The prognostic analysis of further axillary dissection in breast cancer with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes undergoing mastectomy.

Background: The ACOSOG Z0011 study has shown that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is an option to be considered in patients who had 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who proceed with breast-conserving along with postoperative radiotherapy. However, there remains controversy regarding the applicability of this approach in patients who had a mastectomy. The aim of our study is to determine the prognostic differences and risk factors associated with the decision to opt for ALND in breast cancer patients who had 1-2 metastatic SLNs who receive a mastectomy. Methods: The study conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with cT1-2N0 breast cancer and treated at The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 2016 and December 2021, and patients were divided into two cohorts according to whether ALND was performed after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB): SLNB cohort and SLNB + ALND cohort. Outcomes included the locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to ensure the balance of variables between the two cohorts. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to ascertain the univariate and multivariate relative risks associated with survival. Results: There were 812 cases enrolled. After the PSM, 234 receiving ALND and 234 not receiving ALND were matched. A median follow-up period of 56.72 ± 20.29 months was observed. During that time, no significant difference was identified in the DFS and OS in the SLNB + ALND cohort and the SLNB cohort (P = 0.208 and P = 0.102), except for those under 40 years old, SLNB + ALND group showed a reduction in LRR compared to SLNB group (11.1% vs. 2.12%, P = 0.044). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that younger (≤ 40 years), progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and SLNB alone were independent risk factors for LRR; perineural invasion was a risk factor, while endocrinotherapy was a beneficial prognostic indicator for DFS and OS among patients with positive hormone receptor. Conclusion: ALND does not impact DFS and OS in patients with 1-2 metastatic SLNs who have completed a mastectomy. Being younger (≤ 40 years), having a negative PR, and undergoing SLNB alone were independent risk factors for LRR. Given this finding, we recommend avoiding axillary treatment such as ALND or radiotherapy in patients without risk factors.

A new prediction nomogram of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in cT1-2 breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes.

We aimed to analyze the risk factors and construct a new nomogram to predict non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastasis for cT1-2 breast cancer patients with positivity after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). A total of 830 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2021 at multi-center were included in the retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into training (n = 410), internal validation (n = 298), and external validation cohorts (n = 122) based on periods and centers. A nomogram-based prediction model for the risk of NSLN metastasis was constructed by incorporating independent predictors of NSLN metastasis identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses in the training cohort and then validated by validation cohorts. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) (P < 0.001), the proportion of positive SLNs (P = 0.029), lymph-vascular invasion (P = 0.029), perineural invasion (P = 0.023), and estrogen receptor (ER) status (P = 0.034) were independent risk factors for NSLN metastasis. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) value of this model was 0.730 (95% CI 0.676-0.785) for the training, 0.701 (95% CI 0.630-0.773) for internal validation, and 0.813 (95% CI 0.734-0.891) for external validation cohorts. Decision curve analysis also showed that the model could be effectively applied in clinical practice. The proposed nomogram estimated the likelihood of positive NSLNs and assisted the surgeon in deciding whether to perform further axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and avoid non-essential ALND as well as postoperative complications.

[The mechanism of microcystin leucine-arginine (MC-LR)-induced injury of Sertoli cell immune response and biological behavior].

Microcystin-leucine arginine (MC-LR), a potentially carcinogenic toxin, is produced by Cyanobacteria such as Microcystis and Ananabacteria during water bloom. Increasing evidence demonstrated that MC-LR induces male reproductive toxicity, mainly by inducing germ cell apoptosis, destroying cell cytoskeleton, interfering with DNA damage repair pathway, and damaging blood-testicular barrier (BTB), which eventually lead to male sterility. Testicular Sertoli cells are the somatic cells that directly contact with spermatogenic cells in seminiferous tubules. They not only regulate immune response to maintain testicular immune homeostasis by secreting a variety of cytokines and immunosuppressive factors, but also provide the protective effects of spermatogenic cells by forming BTB. MC-LR induces inflammation and apoptosis of Sertoli cells, and destroys the integrity of the BTB, and then causes spermatogenesis dysfunction.

Luteolin Inhibited the Self-Renewal and Altered the Polarization of Primary Alveolar Macrophages.

Pure plant extract luteolin has been demonstrated to possess numerous biological and immunological effects. However, how luteolin affects mice alveolar macrophages' self-renewal and polarization closely related to inflammatory and immunomodulatory is still unknown. In our study, the transcriptomic analysis showed that several self-renewal-related pathways in luteolin-pretreated alveolar macrophages were inhibited compared to the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-treated group. Ki-67 staining and EdU assay indicated that luteolin inhibited GM-CSF-induced alveolar macrophage proliferation. Moreover, GM-CSF-induced expressions of c-Myc and KLF4 were significantly suppressed by luteolin at transcriptional and protein levels. Besides, we found that luteolin promoted M1 macrophage polarization induced by LPS plus IFN-γ. At the same time, it inhibited M2 macrophage polarization induced by IL-4 in both alveolar and bone marrow-derived macrophages by detecting macrophage polarization-related gene expressions at mRNA and protein levels. We found that luteolin inhibited self-renewal and altered the polarization of primary alveolar macrophages. Taken together, our data will aid in a better understanding of the immunomodulatory effects of luteolin on the primary alveolar macrophages.

[Preoperation risk factor analysis in orthotopic liver transplantation with pre-transplant artificial liver support therapy].

OBJECTIVES: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is an accepted therapy for selected patients with advanced liver diseases. However, the early mortality rate after OLT remains relatively high due to the poor selection of candidates with various serious conditions. The aim of this study is to assess the value of pretransplantation artificial liver support treatment in reducing the pre-operation risk factors relating to early mortality after OLT. METHODS: 50 adult patients in various stages of different etiologies who underwent OLT procedures had been treated with molecular adsorbent recycling system (MARS) preoperatively. The study was designed in two parts: the first one was to evaluate the effectiveness of a single MARS therapy by using some clinical and laboratory parameters which were supposed to be therapeutical pretransplantation risk factors. The second part was to study the patients undergoing OLT by using the regression analysis on preoperation risk factors relating to early (within 30 d after OLT) mortality rate. RESULTS: Among the 50 patients, a statistically significant improvement of the biochemical parameters was observed (pretreatment vs posttreatment). 8 patients cancelled their scheduled LTXs due to significant improvements in their clinical conditions or recovery of their failing liver functions. 8 patients died and 34 patients successfully underwent LTX. The immediate outcome (within 30 postoperative days) of these 34 patients was that 28 were kept alive and 6 died. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperation sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), level of creatinine, INR, TNFalpha, and IL-10 are the main preoperative risk factors relating to early death after an operation. MARS treatment before a transplant operation can relieve these factors significantly, hence improve survival rate of liver transplantation or even make the transplantation unnecessary.

[Over 55 years-old live-related donor kidney transplants: a report of 12 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors of the over 55-year-old donor and the safety and efficacy of the donor, and the recipient with the immediate and long-term of the kidney. METHODS: The living-related donor kidney transplantation in 15 cases was performed in our unit from October 1999 to April 2002. Of these, 12 donors were over 55 with age ranging from 55 to 73 years-old and mean age of 62, 75 years. 5 donors were male and 7 were female. Father in 5 cases and 6 and 1 were mother and grandmother, respectively. The donors were evaluated depending on general state of health, hypertension, diabate and important organa in condition; and renal function by creatinine (Cre), creatinine clearance (Ccr), Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), B ultrasound and renal arteriograph prior to operation. The all receipients with ages ranging from 14 to 46 years with end-stage renal diseases (ESRD) from and their mean age was 32.9 years. The donor' left nephrectomy was performed in 10 cases and right nephrectomy in 2. Warm-ischemia time was from 70 s to 170 s (mean time, 92 s). Cold-ischemia time was from 60 minutes to 120 minutes and mean 84 minutes. The follow-up is from 12 to 42 months and mean 20, 84 months. RESULTS: All the 12 donors were perfectly recovered during operation and postoperation. During their 11-day stay in the hospital no complications was observed. The donor' creatinine was raised to about 12 to 34 micro mol/L (mean, 22 micro mol/L). One recipient died from lung infection at 28 days postoperative and 1 died due to liver failure with normal graft function after transplanted 6 months and yet one recipient with delayed graft function had recovered by 12 times dialysis. The remain recipient had a better recovered. CONCLUSION: Aged (>or= 55 years-old) donor renal transplantation can be carried out as the poor supply of can be used kidney but must to controled the indication and the prepare to be accomplished seriously.