Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 18(37): 5295-9, 2012 Oct 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23066326

RESUMO

AIM: To compare fluoroscopic, endoscopic and guide wire assistance with ultraslim gastroscopy for placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes. METHODS: The information regarding nasojejunal tube placement procedures was retrieved using the gastrointestinal tract database at Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College. Records from 81 patients who underwent nasojejunal tubes placement by different techniques between 2004 and 2011 were reviewed for procedure success and tube-related outcomes. RESULTS: Nasojejunal feeding tubes were successfully placed in 78 (96.3%) of 81 patients. The success rate by fluoroscopy was 92% (23 of 25), by endoscopic technique 96.3% (26 of 27), and by guide wire assistance (whether via transnasal or transoral insertion) 100% (23/23, 6/6). The average time for successful placement was 14.9 ± 2.9 min for fluoroscopic placement, 14.8 ± 4.9 min for endoscopic placement, 11.1 ± 2.2 min for guide wire assistance with transnasal gastroscopic placement, and 14.7 ± 1.2 min for transoral gastroscopic placement. Statistically, the duration for the third method was significantly different (P < 0.05) compared with the other three methods. Transnasal placement over a guidewire was significantly faster (P < 0.05) than any of the other approaches. CONCLUSION: Guide wire assistance with transnasal insertion of nasojejunal feeding tubes represents a safe, quick and effective method for providing enteral nutrition.


Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral/instrumentação , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Intubação Gastrointestinal/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Endoscopia/métodos , Feminino , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Gastroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Intubação Gastrointestinal/métodos , Jejuno/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 31: 29, 2012 Mar 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22458379

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Response gene to complement-32 (RGC-32) is comprehensively expressed in many kinds of tissues and has been reported to be expressed abnormally in different kinds of human tumors. However, the role of RGC-32 in cancer remains controversial and no reports have described the effect of RGC-32 in pancreatic cancer. The present study investigated the expression of RGC-32 in pancreatic cancer tissues and explored the role of RGC-32 in transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß)-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human pancreatic cancer cell line BxPC-3. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining of RGC-32 and E-cadherin was performed on specimens from 42 patients with pancreatic cancer, 12 with chronic pancreatitis and 8 with normal pancreas. To evaluate the role of RGC-32 in TGF-ß-induced EMT in pancreatic cancer cells, BxPC-3 cells were treated with TGF-ß1, and RGC-32 siRNA silencing and gene overexpression were performed as well. The mRNA expression and protein expression of RGC-32 and EMT markers such E-cadherin and vimentin were determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blot respectively. Finally, migration ability of BxPC-3 cells treated with TGF-ß and RGC-32 siRNA transfection was examined by transwell cell migration assay. RESULTS: We found stronger expression of RGC-32 and higher abnormal expression rate of E-cadherin in pancreatic cancer tissues than those in chronic pancreatitis tissues and normal pancreatic tissues. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that both RGC-32 positive expression and E-cadherin abnormal expression in pancreatic cancer were correlated with lymph node metastasis and TNM staging. In addition, a significant and positive correlation was found between positive expression of RGC-32 and abnormal expression of E-cadherin. Furthermore, in vitro, we found sustained TGF-ß stimuli induced EMT and up-regulated RGC-32 expression in BxPC-3 cells. By means of siRNA silencing and gene overexpression, we further demonstrated that RGC-32 mediated TGF-ß-induced EMT and migration in BxPC-3 cells. CONCLUSIONS: The results above indicated that RGC-32 might be a novel metastasis promoting gene in pancreatic cancer and it enhances metastatic phenotype by mediating TGF-ß-induced EMT in human pancreatic cancer cell line BxPC-3.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/genética , Transição Epitelial-Mesenquimal/efeitos dos fármacos , Proteínas Musculares/genética , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/farmacologia , Caderinas/genética , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Movimento Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Movimento Celular/genética , Transição Epitelial-Mesenquimal/genética , Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Metástase Neoplásica/genética , Fenótipo , Interferência de RNA
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA