[Pregnancy after breast cancer in germany - results of a retrospective database analysis]. / Schwangerschaften nach Brustkrebs in Deutschland - Ergebnisse einer retrospektiven Datenbankanalyse.

BACKGROUND: After the establishment of the FertiPROTEKT network in 2006, an impetus for possibilities of pregnancy during and after breast cancer was introduced. Nowadays, breast cancer survivors are confronted with the question how often women become pregnant after breast cancer and whether there have been significant changes in this respect during the past 10 years. The aim of the study was, therefore, to examine the change in frequency of pregnancies after breast cancer treatment and the time from the first breast cancer diagnosis to pregnancy over one decade, i. e., the period from 2010-2012 compared to the period from 2000-2002. METHODS: The study is based on data from the IMS Disease Analyzer database, which enables access to anonymous data from registered physicians. Data from 102 gynecological practices were available for the present study. The study included women aged 20-45 with breast cancer. RESULTS: A total of 179 pregnant women were included in this study from 2000-2002 and 2010-2012. 65 pregnancies were recorded in the period from 2000-2002, 114 pregnancies from 2010-2012. The time interval from the breast cancer diagnosis to pregnancy (analysed time period was 10 years) was 896 days (SD: 690) in the period from 2000-2002 and 552 days (SD: 696) in the period from 2010-2012 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There was a significant increase in pregnancies within the first 2 years after the breast cancer diagnosis. These data are consistent with the intensified consultations after the introduction of the FertiPROTEKT network.

Prevalence of menopausal symptoms and their influence on adherence in women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The use of aromatase inhibitors for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer may affect the quality of life of patients, as well as adherence to treatment. METHODS: Here we report the 2-year results of the 180 patients in the COMPAS study. This is the first randomized, controlled study reporting on menopausal symptoms under endocrine treatment with aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer patients, based on the Menopause Rating Scale. We analyzed the prevalence of menopausal symptoms as well as their associations with patient adherence. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences among the control and the intervention groups. The majority of women experienced the symptoms at various severities. Overall, we found an increase in the prevalence of hot flushes, sleep disorders, bladder problems, dryness of the vagina as well as of joint and muscular discomfort between the 12- and 24-month visits. In compliant patients, all symptoms except for vaginal dryness improved between the 12- and 24-month visits while, in non-compliant women, hot flushes, irritability, dryness of the vagina as well as joint and muscular discomfort deteriorated. When comparing compliant and non-compliant patients, we found a significant difference only for anxiety (p = 0.028) in the 12-month analysis, as well as a large but non-significant difference for heart discomfort (p = 0.089) in the 24-month visit. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the majority of women treated with aromatase inhibitors are experiencing menopausal symptoms at various severities. We showed that the mean symptom values in compliant patients improve with longer therapy duration. Furthermore, anxiety correlates with better compliance, while heart discomfort may lead to therapy discontinuation.

Persistence with bisphosphonates in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective database analysis.

BACKGROUND: In women with breast cancer and bone metastasis, compliance to antiresorptive treatment is of upmost importance to ensure maximum effectiveness in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to investigate persistence with oral and intravenous bisphosphonates (BIS) in a large group of women with metastatic breast cancer and to identify the determinants of non-persistence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used data from the Disease Analyzer database (IMS Health, Germany), which includes 2,067 general practices and 397 gynaecological practices. From a dataset of 20 million patients, we identified 1,045 patients diagnosed between January 2001 and December 2010 with bone metastasis (ICD 10: C795) following breast cancer (ICD 10: C50) with first-time cancer-related bisphosphonate prescriptions (ATC: M03B4). Of these, 763 patients received intravenous treatment, and 280 patients received oral BIS treatment. RESULTS: After 1 year, 35.3 % of patients treated with intravenous, and 45.6 % of patients treated with oral bisphosphonates discontinued their therapy (p = 0.002). Multivariate Cox Regression analyses showed a significant increased risk of treatment discontinuation in patients using intravenous BIS (HR: 0.82) compared with oral BIS. Patients younger than 50 (HR: 1.52) were most likely to discontinue treatment compared with the reference group of women over 70. The use of other treatments, such as chemotherapy or hormone therapy, was associated with a decreased risk of treatment discontinuation. Moreover, treatment discontinuation was higher in West Germany compared with East Germany (HR: 1.65) and in patients covered under private health insurance (HR: 1.33). CONCLUSIONS: Persistence with all bisphosphonate treatments in women with breast cancer and bone metastasis is low and needs to be significantly increased to improved outcomes in clinical practice. Further research is required to understand this complex issue.

Persistence in patients with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors: a retrospective database analysis.

Compliance and persistence are often underestimated in breast cancer (BC) treatment. The aim of our study was to analyze the persistence with tamoxifen (TAM) and aromatase inhibitors (AI) in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive BC and to identify determinants of non-persistence. We used data of the Disease Analyzer database (IMS HEALTH, Germany) including 2,067 general practices and 397 gynecological practices. Out of a dataset of 15 million patients, we identified BC patients with a first-time TAM or AI prescriptions from October 2001 to December 2010. For persistence analyses, 12,412 women on tamoxifen, 2,796 on anastrozole, 647 on exemestane, and 1,657 on letrozole met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Within 3 years of follow-up, the discontinuation rates increased to 52.2 % for tamoxifen, 47 % for anastrozole, 55.1 % for exemestane, and 44.3 % for letrozole treated women. A minor proportion of patients switched to a different endocrine treatment; 33 % tamoxifen, 20 % anastrozole, 22.9 % exemestane, and 23 % letrozole. The multivariate hazard ratios of the cox regression models showed that patients younger than 50 were most likely to discontinue initial therapy when compared with the reference group of women over 70 (p < 0.001). In contrast, patients treated in gynecologist practice had significantly longer persistence than patients who obtained their prescriptions in general practitioner practice (p < 0.001). In addition, the presence of the co morbidities like diabetes (p < 0.001) or depression (p < 0.002) was also associated with decreased risk of treatment discontinuation. Persistence with all endocrine treatments in women with hormone-receptor-positive BC is low and needs to be significantly increased to improved outcome in clinical practice. Further research is required to understand this complex issue.

Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study: results of a randomised, multicentre trial comparing the effect of zoledronic acid or alendronate on bone metabolism in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

SUMMARY: The ROSE study compared a once-yearly intravenous dose of zoledronic acid with a once-weekly oral dose of alendronate in postmenopausal women. Once-yearly zoledronic acid showed a greater and faster reduction in the levels of two markers of bone turnover and may be an effective option for the treatment of osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION: The open-label Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study was designed to compare a once-yearly intravenous (iv) dose of zoledronic acid with a once-weekly oral dose of alendronate with respect to markers of bone turnover in approximately 600 postmenopausal women in Germany. METHODS: Levels of N-telopeptide of collagen type I (NTx) and procollagen 1 C terminal extension peptide (P1NP) were assessed during the study. The primary objective was to assess if zoledronic acid was superior to alendronate in reducing serum NTx levels after 12 months' treatment. RESULTS: A significantly greater reduction in NTx levels from baseline to month 12 (as determined by the area under the curve) was observed in patients treated with zoledronic acid (n = 408) versus those receiving alendronate (n = 196; 0.282 ng/mL vs. 0.270 ng/mL; P = 0.012). The reduction in levels of P1NP after 1 year was also significantly greater in patients treated with zoledronic acid compared with those receiving alendronate (28.21 vs. 25.53 ng/mL; P = 0.0024). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar between groups; both treatments were generally well tolerated. Although post-dose symptoms, including the incidence of influenza-like symptoms, were higher with zoledronic acid than alendronate initially, the incidence was similar between groups from days 4-360. Gastrointestinal symptoms were more frequent with alendronate than zoledronic acid throughout the study. CONCLUSION: In this study, once-yearly iv zoledronic acid provided a greater and faster reduction in the levels of NTx and P1NP versus once-weekly oral alendronate.

Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The level of adherence of various pharmacological therapies in chronic diseases varies, but is predominantly low. With tamoxifen (TAM), 23% and 50% nonadherence after 1 and 4 years have been reported. Day-to-day clinical observation suggests that adherence may even be lower with aromatase inhibitors, but limited data exist on the situation in daily clinical routine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of adherent patients in a randomly selected sample of postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer, who had been assigned to an adjuvant endocrine treatment with TAM or anastrozole (ANA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated a random sample of 100 postmenopausal women with breast cancer (50 TAM and 50 ANA) who had received surgery for their primary breast cancer at our hospital in 2004/2005 and thereafter had been assigned to an adjuvant endocrine treatment. We evaluated the adherence rate with a detailed questionnaire and additionally carried out a retrospective prescription check of the hospital chart as well as calling the local physicians of our patients. A patient was counted as adherent with a self-reported tablet intake of 80% or more and if a medication possession ratio of 80% or more was achieved. RESULTS: Regarding the baseline characteristics, a significant difference in mean age was noticed in women on ANA versus TAM [65 (+/-3) and 72 (+/-3); P<0.001]. All women on TAM and ANA reported to be adherent (100%). After controlling for prescriptions, only 40 (80%) and 27 (69%) of the women on TAM and ANA were still classified as adherent (P<0.01 and P<0.01 versus self-report). We found no significant correlation of adherence to any baseline characteristics or side-effects in a logistic regression model. CONCLUSIONS: An important goal of any therapeutic intervention is to achieve comparable efficacy in routine clinical practice to that demonstrated in randomised clinical trials. However, a similar magnitude of adherence will be necessary in routine clinical practice to assure comparable clinical effects. Our results further support the data on suboptimal adherence of women with breast cancer on adjuvant TAM treatment. Here, we evaluated for the first time the patient reported and real-world adherence on adjuvant ANA and were able to show a similarly low adherence compared with TAM. More prospective studies are needed to increase our understanding of the underlying reasons for nonadherence in women with breast cancer.

[Clinical presentation and diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteomalacia]. / Klinik und Diagnostik der Osteoporose und Osteomalazie.

Osteoporosis and osteomalacia are systemic metabolic bone diseases characterized by an impaired composition, architecture, and quality of bone. In light of the demographic development and the recent use of sensitive tests, both diseases are increasingly diagnosed. Subjects at high risk include elderly, chronically hospitalized patients, and nursing home residents. Patients with gastrointestinal, rheumatologic and endocrine disorders are also at risk for the development of osteoporosis or osteomalacia. In this review, we will discuss practical aspects of the clinical presentation and the diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteomalacia.

Bone mass and the risk of breast cancer: the influence of cumulative exposure to oestrogen and reproductive correlates. Results of the Marburg breast cancer and osteoporosis trial (MABOT).

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest an inverse relation between breast cancer and osteoporosis. Oestrogen is important in the pathophysiology of both breast and bone, and although cumulative exposure to oestrogen may explain the link between breast cancer and bone mass, this has never been proved. The Marburg breast cancer and osteoporosis trial (MABOT) aimed to elucidate the relation between breast cancer and bone mass ascertained by ultrasonometry measurement and to investigate whether endogenous and exogenous exposure to oestrogen and reproductive correlates has a role in this association. METHODS: We performed a case-control study including 2492 women (mean age+/-S.D., 54.4+/-10.3 years) in whom diseases and drug treatments known to affect bone metabolism, except for HT, had been excluded. All women underwent ultrasonometry measurement at the heel; 242 of the women had an incident breast cancer without a prior, specific pharmacological breast cancer treatment. The ultrasonometry variables - speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and the stiffness index (SI) - were calculated and compared in women with and without breast cancer. Because of significant intergroup differences in factors such as age, body mass index and exposure to oestrogen, a multiple linear regression analysis as well as a second analysis of ultrasonometry variables was undertaken using a randomly selected sample of 242 healthy women post-matched with the breast cancer group for possible confounding variables. Odds ratios were used to compare the relation between breast cancer risk and ultrasonometry heel measurements. RESULTS: Women with breast cancer were significantly older, weighed more, had a higher body mass index, were more likely to be parous and to have breast fed, were older at the menopause and had been exposed to oestrogen for longer than control women. In addition, the ultrasonometry variables speed of sound and the stiffness index T- and Z-score were significantly higher in women with breast cancer even after a matched pair analysis was performed (p<0.001). Additionally, results of a multiple linear regression showed that women with breast cancer had a significantly higher SOS (p<0.001), body weight (p<0.05) and duration of breast feeding (p<0.05) while osteoporotic fracture were reduced (p<0.001). When women with breast cancer and their matched controls were finally grouped according to SOS and T-score quartiles, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for breast cancer risk in the second, third and fourth quartiles compared with the lowest quartile were 2.5 (1.4-4.3), 3.1 (1.8-5.3) and 4.7 (2.7-8.2) as well as 1.9 (1.1-3.2), 2.3 (1.3-3.9) and 2.9 (1.7-5.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasonometry variables speed of sound, stiffness index, T- and Z-score are higher in women with an incident breast cancer than in healthy controls, even after post-matching for possible confounding variables. This association was confirmed in a multiple linear regression model. Women with SOS and T-score values in the higher quartiles have a greater risk of breast cancer than women in the lowest quartile. We found no association between the higher ultrasonometry variables and cancer specific characteristics or reproductive correlates such as age at menarche and menopause or cumulative oestrogen exposure. Although the biological mechanisms linking bone mass and the risk of breast cancer are not fully understood, factors other than reproductive correlates, endogenous and exogenous exposure to oestrogen must play a part.

Biochemical markers of bone turnover during pregnancy: a longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to prospectively investigate the effect of pregnancy on biochemical markers of bone turnover in healthy pregnant women. METHODS: During the course of our longitudinal study, biochemical markers of bone remodeling were measured in all three trimester of pregnancy (first trimester: 12.5+/-1.8 SD, second trimester: 21.6+/-1 SD, third trimester: 34.8+/-1.6 SD weeks of gestation). Serum type I collagen C-telopeptides (CTX) and a crosslinked peptide of the carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) were used as markers of bone resorption. Bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and the N-terminal propeptides of type I collagen (PINP) were used as biochemical markers of bone formation. Blood samples for the analysis of all 4 biochemical markers according to each trimester of pregnancy were available in 49 patients. RESULTS: The main changes for all biochemical markers were seen between the second and the third trimester. According to the markers of bone resorption, both serum CTX and ICTP showed a significant increase from the first to the third and from the second to the third trimester (p<0.001; median percentage change: CTX=101.5% and ICTP=40%). Concerning markers of bone formation, PINP showed a significant decrease from the first to the second trimester (p=0.001) followed by a significant increase from the second to the third trimester (p<0.001, 63.8%) and an overall increase from the first to the third trimester (p<0.001). BAP also showed a significant increase from the second to the third trimester (p<0.001; 51.7%) and an overall increase from the first to the third trimester (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Markers of bone resorption were significantly increased during pregnancy. In contrast to bone resorption, markers of bone formation showed an increase as well as a decrease during pregnancy indicating a state of high bone turnover. This might coincide with the change in bone mineral density that was observed in some, but not all, studies using "dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry" (DXA) as well as "quantitative ultrasonometry" (QUS).