Aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase (De Ritis ratio) predicts survival in major burn patients.

BACKGROUND: Although treatment of burn patients has significantly improved in recent decades, major burns remain fatal. Therefore, the evaluation of the death risk of the patients with extensive burns is very important. The ratio between the serum levels of aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase (De Ritis ratio) was an independent predictor of poor outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke, cardiac surgery, non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Our aim was to determine whether the ratio between the serum levels of AST and ALT (De Ritis ratio) was useful to assess prognosis in extensively burned patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-center cohort study at the Burns Department of Changhai Hospital. This retrospective observational analysis was performed based on the clinical data of major burn patients admitted between May 1, 2005 and April 30, 2018. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on variables such as age, sex, total body surface area (TBSA), De Ritis ratio, and serum albumin level, which may affect mortality in major burn patients. We assessed their diagnostic value and found the cut-off value by receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. We used the Kaplan-Meier curve to display the impact of the De Ritis ratio and serum albumin level on survival in burn patients. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients with extensive burns were included in the study. The cohort predominantly consisted of males (74.64%), and most of the patients (78.35%) had been burned by a flame. Age, TBSA, inhalation, and the De Ritis ratio were found to be independent risk factors for the 30-days mortality of major burn patients, while age, TBSA, inhalation, and the De Ritis ratio were independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. Further, the De Ritis ratio was a better mortality predictor than serum albumin in severely burned patients, whose area under ROC for 30-day and 90-day mortality was 0.771 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.708-0.835) and 0.750 (95% CI, 0.683, 0.818). CONCLUSIONS: The De Ritis ratio was useful as a prognostic indicator for major burn patients, which can be conveniently obtained through blood examination. Regardless of whether the prediction was for 30-day or 90-day mortality, the accuracy remained high. Moreover, compared to serum albumin level, the De Ritis ratio was superior in assessing the prognosis of extensively burned patients.

ANXA10 promotes melanoma metastasis by suppressing E3 ligase TRIM41-directed PKD1 degradation.

Melanoma is a highly metastatic cancer that requires effective and targeted curative therapy. Annexin A10 (ANXA10), a member of the annexin family, is a calcium- and phospholipid-binding protein. Considerable evidence indicates that ANXA10 is involved in tumour progression, but little is known about its role in melanoma development. In this study, we find that ANXA10 expression is significantly upregulated, and correlates with melanoma progression. ANXA10 knockout profoundly reduces cell migration and the metastatic activity of melanoma. In addition, ANXA10 knockout induces the N- to E-cadherin switch by upregulating SMAD6, an inhibitory SMAD in the TGF-ß/SMAD pathway. The negative regulation of SMAD6 by ANXA10 is dependent on PKD1. ANXA10 interacts with PKD1 and inhibits E3 ligase TRIM41-targeted PKD1 degradation. In B16F10 melanoma cells, protein levels of ANXA10 and PKD1 are inversely correlated with SMAD6 level, but correlated with cell migration. Interestingly, ANXA10 and SMAD6 levels are inversely correlated in clinical samples of melanoma progression. Our findings suggest that the ANXA10-PKD1-SMAD6 axis is a new target for therapeutic strategies against melanoma metastasis.

Risk Factors for Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury.

BACKGROUND: Until now, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) has been considered the leading cause of blood transfusion-related diseases and death. In addition, there is no clinically effective treatment plan for TRALI. The aim of this study was to systematically summarize the literature on risk factors for TRALI in critical patients. METHODS: Electronic searches (up to March 2020) were performed in the Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, Embase, and PubMed databases. We included studies reporting on the risk factors of TRALI for critical patients and extracted risk factors. A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: We summarized and analyzed the potential risk factors of TRALI for critical patients in 13 existing studies. Host-related factors were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.16 [95% CI 1.08-1.24]), female sex (OR 1.26 [95% CI 1.16-1.38]), tobacco use status (OR 3.82 [95% CI 1.91-7.65]), chronic alcohol abuse (OR 3.82 [95% CI 2.97-26.83]), positive fluid balance (OR 1.24 [95% CI 1.08-1.42]), shock before transfusion (OR 4.41 [95% CI 2.38-8.20]), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of the recipients (OR 2.72 [95% CI 1.43-5.16]). The transfusion-related factors were the number of transfusions (OR 1.40 [95% CI 1.14-1.72]) and units of fresh frozen plasma (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.01-1.46]). The device-related factor was mechanical ventilation (OR 4.13 [95% CI 2.20-7.76]). CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors that were positively correlated with TRALI in this study included number of transfusions and units of fresh frozen plasma. Age, female sex, tobacco use, chronic alcohol abuse, positive fluid balance, shock before transfusion, ASA score, and mechanical ventilation may be potential risk factors for TRALI. Our results suggest that host-related risk factors may play a more important role in the occurrence and development of TRALI than risk factors related to blood transfusions.

Admission Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Predicts Survival in Patients with Extensive Burns.

BACKGROUND: Extensive burns is one of the most common severe injuries, with a high annual death rate. Previous studies showed that the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a prognostic factor for some inflammatory diseases. However, until now, no study has evaluated the clinical prognostic value of NLR in extensively burned patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of NLR in this medical condition to provide clinical guidance. METHODS: 271 patients diagnosed with extensive burns were analysed retrospectively between 2005 and 2018 in the Department of Burn Surgery of Changhai Hospital. NLR cut-off values at the first 3 days of hospitalization were calculated by the ROC analysis. RESULTS: Of the 271 patients in this study, the majority (82.3%) were injured by flame. The median total body surface area (TBSA) was 55% (IQR, 40% to 85%) and the median full thickness burn (FTB) was 20% (IQR, 3%-44%). The patients' NLR declined within the first 3 days after admission, and we found that NLR was negatively correlated with the ventilator-free days at day 28 (r = -0.127, P = 0.048). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher admission NLR was independently predictive of higher mortality. According to the ROC curve, the best cut-off values for day 1 (or admission day), day 2 and day 3 NLR were 14, 13 and 7.5, respectively. We then performed a survival analysis, finding that those NLR above the cut-off point had decreased overall survival compared to those with NLR below the cut-off point (p = 0.023, 0.045 and 0.019 for day 1, 2, and 3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: NLR continuously decreased in the first 3 days of hospitalization. Admission NLR above 14 is associated with a decreased survival in patients with extensive burns. These findings demonstrate that NLR has prognostic value in these patients.

Risk factors for hypertrophic burn scar pain, pruritus, and paresthesia development.

Hypertrophic scar pain, pruritus, and paresthesia symptoms are major and particular concerns for burn patients. However, because no effective and satisfactory methods exist for their alleviation, the clinical treatment for these symptoms is generally considered unsatisfactory. Therefore, their risk factors should be identified and prevented during management. We reviewed the medical records of 129 postburn hypertrophy scar patients and divided them into two groups for each of three different symptoms based on the University of North Carolina "4P" Scar Scale: patients with scar pain requiring occasional or continuous pharmacological intervention (HSc pain, n = 75) vs. patients without such scar pain (No HSc pain, n = 54); patients with scar pruritus requiring occasional or continuous pharmacological intervention (HSc pruritus, n = 63) vs. patients without such scar pruritus (No HSc pruritus, n = 66); patients with scar paresthesia that influenced the patients' daily activities (HSc paresthesia, n = 31) vs. patients without such scar paresthesia (No HSc paresthesia, n = 98). Three multivariable logistic regression models were built, respectively, to identify the risk factors for hypertrophic burn scar pain, pruritus, and paresthesia development. Multivariable analysis showed that hypertrophic burn scar pain development requiring pharmacological intervention was associated with old age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.046; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.011-1.082, p = 0.009), high body mass index (OR = 1.242; 95%CI, 1.068-1.445, p = 0.005), 2-5-mm-thick postburn hypertrophic scars (OR = 3.997; 95%CI, 1.523-10.487, p = 0.005), and 6-12-month postburn hypertrophic scars (OR = 4.686; 95%CI, 1.318-16.653, p = 0.017). Hypertrophic burn scar pruritus development requiring pharmacological intervention was associated with smoking (OR = 3.239; 95%CI, 1.380-7.603; p = 0.007), having undergone surgical operation (OR = 2.236; 95%CI, 1.001-4.998; p = 0.049), and firm scars (OR = 3.317; 95%CI, 1.237-8.894; p = 0.017). Finally, hypertrophic burn scar paresthesia development which affected the patients' daily activities was associated with age (OR = 1.038; 95%CI, 1.002-1.075; p = 0.040), fire burns (OR = 0.041; 95%CI, 0.005-0.366; p = 0.004, other burns vs. flame burns), and banding and contracture scars (OR = 4.705; 95%CI, 1.281-17.288, p = 0.020).