RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment of childhood medulloblastoma has evolved to reduce neurotoxicity while improving survival. However, the impact of evolving therapies on late neurocognitive outcomes and adult functional independence remains unknown. METHODS: Adult survivors of childhood medulloblastoma (n=505; median[minimum-maximum] age, 29[18-46] years) and sibling controls (n=727; 32[18-58] years) from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study completed surveys assessing neurocognitive problems and chronic health conditions (CHCs). Treatment exposures were categorized as historical (craniospinal irradiation [CSI]≥30 Gy, no chemotherapy), standard-risk (CSI>0 to <30 Gy +chemotherapy) and high-risk (CSI≥30 Gy +chemotherapy) therapy. Latent class analysis identified patterns of functional independence using employment, independent living, assistance with routine/personal care needs, driver's license, marital/partner status. Multivariable models estimated risk of neurocognitive impairment in survivors versus siblings and by treatment exposure group, and associations between neurocognitive impairment, CHCs, and functional independence. RESULTS: Survivors in each treatment exposure group had 4- to 5-fold elevated risk of impaired memory and task efficiency compared to siblings. Contemporary risk-based therapies did not confer lower risk compared to historical therapy. Survivors treated in the 1990s had higher risk of memory impairment (relative risk [RR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-3.60) compared to survivors treated in the 1970s. Sensorimotor, hearing problems and seizures were associated with 33%-34%, 25-26% and 21%-42% elevated risk of task efficiency and memory impairment, respectively. Treatment-related CHCs and neurocognitive impairment were associated with non-independence. CONCLUSIONS: Despite treatment changes, long-term survivors of childhood medulloblastoma remain at risk for neurocognitive impairment, which was associated with CHCs. Neurocognitive surveillance after contemporary regimens is imperative.
RESUMO
Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in children with extensive heterogeneity that results in varied clinical outcomes. Recently, MB was categorized into four molecular subgroups, WNT, SHH, Group 3, and Group 4. While SHH and Group 4 are known for their intermediate prognosis, studies have reported wide disparities in patient outcomes within these subgroups. This study aims to create a radiomic prognostic signature, medulloblastoma radiomics risk (mRRisk), to identify the risk levels within the SHH and Group 4 subgroups, individually, for reliable risk stratification. Our hypothesis is that this signature can comprehensively capture tumor characteristics that enable the accurate identification of the risk level. In total, 70 MB studies (48 Group 4, and 22 SHH) were retrospectively curated from three institutions. For each subgroup, 232 hand-crafted features that capture the entropy, surface changes, and contour characteristics of the tumor were extracted. Features were concatenated and fed into regression models for risk stratification. Contrasted with Chang stratification that did not yield any significant differences within subgroups, significant differences were observed between two risk groups in Group 4 (p = 0.04, Concordance Index (CI) = 0.82) on the cystic core and non-enhancing tumor, and SHH (p = 0.03, CI = 0.74) on the enhancing tumor. Our results indicate that radiomics may serve as a prognostic tool for refining MB risk stratification, towards improved patient care.
RESUMO
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome characterized by the development of both central and peripheral nervous system tumors. Low-grade glioma (LGG) is the most prevalent central nervous system tumor occurring in children with NF1, arising most frequently within the optic pathway, followed by the brainstem. Historically, treatment of NF1-LGG has been limited to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and surgery. Despite treatment with chemotherapy, a subset of children with NF1-LGG fail initial therapy, have a continued decline in function, or recur. The recent development of several preclinical models has allowed for the identification of novel, molecularly targeted therapies. At present, exploration of these novel precision-based therapies is ongoing in the preclinical setting and through larger, collaborative clinical trials. Herein, we review the approach to surveillance and management of NF1-LGG in children and discuss upcoming novel therapies and treatment protocols.
RESUMO
Pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) is the most common childhood brain tumor group. The natural history, when curative resection is not possible, is one of a chronic disease with periods of tumor stability and episodes of tumor progression. While there is a high overall survival rate, many patients experience significant and potentially lifelong morbidities. The majority of pLGGs have an underlying activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway due to mutational events, leading to the use of molecularly targeted therapies in clinical trials, with recent regulatory approval for the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibition for BRAFV600E mutated pLGG. Despite encouraging activity, tumor regrowth can occur during therapy due to drug resistance, off treatment as tumor recurrence, or as reported in some patients as a rapid rebound growth within 3 months of discontinuing targeted therapy. Definitions of these patterns of regrowth have not been well described in pLGG. For this reason, the International Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma Coalition, a global group of physicians and scientists, formed the Resistance, Rebound, and Recurrence (R3) working group to study resistance, rebound, and recurrence. A modified Delphi approach was undertaken to produce consensus-based definitions and recommendations for regrowth patterns in pLGG with specific reference to targeted therapies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Glioma , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Humanos , Glioma/tratamento farmacológico , Glioma/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Criança , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Gradação de TumoresRESUMO
Pediatric glioma therapy has evolved to delay or eliminate radiation for low-grade tumors. This study examined these temporal changes in therapy with long-term outcomes in adult survivors of childhood glioma. Among 2,501 5-year survivors of glioma in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study diagnosed 1970-1999, exposure to radiation decreased over time. Survivors from more recent eras were at lower risk of late mortality (≥5 years from diagnosis), severe/disabling/life-threatening chronic health conditions (CHCs) and subsequent neoplasms (SNs). Adjusting for treatment exposure (surgery only, chemotherapy, or any cranial radiation) attenuated this risk (for example, CHCs (1990s versus 1970s), relative risk (95% confidence interval), 0.63 (0.49-0.80) without adjustment versus 0.93 (0.72-1.20) with adjustment). Compared to surgery alone, radiation was associated with greater than four times the risk of late mortality, CHCs and SNs. Evolving therapy, particularly avoidance of cranial radiation, has improved late outcomes for childhood glioma survivors without increased risk for late recurrence.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Glioma , Humanos , Glioma/mortalidade , Glioma/terapia , Glioma/radioterapia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Criança , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Pré-Escolar , Morbidade , Fatores de Tempo , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral ONC201 administered twice-weekly on consecutive days (D1D2) in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed DIPG and/or recurrent/refractory H3 K27M glioma. METHODS: This phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study included pediatric patients with H3 K27M-mutant glioma and/or DIPG following ≥1 line of therapy (NCT03416530). ONC201 was administered D1D2 at 3 dose levels (DLs; -1, 1, and 2). The actual administered dose within DLs was dependent on weight. Safety was assessed in all DLs; PK analysis was conducted in DL2. Patients receiving once-weekly ONC201 (D1) served as a PK comparator. RESULTS: Twelve patients received D1D2 ONC201 (DL1, nâ =â 3; DL1, nâ =â 3; DL2, nâ =â 6); no dose-limiting toxicities or grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred. PK analyses at DL2 (D1-250 mg, nâ =â 3; D1-625 mg, nâ =â 3; D1D2-250 mg, nâ =â 2; D1D2-625 mg, nâ =â 2) demonstrated variability in Cmax, AUC0-24, and AUC0-48, with comparable exposures across weight groups. No accumulation occurred with D1D2 dosing; the majority of ONC201 cleared before administration of the second dose. Cmax was variable between groups but did not appear to increase with D1D2 dosing. AUC0-48 was greater with D1D2 than once-weekly. CONCLUSIONS: ONC201 given D1D2 was well tolerated at all DLs and associated with greater AUC0-48.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Mutação , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Glioma/tratamento farmacológico , Glioma/genética , Glioma/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Pré-Escolar , Histonas , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Prognóstico , SeguimentosRESUMO
Within the last few decades, we have witnessed tremendous advancements in the study of pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG), leading to a much-improved understanding of their molecular underpinnings. Consequently, we have achieved successful milestones in developing and implementing targeted therapeutic agents for treating these tumors. However, the community continues to face many unknowns when it comes to the most effective clinical implementation of these novel targeted inhibitors or combinations thereof. Questions encompassing optimal dosing strategies, treatment duration, methods for assessing clinical efficacy, and the identification of predictive biomarkers remain unresolved. Here, we offer the consensus of the international pLGG coalition (iPLGGc) clinical trial working group on these important topics and comment on clinical trial design and endpoint rationale. Throughout, we seek to standardize the global approach to early clinical trials (phase I and II) for pLGG, leading to more consistently interpretable results as well as enhancing the pace of novel therapy development and encouraging an increased focus on functional endpoints as well and quality of life for children faced with this disease.