Crosstalk between GBP2 and M2 macrophage promotes the ccRCC progression.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) represents a highly heterogeneous kidney malignancy associated with the poorest prognosis. The metastatic potential of advanced ccRCC tumors is notably high, posing significant clinical challenges. There is an urgent imperative to develop novel therapeutic approaches to address ccRCC metastasis. Recent investigations indicated a potential association between GBP2 and tumor immunity. However, the precise functional role of GBP2 in the progression of ccRCC remains poorly understood. The present study revealed a strong correlation between GBP2 and M2 macrophages. Specifically, our findings demonstrated that the inhibition of GBP2 significantly impedes the migratory and invasive capabilities of ccRCC cells. We observed that the presence of M2 macrophages can reverse the effects of GBP2 knockdown on tumor cell migration and invasion. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that M2 macrophages promote the expression of the GBP2/p-STAT3 and p-ERK axis in tumor cells through the secretion of interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), thereby substantially enhancing the migratory and invasive capacities of the tumor cells. Simultaneously, we have identified that GBP2 promotes the polarization of macrophages to the M2 phenotype by stimulating the secretion of interleukin-18 (IL-18). In summary, our investigation anticipates that the GBP2/IL-18/M2 macrophages/IL-10 and the TGF-ß/GBP2, p-STAT3, p-ERK loop plays a crucial role in ccRCC metastasis. The collective findings from our research underscore the significant role of GBP2 in tumor immunity and emphasize the potential for modulating GBP2 as a promising therapeutic strategy for targeting ccRCC metastasis.

GBP2 promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression through immune infiltration and regulation of PD­L1 expression via STAT1 signaling.

Guanylate­binding protein 2 (GBP2) has been widely studied in cancer, however, its potential role in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is not fully elucidated. The present study aimed to explore the effect of GBP2 on tumor progression and its possible underlying molecular mechanisms in ccRCC. The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia databases, and several bioinformatics analysis tools, such as Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2, Kaplan­Meier plotter, UALCAN, LinkedOmics, Metascape, GeneMANIA and Tumor Immune Estimation Resource, were used to characterize the functional relationship between GBP2 and ccRCC. Focusing on the association between GBP2 and programmed death ligand 1 (PD­L1) in vitro, the regulatory mechanism was investigated by knockdown and overexpression of GBP2 in Caki­1 and 786­O cells using reverse transcription­quantitative PCR, western blotting and co­immunoprecipitation techniques. The results indicated that GBP2 was commonly upregulated in ccRCC, correlating with worse prognosis. In addition, GBP2 expression levels were positively associated with different patterns of immune cell infiltration, suggesting that the GBP2 gene regulates PD­L1 expression via the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) pathway. The present study suggested that GBP2 regulates tumor immune infiltration and promotes tumor immune escape through PD­L1 expression, revealing a potential immunotherapeutic target for ccRCC.

[Causes of and risk factors for failure in catheter removal after transurethral resection of the prostate].

OBJECTIVE: To find the causes of the failure in the first catheter removal (CR) after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and the related risk factors. METHODS: We collected the clinical data on 285 BPH patients treated by TURP from June 2015 to May 2018. We divided the cases into a successful CR (SCR) and a failed CR (FCR) group and investigated the risk factors for the first CR after TURP by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: CR was successfully performed in 246 and failed in 39 of the 285 cases. In the FCR group, post-CR urinary retention occurred in 15 cases immediately after, severe urinary tract irritation in 13, massive gross hematuria in 7 and urinary incontinence in 4 within 1 month. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent risk factors for CR failure included IPSS (OR = 5.106, P = 0.013), preoperative urinary tract infection (OR = 3.835, P = 0.041), prostate volume (OR = 4.160, P = 0.011) and catheter compression time (OR = 4.051, P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The common causes of the failure in catheter removal after TURP included early postoperative urinary retention, urinary infection, secondary hematuria and urinary incontinence.