The Metabolic Health Index Identifies Patients That Will Benefit From Metabolic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic syndrome is a modern world's major health hazard related to comorbidities like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Bariatric surgery is well known to lower this health risk in patients with obesity. There is a need for an objective measure to assess the intended reduction in health hazard and indirectly the eligibility for bariatric surgery. The Metabolic Health Index (MHI) quantitatively summarizes the cumulative impact of the metabolic syndrome on health status on a scale from 1 to 6. This study describes the use of the MHI as a supportive tool in the decision for and outcome assessment of bariatric surgery. METHODS: The general usability of the MHI was tested by extending its application to patient data of five other bariatric centers in the Netherlands. Retrospective laboratory and national bariatric quality registry data of 11,501 patients were collected. RESULTS: The quantification of (improvement in) metabolic health burden as measured by the MHI was independent of the dataset that was used to derive the MHI model. Patients with MHI > 2.8 prior to surgery improved significantly more in MHI 12 mo after surgery compared to patients with MHI ≤ 2.8 (1.1 compared to 0.4 MHI points, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The MHI is robust between centers and is suitable for general use in clinical decision-making. As changes in MHI over time reflect metabolic health alterations, it is suitable as an outcome measure of surgery. An MHI cut-off value of 2.8 helps to predict the likelihood of significant improvement after surgery, independent of body mass index and known metabolic comorbidities.

Prognostic Value of Combined Biomarkers in Patients With Heart Failure: The Heartmarker Score.

Background: Heart failure (HF) biomarkers have prognostic value. The aim of this study was to combine HF biomarkers into an objective classification system for risk stratification of patients with HF. Methods: HF biomarkers were analyzed in a population of HF outpatients and expressed relative to their cut-off values (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] >1,000 pg/mL, soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 [ST2] >35 ng/mL, growth differentiation factor-15 [GDF-15] >2,000 pg/mL, and fibroblast growth factor-23 [FGF-23] >95.4 pg/mL). Biomarkers that remained significant in multivariable analysis were combined to devise the Heartmarker score. The performance of the Heartmarker score was compared to the widely used New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification based on symptoms during ordinary activity. Results: HF biomarkers of 245 patients were analyzed, 45 (18%) of whom experienced the composite endpoint of HF hospitalization, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or death. HF biomarkers were elevated more often in patients that reached the composite endpoint than in patients that did not reach the endpoint. NT-proBNP, ST2, and GDF-15 were independent predictors of the composite endpoint and were thus combined as the Heartmarker score. The event-free survival and distance covered in 6 minutes of walking decreased with an increasing Heartmarker score. Compared with the NYHA classification, the Heartmarker score was better at discriminating between different risk classes and had a comparable relationship to functional capacity. Conclusions: The Heartmarker score is a reproducible and intuitive model for risk stratification of outpatients with HF, using routine biomarker measurements.

Assessment of Comorbidity in Bariatric Patients through a Biomarker-Based Model-A Multicenter Validation of the Metabolic Health Index.

BACKGROUND: The metabolic health index (MHI) is a biomarker-based model that objectively assesses the cumulative impact of comorbidities type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia on the health state of bariatric patients. The MHI was developed on a single-center cohort using a fully laboratory data-driven approach, resulting in a MHI score on a range from 1 to 6. To show universal applicability in clinical care, the MHI was validated externally and potential laboratory-related shortcomings were evaluated. METHODS: Retrospective laboratory and national bariatric quality registry data were collected from five Dutch renowned bariatric centers (n = 11 501). MHI imprecision was derived from the cumulative effect of biological and analytical variance of the individual input variables of the MHI model. The performance of the MHI (model) was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: The cumulative imprecision in MHI was 0.25 MHI points. Calibration of the MHI model diverged over the different centers but was accounted for by misregistration of comorbidity after cross-checking the data. Discriminative performance of the MHI model was consistent across the different centers. CONCLUSIONS: The MHI model can be applied in clinical practice of bariatric centers, regardless of patient mix and analytical platform. Because the MHI is based on objective parameters, it is insensitive to diverging clinical definitions of comorbidities. Therefore, the MHI can be used to objectify severity of metabolic comorbidities in bariatric patients. The MHI can support the patient-selection process for surgery and objectively assessing the effect of surgery on the metabolic health state.

Visual Analysis of Biomarkers Reveals Differences in Lipid Profiles and Liver Enzymes before and after Gastric Sleeve and Bypass.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery results in both intentional and unintentional metabolic changes. In a high-volume bariatric center, extensive laboratory panels are used to monitor these changes pre- and postoperatively. Consecutive measurements of relevant biochemical markers allow exploration of the health state of bariatric patients and comparison of different patient groups. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare biomarker distributions over time between 2 common bariatric procedures, i.e., sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (RYGB), using visual analytics. METHODS: Both pre- and postsurgical (6, 12, and 24 months) data of all patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery were collected retrospectively. The distribution and evolution of different biochemical markers were compared before and after surgery using asymmetric beanplots in order to evaluate the effect of primary SG and RYGB. A beanplot is an alternative to the boxplot that allows an easy and thorough visual comparison of univariate data. RESULTS: In total, 1,237 patients (659 SG and 578 RYGB) were included. The sleeve and bypass groups were comparable in terms of age and the prevalence of comorbidities. The mean presurgical BMI and the percentage of males were higher in the sleeve group. The effect of surgery on lowering of glycated hemoglobin was similar for both surgery types. After RYGB surgery, the decrease in the cholesterol concentration was larger than after SG. The enzymatic activity of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphate in sleeve patients was higher presurgically but lower postsurgically compared to bypass values. CONCLUSIONS: Beanplots allow intuitive visualization of population distributions. Analysis of this large population-based data set using beanplots suggests comparable efficacies of both types of surgery in reducing diabetes. RYGB surgery reduced dyslipidemia more effectively than SG. The trend toward a larger decrease in liver enzyme activities following SG is a subject for further investigation.

Metabolic Health Index (MHI): Assessment of Comorbidity in Bariatric Patients Based on Biomarkers.

PURPOSE: The focus of bariatric surgery is reduction of weight, reflected in body mass index (BMI). However, the resolution of comorbidity is a second important outcome indicator. The degree of comorbidity is hard to quantify objectively as comorbidities develop gradually and are interdependent. Multiple scoring systems quantifying comorbidity exist but they lack continuity and objectivity. In analogy with BMI as index for weight, the Metabolic Health Index (MHI) is developed as objective quantification of metabolic health status. Laboratory data were used as comorbidities affect biomarkers. Conversely, laboratory data can be used as objectively obtained variables to describe comorbidity. METHODS: Laboratory data were collected and crosschecked by national quality registry entries. Machine learning was applied to develop an ordinal logistic regression model, using 4 clinical and 32 laboratory input variables. The output was mathematically transformed into a continuous score for intuitive interpretation, ranging from 1 to 6 (MHI). RESULTS: In total, 4778 data records of 1595 patients were used. The degree of comorbidity is best described by age at phlebotomy, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), and concentrations of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), triglycerides, and potassium. The model is independent of day of sampling and type of surgery. Mean MHI was significantly different between patient subgroups with increasing number of comorbidities. CONCLUSION: The MHI reflects severity of comorbidity, enabling objective assessment of a bariatric patient's metabolic health state, regardless day of sampling and surgery type. Next to weight-focused outcome measures like %TWL, the MHI can serve as outcome measure for metabolic health.