Cancer detection and complications of transperineal prostate biopsy with antibiotics when indicated.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate, including clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), in a large cohort of patients who underwent transperineal ultrasonography-guided systematic prostate biopsy (TPB-US) using a probe-mounted transperineal access system, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cognitive fusion in case of a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System grade 3-5 lesion, under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting. Additionally, to compare the incidence of procedure-related complications with a cohort of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasonography-guided (TRB-US) and transrectal MRI-guided biopsies (TRB-MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational cohort study in men who underwent TPB-US prostate biopsy in a large teaching hospital. For each participant, prostate-specific antigen level, clinical tumour stage, prostate volume, MRI parameters, number of (targeted) prostate biopsies, biopsy International Society of Uropathology (ISUP) grade and procedure-related complications were assessed. csPCa was defined as ISUP grade ≥2. Antibiotic prophylaxis was only given in those with an increased risk of urinary tract infection. RESULTS: A total of 1288 TPB-US procedures were evaluated. The overall detection rate for PCa in biopsy-naive patients was 73%, and for csPCa it was 63%. The incidence of hospitalization was 1% in TPB-US (13/1288), compared to 4% in TRB-US (8/214) and 3% in TRB-MRI (7/219; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary combined systematic and target TPB-US with MRI cognitive fusion is easy to perform in an outpatient setting, with a high detection rate of csPCa and a low incidence of procedure-related complications.

Fractionation of Adipose Tissue Procedure With a Disposable One-Hole Fractionator.

BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue has been widely used in regenerative surgery for its therapeutic potential. This potential is often ascribed to the stromal vascular fraction (SVF), which can be mechanically isolated. Mechanical isolation results in an SVF that retains intact cell-cell communication including extracellular matrix and is therefore named tissue-SVF (tSVF). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new disposable 1-hole fractionator for fractionation of adipose tissue (FAT), and compare this new device with the existing reusable 3-hole fractionator. METHODS: The composition of tSVF obtained via the 1-hole fractionator was histologically and histochemically compared to unprocessed adipose tissue. The number of viable nuclear cells in tSVF obtained by the 1-hole and 3-hole fractionators as well as unprocessed adipose tissue were compared after enzymatic isolation and tested for colony-forming capacity. Flow cytometry was used to compare different cell compositions based on surface marker expression between tSVF isolated by the two types of fractionators. RESULTS: Fractionation of adipose tissue with the 1-hole fractionator condenses vasculature and extracellular matrix by disrupting adipocytes. The number of viable nuclear cells in tSVF obtained with the two fractionators was comparable and significantly higher than unprocessed lipoaspirate. Furthermore, tSVF isolated by both fractionators showed similar cell compositions and comparable colony-forming capacities. CONCLUSIONS: FAT with a disposable 1-hole fractionator effectively isolates tSVF with a cell count and cell composition comparable to the fraction obtained with the 3-hole reusable fractionator. The disposable 1-hole fractionator, however, is safer and more user friendly.