Does preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment of high-risk patients improve the safety and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery?

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend preoperative multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment for high-risk surgical patients. Preoperative MDT meetings can help to improve surgical care, but there is little evidence on whether they improve patient outcomes. METHODS: This paper aims to share our experience of MDT meetings for high-risk surgical patients to underline their added value to the current standard of care. An observational study of a retrospective cohort of preoperative high-risk MDT meetings of a tertiary referral hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. For 249 patients the outcomes preoperative data, MDT decisions, and patient outcomes were collected from electronic health records. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 249 patients were discussed at high-risk MDT meetings. Most of the patients (97%) were assessed as having an American Society of Anesthesiology score ≥ 3, and 219 (88%) had a European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Anaesthesiology risk score of intermediate or high. After MDT assessment, 154 (62%) were directly approved for surgery, and 39 (16%) were considered ineligible for surgery. The remaining 56 (23%) patients underwent additional assessments before reconsideration at a high-risk MDT meeting. The main reason for patients being discussed at the high-risk MDT meeting was to assess the risk-benefit ratio of surgery. Ultimately, 184 (74%) patients underwent surgery. Of the operated patients, 122 (66%) did not have a major complication in the postoperative period, and 149 patients (81%) were alive after one year. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort study shows the vulnerability and complexity of high-risk patients but also shows that the use of an MDT assessment contributes too improved peri- and postoperative treatment strategies in high-risk patients. Most patients underwent surgery after careful risk assessment and, if deemed necessary, preoperative and perioperative treatment optimization to reduce their risk.

The effects of golimumab treatment on systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction appears more prevalent in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) blocking therapy, a strong and effective anti-inflammatory drug, on diastolic LV function in AS are unknown. The objective of the study was to find the effects of 1-year treatment with golimumab 50 mg subcutaneously once per month on systolic and diastolic LV dysfunction in AS patients. METHODS: Forty consecutive AS patients were treated with TNF-α blocking therapy for 1 year. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients at baseline and after 1 year of treatment. RESULTS: Diastolic LV function improved after treatment in four out of six (67%) AS patients who completed follow-up (P=0.125), and did not develop or worsen in any of the other patients. Treatment with TNF-α blocking therapy had no effect on systolic LV function. CONCLUSION: These findings give support to the hypothesis that diastolic LV dysfunction improves during treatment with TNF-α blocking therapy.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic inflammatory joint disorders.

Inflammatory joint disorders (IJD), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (ASp) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), are prevalent conditions worldwide with a considerable burden on healthcare systems. IJD are associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) disease-related morbidity and mortality. In this review, we present an overview of the literature. Standardised mortality ratios are increased in IJD compared with the general population, that is, RA 1.3-2.3, ASp 1.6-1.9 and PsA 0.8-1.6. This premature mortality is mainly caused by atherosclerotic events. In RA, this CV risk is comparable to that in type 2 diabetes. Traditional CV risk factors are more often present and partially a consequence of changes in physical function related to the underlying IJD. Also, chronic systemic inflammation itself is an independent CV risk factor. Optimal control of disease activity with conventional synthetic, targeted synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs decreases this excess risk. High-grade inflammation as well as anti-inflammatory treatment alter traditional CV risk factors, such as lipids. In view of the above-mentioned CV burden in patients with IJD, CV risk management is necessary. Presently, this CV risk management is still lacking in usual care. Patients, general practitioners, cardiologists, internists and rheumatologists need to be aware of the substantially increased CV risk in IJD and should make a combined effort to timely initiate CV risk management in accordance with prevailing guidelines together with optimal control of rheumatic disease activity. CV screening and treatment strategies need to be implemented in usual care.

Tumor necrosis factor blocking therapy and congestive heart failure in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disorders: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blocking therapy is an effective treatment for chronic inflammatory arthritis. As circulating TNF might induce or exacerbate the development of congestive heart failure (CHF), several trials have investigated the effect of TNF blocking therapy on CHF. However, due to inefficacy and even a risk of exacerbation of CHF, TNF blocking therapy has since then been contraindicated in patients with advanced CHF, New York Heart Association class III and IV. We review current knowledge on the pathophysiological mechanisms and safety of TNF blocking therapy in chronic inflammatory arthritis patients with regard to CHF. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature published up till December 2013 was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify all studies investigating the effect of TNF blocking therapy on the occurrence and risk of CHF in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). All articles reporting data on the prevalence or incidence of CHF during treatment with TNF blocking therapy in patients with in RA, AS or PsA were included. Also imaging studies and studies with biomarkers, investigating the effect of TNF blocking therapy on cardiac function were included. RESULTS: In total, 54 studies were included. Results from large prospective registries suggest that first, a potentially harmful effect of TNF blocking therapy on the incidence of CHF in older RA patients cannot be excluded and that no harmful effect was observed of TNF blocking therapy in other patients. Second, we found that TNF blocking therapy potentially improves several echocardiographic parameters of cardiac function in RA, AS and PsA, but due to small sample sizes, these results require validation in larger studies. Third, we found improvement in NT-proBNP levels after use of TNF blocking therapy in both RA and AS. CONCLUSION: Based on current literature, in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis and concomitant symptomatic mild-tomoderate CHF (NYHA class I or II), treatment with TNF blocking therapy is not contraindicated. In chronic inflammatory arthritis patients with concomitant symptomatic moderate-to-severe CHF, NYHA class III-IV, treatment with TNF blocking therapy should be avoided if possible. Whenever, treatment with TNF-blocking therapy is considered in these patients consultation with a cardiologist is recommended before treatment is initiated.

Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a high prevalence of hypothyroidism that amplifies its cardiovascular risk.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Other autoimmune diseases such as hypothyroidism are also associated with an enhanced risk for CVD. Our objective was to determine first, the prevalence of hypothyroid disorders in RA patients, and second, the risk of CVD in RA patients with hypothyroid abnormalities. SUBJECTS: were RA patients who participated in an ongoing prospective cohort study of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity (n = 358) in which hypothyroid abnormalities were assessed. CVD was defined as a verified medical history of coronary, cerebral or peripheral arterial disease. RESULTS: Clinical hypothyroidism was observed in 16 of 236 female RA patients (6.8%), which is significantly higher than in the general population of The Netherlands. Subclinical hypothyroidism was detected in 6 out of 236 RA women (2.5%). In female RA patients, CVD was present in 6 out of 16 (37.5%) of all hypothyroid women. The odds ratio for CVD comparing female hypothyroid RA patients with female euthyroid RA patients was 4.1 (95% CI 1.2-14.3) after adjustment for sex, age, diabetes, smoking (ever), hypertension and statin use. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical hypothyroidism was observed three times more often in female RA patients than females in the general population. In female RA patients, clinical hypothyroidism was associated with a fourfold higher risk of CVD in comparison with euthyroid female RA patients independently of the traditional risk factors.

Increased disease activity is associated with a deteriorated lipid profile in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular mortality is increased in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. A possible explanation might be a more prevalent atherogenic lipid profile in patients with ankylosing spondylitis than in the general population. It has been postulated that inflammation deteriorates the lipid profile, thereby increasing cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between disease activity and lipid profile in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: Disease activity parameters for ankylosing spondylitis and lipid levels (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) and triglycerides) were measured in 45 patients with ankylosing spondylitis for 6 months after starting treatment with leflunomide or placebo. Findings in this treatment group were compared with those in 10 patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with etanercept. A specialised regression model, adjusting for repeated measurements, age and sex, was used to assess the influence of the disease activity variables on the lipid levels. RESULTS: Multilevel regression analyses showed significant associations between disease activity parameters and lipid levels-for instance, an increase of 30 mm at the end of the first hour in erythrocyte sedimentation rate was associated with a decrease of about 6% in total cholesterol level and a decrease of about 11% in HDLc levels. Similar significant associations were found between other disease activity parameters and lipid levels. CONCLUSION: Increase in disease activity was associated with decreases in lipid levels. The decrease in HDLc levels tended to be almost twice as large as the decrease in total cholesterol levels, resulting in a more atherogenic lipid profile. Hence, effective treatment of disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis may lower the cardiovascular risk by improving the lipid profile.

Antibodies against human 60 kDa heat shock protein are not associated with cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with an unexplained increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Antibodies against human 60 kDa heat shock protein (anti-HSP60) are associated with the presence and severity of CVD. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether anti-HSP60 antibodies are associated with prevalent CVD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: In a nested case-control design, anti-HSP60 antibody levels were measured in the serum samples of 192 rheumatoid patients. In a regression analysis the association between prevalent CVD and anti-HSP60 antibodies was examined, along with the possible influence on this association of several demographic, rheumatoid arthritis, and CVD related variables. RESULTS: In a random sample of 326 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 48 cases were identified who also suffered from CVD. Three controls per case with rheumatoid arthritis but without CVD (n = 144) were matched for sex, age, disease duration, and smoking habits. A regression analysis showed no significant association between prevalent CVD and anti-HSP60 antibodies (odds ratio = 1.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.997 to 1.004)). After correcting for possible confounding variables, still no association was found. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the general population, anti-HSP60 antibody titres are not associated with prevalent CVD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These findings could be the result of an altered immune response to HSP60 in rheumatoid arthritis.