International study of treatment efficacy in SS shows superiority of combination therapy and heterogeneity of treatment strategies.

Despite increasing availability of therapies, patients with Sezary syndrome (SS) commonly endure multi-line treatment journeys, mostly with partial responses of short duration. Measuring clinical benefit is challenging; time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) provides a robust, objective measurement of efficacy. This international observational study examines patterns of clinical care and therapeutic benefit as measured by TTNT. TTNT was calculated for monotherapies and combination therapies, with consideration to treatment line. 178 patients with SS (73% de novo, 27% secondary) were included, receiving 721 lines of systemic therapy, with median follow-up of 56.9 months. Across all lines, 58 different therapeutic regimens were prescribed (54 were systemic therapies) and classified into 17 treatment groups. The most common first-line treatments were extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP)-containing combination therapy (20%) and retinoid monotherapy (19%). Median TTNT for all first-line therapies was short (5.4 months). First-line, combination therapies had longer median TTNT than monotherapies, 10.0 vs 5.0 months (P = .004), respectively. Later delivery of combination therapies was associated with shorter clinical benefit, with median TTNT reduced to 6.2 and 2.2 months for mid-line (2nd-4th line) and late-line (≥5th line), respectively (P < .001). First-line ECP-containing treatments were associated with longer median TTNT than non-ECP-containing treatments, 9.0 vs 4.9 months (P = .007). For both ECP-monotherapy and ECP-containing combination therapy, significant reductions in TTNT were seen in later lines. These data suggest therapeutic benefit from first-line delivery of combination therapy for SS and favor early inclusion of ECP in the treatment algorithm for those who can access it.

CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders-An Australian Clinical Practice Statement from the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre.

The CD30-postive lymphoproliferative disorders, including lymphomatoid papulosis and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, account for up to 30% of all cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) and are the second most common form of CTCLs after mycosis fungoides. Both conditions differ in their clinical presentations; however, they share the expression of the CD30 antigen as a common immunophenotypic hallmark. There is a wide spectrum of management options depending on factors such as extent of disease, staging and treatment tolerability. This Clinical Practice Statement is reflective of the current clinical practice in Australia.

Excellent treatment outcomes from low dose radiation therapy for primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-Cell lymphoproliferative disorder.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Primary cutaneous CD4 + small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (PCSMLPD) is a benign behaving condition, typically manifesting as solitary head or neck papules, frequently creating cosmetic concerns. Optimal management of this rare disease is unclear. Herein, patterns of care and treatment outcomes are described, with particular focus on low-dose RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligibility required biopsy-proven PCSMLPD on central review, diagnosed between 2007-2022. Patterns of care, treatment responses and relapse patterns were assessed. Freedom-from-progression (FFP) was compared between RT and surgery. RESULTS: 41 patients were eligible. First-line treatments were: RT, 19 (46.3 %); surgery, 17 (41.5 %) (3 received adjuvant RT); watchful waiting, 5 (12.2 %). Median follow-up was 37.7 months. Overall, 24 patients received RT (19 definitive first-line, 3 adjuvant, 2 second-line). 10 (42 %) received 4 Gy in 2 fractions (with no acute toxicities); 14 (58 %) received 20-40 Gy. Complete response rate was 100 %. No post-RT relapses observed. After first-line surgery alone (n = 14, 3 with positive margins), 4 (28.5 %) experienced relapse (2 local, 2 distant). Watchful-waiting (n = 5) led to partial resolution post-biopsy in 4 patients; no complete resolution seen. 3-year FFP for RT alone was 100 % vs 61 % for surgery alone (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: RT is a successful, non-invasive option for PCSMLPD: 100 % achieved complete response, with no relapses, and FFP appearing numerically superior to surgery in this cohort. In this first series of low-dose RT for PCSMLPD, 4 Gy in 2 fractions appears an excellent treatment option, offering durable disease control, no acute toxicities and convenient treatment time of only 2 days.

VEXAS syndrome: A dermatological perspective.

VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory and somatic mutation) syndrome is a genetically defined disorder identified in 2020, describing patients with inflammatory syndromes associated with haematological dysfunction. It is a severe, treatment-resistant condition, with estimated mortality between 40% and 63%. A wide range of cutaneous manifestations have been described. Here, we report on two patients with treatment-resistant neutrophilic dermatosis and myelodysplastic syndrome, who were subsequently diagnosed with VEXAS syndrome. Our cases highlight the need for dermatologists' awareness of this novel condition and to initiate early referral to haematologists for appropriate multidisciplinary care.

Targeted Approaches to T-Cell Lymphoma.

The T-cell lymphomas are a rare group of Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas derived from mature T-lymphocytes. They are divided broadly into the Peripheral T-cell lymphomas and the Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Clinical outcomes vary widely but are generally unsatisfactory with current treatments. The development of an understanding of the various critical pathways in T-cell lymphogenesis and subsequent identification of therapeutic targets has led to a rapid expansion of the previously underwhelming T-cell lymphoma armament. This review aims to provide an up-to-date overview of the current state of targeted therapies in the T-cell lymphomas, including novel antibody-based treatments, small molecule inhibitors and immune-based therapies.

Advances in Frontline Management of Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of lymphomas that are frequently associated with a poor prognosis. For many decades, the standard-of-care has been CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone)-based therapy, but it is well-recognized that survival outcomes are unsatisfactory, especially when compared with B-cell lymphomas. Major recent advances in cancer diagnosis and management have the potential to significantly improve PTCL outcomes. These include: (1) improved diagnostic techniques that incorporate molecular genetic data to further refine diagnosis and subtyping; (2) the development of novel agents; and (3) improved monitoring modalities, such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans and circulating tumor DNA. In this review, we aim to explore these 3 advances in the context of frontline management of PTCL.

Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: Australian clinical practice statement.

Primary cutaneous lymphomas represent a heterogeneous group of T- and B-cell lymphomas with distinct clinical presentations, histopathologic features, treatment approaches and outcomes. The cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, which include mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, account for the majority of the cutaneous lymphomas. This Clinical Practice Statement is reflective of the current clinical practice in Australia. An expanded form of the Clinical Practice Statement (and updates), along with helpful patient resources and access to support groups, can be found at the following (http://www.australasianlymphomaalliance.org.au).

Pralatrexate in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma: a retrospective multicenter study.

We present a retrospective multicenter study of pralatrexate treatment outcomes in an Australian practice setting for patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma who had failed 1+ systemic therapies, treated via a compassionate access program. Endpoints assessed included response rates, toxicities, and subsequent therapies. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and time to best response, were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The study included 31 patients, with median age 69 years. We demonstrated ORR of 35.5% (n = 11), including 4 complete responses (13%) and 7 partial responses (23%). The predicted median OS was 10 months, with EFS of 9 months, and PFS of 9 months. Median TTNT was 8 months. Mucositis was the most commonly observed toxicity. This study - the second largest real-world cohort reported to date - underscores the importance of pralatrexate in relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma, as well as its acceptable toxicity profile.

T follicular helper phenotype predicts response to histone deacetylase inhibitors in relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are active agents for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Anecdotally angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) appears to respond better than PTCL-not otherwise specified (NOS) to HDACi. The new World Health Organization classification shows that a subgroup of PTCL carries similarities in phenotype and gene expression profiling to AITL, comparable to T follicular helper (TFH) cells. The disease might behave similarly to AITL when treated with HDACi. We analyzed 127 patients with AITL or PTCL-NOS treated with HDACi at relapse as a single agent or in combination. We re-reviewed the pathology of all PTCL-NOS to identify the TFH phenotype. Patients received HDACi at relapse as a single agent in 97 cases (76%, 59 TFH, 38 non-TFH) or in combination in 30 cases (24%, 18 TFH, 12 non-TFH) including duvelisib, lenalidomide, lenalidomide plus carfilzomib, and pralatrexate. Seven PTCL-NOS had TFH phenotype; 2 PTCL-NOS were reclassified as AITL. Overall response rate (ORR) was 56.5% (28.9% complete response [CR]) in TFH and 29.4% (19.6% CR) in non-TFH phenotype patients (P = .0035), with TFH phenotype being an independent predictor of ORR (P = .009). Sixteen patients sufficiently responded to HDACi or HDACi in combination with another agent to proceed directly to allogeneic transplantation; 1 of 16 responded to donor lymphocyte infusion (12 TFH, 4 non-TFH). Our results, although retrospective, support that HDACi, as a single agent or in combination, may have superior activity in TFH-PTCL compared with non-TFH PTCL. This differential efficacy could help inform subtype-specific therapy and guide interpretation of HDACi trials.

Role of Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are distinct pathological entities with clinical advancements lagging behind their B-cell lymphoma counterpart. Frequently aggressive in their clinical behaviour, clinicians are constantly challenged with low complete remission rates, early relapses and failure to achieve long-term responses despite aggressive first-line chemotherapy, resulting in poor overall survival in the majority of patients. There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal therapy for PTCL and treatment approaches are mainly derived from prospective phase II studies, registry data and retrospective studies. Despite its biological heterogeneity, a less than satisfactory "one-size-fits-all" approach has been adopted to date. Although its role remains controversial, for many years, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been adopted by clinicians with the aim of overcoming poor outcomes by consolidating responses. In this review, we aim to define the role of both autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in PTCL in both frontline and salvage settings, especially in the context of recent advancements in this field.

Lack of Durable Remission with Conventional-Dose Total Skin Electron Therapy for the Management of Sezary Syndrome and Multiply Relapsed Mycosis Fungoides.

Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS) are multi-relapsing, morbid, cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Optimal treatment sequencing remains undefined. Total skin electron therapy (TSE) is a highly technical, skin-directed treatment, uniquely producing symptom-free and treatment-free intervals. Recent publications favour low-dose TSE for reduced toxicity, but early data support conventional-dose TSE (cdTSE) for longer disease control. Patient selection requires weighing-up tolerability against response durability. We investigated duration of benefit from cdTSE in patients with poorer prognosis diseases: SS and heavily pre-treated MF. Endpoints were overall survival, and "time to next treatment" (TTNT) as surrogate for clinical benefit duration. Seventy patients (53 MF, 17 SS) were eligible: median prior treatments, 4; median cdTSE dose, 30 Gy; median follow-up, 5.8 years. SS patients had worse prognosis (HR = 5.0, p < 0.001) and shorter TTNT (HR = 4.5, p < 0.001) than MF patients; median TTNT was only 3.7 months. Heavily pre-treated MF patients had inferior prognosis (HR = 1.19 per additional line, p = 0.005), and shorter TTNT (HR = 1.13 per additional line, p = 0.031). Median TTNT for MF patients with ≥3 prior treatments was 7.1 months, versus 23.2 months for 0-2 prior treatments. In conclusion, cdTSE has a limited role in SS. TTNT is reduced in heavily pre-treated MF patients, suggesting greater benefit when utilized earlier in treatment sequencing.

Prolonged survival with the early use of a novel extracorporeal photopheresis regimen in patients with Sézary syndrome.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has demonstrated therapeutic benefit in patients with Sézary syndrome (SS) and erythrodermic mycosis fungoides (e-MF). To examine the efficacy of ECP in the modern era of novel therapies, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 65 patients with a diagnosis of SS or e-MF with blood involvement who were treated with ECP at our institute. Overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and skin response rate (RR) were used as the study end points to determine patient outcome. The median follow-up from diagnosis was 48 months (range 1-225 months), with a median predicted OS of 120 months. The majority (88%) of patients commenced ECP at treatment lines 1 to 3, either as a monotherapy or in conjunction with other systemic agents. The use of ECP monotherapy resulted in a significantly longer median TTNT when compared with interferon-α (P = .0067), histone deacetylase inhibitors (P = .0003), novel immunotherapy agents (P = .028), low-dose methotrexate (P < .0001), and chemotherapy (P < .0001). In particular, early commencement of ECP at treatment lines 1 to 3 yielded a TTNT of 47 months. The results of our study support the utilization of ECP for SS/e-MF, and we recommend that ECP should be considered as early as possible in the treatment paradigm for these patients.

Brentuximab vedotin in T-cell lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Brentuximab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate, which combines a CD30 monoclonal antibody with the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethylauristatin E. The utility of brentuximab vedotin has been explored in a number of diseases, with a recent focus on T-cell lymphoma, particularly systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (sALCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), as well as other peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) histologies. Areas covered: This review surveys current data on the efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in T-cell lymphoma, as well as embedding it in a therapeutic context by reviewing potential competitor agents in the clinic. Data are drawn from published literature, with a focus on clinical trial data rather than preclinical studies or case reports. Expert opinion: Brentuximab vedotin has a clear clinical benefit in CTCL and sALCL, and can achieve durable responses in a number of patients. Toxicities, particularly peripheral neuropathy, may limit treatment in some patients; however, the agent is generally well tolerated. In this context, brentuximab vedotin has been globally approved for use in sALCL and certain CTCL subtypes, however, further information is required to enhance our understanding of when and in whom to best employ this agent, as well as exploring rational combinations to augment responses.

IPH4102, a monoclonal antibody directed against the immune receptor molecule KIR3DL2, for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic options for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome include a variety of immunomodulatory, epigenetic, and cytotoxic options; however, none has been demonstrated to be efficacious for all patients, or to deliver deep and durable responses to the majority of patients. In this review, we examine the monoclonal antibody, IPH4102, a novel agent for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Areas covered: In this review, we examine data demonstrating the tissue specificity of KIR3DL2 receptor, which is highly expressed on the malignant cells in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, including mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. This specificity has led to the development of the agent IPH4102. Preclinical data showing efficacy of IPH4102 in vivo are outlined, as well as the results from Phase I clinical trials, which suggest that the agent is both efficacious and well-tolerated. Larger scale clinical trials are to follow. Expert Opinion: We examine the putative benefit of IPH4102 in comparison to established agents already in the clinic, highlighting its efficacy and relative safety. We also examine possible directions that may better define the role of IPH4102 in the treatment of T-cell lymphoma in the future.

Systemic Treatment Options for Advanced-Stage Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Globally, the most common subtypes of CTCL are mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. CTCL can confer significant morbidity and even mortality in advanced disease. Here we review the current and potential future treatments for advanced-stage CTCL. RECENT FINDINGS: Heterogeneity of treatment choice has been demonstrated both in US and non-US centers. Systemic treatment choice is currently guided by prognostic features, incorporating stage, immunophenotypic and molecular findings, and patient-specific factors such as age and comorbidities. Randomized controlled studies are uncommon, and the literature is composed predominantly of retrospective, cohort, and early-phase studies. International consensus guidelines are available; however, the lack of comparative trials means that there is no clear algorithmic approach to treatment. This review article reports on the systemic treatment options in current use for advanced CTCL, and on the possible future therapies, acknowledging that an algorithmic approach is not yet forthcoming to guide treatment prioritization.