The sense and nonsense of direct-to-consumer genetic testing for cardiovascular disease.

Expectations are high that increasing knowledge of the genetic basis of cardiovascular disease will eventually lead to personalised medicine-to preventive and therapeutic interventions that are targeted to at-risk individuals on the basis of their genetic profiles. Most cardiovascular diseases are caused by a complex interplay of many genetic variants interacting with many non-genetic risk factors such as diet, exercise, smoking and alcohol consumption. Since several years, genetic susceptibility testing for cardiovascular diseases is being offered via the internet directly to consumers. We discuss five reasons why these tests are not useful, namely: (1) the predictive ability is still limited; (2) the risk models used by the companies are based on assumptions that have not been verified; (3) the predicted risks keep changing when new variants are discovered and added to the test; (4) the tests do not consider non-genetic factors in the prediction of cardiovascular disease risk; and (5) the test results will not change recommendations of preventive interventions. Predictive genetic testing for multifactorial forms of cardiovascular disease clearly lacks benefits for the public. Prevention of disease should therefore remain focused on family history and on non-genetic risk factors as diet and physical activity that can have the strongest impact on disease risk, regardless of genetic susceptibility.

Polytopic anomalies with agenesis of the lower vertebral column.

We describe clinical, pathological and radiological findings in 15 cases of sporadic and familial lower spine agenesis with additional anomalies of the axial skeleton and internal organs and speculate about the cause and pathogenesis of this malformation complex. We show that all of these findings are defects of blastogenesis, originate in the primary developmental field and/or the progenitor fields, thus representing polytopic field defects. This concept appears applicable in our cases and makes such terms such as "caudal regression syndrome" or "axial mesodermal dysplasia spectrum" redundant.

Auditory stimuli as a trigger for arrhythmic events differentiate HERG-related (LQTS2) patients from KVLQT1-related patients (LQTS1).

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to identify a possible relationship between genotype and phenotype in the congenital familial long QT syndrome (cLQTS). BACKGROUND: The cLQTS, which occurs as an autosomal dominant or recessive trait, is characterized by QT-interval prolongation on the electrocardiogram and torsade de pointes arrhythmias, which may give rise to recurrent syncope or sudden cardiac death. Precipitators for cardiac events are exercise or emotion and occasionally acoustic stimuli. METHODS: The trigger for cardiac events (syncope, documented cardiac arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death) was analyzed in 11 families with a familial LQTS and a determined genotype. RESULTS: The families were subdivided in KVLQT1-related families (LQTS1, n = 5) and HERG (human ether-a-gogo-related gene)-related families (LQTS2, n = 6) based on single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and sequencing. Whereas exercise-related cardiac events dominate the clinical picture of LQTS1 patients, auditory stimuli as a trigger for arrhythmic events were only seen in LQTS2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Arrhythmic events triggered by auditory stimuli may differentiate LQTS2 from LQTS1 patients.