Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Dermatitis ; 35(2): 152-159, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38052041

RESUMO

Background: Allergic contact dermatitis is frequently caused by metals, including multiple metals simultaneously. Objectives: To assess characteristics and associations of positive and clinically relevant patch test (PT) reactions with solitary and concurrent metal sensitization. Methods: A retrospective analysis of PT results for nickel, cobalt, and/or chromium from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group between 2001 and 2018 (n = 43,522). Results: 18.0% had a positive/allergic reaction to nickel sulfate hexahydrate, 7.3% to cobalt chloride hexahydrate, and 3.0% to potassium dichromate. 87.9% patients had a currently relevant reaction to 0, 9.4% to 1, and 2.7% to multiple metals tested. Patients with 1 versus no currently relevant reactions to metal were more likely to have a primary dermatitis site of trunk, feet, and ears; patients with currently relevant reactions to multiple metals had more dermatitis affecting the trunk and ears. Metal sources varied by co-reacting metal, especially for patients with cobalt and chromium allergy. Jewelry was the most commonly identified source of nickel and cobalt for both solitary and concurrent metal allergy. Conclusions: Sensitization to multiple metals occurred in 6% of patients. Allergen sources varied between patients with sensitivity to 1 metal versus those who had concurrent sensitivity to cobalt and/or chromium.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Níquel , Humanos , Níquel/efeitos adversos , Cobalto/efeitos adversos , Cromo/efeitos adversos , Testes do Emplastro/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Metais/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos
2.
Dermatitis ; 30(5): 306-313, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31524759

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of nickel allergy in occupational settings is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to characterize occupationally related nickel allergy (ORNA). METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 44,378 patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 1998 to 2016. Characteristics of individuals with ORNA were compared with those with non-ORNA (NORNA). RESULTS: A total of 7928 (18.2%) individuals were positive to nickel sulfate 2.5%. Two hundred sixty-eight (3.4%) had ORNA. As compared with NORNA, ORNA was statistically associated with the male sex (41.0% vs 12.9%, P < 0.001), a diagnosis of irritant contact dermatitis (22.4% vs 12.0%, P < 0.001), and no history of eczema (81.7% vs 75.7%, P = 0.0217). The most common sites of ORNA dermatitis were hand (39.9%) and arm (18.1%), which were significantly more common than in NORNA (P < 0.0001). Sixteen industry categories and 22 occupation categories were identified for ORNA; the most common industries were durable goods manufacturing (24.6%) and personal services (15.7%), and the most frequent occupations were hairdressers/cosmetologists/barbers (14.3%), machine operators (9.3%), and health care workers (7.1%). Overall 30% of ORNA occupations were in metalworking. Of 215 ORNA sources identified, instruments/phones/other equipment (16.3%), vehicles/machinery (15.8%), and tools (15.3%) were the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational nickel allergy is distinct from nonoccupational nickel allergy.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Níquel/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Braço , Estudos Transversais , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/induzido quimicamente , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Humanos , Indústrias/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 80(3): 701-713, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30342160

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nickel is a common allergen. OBJECTIVE: To examine the epidemiology of nickel sensitivity in North America. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 44,097 patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 1994 to 2014. Nickel sensitivity was defined as a positive patch test for nickel. We evaluated the frequency of nickel sensitivity and patient demographics. For each positive reaction to nickel, we tabulated clinical relevance, occupational relatedness, and exposure sources. RESULTS: The average frequency of nickel sensitivity was 17.5% (1994-2014). Nickel sensitivity significantly increased over time (from 14.3% in 1994-1996 to 20.1% in 2013-2014 [P < .0001]). Nickel-sensitive patients were significantly more likely to be female, young, nonwhite, and atopic (have eczema and asthma) and/or have dermatitis affecting the face, scalp, ears, neck, arm, or trunk (P values ≤ .0474). Overall, 55.5% of reactions were currently clinically relevant; this percentage significantly increased over time (from 44.1% in 1994-1996 to 51.6% in 2013-2014 [P < .0001]). The rate of occupational relatedness was 3.7% overall, with a significant decrease over time (from 7.9% in 1994-1996 to 1.9% in 2013-2014 [P < .0001]). Jewelry was the most common source of nickel contact. LIMITATIONS: Tertiary referral population. CONCLUSIONS: Nickel allergy is of substantial public health importance in North America. The frequency of nickel sensitivity in patients referred for patch testing has significantly increased over a 20-year period.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Níquel/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Vestuário/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Joias/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Níquel/imunologia , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Testes do Emplastro , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 79(4): 664-671, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29665973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nickel is a common allergen responsible for allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: To characterize nickel sensitivity in children and compare pediatric cohorts (≤5, 6-12, and 13-18 years). METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 1894 pediatric patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 1994 to 2014. We evaluated demographics, rates of reaction to nickel, strength of nickel reactions, and nickel allergy sources. RESULTS: The frequency of nickel sensitivity was 23.7%. Children with nickel sensitivity were significantly less likely to be male (P < .0001; relative risk, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.75) or have a history of allergic rhinitis (P = .0017; relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.90) compared with those who were not nickel sensitive. In the nickel-sensitive cohort, the relative proportion of boys declined with age (44.8% for age ≤5, 36.6% for age 6-12, and 22.6% for age 13-18 years). The most common body site distribution for all age groups sensitive to nickel was scattered/generalized, indicating widespread dermatitis. Jewelry was the most common source associated with nickel sensitivity (36.4%). LIMITATIONS: As a cross-sectional study, no long-term follow-up was available. CONCLUSIONS: Nickel sensitivity in children was common; the frequency was significantly higher in girls than in boys. Overall, sensitivity decreased with age. The most common source of nickel was jewelry.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Níquel/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Distribuição por Idade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade/fisiopatologia , Incidência , Masculino , Níquel/imunologia , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo
5.
J Cutan Pathol ; 45(6): 458-462, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29512830

RESUMO

Mycosis fungoides in palmoplantar localization (MFPP) is a rare variant of MF that is confined to the hands and feet. Patients commonly receive treatment over many years for suspected palmoplantar dermatitis before the diagnosis is made. Most MFPP patients remain at patch or plaque stage, and often respond to treatment with radiotherapy. Herein, we describe a 77-year-old man who suffered 6 years of hand and foot dermatitis that failed multiple treatments, most notably TNF-α inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil. He eventually developed a tumor on the hand, which was biopsied to reveal a dense dermal infiltrate of large lymphocytes (CD3+/CD4-/CD8-/TCR-BetaF1+/partial CD30+). A subsequent biopsy of an eczematous patch from his hand revealed an epidermotropic and syringotropic infiltrate comprised of smaller lymphocytes with a concordant immunophenotype and matching clonal peak with TCR gene rearrangement. He was diagnosed with MFPP and started on radiotherapy with a modest response; therefore, a decision was made to start brentuximab vedotin, which resulted in a complete response. MFPP is an exceedingly rare variant of MF that can show large-cell transformation and progress in stage. We highlight a possible association between disease progression and immunosuppressants and the potential role for treatment with brentuximab.


Assuntos
Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Micose Fungoide/tratamento farmacológico , Micose Fungoide/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Brentuximab Vedotin , Ligante CD30/análise , Ligante CD30/biossíntese , Transformação Celular Neoplásica/patologia , , Mãos , Humanos , Masculino
6.
Dermatitis ; 26(6): 268-70, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26551605

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Repeated and prolonged use of surfactants can cause irritant as well as allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: This study reports the frequency of positive patch test results to surfactants tested on the North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening series including cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB), amidoamine (AA), dimethylaminopropylamine (DMAPA), oleamidopropyl dimethylamine (OPD), and cocamide diethanolamide (CDEA), and correlations of positive reactions between CAPB and the other surfactants. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 10 877 patients patch tested between 2009 and 2014 to the surfactants CAPB, AA, DMAPA, OPD, and CDEA. Frequencies of positive reactions to these surfactants were calculated, and trends of reactivity between the surfactants analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: The OPD had the highest rate of positive patch reactions (2.3%) followed by DMAPA (1.7%), and CAPB (1.4%). The AA and CDEA had the lowest rate of positive reactions (0.8%). There was a high degree of overlap in positive patch tests between the surfactants. The CDEA was the least likely to coreact with another surfactant.


Assuntos
Betaína/análogos & derivados , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/imunologia , Tensoativos/efeitos adversos , Betaína/efeitos adversos , Betaína/imunologia , Diaminas , Etanolaminas/efeitos adversos , Etanolaminas/imunologia , Humanos , Testes do Emplastro , Propilaminas/efeitos adversos , Propilaminas/imunologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Contact Dermatitis ; 72(2): 65-74, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25345884

RESUMO

Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis is a pseudolymphoma with clinical and histological features of allergic contact dermatitis and cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Incorrect diagnosis may lead to unnecessary testing, unnecessary treatment, or patient harm. The objective of this study is to present a case to demonstrate the diagnostic challenge and overlap between allergic contact dermatitis and cutaneous T cell lymphoma in a patient with lymphomatoid contact dermatitis caused by methylchoroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and paraben mix, and to review the existing literature in order to summarize the demographics, clinical features, allergens and treatments reported for lymphomatoid contact dermatitis. A search of major scientific databases was conducted for English-language articles reporting cases of lymphomatoid contact dermatitis or additional synonymous search headings. Nineteen articles with a total of 23 patients were analysed. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis was more common in men, with an average age of 58.5 years. Fourteen unique allergens were identified and confirmed by patch testing. However, no single test or study was diagnostic of lymphomatoid contact dermatitis. Allergen avoidance was the most useful management tool, but selected patients required topical or systemic immunosuppression. In conclusion, without specific diagnostic features, evaluation for lymphomatoid contact dermatitis should include a thorough history and examination, patch testing, and biopsy with immunohistochemistry and clonality studies.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/imunologia , Pseudolinfoma/diagnóstico , Pseudolinfoma/imunologia , Linfócitos T , Biópsia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Linfoma de Células T/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Tiazóis/efeitos adversos
9.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 60(1): 39-50, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18842323

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Phototherapy modalities are frequently used in the treatment of patch and plaque mycosis fungoides (MF), but consensus recommendations on treatment regimens are variable. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate current practice variation in patch and plaque MF phototherapy treatment and review the relevant literature. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of International Society of Cutaneous Lymphomas members and literature review. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 29%. Psoralen plus ultraviolet (UV) A (PUVA) and narrowband UVB were the most common phototherapy modalities used for patch and plaque MF treatment, with a predilection for PUVA in cases of more extensive disease and increasing skin phototype. For phototherapy treatment regimens, survey and literature results support: (1) narrowband UVB 3 times per week in the initial clearing regimen continued until clearance; and (2) PUVA 2 to 3 times per week in the initial clearing regimen, continued until clearance. Maintenance therapy regimens for narrowband UVB and PUVA varied widely from no additional treatment to one treatment per week for 5 years or more. There is not evidence to show whether phototherapy can prevent relapse or prolong disease-free interval. LIMITATIONS: Small survey size of specialty interest group and limited response rate are limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Although phototherapy initial clearing regimens for MF are generally consistent, variability and lack of consensus remain in the duration and frequency of maintenance therapy.


Assuntos
Linfoma Cutâneo de Células T/terapia , Fototerapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica
10.
Dermatitis ; 19(2): 90-4, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18413110

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Grenz ray therapy (GRT) has been used to treat dermatoses refractory to other therapy. Patient's assessments to GRT alone have not been previously reported. OBJECTIVE: (1) To report the patterns of use of GRT at our center over a 10-year period and evaluate the efficacy of GRT in treating recalcitrant skin conditions, (2) to evaluate patient perceptions about GRT, and (3) to evaluate whether patients felt this form of treatment was worthwhile. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey by mailed questionnaire to patients treated with GRT from 1990 to 2001. RESULTS: Of 351 patients treated with GRT from 1990 to 2001, 98 (28%) returned the questionnaire; 64% reported decreased severity or clearing of disease (p = .003), and 63% reported decreased or no discomfort (p = .006) 3 months following treatment. Overall, 54% said GRT was worthwhile, and 53% would choose it again; 40% reported mild side effects. Number of treatments (p = .2) or total dose (p = .25) were not significantly different among responders to GRT and nonresponders to GRT. In a subgroup of treated patients with a diagnosis of contact dermatitis (94% with hand dermatitis), 64% felt GRT was worthwhile and 77% indicated that they would choose this therapy again if needed. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients treated with GRT for recalcitrant dermatitis reported that this treatment was an effective therapy in decreasing the discomfort and severity of their skin condition. Overall, just more than half of treated patients believed GRT was a worthwhile therapy that they would use again.


Assuntos
Satisfação do Paciente , Dermatopatias/radioterapia , Terapia por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/radioterapia , Dermatite Atópica/radioterapia , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/radioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psoríase/radioterapia , Doses de Radiação , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia por Raios X/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Raios X/psicologia
12.
Dermatitis ; 19(1): 16-9, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18346391

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nickel allergy has been studied by contact dermatitis groups around the world, and the frequency of nickel sensitivity has been reported to be decreasing in some populations. OBJECTIVE: To review the prevalence of nickel allergy as observed by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 1992 to 2004. METHODS: The computer database of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group was used to examine the prevalence of nickel allergy over the study period and to analyze it by time, sex, and age. RESULTS: From 1992 to 2004, 25,626 patients were patch-tested. The percentage of women tested was fairly constant (61.4-66.3%). A steady increase in nickel sensitivity was seen from 1992 to 2004. Subgroup analysis did not identify a population with declining nickel allergy. CONCLUSIONS: Nickel allergy continues to increase in younger and older men and women patch-tested in North America.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Tardia/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Tardia/epidemiologia , Níquel/toxicidade , Testes do Emplastro/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Tardia/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Níquel/administração & dosagem , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo
13.
Dermatitis ; 18(4): 230-1, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18021605

RESUMO

Erlotinib is a reversible inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase (TK) newly approved for the treatment of refractory, locally advanced, or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer. Acneiform skin reactions with EGFR inhibitors are common, with a dose-dependent skin reaction being seen in 50 to 100% of patients. This case illustrates the typical skin reaction seen with EGFR-TK inhibitors and illustrates the lack of reaction in skin with sebaceous glands that have been destroyed by radiation. Discussion of this skin reaction in the literature of dermatology is limited; this case illustrates a pattern of reaction that may suggest a mechanism for this skin reaction pattern to erlotinib.


Assuntos
Erupções Acneiformes/etiologia , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Toxidermias/etiologia , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Quinazolinas/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Cloridrato de Erlotinib , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Quinazolinas/administração & dosagem
16.
Cutis ; 76(3): 178-80, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16268260

RESUMO

Tea tree oil is a popular ingredient in many over-the-counter healthcare and cosmetic products. With the explosion of the natural and alternative medicine industry, more and more people are using products containing tea tree oil. This article reviews basic information about tea tree oil and contact allergy, including sources of tea tree oil, chemical composition, potential cross reactions, reported cases of allergic contact dermatitis, allergenic compounds in tea tree oil, practical patch testing information, and preventive measures.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/efeitos adversos , Óleo de Melaleuca/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/análise , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/análise , Cosméticos/química , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Humanos , Testes do Emplastro , Óleo de Melaleuca/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA