Effects of tumor marker regression load score on long-term prognosis of gastric cancer patients undergoing radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The effects of the dynamics of serum tumor markers (CA72-4, CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and AFP) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on the prognosis of gastric cancer(GC) patients remain unclear. METHODS: The training set contained 334 GC patients from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FJMUUH) and 113 GC patients in Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital (QhUAH) were used as an external validation set. Tumor marker regression load (ΔTMRL) indicator, including ΔCA72-4, ΔCEA, ΔCA19-9, ΔCA125, and ΔAFP, is defined as [(postNACT marker- preNACT marker)/preNACT marker]. Tumor marker regression load score (TMRLS) consists of ΔCA72-4, ΔCEA and ΔCA125. The predictive performance of the nomogram-TMRLS was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve(AUC), decision curve analysis(DCA), and C-index. RESULTS: Patients from FJMUUH were divided into two groups, TMRLS-low and TMRLS-high, determined by R package maxstat. Survival analysis revealed a higher 3-year overall survival(OS) in the TMRLS-low than in the TMRLS-high group. The TMRLS-high group who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy(AC) showed a significantly higher 3-year OS rate than those who did not. Multivariate COX regression analysis indicated that TMRLS was an independent prognostic factor for OS. A nomogram for predicting OS based on TMRLS showed a significantly higher C-index and AUC than the ypTNM stage. The above results were also found in the QhUAH external validation cohort. CONCLUSION: TMRLS is a novel independent prognostic factor for GC who underwent NACT and a radical gastrectomy. Furthermore, the TMRLS-high group, who received postoperative AC, may achieve better survival outcomes. Notably, the predictive performance of the nomogram-TMRLS significantly outperformed that of the ypTNM stage.

Robotic gastrectomy was reliable option for overweight patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: The role of minimally invasive surgery using robotics versus laparoscopy in resectable gastric cancer patients with a high body mass index (BMI) remains controversial. METHODS: A total of 482 gastric adenocarcinoma patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 who underwent minimally invasive radical gastrectomy between August 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 109 cases in the robotic gastrectomy (RG) group and 321 cases in the laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) group. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio was performed, and the perioperative outcomes, lymph node dissection, and 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared. RESULTS: After PSM, 109 patients were included in each of the RG and LG groups, with balanced baseline characteristics. Compared with the LG group, the RG group had similar intraoperative estimated blood loss [median (IQR) 30 (20-50) vs. 35 (30-59) mL, median difference (95%CI) - 5 (- 10 to 0)], postoperative complications [13.8% vs. 18.3%, OR (95%CI) 0.71 (0.342 to 1.473)], postoperative recovery, total harvested lymph nodes [(34.25 ± 13.43 vs. 35.44 ± 14.12, mean difference (95%CI) - 1.19 (- 4.871 to 2.485)] and textbook outcomes [(81.7% vs. 76.1%, OR (95%CI) 1.39 (0.724 to 2.684)]. Among pathological stage II-III patients receiving chemotherapy, the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in the RG group was similar to that in the LG group [median (IQR): 28 (25.5-32.5) vs. 32 (27-38.5) days, median difference (95%CI) - 3 (- 6 to 0)]. The 3-year OS (RG vs. LG: 80.7% vs. 81.7%, HR = 1.048, 95%CI 0.591 to 1.857) and DFS (78% vs. 76.1%, HR = 0.996, 95%CI 0.584 to 1.698) were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: RG conferred comparable lymph node dissection, postoperative recovery, and oncologic outcomes in a selected cohort of patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2.

Prognostic value of preoperative sarcopenia in gastric cancer: A 10-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer (GC); however, studies with 10-year survival follow-up are lacking. METHODS: Consecutive patients with GC who underwent radical gastrectomy between December 2009-2012 were included retrospectively. Preoperative sarcopenia was diagnosed using computed tomography skeletal muscle index. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis determined the prognostic factors for OS and RFS. RESULTS: In total, 781 patients with GC were included; among these, 207 (26.5%) had preoperative sarcopenia. Patients with sarcopenia had significantly lower 10-year OS and RFS than patients without sarcopenia (39.61% vs. 58.71% and 39.61% vs. 57.84%, respectively). Further, preoperative sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for 10-year OS (HR = 1.467; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.169-1.839) and RFS (HR = 1.450; 95% CI: 1.157-1.819). Patients with sarcopenia had a higher risk of death and recurrence in the first 10 years postoperatively than patients without sarcopenia. Additionally, the risk of death (HR = 2.62; 95% CI:1.581-4.332) and recurrence (HR = 2.34; 95% CI:1.516-3.606) was the highest in the 1st postoperative year and remained relatively stable thereafter. Further, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved 10-year OS (p = 0.006; HR = 0.558) and RFS (p = 0.008; HR = 0.573) in patients with TNM stage II-III GC that presented with sarcopenia. CONCLUSION: Preoperative sarcopenia remained an independent risk factor for postoperative very long-term prognosis of GC. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy improved the long-term outcomes of stage II-III patients with sarcopenia.

Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes After Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer in Elderly Individuals: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.

BACKGROUND: Robotic gastrectomy (RG) has been widely used to treat gastric cancer. However, whether the short-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy are superior to those of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer has not been reported. METHODS: The study enrolled of 594 elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent robotic or laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. The RG cohort was matched 1:3 with the LG cohort using propensity score-matching (PSM). RESULTS: After PSM, 121 patients were included in the robot group and 363 patients in the laparoscopic group. Excluding the docking and undocking times, the operation time of the two groups was similar (P = 0.617). The RG group had less intraoperative blood loss than the LG group (P < 0.001). The time to ambulation and first liquid food intake was significantly shorter in the RG group than in the LG group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.14). Significantly more lymph nodes were dissected in the RG group than in the LG group (P = 0.001). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was started earlier in the RG group than in the LG group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer, RG is safe and feasible. Compared with LG, RG is associated with less intraoperative blood loss; a faster postoperative recovery time, allowing a greater number of lymph nodes to be dissected; and earlier adjuvant chemotherapy.