Synthetic lethality of combined ULK1 defection and p53 restoration induce pyroptosis by directly upregulating GSDME transcription and cleavage activation through ROS/NLRP3 signaling.

BACKGROUND: High expression of ubiquitin ligase MDM2 is a primary cause of p53 inactivation in many tumors, making it a promising therapeutic target. However, MDM2 inhibitors have failed in clinical trials due to p53-induced feedback that enhances MDM2 expression. This underscores the urgent need to find an effective adaptive genotype or combination of targets. METHODS: Kinome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screen was performed to identify genes that modulate the response to MDM2 inhibitor using TP53 wild type cancer cells and found ULK1 as a candidate. The MTT cell viability assay, flow cytometry and LDH assay were conducted to evaluate the activation of pyroptosis and the synthetic lethality effects of combining ULK1 depletion with p53 activation. Dual-luciferase reporter assay and ChIP-qPCR were performed to confirm that p53 directly mediates the transcription of GSDME and to identify the binding region of p53 in the promoter of GSDME. ULK1 knockout / overexpression cells were constructed to investigate the functional role of ULK1 both in vitro and in vivo. The mechanism of ULK1 depletion to activate GSMDE was mainly investigated by qPCR, western blot and ELISA. RESULTS: By using high-throughput screening, we identified ULK1 as a synthetic lethal gene for the MDM2 inhibitor APG115. It was determined that deletion of ULK1 significantly increased the sensitivity, with cells undergoing typical pyroptosis. Mechanistically, p53 promote pyroptosis initiation by directly mediating GSDME transcription that induce basal-level pyroptosis. Moreover, ULK1 depletion reduces mitophagy, resulting in the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and subsequent increasing of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This in turn cleaves and activates GSDME via the NLRP3-Caspase inflammatory signaling axis. The molecular cascade makes ULK1 act as a crucial regulator of pyroptosis initiation mediated by p53 activation cells. Besides, mitophagy is enhanced in platinum-resistant tumors, and ULK1 depletion/p53 activation has a synergistic lethal effect on these tumors, inducing pyroptosis through GSDME directly. CONCLUSION: Our research demonstrates that ULK1 deficiency can synergize with MDM2 inhibitors to induce pyroptosis. p53 plays a direct role in activating GSDME transcription, while ULK1 deficiency triggers upregulation of the ROS-NLRP3 signaling pathway, leading to GSDME cleavage and activation. These findings underscore the pivotal role of p53 in determining pyroptosis and provide new avenues for the clinical application of p53 restoration therapies, as well as suggesting potential combination strategies.

Contribution of insurance status to the association between marital status and cancer-specific survival: a mediation analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the extent to which marriage influences cancer-specific survival (CSS) by influencing the insurance status among patients with common solid cancers and the feasibility of reducing the survival gap caused by marriage by increasing private insurance coverage for unmarried patients. SETTING: A retrospective cohort study with patients retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results programme. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with nine common solid cancers diagnosed between 2007 and 2016 were included. Patients were excluded if their marital status, insurance status, socioeconomical status, stage or cause of death was unavailable, if survival time was less than 1 month, or if they were younger than 18 years at the time of diagnosis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was CSS, which was compared between married and unmarried individuals. Mediation analyses were conducted to determine the contribution of insurance status to the association between marriage and CSS. RESULTS: Married patients had better CSS than those unmarried (time ratio 1.778; 95% CI 1.758 to 1.797). Private health insurance was a key factor mediating the association between marital status and CSS (proportion mediated (PM), 17%; 95% CI 17% to 17.1%). The PM ranges from 10.7% in prostate cancer to 20% in kidney cancer. The contribution of private insurance to the association between marital status and CSS was greater among women than among men (PM 18.5% vs 16.7%). The mediating effect of private insurance was the greatest for the comparison between married and separated individuals (PM 25.6%; 95% CI 25.3% to 25.8%) and smallest for the comparison between married and widowed individuals (PM 11.0%; 95% CI 10.9% to 11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: 17% of the marital disparities in CSS are mediated by private insurance coverage. Increasing private insurance coverage for unmarried patients may reduce the survival gap related to marital status and sex. However, it is unclear whether better publicly funded insurance would have the same effect.

Assessment of Modifiable Factors for the Association of Marital Status With Cancer-Specific Survival.

Importance: Married patients with cancer have better cancer-specific survival than unmarried patients. Increasing the early diagnosis and definitive treatment of cancer among unmarried patients may reduce the survival gap. Objectives: To evaluate the extent to which marriage is associated with cancer-specific survival, stage at diagnosis, and treatment among patients with 9 common solid cancers and to recommend methods for reducing the survival gap. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study included patients older than 18 years who were diagnosed with 1 of 9 common cancers between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016. Patient data were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Statistical analyses were performed from August 1 to October 1, 2020. Exposures: Marital status, classified as married and unmarried (including single, separated, divorced, widowed, and unmarried patients or domestic partners). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the time ratio (TR) of cancer-specific survival (married vs unmarried). Mediation analyses were conducted to determine the extent to which the association of marriage with cancer-specific survival was mediated by stage at diagnosis and treatment. Results: This study included 1 733 906 patients (894 379 [51.6%] women; 1 067 726 [61.6%] married; mean [SD] age, 63.76 [12.60] years). Multivariate analyses found that those who were married were associated with better cancer-specific survival than unmarried patients (TR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.35-1.37). Early diagnosis in breast cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, and melanoma mediated the association between marital status and cancer-specific survival (breast cancer: proportion mediated [PM], 11.4%; 95% CI, 11.2%-11.6%; colorectal cancer: PM, 10.9%; 95% CI, 10.7%-11.2%; endometrial cancer: PM, 12.9%; 95% CI, 12.5%-13.3%; melanoma: PM, 12.0%; 95% CI, 11.7-12.4%). Surgery mediated the association between marital status and cancer-specific survival in lung (PM, 52.2%; 95% CI, 51.9%-52.4%), pancreatic (PM, 28.9%; 95% CI, 28.6%-29.3%), and prostate (PM, 39.3%; 95% CI, 39.0%-39.6%) cancers. Chemotherapy mediated the association of marital status with cancer-specific survival in lung (PM, 37.7%; 95% CI, 37.6%-37.9%) and pancreatic (PM, 28.6%; 95% CI, 28.4%-28.9%) cancers. Improved cancer-specific survival associated with marriage was greater among men than women (men: TR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.25-1.28; women: TR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.19-1.21). The contribution of receiving an early diagnosis and treatment with surgery or chemotherapy to the association between marital status and cancer-specific survival was greater among men than women (early diagnosis: PM, 21.7% [95% CI, 21.5%-21.9%] vs PM, 20.3% [95% CI, 20.2%-20.4%]; surgery: PM, 26.6% [95% CI, 26.4%-26.7%] vs PM, 11.1% [95% CI, 11.0%-11.2%]; chemotherapy: PM, 6.8% [95% CI, 6.7%-6.8%] vs PM, 5.1% [95% CI, 5.0%-5.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, survival disparities associated with marital status were attributable to early diagnosis in breast, colorectal, and endometrial cancers as well as melanoma and to treatment-related variables in lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. The findings also suggest that marriage may play a greater protective role in the cancer-specific survival of men than of women.