RESUMO
Background: Insufficient surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) can lead to prolonged hospitalization, hospital re-admissions, increased morbidity and mortality, and higher healthcare costs. Overdoing prophylaxis can result in antimicrobial resistance, Clostridium difficile infections, and acute kidney failure. Patients and Methods: To investigate the adherence to local SAP guidelines for vascular surgery, a retrospective observational single center intervention study was performed in a Dutch hospital. Results: Antibiotic choice, dose, interval, timing, and duration were adherent to the guidelines in 96%, 97%, 96%, 85%, and 41% of the surgeries, respectively. Adherence to all five aspects was achieved in only 37% of all procedures. Conclusions: Further interventions are necessary to improve specific parameters such as duration and timing.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos VascularesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical compounding preparations, produced by (hospital) pharmacies, usually do not have marketing authorization. As a consequence, some of these pharmaceutical compounding preparations can be picked-up by a pharmaceutical company to obtain marketing authorization, often leading to price increases. An example is the 3,4-diaminopyridine slow release (3,4-DAP SR) tablets for Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS). In 2009 marketing authorization was given for the commercial immediate release phosphate salt of the drug, including a fifty-fold price increase compared to the pharmaceutical compounding preparation. Obtaining marketing authorization for 3,4-DAP SR by academia might have been a solution to prevent this price increase. To determine whether the available data of a pharmaceutical compounding preparation with long-term experience in regular care are adequate to obtain marketing authorization, 3,4-DAP SR is used as a case study. METHODS: A retrospective qualitative case-study was performed. Initially, document analysis was executed by collecting the required data for marketing authorization in general and whether data of Firdapse® and 3,4-DAP SR met these requirements. Secondly, the (non-) available data of the two formulations were compared with each other to determine the differences in availability. RESULTS: At the time of approval, almost all data were available for both Firdapse® and 3,4-DAP SR. Conversely, much of the data used for the approval of Firdapse® originated from the 3,4-DAP immediate release (3,4-DAP IR) formulation. Only two bioequivalence studies and one pharmacology safety study was performed with Firdapse® before marketing authorization application. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, at time Firdapse® obtained approval, the data available did not differ substantially from 3,4-DAP SR, indicating that approval with 3,4-DAP SR would have been possible. We make a plea for approval of orphan medicinal products developed and manufactured by academic institutions as to keep utilization of these products affordable.
Assuntos
4-Aminopiridina/análogos & derivados , Composição de Medicamentos/métodos , Síndrome Miastênica de Lambert-Eaton/tratamento farmacológico , Marketing/métodos , Produção de Droga sem Interesse Comercial/métodos , 4-Aminopiridina/economia , 4-Aminopiridina/uso terapêutico , Amifampridina , Publicidade Direta ao Consumidor/economia , Publicidade Direta ao Consumidor/legislação & jurisprudência , Publicidade Direta ao Consumidor/métodos , Composição de Medicamentos/economia , Humanos , Síndrome Miastênica de Lambert-Eaton/economia , Marketing/economia , Marketing/legislação & jurisprudência , Produção de Droga sem Interesse Comercial/economia , Produção de Droga sem Interesse Comercial/legislação & jurisprudência , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Potássio/economia , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Potássio/uso terapêutico , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AIMS: In the past decade, many clinical trials with gene- and cell-based therapies (GCTs) have been performed. Increased interest in the development of these drug products by various stakeholders has become apparent. Despite this growth in clinical studies, the number of therapies receiving marketing authorization approval (MAA) is lagging behind. To enhance the success rate of GCT development, it is essential to better understand the clinical development of these products. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are a GCT product subtype with promising efficacy in cancer treatment which are tested in many clinical trials, but have not yet received MAA. METHODS: We generated an overview of the characteristics of CAR T-cell clinical development in the United States, Canada and Europe. Subsequently, the characteristics of clinical trials with CAR T-cell products that proceeded to a subsequent clinical trial, used as a proxy for success, were compared with those that did not proceed. RESULT: From the U.S. and European Union clinical trial databases, 106 CAR T-cell trials were selected, from which 49 were linked to a subsequent trial and 57 were not. The majority of the trials had an academic sponsor from which most did not proceed, whereas most commercially sponsored trials were followed by another clinical trial. Furthermore, trials with a subsequent trial more frequently recruited large patient cohorts and were more often multicenter compared with trials that were not followed up. DISCUSSION: These characteristics can be used by investigators to better design clinical trials with CAR T cells. We encourage sponsors to plan clinical development ahead for a higher efficiency of product development and thereby achieving a higher success rate of development towards MAA.