Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis, treatment, and recurrence prediction of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a type of secondary cancer which is not sensitive to conventional intravenous chemotherapy. Treatment strategies for PC are usually palliative rather than curative. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely used in the medical field, making the early diagnosis, individualized treatment, and accurate prognostic evaluation of various cancers, including mediastinal malignancies, colorectal cancer, lung cancer more feasible. As a branch of computer science, AI specializes in image recognition, speech recognition, automatic large-scale data extraction and output. AI technologies have also made breakthrough progress in the field of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) based on its powerful learning capacity and efficient computational power. AI has been successfully applied in various approaches in PC diagnosis, including imaging, blood tests, proteomics, and pathological diagnosis. Due to the automatic extraction function of the convolutional neural network and the learning model based on machine learning algorithms, AI-assisted diagnosis types are associated with a higher accuracy rate compared to conventional diagnosis methods. In addition, AI is also used in the treatment of peritoneal cancer, including surgical resection, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, which significantly improves the survival of patients with PC. In particular, the recurrence prediction and emotion evaluation of PC patients are also combined with AI technology, further improving the quality of life of patients. Here we have comprehensively reviewed and summarized the latest developments in the application of AI in PC, helping oncologists to comprehensively diagnose PC and provide more precise treatment strategies for patients with PC.

N-glycan biosignatures as a potential diagnostic biomarker for early-stage pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%, owing to its late-stage diagnosis. Early detection of pancreatic cancer (PC) can significantly increase survival rates. AIM: To identify the serum biomarker signatures associated with early-stage PDAC by serum N-glycan analysis. METHODS: An extensive patient cohort was used to determine a biomarker signature, including patients with PDAC that was well-defined at an early stage (stages I and II). The biomarker signature was derived from a case-control study using a case-cohort design consisting of 29 patients with stage I, 22 with stage II, 4 with stage III, 16 with stage IV PDAC, and 88 controls. We used multiparametric analysis to identify early-stage PDAC N-glycan signatures and developed an N-glycan signature-based diagnosis model called the "Glyco-model". RESULTS: The biomarker signature was created to discriminate samples derived from patients with PC from those of controls, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.86. In addition, the biomarker signature combined with cancer antigen 19-9 could discriminate patients with PDAC from controls, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.919. Glyco-model demonstrated favorable diagnostic performance in all stages of PC. The diagnostic sensitivity for stage I PDAC was 89.66%. CONCLUSION: In a prospective validation study, this serum biomarker signature may offer a viable method for detecting early-stage PDAC.

Dynamic ctDNA-based analysis of drug-resistant gene alterations at RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients after cetuximab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore the dynamic changes of genomic mutations and their correlations with the efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with cetuximab plus mFOLFOX as the first-line treatment. METHODS: We included mCRC patients from January 2018 to October 2020 as a studied cohort which were treated with cetuximab plus mFOLFOX as first line therapy. Blood samples were collected for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test at three timepoints: before the first-line therapy(baseline), at the time of first-line progression and at the time of second-line progression. Progression-free survival was considered as the primary endpoint while objective response rate and overall survival were determined as the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Totally 39 patients received first-line treatment, of which 25 patients entered the second-line treatment, while 10 patients entered the third-line treatment. The median follow-up time was 16.4 months (95 %CI, 14.8-19.3). Along the treatment from first-line progress disease (PD) to second-line PD, proportions of TP53 (12/18, 67 %), APC (10/18, 56 %), FBXW7 (3/18, 17 %), and AMER1 (2/18, 11 %) were gradually increased according to results of single nucleotide variation (SNV). CONCLUSIONS: Resistant gene mutations caused by anti-EGFR drugs in RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC patients can be observed by dynamic ctDNA analysis. TP53 and AMER1 mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB) levels, and TP53/AMER1 co-mutation may predict the efficacy of the first-line cetuximab-contained treatment. Situations of genetic mutations were differentiated from first-line PD to second-line PD, which indicated that mutation detection may contribute to predict prognosis of mCRC patients.

Epidemiology, site-specific characteristics and survival of carcinosarcoma: a retrospective study based on SEER database.

OBJECTIVES: Carcinosarcoma (CS) is a rare and biphasic malignancy characterised by a highly invasive biological nature and poor prognosis. This study explored the epidemiology, site-specific characteristics and survival outcome of CS. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective study in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1975-2018) for primary CS. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: SEER database includes publicly available information from regional and state cancer registries in the US centres. A total of 5042 CS patients were identified. We selected the top five anatomic CS (uterus, double adnexa, lung, bladder and breast) patients for further analysis. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence was estimated by geographical region, age, sex, race, stage and primary site. Trends were calculated using joinpoint regression. The cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate and initial treatment were summarised. RESULTS: Nearly 80% of CS occurred in the uterus and double adnexa, followed by lung, bladder and breast. The elderly and black population presented the highest age-adjusted rate of CS. The rates of distant metastasis in CS progressively increased from 1989 to 2018. Atlanta was the area with the highest incidence at 0.7 per 100 000. Pulmonary and bladder CS more frequently occurred in men and were diagnosed with regional stage. Distant metastasis was mostly found in ovary/fallopian tube CS. Radiotherapy was more commonly applied in uterine CS, while adnexa CS cases were more likely to receive chemotherapy. Multiple treatments were more used in breast CS. Pulmonary CS seemed to suffer worse CSS (median: 9.92 months), for which radiotherapy might not provide survival benefits (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.86). Compared with the common histological types in each site, CS had the shortest survival. CONCLUSIONS: CS has unique clinical features in each primary site. Substantial prognosis variances exist based on tumour locations. The aggressive course is the common feature in CS at all sites.

Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibition for colorectal cancer: recent advances and future directions.

For colorectal cancer (CRC), surgical resection remains essential for achieving good prognoses. Unfortunately, numerous patients with locally advanced CRC and metastatic CRC failed to meet surgical indications or achieve pathological complete response after surgery. Perioperative therapy has been proven to effectively lower tumor staging and reduce recurrence and metastasis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown unprecedented prolongation of survival time and satisfactory safety in patients with high microsatellite instability/deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR), while the therapeutic effect obtained by patients with mismatch repair-proficient or microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) was considered minimal. However, recent studies found that certain CRC patients with dMMR/MSI-H presented intrinsic or acquired immune resistance, and pMMR/MSS CRC patients can also achieve better efficacy. Therefore, more predictors are required for screening patients with potential clinical benefits. Since the discovery of synergistic effects between immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, different immunotherapy-based therapies have been applied to the perioperative therapy of CRC in an increasing number of research. This review comprehensively summarized the past and current progress of different combinations of immunotherapy in perioperative clinical trials for CRC, focusing on the efficacy and safety, and points out the direction for future development.

Combining Anti-epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Therapy with Immunotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC).

INTRODUCTION: Monoclonal antibodies binding the EGFR, such as cetuximab and panitumumab, have been extensively used as targeted therapy for the treatment of mCRC. However, in clinical practice, it has been found that these treatment options have some limitations and fail to fully exploit their immunoregulatory activities. Meanwhile, because of the limited effects of current treatments, immunotherapy is being widely studied for patients with mCRC. However, previous immunotherapy trials in mCRC patients have had unsatisfactory outcomes as monotherapy. Thus, combinatorial treatment strategies are being researched. AREAS COVERED: The authors retrieved relevant documents of combination therapy for mCRC from PubMed and Medline. This review elaborates on the knowledge of immunomodulatory effects of anti-EGFR therapy alone and in combination with immunotherapy for mCRC. EXPERT OPINION: Although current treatment options have improved median overall survival (OS) for advanced disease to 30 months, the prognosis remains challenging for those with metastatic disease. More recently, the combination of anti-EGFR therapy with immunotherapy has been shown activity with complementary mechanisms. Hence, anti-EGFR therapy in combination with immunotherapy may hold the key to improving the therapeutic effect of refractory mCRC.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis with intraperitoneal immunotherapy: current treatment options and perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is an advanced malignancy that is not sensitive to systemic conventional chemotherapy. Treatment options for PC are usually palliative rather than curative. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy are associated with limited efficacy in patients with PC. However, the peritoneum can produce effective immunity by inducing T-lymphocyte recruitment and proliferation, and the unique immune environment of the peritoneum provides the rationale for IP immunotherapy in PC. AREAS COVERED: The authors retrieved relevant documents of IP immunotherapy for PC from PubMed and Medline. This review elaborates on the knowledge of the peritoneal immune microenvironment and IP immunotherapy for PC covering immune stimulators, radioimmunotherapy, catumaxomab, cancer vaccines, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. EXPERT OPINION: The prognosis of PC is poor. However, the peritoneal cavity is a unique immune compartment with abundant immune cells which can produce effective immunity. IP immunotherapy may be a promising strategy in patients with PC.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of anal adenocarcinoma: a nomogram development based on SEER database and validation in the WCH database.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively understand anal canal adenocarcinomas (AA) and develop a nomogram for prognostic prediction of AA. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (the year 2004-2015). An external validation set was collected from West China Hospital (WCH) databases. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the demographic characteristic. A novel nomogram was developed to estimate individual survival probability and its performance was validated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analyses (DCA). RESULTS: A total of 7901 patients were enrolled including 749 AA patients and 7152 squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal (ASCC) patients. Before PSM, patients with AA had shorter cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS than those with ASCC. However, after PSM, patients with AA were related to a favorable OS (p < 0.001), but a comparable CSS (p = 0.140) to those with ASCC. Age, sex, grade, surgery, and M stage were the independent prognostic factors of CSS for AA and were included in the establishment of a novel nomogram. Patients from the WCH database (n = 112) were used as an external validation cohort. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.78 and 0.735 in internal and external validation, respectively, which suggested the good discrimination power of the model. Furthermore, calibration curves and DCA suggested good agreement between the predicted and actual survival. Lastly, a risk classification system based on a nomogram revealed the reliability of the novel model. CONCLUSION: AA and ASCC had distinct clinical features. AA was associated with a better prognosis than ASCC after PSM. The model of nomogram showed an accurate predictive ability for prognostic factors of AA patients.

Tumor calcification is associated with better survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy.

Aims: The purpose was to investigate the correlation between calcification and outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who received bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Methods: A single retrospective cohort study was conducted with all diagnosed mCRC cases who received bevacizumab and chemotherapy as the first-line therapy. Results: Among all enrolled patients (n = 159), 31 had tumor calcification. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly better in patients with tumor calcification than in those without calcification. A higher objective overall response rate was also observed in the tumor calcification group. On multivariate analysis, tumor calcification was independently associated with overall survival and progression-free survival. Conclusions: Tumor calcification was independently associated with improved survival in mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies globally and nearly half of these patients develop metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The current standard treatment for mCRC includes 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Nevertheless, a predictive biomarker of efficacy for bevacizumab has not yet been firmly established. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the correlation between tumor calcification and prognosis in mCRC patients who received bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. The authors found that tumor calcification was independently associated with improved survival in mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of raltitrexed plus S-1 versus regorafenib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world propensity score matching study.

Background: Raltitrexed plus S-1 (RS) and regorafenib both showed considerable efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of two different regimens in patients with refractory mCRC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included mCRC patients who were treated with RS or regorafenib from February 2017 to June 2021. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to balance the baseline characteristics of all patients. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, and safety of two regimens were evaluated. Results: A total of 187 patients were included in our study, with 107 patients in the RS group and 80 patients in the regorafenib group. After PSM, 78 pairs were recognized. Patients treated with RS had a semblable PFS compared to those treated with regorafenib before PSM (4.8 months vs 5.5 months, p = 0.400) and after PSM (4.7 months vs 5.4 months, p = 0.430). Patients in the RS group were associated with a longer OS than those in the regorafenib group (13.4 months vs 10.1 months, p = 0.010). A similar trend of OS was also obtained in the matched cohort (13.3 months vs 10.0 months, p = 0.024). Both objective response rate (12.8% vs 5.1%, p = 0.093) and disease control rate (53.8% vs 46.2%, p = 0.337) in the RS cohort were higher than those in the regorafenib group, without significant differences. Adverse events (AEs) of each group were well tolerated. Conclusion: Patients treated with RS demonstrated a longer OS than those treated with regorafenib and had manageable AEs, which could be recognized as a primary choice for refractory mCRC. Plain Language Summary: Efficacy and Safety of Raltitrexed plus S-1 Versus Regorafenib in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-world Propensity Score Matching StudyBoth raltitrexed plus S-1 (RS) and regorafenib showed considerable efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. No study has compared the two regimens yet. Therefore, we compare the efficacy and safety between RS and regorafenib to provide an optimal treatment option. We retrospectively included patients with mCRC who failed at least two standard treatments. All enrolled patients received RS or regorafenib treatments. We conducted a propensity score matching to eliminate differences in the enrolled patients. After the analysis, we found no significant differences in progression-free survival in patients between the two groups. However, patients treated with RS had a longer OS than those treated with regorafenib, whether before matching (13.4 months vs 10.1 months, p = 0.010) or after matching (13.3 months vs 10.0 months, p = 0.024). In addition, the adverse effects caused by cancer-related therapy were tolerable for the patient. Certainly, this is a non-randomized retrospective study with a small sample size, so we conducted a propensity score matching to minimize potential bias. Importantly, this is the first research comparing the two treatments, and we believe that the results of this article could present a primary choice for clinical doctors dealing with patients with standard treatments that failed mCRC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated ophthalmic adverse events: current understanding of its mechanisms, diagnosis, and management.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1 receptor/ligand have revolutionized cancer treatment, achieving unprecedented efficacy in numerous malignancies. Despite the excellent therapeutic effects of ICIs, medications, such as pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab, typically cause a broad spectrum of toxicity events termed as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Out of all irAEs, ophthalmic adverse events occur infrequently and are not comprehensively recognized. The current understanding of ophthalmic irAEs is mainly derived from case reports and case series. In this review, based on relevant articles in the literature and current evidence, we summarize the incidences, manifestations, diagnoses, underlying mechanisms, treatments, and outcomes of ophthalmic irAEs and discuss possible management strategies. A better understanding of these features is critical for managing patients with ICI-associated ophthalmic adverse events.

Biweekly Raltitrexed Combined With Irinotecan as Second-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Irinotecan-based doublet chemotherapy strategy was standard second-line backbone for patients with oxaliplatin-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of raltitrexed combined with irinotecan biweekly administered as the second-line therapy for mCRC patients. METHODS: The study was a prospective, single-center, non-randomized, open-label phase II clinical trial. Patients with mCRC after failure with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine or its derivatives were enrolled. Irinotecan (180 mg/m2) and raltitrexed (2.5 mg/m2) were given intravenously on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Between December 2012 and October 2016, 33 and 35 patients enrolled were assessed for response and safety, respectively. The ORR was 8.6%, and the DCR was 71.4%. The median PFS was 4.5 months (95% CI 3.8-5.2). The median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI 8.5-15.5). Four patients received conversion therapy to no evidence of disease (NED), and 2 patients were still alive with beyond 24 months survival. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were anorexia (14.3%), vomiting (14.3%), nausea (11.4%), fatigue (8.6%), and leukopenia (8.6%). No one died from treatment-related events. The incidence and severity of toxicity were irrelevant to UGT1A1 status. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of irinotecan with raltitrexed is an efficient, convenient, and acceptable toxic regimen for second-line treatment for mCRC patients.

Clinicopathologic features, treatment, survival, and prognostic factors of combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma: A nomogram development based on SEER database and validation in multicenter study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to comprehensively understand the combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) and develop a nomogram for prognostic prediction of CHC. METHODS: Data were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (year 2004-2014). Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to match the demographic characteristic of the CHC versus hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). A nomogram model was established to predict the prognosis in terms of cancer specific survival (CSS). The established nomogram was externally validated by a multicenter cohort. RESULTS: A total of 71,756 patients enrolled in our study including 62,877 HCC patients, 566 CHC patients, and 8303 ICC patients. The CHC, HCC, and ICC are not exactly similar in clinical characteristic. After PSM, the CSS of CHC was better than HCC but comparable to ICC. Tumor size, M stage, surgery, chemotherapy, and surgery were independently prognostic factors of CHC and were included in the establishment of novel nomogram. The c-index of the novel nomogram in SEER training set and multicenter validation was 0.779 and 0.780, respectively, which indicated that the model was with better discrimination power. In addition, decision curve analyses proved the favorable potential clinical effect of the predictive model. Lastly, a risk classification based on nomogram also verified the reliability of the model. CONCLUSION: CHC had better survival than HCC but was comparable to ICC. The nomogram was established based on tumor size, M stage, chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy and well validated by external multicenter cohort.

Immune-Related Pneumonitis Was Decreased by Addition of Chemotherapy with PD-1/L1 Inhibitors: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).

PURPOSE: Immune-related pneumonitis (IRP) has attracted extensive attention, owing to its increased mortality rate. Conventional chemotherapy (C) has been considered as an immunosuppressive agent and may thus reduce IRP's risk when used in combination with PD-1/L1 inhibitors. This study aimed to assess the risk of IRP with PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (I+C) versus PD-1/L1 inhibitors alone (I) in solid cancer treatment. METHOD: Multiple databases were searched for RCTs before January 2021. This NMA was performed among I+C, I, and C to investigate IRP's risk. Subgroup analysis was carried out on the basis of different PD-1/L1 inhibitors and cancer types. RESULTS: Thirty-one RCTs (19,624 patients) were included. The I+C group exhibited a lower risk of IRP in any grade (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.95) and in grade 3-5 (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.92) as opposed to the I group. The risk of any grade IRP with PD-1 plus chemotherapy was lower than that with PD-1 monotherapy (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.89), although grade 3-5 IRP was similar. There was no statistically meaningful difference in the risk of any grade IRP between PD-L1 plus chemotherapy and PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.43-2.09) or grade 3-5 IRP (RR, 0.71;95% CI, 0.24-2.07). In addition, compared with the I group, the I+C group was correlated with a decreased risk in IRP regardless of cancer type, while a substantial difference was only observed in NSCLC patients for grade 3-5 IRP (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-0.98). CONCLUSION: In comparison to PD-1/L1 inhibitor treatment alone, combining chemotherapy with PD-1/L1 inhibitors might reduce the risk of IRP in the general population. Furthermore, PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy were correlated with a decreased risk of IRP compared to PD-1 inhibitor treatment alone. In contrast to the I group, the I+C group exhibited a lower risk of IRP, especially for NSCLC patients.

Inflammation-nutritional markers of peripheral blood could predict survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation-nutritional markers of peripheral blood are easily assessed and can predict survival. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between inflammation-nutritional parameters and survival of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study from March 2017 to April 2020 in advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between peripheral blood parameters (absolute lymphocyte count [ALC], absolute neutrophil count [ANC], absolute monocyte count [AMC], absolute eosinocyte count [AEC], lactic dehydrogenase [LDH], plasma-albumin [ALB], neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio [NLR], and platelet/lymphocyte ratio [PLR]) measured before therapy initiation and prognosis. RESULTS: Among 184 evaluable patients, 134 (72.8%) were male and the median age was 58 years (range 33-87) with 31 (16.8%) ≥70 years. An elevated ANC (≥7500/ul), NLR (≥5), and PLR (≥200) was significantly associated with worse objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), while increased ALC (≥1000/ul) and ALB (≥3.5 g/dl) could significantly improve survival in terms of ORR, PFS, and OS. In multivariate analyses, higher AEC (≥150/ul) and AMC (≥650/ul) could significantly decrease the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.363, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.141-0.931, p = 0.035; HR 0.370, 95% CI 0.203-0.675, p = 0.001). A higher NLR and PLR, and lower ALB were independent predictors of poor prognosis for OS (HR 1.964, 95% CI 1.027-3.755, p = 0.041; HR 4.255, 95% CI 2.364-7.658, p = 0.000; HR 1.962, 95% CI 1.213-3.174, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our research illustrated that pretreatment AEC, AMC, ALB, NLR, and PLR are independent predictors for survival in advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

Anterior wall adenocarcinoma of bladder with similar clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics as common bladder carcinomas should not be treated as or classified into urachal adenocarcinomas.

PURPOSE: To discuss whether the dome or anterior wall of bladder adenocarcinoma (BAC) should be classified into urachal carcinoma (UrC) and the relationship of primary tumor location (PTL) as well as treatment with survival. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database was examined for eligible patients from 1975 to 2016. Patients were classified into adenocarcinoma originating from the urachus (UAC), the dome (D-BAC), the anterior wall (A-BAC), and the other sites adenocarcinoma of the bladder (O-BAC). The clinicopathological features, treatment, and survival were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Comparable clinicopathologic features were obtained between UAC and D-BAC, which were different from those of A-BAC and O-BAC; otherwise, the latter two had similar clinicopathologic features. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses indicated that PTL was an independent predictor for survival. O-BAC conferred the worst prognosis then followed by A-BAC, D-BAC, and UAC. For non-metastatic UAC or D-BAC, partial cystectomy (with an en bloc resection of the urachus and umbilicus) is optimal for survival. However, the worse survival of non-metastatic D-BAC (compared with UAC) suggested different modalities, maybe more intensive surgery approaches, should be considered for D-BAC. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that PTL of UAC and BAC was an independent predictor for survival. A-BAC had comparable characters and prognosis with O-BAC and should not be classified into and treated as UrC. For non-metastatic disease, non-metastatic D-BAC may need more intensive modality.

First-line therapy of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus cetuximab plus chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma or mucinous component.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy with cetuximab plus chemotherapy based on the stratification of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA) or mucinous component (MC). METHODS: A retrospective study involving all mCRC patients receiving first-line bevacizumab-based or cetuximab-based chemotherapy at our hospital from September 2013 to January 2020 was conducted. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the cetuximab-chemotherapy group and the bevacizumab-chemotherapy group on the basis of the conventional pathological classification of MA or MC. RESULTS: A total of 620 patients with mCRC were included in our study, consisting of 141 (22.7%) patients with MA/MC and 479 (77.3%) patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMA). In the MA/MC cohort, patients who were treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy were associated with significantly better OS than those treated with cetuximab-base chemotherapy (30.0 vs. 26.3 months, p = 0.002), irrespective of tumor sites. The efficacy of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy was higher in nearly all subgroups as shown in the subgroup analysis. In the NMA cohort, median OS was better in the cetuximab plus chemotherapy group than that in the bevacizumab plus chemotherapy group (32.2 vs. 27.0 months, p = 0.005) for left-side mCRC patients, whereas OS was significantly longer in the bevacizumab plus chemotherapy group for right-side mCRC patients (26.0 vs. 20.9 months, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Conventional pathological classification (e.g. MA/MC) should be considered when tailoring the individualized optimal treatment for mCRC. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy may be the optimal option for patients with MA/MC.

Bevacizumab Combined with S-1 and Raltitrexed for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies: A Phase II Study.

LESSONS LEARNED: Bevacizumab combined with S-1 and raltitrexed demonstrated positive antitumor efficacy and acceptable toxicity. This combination might represent a treatment option for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND: In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies, S-1 plus raltitrexed showed a good objective response rate (ORR) and significant survival benefit in our previous study. In the present study, we assessed the activity and safety of bevacizumab combined with S-1 and raltitrexed. METHODS: This investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial was performed at West China Hospital in China. Patients with mCRC who had disease progression after fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin and had at least one measurable lesion were eligible for this trial. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (for tumors with wild-type RAS) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in the first or second line was allowed, but patients who had been treated with bevacizumab across two consecutive chemotherapy regimens were excluded. Patients received bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg on day 1), oral S-1 (80-120 mg per day for 14 days), and raltitrexed (3 mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: From September 2015 to November 2019, 44 patients were enrolled. Tumor response evaluation was available in 44 patients at the time of the analysis. There were no complete responses; the ORR was 15.9%, and the disease control rate was 54.5%. Median PFS and OS were 110 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.0-155.0) and 367 days (95% CI, 310.4-423.6), respectively. The combination was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with S-1 and raltitrexed showed promising antitumor activity and safety in refractory mCRC.

Clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of different histological types of primary small bowel adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis based on the SEER database.

PURPOSE: This aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), mucinous small bowel adenocarcinoma (MSBA), and signet ring cell carcinoma of the small bowel (SRCSB). METHODS: Information on patients with SBA, MSBA, and SRCSB (2004-2015) was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the survival analyses. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was implemented to determine the differences among these tumors. RESULTS: In all, 3697 patients with SBA (n = 3196), MSBA (n = 325) and SRCSB (n = 176) were ultimately eligible for this study. Poor differentiation, local invasion, and lymph node metastasis were more likely to be observed in SRCSB than in SBA and MSBA. Surgery was the most common treatment modality in all groups. The prognosis of SBA was similar to that of MSBA, but better than that of SRCSB in both unmatched and matched cohorts. M stage, surgery, and chemotherapy were identified as independent predictors of survival in all patients. Surgery and chemotherapy could significantly improve outcomes in all groups before and after PSM. Radiotherapy was associated with a survival benefit in patients with SBA, but this trend was not maintained after PSM. Survival advantages of SBA and MSBA were remarkable in the stratified analysis of surgery after PSM. CONCLUSION: Patients with SRCSB had the worst prognosis among all histological types examined. However, surgery and chemotherapy could improve patients survival, regardless of histological type.

Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Metatinib Tromethamine Tablet in Patients with Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors: A Phase I Clinical Trial.

LESSONS LEARNED: MET overexpression is uncommon, and positive MET immunohistochemistry (1+/2+) was an independent positive prognostic factor for response rate and progression-free survival. Whether MET overexpression can be considered a potential predictive biomarker and be used as an inclusion criterion is worth investigating in a future study. BACKGROUND: Metatinib tromethamine tablet (metatinib) is a small molecule receptor kinase inhibitor targeting both c-MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. This phase I trial aimed to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of metatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Eligible patients received a single dose of metatinib in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with dose levels of 25-800 mg/day, after a single dose on day 1, then 2 days off, and then a multidose schedule of once-daily doses for 25 consecutive days (days 4-28). Primary endpoints were MTD and safety; secondary and exploratory endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and biomarkers. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (including nine patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]) received at least one dose of study drug (one patient quit the study without continuous multiple-dose administration after receiving a single dose of metatinib). Hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, and liver dysfunction were the DLTs, and 200 mg/day was the MTD. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were skin toxicity (50%), diarrhea (33.3%), and liver dysfunction (27.8%). Three patients (only one of six in the 200 mg/day cohort; the other two in the 300 mg/day cohort) experienced severe TRAEs: one patient with severe liver dysfunction and two patients with severe liver dysfunction and skin toxicity, respectively. Pharmacokinetics assessment indicated that metatinib was rapidly absorbed and metabolized to the formation of reactive metabolite, SCR-1510, after single-dose administration. The mean time taken to achieve maximum concentration and terminal elimination half-life of SCR-1510 was approximately 2.0-3.0 hours and ranged from 8 to 14 hours. Two patients had partial responses. The objective response rate and disease control rate (DCR) were 11.1% and 61.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.75 months. CONCLUSION: Metatinib administration of 200 mg/day was well tolerated, safe, and effective. The MTD was 200 mg/day, which should be recommended in further investigations.