocyte ratio (WMR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were discovered to be independent prognostic factors. Based on the findings of our multivariate analysis, a risk nomogram was developed to assess patient prognosis. Internal bootstrap resampling was utilized to validate the model, and while the accuracy of the AUC curve at 1 year was modest at 0.657 (95% CI 0.458-0.856), good results were achieved in predicting 3- and 5 year survival with AUCs of 0.757 (95% CI 0.670-0.843) and 0.768 (95% CI 0.643-0.893), respectively. Calibration curves for 1-, 3-, and 5 year overall survival probabilities demonstrated good cocsistency between expected and actual outcomes. Patients with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, CIRS-G score > 5 points and low PNI, WMR and LMR correlated with poor prognosis. The nomogram model developed based on these factors demonstrated good predictive performance and provides a simple, accessible, and practical tool for clinicians to guide clinical decision-making and study design.

Postoperative recovery after breast cancer surgery: A randomised controlled trial of opioid-based versus opioid-free anaesthesia with thoracic paravertebral block.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative use of opioids has revealed significant adverse effects associated with poor postoperative outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether opioid-free anaesthesia based on thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) could improve postoperative recovery after breast cancer surgery. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty adult women undergoing breast cancer surgery were enrolled. Key exclusion criteria included remote metastasis (but not to axillary lymph nodes of the surgical side), contraindication to interventions or drugs and a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients were randomised at a 1 : 1 ratio to receive either TPVB-based opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA group) or opioid-based anaesthesia (control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The QoR-15 global score was 140.3 ±â€Š5.2 in the OFA group and 132.0 ±â€Š12.0 in the control group ( P  < 0.001). The percentage of patients with good recovery (QoR-15 global score ≥118) was 100% (40/40) in the OFA group and 82.5% (33/40) in the control group ( P  = 0.012). Improved QoR in the OFA group was also evident in sensitivity analysis that rated QoR as excellent for a score of 136 to 150, as good at 122 to 135, as moderate at 90 to 121 and as poor at 0 to 89. The OFA group had higher scores in the domains of physical comfort (45.7 ±â€Š3.0 versus 41.8 ±â€Š5.7, P  < 0.001) and physical independence (18.3 ±â€Š2.2 versus 16.3 ±â€Š4.5, P  = 0.014). The two groups did not differ in pain outcomes or health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: TPVB-based opioid-free anaesthesia improved early postoperative quality of recovery without compromising pain control in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT04390698.

Trajectory of worst pain within the first two weeks following pelvic and sacral tumor surgery and long-term outcome: a pilot observational prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pain management after pelvic and sacral tumor surgery is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach. Few data on postoperative pain trajectories have been reported after pelvic and sacral tumor surgery. The aim of this pilot study was to determine pain trajectories within the first 2 weeks after surgery and explore the impact on long-term pain outcomes. METHODS: Patients scheduled for pelvic and sacral tumor surgery were prospectively recruited. Worst/average pain scores were evaluated postoperatively using questions adapted from the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) until pain resolution was reached or up to 6 months after surgery. Pain trajectories over the first 2 weeks were compared using the k-means clustering algorithm. Whether pain trajectories were associated with long-term pain resolution and opioid cessation was assessed using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were included. Two distinct groups of trajectories for worst and average pain scores over the first 2 weeks were generated. The median pain duration in the high vs low pain group was 120.0 (95% CI [25.0, 215.0]) days vs 60.0 (95% CI [38.6, 81.4]) days (log rank p = 0.037). The median time to opioid cessation in the high vs low pain group was 60.0 (95% CI [30.0, 90.0]) days vs 7.0 (95% CI [4.7, 9.3]) days (log rank p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient and surgical factors, the high pain group was independently associated with prolonged opioid cessation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.423, 95% CI [1.254, 4.681], p = 0.008) but not pain resolution (HR 1.557, 95% CI [0.748, 3.243], p = 0.237). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative pain is a significant problem among patients undergoing pelvic and sacral tumor surgery. High pain trajectories during the first 2 weeks after surgery were associated with delayed opioid cessation. Research is needed to explore interventions targeting pain trajectories and long-term pain outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03926858 , 25/04/2019).

Serum level of calpains product as a novel biomarker of acute lung injury following cardiopulmonary bypass.

Objective: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis whether serum level of calpains could become a meaningful biomarker for diagnosis of acute lung injury (ALI) in clinical after cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) technology. Methods and results: Seventy consecutive adults underwent cardiac surgery with CPB were included in this prospective study. Based on the American-European Consensus Criteria (AECC), these patients were divided into ALI (n = 20, 28.57%) and non-ALI (n = 50, 71.43%) groups. Serum level of calpains in terms of calpains' activity which was expressed as relative fluorescence unit (RFU) per microliter and measured at beginning of CPB (baseline), 1 h during CPB, end of CPB as well as 1, 12, and 24 h after CPB. Difference of serum level of calpains between two groups first appeared at the end of CPB and remained different at subsequent test points. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that serum level of calpains 1 h after CPB was an independent predictor for postoperative ALI (OR 1.011, 95% CI 1.001, 1.021, p = 0.033) and correlated with a lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the first 2 days (The first day: r = -0.389, p < 0.001 and the second day: r = -0.320, p = 0.007) as well as longer mechanical ventilation time (r = 0.440, p < 0.001), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (r = 0.419, p < 0.001) and hospital LOS (r = 0.297, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Elevated serum level of calpains correlate with impaired lung function and poor clinical outcomes, indicating serum level of calpains could act as a potential biomarker for postoperative ALI following CPB in adults. Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05610475], identifier [NCT05610475].

What is the appropriate skin cleaning method for nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy patients? A randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of various cleaning methods for skin with acute radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 168 NPC inpatients were randomized, while 152 patients completed the whole trial and the data were analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into the non-washing group (Group 1), washing with water alone group (Group 2), and washing with water and soap group (Group 3). All three groups received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with other treatments. Follow-up from recruitment or the initial radiotherapy dose to 1 month after the final radiotherapy dose. CONSORT checklist was applied as the reporting guidelines for this study. The study evaluated a range of endpoints, including incidence, timing, severity of acute RD, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: There were no allergic reactions or aggravating in both washing groups during the whole treatment. The incidence of acute RD was 100% in all three groups, while the incidence of severe RD (grades 2-3) differed among groups (Group 1 vs. Group 2 vs. Group 3: 51% vs. 23.5% vs. 18%; P = 0.001), washing moderately reduced severity compared with patients without washing. Washing also delayed the onset time of acute RD; the incidence of acute RD was significantly lower than non-washing during the first 20 fractions (P < 0.001). What is more, washing reduced the incidence of moist desquamation (25.5% vs. 5.9% vs. 6%; P = 0.003) and helped relieve itching (6.49 ± 2.09 vs. 4.90 ± 1.90 vs. 4.00 ± 1.58; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among groups with respect to pain or burning sensation. Washing improved QOL on physical (64.37 ± 4.08 vs. 67.41 ± 4.05 vs. 71.30 ± 4.87; P < 0.001), emotional (61.47 ± 4.75 vs. 65.75 ± 3.46 vs. 70.80 ± 3.27; P < 0.001), and social functional dimensions (62.64 ± 3.57 vs. 64.87 ± 3.88 vs. 68.04 ± 4.89; P < 0.001) at the end of radiotherapy, and the outcome was similar at 1 month after radiotherapy (P < 0.05). Washing with water and soap was the most effective way to reduce itching and improving QOL among the three groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Washing irradiated skin reduces the occurrence and severity of acute radiation dermatitis. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: ChiCTR2000038231, date of registration 09.18.2020.

Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Spinal fusion surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain. We examined whether bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block could alleviate postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. DESIGN: Blinded, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital, operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward. PATIENTS: Sixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II scheduled for lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomized into the erector spinae plane block group (ESPB group) and the control group in a 1:1 ratio. INTERVENTIONS: Pre-operative ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block was performed in the ESPB group, while sham subcutaneous infiltration was performed in the control group. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was pain intensity at rest within 12 h postoperatively using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included NRS pain scores at rest and on movement, postoperative opioid consumption and proportions of patients requiring opioid during the first 48 h after surgery. MAIN RESULTS: The ESPB group (n = 30) showed significantly lower pain scores at rest at 4 h after surgery (estimated mean difference - 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.4 to -0.8, p < 0.001), at 8 h (-1.3, 95% CI -1.9 to -0.6, p < 0.001), and at 12 h (-0.7, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.1, p = 0.023). The two groups showed similar pain scores at rest at 24 h after surgery (estimated mean difference - 0.2, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.5) and 48 h (-0.3, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.2). The ESPB group also showed significantly lower pain score on movement at 4 h after surgery (-1.5, 95% CI -2.5 to -0.6). The ESPB group showed a significantly smaller proportion of patients requiring sufentanil within 12 h after surgery (p = 0.020), and the group consumed significantly less sufentanil during that period (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block improves postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

Mass spectrometry of peptides and proteins.

This tutorial article introduces mass spectrometry (MS) for peptide fragmentation and protein identification. The current approaches being used for protein identification include top-down and bottom-up sequencing. Top-down sequencing, a relatively new approach that involves fragmenting intact proteins directly, is briefly introduced. Bottom-up sequencing, a traditional approach that fragments peptides in the gas phase after protein digestion, is discussed in more detail. The most widely used ion activation and dissociation process, gas-phase collision-activated dissociation (CAD), is discussed from a practical point of view. Infrared multiphoton dissociation (IRMPD) and electron capture dissociation (ECD) are introduced as two alternative dissociation methods. For spectral interpretation, the common fragment ion types in peptide fragmentation and their structures are introduced; the influence of instrumental methods on the fragmentation pathways and final spectra are discussed. A discussion is also provided on the complications in sample preparation for MS analysis. The final section of this article provides a brief review of recent research efforts on different algorithmic approaches being developed to improve protein identification searches.