Femoral component rotation in patellofemoral joint replacement.

BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes in patellofemoral joint replacement may be related to femoral component rotation. Assessment of rotational alignment is however difficult as patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis often have trochlear dysplasia. The use of the medial malleolus as a landmark to guide rotation has been suggested. The purpose of our study was to evaluate this technique with regard to femoral component rotation, and to correlate rotation with clinical outcomes at one-year follow-up. METHODS: Forty-one knees in 39 patients had patellofemoral joint replacement using the Zimmer Gender-Solutions patellofemoral prosthesis. Intraoperatively, we determined femoral component rotational alignment using an extramedullary rod aimed at the inferior tip of the medial malleolus. Postoperatively, we measured the angle between the femoral component and the anatomical transepicondylar axis using CT. The amount of rotation was correlated with clinical outcomes at one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Forty knees in 38 patients were available for one-year follow-up. Mean femoral component rotation relative to the anatomical transepicondylar axis was 1.4° external rotation (range, -3.8 to 5.7°). We found no statistically significant correlation between femoral component rotation and change from baseline KOOS subscales at one-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that when using the medial malleolus as a landmark to guide rotation, the femoral component of the patellofemoral prosthesis was oriented in external rotation relative to the anatomical transepicondylar axis in 80% of knees. Our study did not show a relation between the amount of external rotation and clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Femoral component rotation in patellofemoral joint replacement: a study protocol for a prospective observational study.

Patellofemoral joint replacement is a successful treatment option for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. The short and mid-term outcomes are related to malposition and unexplained pain. Whether external rotation of the femoral component in isolated patellofemoral joint replacement is required is unclear. The primary aim of this study is to determine the CT-measured femoral component rotation of patellofemoral joint replacement relative to the transepicondylar axis. The secondary aim is to correlate the CT-measured femoral component rotation with the clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up as assessed with the KOOS questionnaire. We designed a prospective observational study with medical research ethics committee and institutional review board approval. A total of 40 patients who will be treated with patellofemoral joint replacement for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis will be included. Intra-operatively, rotation of the femoral component will be assessed using anatomical landmarks including the epicondylar axis, Whiteside's line, and lower leg axis. The aim is to insert the femoral component between 3 and 6 degrees external rotation relative to the transepicondylar axis. Two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists will measure the angle between the transepicondylar axis and the femoral component, two to three days after surgery. The primary outcome is the CT-based femoral component rotation of the prosthesis relative to the transepicondylar axis. The secondary outcome is the patient reported KOOS questionnaire at 1-year follow-up. Successful completion of this study will provide data on the actual amount of femoral component rotation in patellofemoral joint replacement, and its relationship with clinical results. (Netherlands Trial Register NTR4175).

Determinants of anterior knee pain following total knee replacement: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Anterior knee pain (AKP) following total knee replacement (TKR) is both prevalent and clinically relevant. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the peer-reviewed literature, and to identify and assess the different modifiable and non-modifiable determinants that may be associated with the development of AKP in patients following primary TKR. METHODS: A systematic computerized database search (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar) was performed in January 2012. The quality of the studies was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: A total of 54 articles met the inclusion criteria. Variables that have been researched with regard to the prevalence of AKP include patient and knee-specific characteristics, prosthetic design, operative technique, treatment of the patella, and time of assessment. A weak correlation with AKP was found for specific retained presurgery gait patterns. A weak recommendation can be given for the use of femoral components with a posterior centre of rotation, resection of Hoffa's fat pad, patellar rim electrocautery, and preventing combined component internal rotation. The correlation between postsurgical AKP and the degree of patellar cartilage wear, tibial component bearing strategies, and patellar resurfacing is inconclusive. Due to substantial heterogeneity of the included studies, no meta-analysis was performed. CONCLUSIONS: No single variable is likely to explain the differences in the reported rates of AKP, although variables leading to abnormal patellofemoral joint loading appear to be of special significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Differences in the stress distribution in the distal femur between patellofemoral joint replacement and total knee replacement: a finite element study.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral joint replacement is a successful treatment option for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. However, results of later conversion to total knee replacement may be compromised by periprosthetic bone loss. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated a decrease in distal femoral bone mineral density after patellofemoral joint replacement. It is unclear whether this is due to periprosthetic stress shielding. The main objective of the current study was to evaluate the stress shielding effect of prosthetic replacement with 2 different patellofemoral prosthetic designs and with a total knee prosthesis. METHODS: We developed a finite element model of an intact patellofemoral joint, and finite element models of patellofemoral joint replacement with a Journey PFJ prosthesis, a Richards II prosthesis, and a Genesis II total knee prosthesis. For each of these 4 finite element models, the average Von Mises stress in 2 clinically relevant regions of interest were evaluated during a simulated squatting movement until 120 degrees of flexion. RESULTS: During deep knee flexion, in the anterior region of interest, the average Von Mises stress with the Journey PFJ design was comparable to the physiological knee, while reduced by almost 25% for both the Richards II design and the Genesis II total knee joint replacement design. The average Von Mises stress in the supracondylar region of interest was similar for both patellofemoral prosthetic designs and the physiological model, with slightly lower stress for the Genesis II design. CONCLUSIONS: Patellofemoral joint replacement results in periprosthetic stress-shielding, although to a smaller degree than in total knee replacement. Specific patellofemoral prosthetic design properties may result in differences in femoral stress shielding.

Long-term outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study was to correlate the long-term survival of patellofemoral arthroplasty with primary diagnosis, age, sex, and body mass index. One hundred eighty-five consecutive Richards type II patellofemoral arthroplasties were performed in 161 patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Diagnoses included primary patellofemoral osteoarthritis, posttraumatic patellofemoral osteoarthritis, and patellofemoral osteoarthritis with a previous realignment procedure for patellar subluxation or trochlear dysplasia. Median time to follow-up was 13.3 (range, 2.0-30.6) years. Patellofemoral arthroplasty survival was 84% at 10 years and 69% at 20 years. Primary diagnosis, sex, or age at patellofemoral arthroplasty did not significantly affect the rate of revision (P=.35, P=.24, and P=.65, respectively). The rate of revision in obese patients (body mass index>30 kg/m2) was higher than that in nonobese patients (P=.02).

A dutch survey on circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty is estimated to occur in 4-49% of patients. Some orthopedic surgeons use circumpatellar electrocautery (diathermy) to reduce the prevalence of postsurgical anterior knee pain; however, the extent of its use is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: In April 2009, a postal questionnaire was sent to all 98 departments of orthopedic surgery in The Netherlands. The questions focused on the frequency of total knee arthroplasties, patellar resurfacing, and the use of circumpatellar electrocautery. RESULTS: The response rate was 92%. A total of 18,876 TKAs, 2,096 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, and 215 patellofemoral arthroplasties are performed yearly in The Netherlands by the responding orthopedic surgeons. Of the orthopedic surgeons performing TKA, 13% always use patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, 49% use selective patellar resurfacing, and 38% never use it. Fifty-six percent of orthopedic surgeons use circumpatellar electrocautery when not resurfacing the patella, and 32% use electrocautery when resurfacing the patella. CONCLUSION: There is no consensus among Dutch orthopedic surgeons on the use of patellar resurfacing or circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee replacement performed for osteoarthritis. A prospective clinical trial is currently underway to fully evaluate the effect of circumpatellar electrocautery on the prevalence of anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty.

Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: A matched case-control study of 13 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The long-term outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty is related to progression of femorotibial osteoarthritis with need for conversion to total knee arthroplasty. We investigated whether prior patellofemoral arthroplasty compromises the results of total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: 13 patients who had had 14 Richards type II patellofemoral arthroplasties converted to total knee arthroplasty because of femorotibial osteoarthritis, were individually matched to a control group of 13 patients with 14 primary total knee arthroplasties. The mean follow-up times for the patients and the control group were 5.7 (2-13) years and 5.2 (2-13) years, respectively. Clinical outcome was assessed using Knee Society score (KSS), WOMAC score, range of motion, and complications. RESULTS: KSS and WOMAC scores were similar in the two groups (KSS in patient and control groups: 82 and 86 (p = 0.6); KSS function: 76 and 88 (p = 0.5); WOMAC score: 33 and 21 (p = 0.1)). Within 6 months after conversion, 3 knees had to be manipulated under anesthesia for limited motion. No patients in the control group required manipulation under anesthesia. INTERPRETATION: Patellofemoral arthroplasty appears not to have a negative effect on the outcome of later total knee arthroplasty.

Patellofemoral arthroplasty for symptomatic nonunion after trochlear osteotomy for patellar instability: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with patellofemoral instability with trochlear dysplasia may be treated with trochlear osteotomy. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a patient with patellofemoral instability treated with trochlear osteotomy. The procedure resulted in nonunion with painful bony impingement and isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Patellofemoral arthroplasty was performed. CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral arthroplasty may be considered a salvage procedure for failed surgical treatment for trochlear dysplasia.