RESUMO
Objectives: Prolonged intubation (PI) is a frequently encountered severe complication among patients following cardiac surgery (CS). Solely concentrating on preoperative data, devoid of sufficient consideration for the ongoing impact of surgical, anesthetic, and cardiopulmonary bypass procedures on subsequent respiratory system function, could potentially compromise the predictive accuracy of disease prognosis. In response to this challenge, we formulated and externally validated an intelligible prediction model tailored for CS patients, leveraging both preoperative information and early intensive care unit (ICU) data to facilitate early prophylaxis for PI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, analyzing adult patients who underwent CS and utilizing data from two publicly available ICU databases, namely, the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care and the eICU Collaborative Research Database. PI was defined as necessitating intubation for over 24â h. The predictive model was constructed using multivariable logistic regression. External validation of the model's predictive performance was conducted, and the findings were elucidated through visualization techniques. Results: The incidence rates of PI in the training, testing, and external validation cohorts were 11.8%, 12.1%, and 17.5%, respectively. We identified 11 predictive factors associated with PI following CS: plateau pressure [odds ratio (OR), 1.133; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.111-1.157], lactate level (OR, 1.131; 95% CI, 1.067-1.2), Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR, 1.166; 95% CI, 1.115-1.219), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (OR, 1.096; 95% CI, 1.061-1.132), central venous pressure (OR, 1.052; 95% CI, 1.033-1.073), anion gap (OR, 1.075; 95% CI, 1.043-1.107), positive end-expiratory pressure (OR, 1.087; 95% CI, 1.047-1.129), vasopressor usage (OR, 1.521; 95% CI, 1.23-1.879), Visual Analog Scale score (OR, 0.928; 95% CI, 0.893-0.964), pH value (OR, 0.757; 95% CI, 0.629-0.913), and blood urea nitrogen level (OR, 1.011; 95% CI, 1.003-1.02). The model exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.853 (95% CI, 0.840-0.865) in the training cohort, 0.867 (95% CI, 0.853-0.882) in the testing cohort, and 0.704 (95% CI, 0.679-0.727) in the external validation cohort. Conclusions: Through multicenter internal and external validation, our model, which integrates early ICU data and preoperative information, exhibited outstanding discriminative capability. This integration allows for the accurate assessment of PI risk in the initial phases following CS, facilitating timely interventions to mitigate adverse outcomes.
RESUMO
To analyze the expression profile of fatty acid metabolism (FAM)-related genes, identify a prognostic signature, and evaluate its clinical value for gastric cancer (GC) patients. The mRNA expression profiles of 493 FAM-related genes were obtained from TCGA database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cancer and non-cancer samples were identified, and their relationships with overall survival (OS) of GC patients were evaluated. A prognostic signature of FAM-related genes was identified by the LASSO regression model, and its predictive performance was tested by an independent external cohort. Ninety-three DEGs were identified, of which 44 were downregulated and 49 were upregulated. After optimizing risk characteristics, a prognostic signature of four FAM-related genes (ACBD5, AVPR1A, ELOVL4, and FAAH) were developed. All patients were divided into high-risk (>1.020) and low-risk groups (≤1.020) on the basis of the median risk score. Survival analysis indicated that high-risk patients had a shorter OS than low-risk patients (5-year OS rate, 26.3% vs. 45.0%, p < 0.001). The AUC values for the prediction of 3-year and 5-year OS were 0.664 and 0.624, respectively. In the GSE62254 data set, the 5-year OS rate of high-risk and low-risk patients were 44.7% versus 61.5%, respectively (p = 0.003). The AUC values were 0.632 and 0.627 at 3-year and 5-year prediction. The prognostic signature of FAM-related genes was an independent predictor of OS (hanzard ratio [HR] for TCGA cohort: 1.851, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.394-2.458, p < 0.001; HR for GSE62254: 1.549, 95% CI: 1.098-2.185, p = 0.013). The risk signature of four FAM-related genes was a valuable prognostic tool, and it might be helpful for clinical management and therapeutic decision of gastric cancer patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Prognóstico , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , Fatores de Risco , Ácidos GraxosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the appropriate surgical procedure and clinical decision for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A total of 1,984 appendiceal adenocarcinoma patients from 2004 to 2015 were retrospectively identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All patients were divided into three groups based on the extent of surgical resection: appendectomy (N = 335), partial colectomy (N = 390) and right hemicolectomy (N = 1,259). The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of three groups were compared, and independent prognostic factors were assessed. RESULTS: The 5-year OS rates of patients who underwent appendectomy, partial colectomy and right hemicolectomy were 58.3%, 65.5% and 69.1%, respectively (right hemicolectomy vs appendectomy, P < 0.001; right hemicolectomy vs partial colectomy, P = 0.285; partial colectomy vs appendectomy, P = 0.045). The 5-year CSS rates of patients who underwent appendectomy, partial colectomy and right hemicolectomy were 73.2%, 77.0% and 78.7%, respectively (right hemicolectomy vs appendectomy, P = 0.046; right hemicolectomy vs partial colectomy, P = 0.545; partial colectomy vs appendectomy, P = 0.246). The subgroup analysis based on the pathological TNM stage indicated that there was no survival difference amongst three surgical procedures for stage I patients (5-year CSS rate: 90.8%, 93.9% and 98.1%, respectively). The prognosis of patients who underwent an appendectomy was poorer than that of those who underwent partial colectomy (5-year OS rate: 53.5% vs 67.1%, P = 0.005; 5-year CSS rate: 65.2% vs 78.7%, P = 0.003) or right hemicolectomy (5-year OS rate: 74.2% vs 53.23%, P < 0.001; 5-year CSS rate: 65.2% vs 82.5%, P < 0.001) for stage II disease. Right hemicolectomy did not show a survival advantage over partial colectomy for stage II (5-year CSS, P = 0.255) and stage III (5-year CSS, P = 0.846) appendiceal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Right hemicolectomy may not always be necessary for appendiceal adenocarcinoma patients. An appendectomy could be sufficient for therapeutic effect of stage I patients, but limited for stage II patients. Right hemicolectomy was not superior to partial colectomy for advanced stage patients, suggesting omission of standard hemicolectomy might be feasible. However, adequate lymphadenectomy should be strongly recommended.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias do Apêndice , Humanos , Apendicectomia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Apêndice/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Apêndice/patologia , Colectomia/métodosRESUMO
Aberrant expression of gene is driven by its promoter methylation and is the key molecular basis of carcinogenic processes. This study aimed at identifying a risk signature of methylation-driven (MD) genes and evaluating its prognostic value for colon cancer (CC) patients. The expression profiles of methylation and mRNA in CC samples were obtained from the TCGA database, and the MethylMix algorithm was used to identify MD genes. The relationships between their expression levels and overall survival (OS) of CC patients were analyzed, and a prognostic signature of MD genes was established. The risk score of gene signature was calculated, and the median was used to divide all patients into high (H) and low (L) risk groups. The prognostic value of gene signature was tested by the TCGA cohort and an independent validation cohort (GSE17538 dataset). In total, 69 MD genes were identified, and 7 were associated with OS of CC patients. Ultimately, 4 (TWIST1, LDOC1, EPHX3, and STC2) were screened out to establish a risk signature. The H-risk patients (>0.923) had a worse OS than L-risk patients (≤0.923) in both the TCGA (5-year cumulative survival: 52.9% vs 72.0%, P=0.005) and GSE17538 cohort (49.4% vs 69.3%, P=0.004). The AUC values of MD genes signature for the prediction of 3- and 5-year OS were 0.648 and 0.643 in the TCGA dataset and 0.634 and 0.624 in the GSE17538 dataset, respectively. The risk signature of four MD genes was identified as an independent predictor of OS for CC patients (HR for TCGA dataset: 2.071, 95% CI=1.196-3.586, P=0.009; HR for GSE17538 dataset: 2.021, 95% CI=1.290-3.166, P=0.002). The risk signature of four MD genes might be a useful prognostic tool and help doctors improve the clinical management of CC patients.
RESUMO
It is great significance of identifying valuable biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This study aimed at developing and validating a miRNAs-based signature as prognostic tool for CRC patients. The miRNA expression profile of 624 CRC samples (613 tumor tissues and 11 normal tissues) was analyzed, and 523 differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRNAs) were identified, in which 191 were downregulated and 332 were upregulated. All patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (N = 308) and an internal validation cohort (N = 200). Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox regression model, a prognostic signature of 10 miRNAs (hsa-miR-149-5p, hsa-miR-193b-5p, hsa-miR-193a-3p, hsa-miR-3677-3p, hsa-miR-29a-3p, hsa-miR-200c-5p, hsa-miR-200a-5p, hsa-miR-6854-5p, hsa-miR-216a-5p and hsa-miR-891a-5p) was developed in the training cohort. The risk score was calculated by the product of the expression level and the coefficients of each miRNA. The prognostic value of 10 miRNAs-based signature for CRC patients was tested and validated. Survival analysis indicated that high-risk patients (> 1.10) had a worse overall survival (OS) than low-risk (≤ 1.10) patients (5-year OS rate for training cohort: 59.3% vs. 78.9%, p < .001; validation cohort: 48.3% vs. 69.3%, p = .011). The miRNA-based signature was an independent prognostic factor for CRC patients (HR for training cohort:2.476, 95% CI:1.202-5.098, p = .014; HR for validation cohort:2.050, 95% CI:1.087-3.869, p = .027). The AUC values for 3-year and 5-year OS prediction were 0.718 and 0.784 in the training cohort, 0.659 and 0.614 in the validation cohort, respectively. The 10 miRNAs-based signature provided a proper prognostic stratification for CRC patients, and it might be a promising tool for survival prediction.
RESUMO
Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram model for the prediction of survival outcome in rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection. Methods: A total of 9,919 consecutive patients were retrospectively identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Significant prognostic factors were determined by the univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. The nomogram model for the prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in rectal cancer patients were developed based on these prognostic variables, and its predictive power was assessed by the concordance index (C-index). Calibration curves were plotted to evaluate the associations between predicted probabilities and actual observations. The internal and external cohort were used to further validate the predictive performance of the prognostic nomogram. Results: All patients from the SEER database were randomly split into a training cohort (n = 6,944) and an internal validation cohort (n = 2,975). The baseline characteristics of two cohorts was comparable. Independent prognostic factors were identified as age, pT stage, lymph node metastasis, serum CEA level, tumor size, differentiation type, perineural invasion, circumferential resection margin involvement and inadequate lymph node yield. In the training cohort, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.719 (95% CI: 0.696-0.742), which was significantly higher than that of the TNM staging system (C-index: 0.606, 95% CI: 0.583-0.629). The nomogram had a C-index of 0.726 (95% CI: 0.691-0.761) for the internal validation cohort, indicating a good predictive power. In addition, an independent cohort composed of 202 rectal cancer patients from our institution were enrolled as the external validation. Compared with the TNM staging system (C-index: 0.573, 95% CI: 0.492-0.654), the prognostic nomogram still showed a better predictive performance, with the C-index of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.626-0.782). Calibration plots showed a good consistency between predicted probability and the actual observation in the training and two validation cohorts. Conclusion: The nomogram showed an excellent predictive ability for survival outcome of rectal cancer patients, and it might provide an accurate prognostic stratification and help clinicians determine individualized treatment strategies.
Assuntos
Nomogramas , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: As a rare gastrointestinal neoplasm, the demographic, clinicopathological, and prognostic characteristics of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its biological features, survival outcome, and prognostic factors. METHODS: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological and survival data of 513 patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with MANEC of the appendix and colorectum bettween 2004 and 2015. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of MANEC located at different anatomical locations were compared, and predictive factors for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: In terms of anatomical distribution of MANEC, the appendix (64.5%, 331/513) was more frequently involved, followed by colon (28.1%, 144/513) and rectum (7.4%, 38/513). The MANEC at different anatomical locations had a distinct clinicopathological characteristic, and colorectal MANEC was significantly associated with more aggressive biological features. The survival outcomes of appendiceal MANEC were significantly better than that of colorectal MANEC (3-year CSS rate 73.8% vs 59.4%, P = 0.010; 3-year OS 69.2% vs 48.3%, P < 0.001). In addition, hemicolectomy had a better survival benefit than appendicectomy for patients with appendiceal MANEC, regardless of lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Tumor location, histology grade III, tumor size > 2 cm, T3-T4 stage, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were independent prognostic factors for patients with MANEC. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location had an important prognostic significance for MANEC. As an uncommon clinical entity, colorectal MANEC had more aggressive biological features and worse prognosis than its appendiceal counterpart. The standard surgical procedure and clinical management strategy for MANEC need to be established.
Assuntos
Apêndice , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Humanos , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/patologia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Estudos Retrospectivos , PrognósticoRESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14871.].
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The number of positive lymph nodes, which was defined as "N stage", is mostly used to predict the survival of D2-resected gastric cancer patients, not the location. A "central lymph node" (CnLN) was defined by Ikoma et al., included common hepatic, celiac and proximal splenic artery LNs. CnLNs located in the extraperigastric area are included in the D2 LN station for gastric cancer. We speculate that CnLNs can be regarded as a predictor of survival. METHODS: Eligible advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection and D2 lymph node dissection between 2004 and 2012 at our institution were identified. The frequency of CnLN metastases and risk factors affecting DFS were examined. Survival differences were assessed by log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The study identified 1178 patients who underwent curative surgery or D2 or more extensive lymphadenectomy. A total of 342 patients had been proven to have CnLN metastasis. Larger tumor size (P < 0.001), more frequent lymphatic vessel invasion (P < 0.001), signet ring cell histology (P = 0.014), and more advanced pathological T stage (P = 0.013) were significantly related to CnLNs metastasis. The patients with CnLN metastasis had a poor prognosis (HR for DFS of 1.366, 95%CI = 1.138-1.640, P = 0.001). For the pN2/3 patients, CnLN metastasis was associated with shorter 5-year DFS (for pN2 patients: 25.9% vs 39.3%, P = 0.017; for pN3 patients: 11.5% vs 23.4%, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Gastric cancer patients with CnLN metastasis who underwent D2 resection had a poor prognosis. With the same N stage, the patients with positive CnLNs had shorter survival. CnLNs metastasis could be a supplement to N stage and a predictor of survival in gastric cancer patients. Large sample, multicenter, randomized clinical trials are still needed in the future.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although many studies have evaluated the prognostic significance of signet ring cell (SRC) histology for gastric cancer (GC) patients, the results were conflicting. The objective of this study was to compare clinicopathologic characteristics between SRC type and other types, and evaluate its impact on survival outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathologic and survival data of 1891 patients who underwent curative resection for GC. All patients were divided into differentiated, undifferentiated and SRC type according to the histological classification. The prognostic differences between different types were compared and clinicopathologic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: SRC histology type had a poorer disease-free survival (DFS) than differentiated type (5-year DFS, 37.7% vs 52.2%, P<0.001), but there was no prognostic difference between SRC type and undifferentiated type (37.7% vs 41.9%, P>0.05). For early GC patients, SRC type was more frequent in younger, female patients and T1a stage tumors; the 5-year DFS of SRC type was similar to that of any other histology type (P>0.05). SRC type showed more aggressive biological features, including extensive stomach involvement, large tumor size, advanced pTstage and pN stage, than other types for locally advanced GC patients; poorer DFS was observed in SRC type compared with differentiated type. Multivariate analysis indicated that SRC type (HR:1.71, 95%CI:1.10-1.68, P<0.01) and undifferentiated type (HR:1.21, 95%CI:1.04-1.40, P<0.05) were independently associated with poor DFS in locally advanced GC patients. CONCLUSION: There was a significant difference between early and locally advanced GC patients with regard to clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of SRC histology. SRC type was an independent prognostic factor for locally advanced GC patients, but not for early GC patients.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Neoplasias Gástricas , Feminino , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignant disease with high incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Nephronectin (NPNT) was found to be dysregulated in some kinds of cancer. The goal of our study was to explore the expression profile of NPNT based on large numbers of GC samples with detailed clinicopathological and prognostic data from our institution and the data from a public database. A total of 117 GC samples and 73 corresponding non-tumorous adjacent tissues (NATs) were obtained from GC patients and used to detect expression of NPNT through immunohistochemistry. Western blot and qRT-PCR were performed to examine expression of NPNT in GC cell lines. Our results found that the positive expression ratio of NPNT in GC tissues is significantly higher than that in NATs (p<0.001). Chi-squared analysis results showed positive expression ratio of NPNT was significantly associated with depth of tumor invasion (p=0.049) and TNM stage (p=0.017). Kaplan-Meier survival and cox analysis results showed that patients with positive NPNT protein expression tend to have poorer prognosis than those with negative NPNT expression (p=0.0032) and NPNT expression was independent prognostic factor. High expression level was seen in GC cell lines. Furthermore, through a series of cancer cell proliferation, invasion and migration associated experiments, we found that NPNT could evidently promote GC cell proliferation, invasion and migration, as well as epithelial-mesenthymal transition. In summary, NPNT was evidently overexpressed in GC and had an oncogenic role. In the future, NPNT could serve as a promising therapeutic target for treating GC patients.
Assuntos
Movimento Celular , Proliferação de Células , Proteínas da Matriz Extracelular/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Transição Epitelial-Mesenquimal , Proteínas da Matriz Extracelular/genética , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Transdução de Sinais , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To review relevant studies and perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of signet ring cell (SRC) histology for gastric cancer (GC) patients. METHODS: Systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase databases. The relevant data were extracted and the association between SRC histology and survival outcome were evaluated using a fixed-effect or random-effect model. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The prevalence of SRC histology varied from 8.7% to 50%. SRC histology type was associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.12, 95%CI: 1.01-1.23, P = 0.034; I2 = 85.1%) and DFS (HR: 1.17, 95%CI: 1.00-1.37, P = 0.040; I2 = 63.6%). The subgroup analysis indicated that SRC type had a better OS than non-SRC type for early GC patients (HR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.48-0.75, P < 0.001; I2 = 33.7%). However, it was a poor prognostic factor for advanced GC when excluding stage IV patients (HR: 1.18, 95%CI: 1.07-1.29, P < 0.001; I2 = 6.5%). SRC type had a higher risk of peritoneal recurrence than non-SRC type (OR: 1.36, 95%CI: 1.06-1.75, P = 0.017; I2 = 1.3%). CONCLUSION: SRC type had a distinctly different prognostic significance for early and advanced GC patients. SRC type was associated with better survival outcomes in early GC patients, but it was a predictive factor for poor survival in advanced GC patients.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Humanos , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whether early gastric cancer with mixed histologic type should be considered for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and prognostic significance for early gastric cancer with mixed histologic type. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathologic and survival data of 302 patients who underwent surgical resection for early gastric cancer. Based on the histologic components, all patients were classified as pure differentiated type, pure undifferentiated type and mixed histologic type. The prognostic differences between different types were compared and predictive factors for LNM were evaluated. RESULTS: Histopathologically, the proportion of mixed histologic type was 12.3% in early gastric cancer. In terms of LNM, mixed histologic type had a more frequent incidence than pure differentiated type (32.4% vs 11.1%, P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between mixed type and pure undifferentiated type for LNM (32.4% vs 21.1%, Pâ¯=â¯0.139). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size >2 cm (odds ratio [OR]: 2.153, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.113-4.164, P < 0.05), submucosal invasion (OR: 3.881, 95%CI: 1.832-8.222, P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (OR: 8.797, 95% CI: 2.643-29.277, P < 0.001), undifferentiated type (OR: 3.146, 95% CI: 1.352-7.320, P < 0.01), and mixed histologic type (OR: 3.635, 95% CI: 1.272-10.390, P < 0.05) were independent risk factors for LNM in early gastric cancer patients. However, mixed histologic type did not affect the survival outcome of these patients (hazard ratio: 0.629, 95% CI: 0.074-5.311, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mixed histologic type was an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients. The decisions regarding endoscopic submucosal dissection for mixed histologic type should be carefully considered.
Assuntos
Gastrectomia/mortalidade , Excisão de Linfonodo/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Adulto , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/classificação , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Adjuvant chemotherapy following the curative resection could improve the survival outcome of advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients. However, it is unclear whether delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy had a negative impact on survival outcome in GC patients. The purpose of this study was to review current published literature about the impact of delaying adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcome and summarize risk factors for delaying adjuvant chemotherapy. Delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy was quite frequent in GC patients who underwent gastrectomy due to postoperative complications, poor nutritional status, comorbid diseases and socioeconomic status. Therefore, it is important for these patients to have a sufficient and smooth transition from surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on current available evidence, there is no specific timing interval for the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in GC patients. Earlier initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (<4 weeks) may not be mandatory for GC patients who underwent curative resection. However, the patients should be recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy within 6-8 weeks if their performance status and nutritional status were deemed to be appropriate. Minimizing postoperative complications and providing requisite nutritional advice may be helpful for timely initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Quimioterapia Adjuvante/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) for patients with gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: A total of 1,720 consecutive patients who underwent curative gastrectomy were retrospectively identified. The association between LVI and clinicopathologic characteristics was determined and its impact on survival outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: LVI was detected in 21.3% of GC patients, 5.9% of patients with early GC, 24.0% of patients with advanced GC, and 6.7% of node-negative patients using H&E staining. Tumor size (odds ratio [OR], 1.509; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.159-1.965; P < .01), differentiated type (OR, 1.817; 95% CI, 1.377-2.398; P < .001), and the depth of tumor invasion (OR, 3.011; 95% CI, 2.174-4.171; P < .001) were independent predictive factors for LVI. LVI-positive patients have a poorer prognosis than LVI-negative patients, irrespective of tumor stage or lymph node metastasis. LVI was an independent prognostic factor for patients with GC (hazard ratio, 1.299; 95% CI, 1.112-1.518; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: LVI provided additional prognostic information for GC patients, and LVI-positive patients should be considered candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine clinicopathological features, risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival outcome in synchronous multiple early gastric cancer (MEGC) patients. METHODS: A total of 338 solitary early gastric cancer (SEGC) and 26 MEGC patients who underwent surgical resection were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological features and predictive factors for MEGC patients were evaluated. Also, we analyzed risk factors for LNM and compared survival difference between SEGC and MEGC patients. RESULTS: The frequency of multiple synchronous lesions was 7.1% in early gastric cancer (EGC) patients. The main and minor lesions were mostly confined to the same third of the stomach (84.6%, 22/26), and the most common location was the lower third of the stomach. With regard to the number of coexisting lesions, most of the patients had two lesions and more than three lesions were not common. Tumor size≤2cm (OR:2.684, 95%CI:1.131-6.368, P<0.05) and the presence of atrophic gastritis (OR:2.418, 95%CI:1.052-5.555, P<0.05) were independent risk factors for synchronous MEGC. There was no significant statistical difference between SEGC and MEGC for LNM (17.5% vs 23.1%, P=0.311). The number of coexisting lesions was not associated with the risk of LNM in EGC. In addition, the survival outcome of MEGC patients was similar to that of SEGC (5-year RFS rate, 96.0% vs 93.7%, P=0.329;5-year OS rate, 96.0% vs 88.3%, P=0.479). CONCLUSION: Meticulous endoscopic examination at the initial diagnosis of MEGC was very important, especially for those with precancerous lesions such as atrophic gastritis. In terms of treatment methods, endoscopic resection may be equally suitable for synchronous MEGC if the lesions fulfilled its indication criteria.
Assuntos
Metástase Linfática , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Feminino , Gastrite Atrófica/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Purpose: Whether young patients with gastric cancer (GC) had a distinct prognostic outcome from older patients remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of young GC patients and evaluate the survival outcome in comparison to their older counterparts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathologic and survival data of 2022 patients who underwent curative resection for GC. All patients were divided into the young patient group (18-40 years) and older patient group (>40 years) according to the patient age. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of young GC patients were analyzed, and the survival difference between the two groups was compared. Results: The incidence of GC in the patients 18-40 years of age was 8.1% (164/2022). The young patient group had different clinicopathologic features from the older group, including a significant female predominance, a larger number of retrieved lymph nodes, a higher proportion of undifferentiated histology type, and middle or lower 1/3 GC. However, the survival outcome of young patients was similar to that of their older counterparts (5-year disease free survival [DFS]: 47.0% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.247), even when comparison based on the TNM stage was made. Deeper tumor invasion (T3-T4 stage, hazard ratios [HR]: 5.791, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 2.908-11.533, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (HR: 2.500, 95% CIs: 1.308-4.781, p = 0.006), and lymphovascular invasion (HR: 2.191, 95% CIs: 1.306-3.677, p = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors for young GC patients. Conclusions: Young age (18-40 years) was not associated with poorer survival outcome in GC patients. However, early diagnosis and curative resection with adequate lymphadenectomy will still be necessary for improving the survival outcome of young GC patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgery is becoming more popular with the development of laparoscopic devices. The objective of this study was to explore whether the 3D imaging system could improve surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer compared with the 2D imaging system. METHODS: Systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase databases and relevant data were extracted. Surgical quality, postoperative complications, and postoperative recovery between 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery groups were compared using a fixed or random effect model. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies involving 1456 patients (3D group 683 patients and 2D group 773 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that mean operation time was significantly shorter in 3D group than in 2D group (WMD, - 9.08; 95% CI, - 14.77, - 3.40; P = 0.002; I2 = 70.3%), especially for gastric cancer patients (WMD, - 14.61; 95% CI, - 26.00, - 3.23, P = 0.012; I2 = 74.1%). In addition, 3D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer had an advantage than 2D group in reducing the amount of intraoperative blood loss (WMD, - 13.60, 95% CI, - 21.48, - 5.72; P = 0.001; I2 = 0%). The number of retrieved lymph nodes in 3D group was not significantly different from that in 2D group, regardless of laparoscopic gastrectomy (WMD, 1.10; 95% CI, - 0.67, 2.88; P = 0.222; I2 = 18.8%) and laparoscopic colorectal surgery (WMD, 0.55, 95% CI; - 1.99, 3.09; P = 0.671; I2 = 76.9%). In addition, there was no significant difference between 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for postoperative complications and postoperative recovery. CONCLUSION: Main advantages of 3D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer were that it could shorten the operation time and reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss. However, 3D laparoscopic surgery had no obvious advantage over 2D laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer patients.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Gastrectomia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Excisão de Linfonodo , Duração da Cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: The prognostic significance of perineural invasion (PNI) for gastric cancer (GC) patients was under debate. This study aimed to review relevant studies and evaluate the impact of PNI on the survival outcome of GC patients. METHODS: Systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase databases. The relevant data were extracted, and the association between PNI and clinicopathological characteristics or survival outcome in GC patients were evaluated using a fixed-effect model or random-effect model. RESULTS: A total 13 studies involving 7004 GC patients were included in this meta-analysis. The positive rate of PNI was 35.9% (2512/7004) in GC patients, ranging from 6.9% to 75.6%. There were significant relationships between PNI and a series of unfavourable clinicopathological factors including undifferentiated histology type (OR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.33, p<0.001; I2=75.3%), diffuse type (OR: 1.96, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.60, p=0.029; I2=79.5%), lymphatic invasion (OR: 7.00, 95% CI 3.76 to 13.03, p<0.001; I2=83.6%), vascular invasion (OR: 5.79, 95% CI 1.59 to 21.13, p=0.008; I2=95.8%), deeper tumour invasion (OR: 4.79, 95% CI 3.65 to 6.28, p<0.001; I2=65.0%) and lymph node metastasis (OR: 3.60, 95% CI 2.37 to 5.47, p<0.001; I2=89.6%). In addition, PNI was significantly associated with worse survival outcome in GC patients (HR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.06, p<0.001; I2=71.0%). CONCLUSION: PNI was frequently detected in surgically resected specimens of GC patients, and it was a predictive factor for survival outcomes in these patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Nervos Periféricos/patologia , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy(AC) following the curative resection could improve the survival outcome of advanced gastric cancer(GC) patients. However, there is no specific timing interval from radical surgery to initiation of AC. Whether delayed initiation of AC could affect the survival outcome of these patients remains unclear. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between delaying AC and the survival outcome of GC patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies that evaluated the relationship between time to AC and survival outcome. Survival data for HR and 95% CI were extracted and converted to a regression coefficient(ß) corresponding to a continuous representation per 4-week delay of AC. Individual adjusted ß were combined using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistic and publication bias was detected using standard error-based funnel plots. RESULTS: A total of 11 eligible studies involving 6,017 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Eight studies evaluated the impact of delaying AC on overall survival(OS) and five evaluated the impact of delaying AC on disease-free survival(DFS). The pooled results demonstrated that the initiation of AC per 4-week delay was associated with a significant decrease in OS(HR:1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08, P < 0.001; I2 = 18.5%) and DFS (HR:1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10, P = 0.001; I2 = 40.6%). CONCLUSION: The initiation of AC per 4-week delay was associated with worse survival outcomes in GC patients. If physical status and postoperative recovery were appropriated, GC patients should be recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy timely.