RESUMO
Cardiovascular complications continue to be a significant source of morbidity and mortality in patients having noncardiac operations. This especially is true in patients with known coronary artery disease facing intraabdominal operations. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting allows coronary artery grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass or a median sternotomy incision. Also, in combination with angioplasty (the "hybrid procedure"), it is possible to offer complete revascularization with far less surgical trauma. We present 2 cases of patients who had minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting followed by major gastrointestinal operations in the same anesthetic setting.
Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Colectomia , Gastrectomia , Anastomose de Artéria Torácica Interna-Coronária/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Angioplastia , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Doença das Coronárias/cirurgia , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Esterno/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , ToracotomiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures, lower extremity injuries, acute head or spinal injury, and extended bedrest place trauma patients at an increased risk for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). We reviewed patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBI), spinal cord injuries (SCI), and lower extremity fractures (LEF) to examine our DVT and PE incidence and evaluate the success of our DVT and PE prophylaxis. METHODS: From January 1, 1994 to March 1, 1995, the records of trauma patients with TBI, SCI, and LEF who were admitted to the trauma service and transferred to an inpatient rehabilitation facility were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had a TBI, 16 patients with SCI, and 12 patients with LEF. Forty-nine of the 50 patients received DVT prophylaxis, with 7 inferior vena cava (IVC) filters placed. The DVT incidence was 6% and the PE incidence was 2%. CONCLUSION: The 6% incidence of DVT was lower than expected due to diligent DVT prophylaxis and appropriate screening of symptomatic patients for clinically significant DVT. The 2% incidence of PE was also lower than expected, most likely due to our lower DVT incidence and the use of IVC filters. The lower DVT and PE incidence verifies our success at DVT and PE prophylaxis.