A phase 2 trial combining afatinib with cetuximab in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations are the third most common EGFR mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are associated with primary resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). There is evidence of activity of combining EGFR TKIs with monoclonal antibodies. This study reports on the efficacy and safety of afatinib in combination with cetuximab. METHODS: In this single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with advanced NSCLC harboring an EGFR ex20ins mutation were treated with afatinib 40 mg once daily in combination with cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. The primary end point was disease control rate (DCR) at 18 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients started treatment, with a median age of 65 years (range, 40-80 years), 78% female, and 95% White. The study achieved its primary end point with a DCR of 54% at 18 weeks, an overall response rate (ORR) of 43%, and a 32% confirmed ORR. Best responses were partial (n = 16), stable (n = 16), progressive disease (n = 2), or not evaluable (n = 3). Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-8.3 months) and median overall survival was 16.8 months (95% CI, 10.7-25.8 months). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were diarrhea (70%), rash (65%), dry skin (59%), paronychia (54%), and erythema (43%). Grade 3 TRAEs were reported in 54% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment with afatinib and cetuximab demonstrated antitumor activity with a DCR of 54% at 18 weeks and a 32% confirmed ORR. Toxicity was significant, although manageable, after dose reduction.

A comprehensive overview of the heterogeneity of EGFR exon 20 variants in NSCLC and (pre)clinical activity to currently available treatments.

Activating EGFR mutations are commonly observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). About 4-10 % of all activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are heterogenous in-frame deletion and/or insertion mutations clustering within exon 20 (EGFRex20+). NSCLC patients with EGFRex20+ mutations are treated as a single disease entity, irrespective of the type and location of the mutation. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature reporting both in vitro and clinical drug sensitivity across different EGFRex20+ mutations. The activating A763_Y764insFQEA mutation has a better tumor response in comparison with mutations in the near- and far regions directly following the C-helix and should therefore be treated differently. For other EGFRex20+ mutations marked differences in treatment responses have been reported indicating the need for a classification beyond the exon-based classification. A further classification can be achieved using a structure-function modeling approach and experimental data using patient-derived cell lines. The detailed overview of TKI responses for each EGFRex20+ mutation can assist treating physicians to select the most optimal drug for individual NSCLC patients.

Exposure-Response Analysis of Osimertinib in EGFR Mutation Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in a Real-Life Setting.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an important drug in the treatment of EGFR-mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical trials with osimertinib could not demonstrate an exposure-efficacy relationship, while a relationship between exposure and toxicity has been found. In this study, we report the exposure-response relationships of osimertinib in a real-life setting. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed, including patients receiving 40 - 80 mg osimertinib as ≥ 2 line therapy and from whom pharmacokinetic samples were collected during routine care. Trough plasma concentrations (Cmin,pred) were estimated and used as a measure of osimertinib exposure. A previously defined exploratory pharmacokinetic threshold of 166 µg/L was taken to explore the exposure-efficacy relationship. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients and 513 osimertinib plasma concentration samples were included. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 13.3 (95% confidence interval (CI):10.3 - 19.1) months and 9.3 (95% CI: 7.2 - 11.1) months for patients with Cmin,pred < 166 µg/L and Cmin,pred ≥ 166 µg/L, respectively (p = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis, a Cmin,pred < 166 µg/L resulted in a non-statistically significant hazard ratio of 1.10 (95% CI: 0.60 - 2.01; p = 77). Presence of a EGFR driver-mutation other than the exon 19 del or L858R mutations, led to a shorter PFS with a hazard ratio of 2.89 (95% CI: 1.18 - 7.08; p = 0.02). No relationship between exposure and toxicity was observed (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: In our real-life cohort, no exposure-response relationship was observed for osimertinib in the current dosing scheme. The feasibility of a standard lower fixed dosing of osimertinib in clinical practice should be studied prospectively.

High dose osimertinib in patients with advanced stage EGFR exon 20 mutation-positive NSCLC: Results from the phase 2 multicenter POSITION20 trial.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with life-threatening advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor an exon 20 deletion and/or insertion mutation (EGFRex20 + ) have limited effective treatment options. The high dose 3rd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib shows promising in vitro activity in EGFRex20 + NSCLC tumors. METHODS: The POSITION20 is a single arm phase II, multicenter study investigating 160 mg osimertinib in patients with EGFRex20+, T790M negative NSCLC. We allowed patients to be treatment naïve and to have asymptomatic brain metastases. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes were duration of response (DoR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment related adverse events (trAEs). RESULTS: From June 2018 to October 2021, 25 patients were enrolled across five centers in the Netherlands. The median age was 70 years (range, 47-87), 20 patients (80%) were women, and the median number of previous lines of therapy was 1 (range, 0-3). The exon 20 mutations were clustered between A763 and L777. The most common exon 20 mutations were p.(N771_H773dup) (n = 3) and p.(A767_V769dup) (n = 3). The ORR was 28% (95% CI, 12-49%), including seven partial responses, with a median DoR of 5.3 months (range, 2.7-27.6). The median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.6-9.1) and the median OS was 15.2 months (95% CI, 14.3-16.0). The most common trAEs were diarrhea (72%), dry skin (44%), and fatigue (44%). The primary reason for discontinuation was progressive disease in 14 patients (56%). CONCLUSION: The POSITION20 study showed modest antitumor activity in patients with EGFRex20 + NSCLC treated with 160 mg osimertinib, with a confirmed ORR of 28% and acceptable toxicity.

Genomic Profiling Identifies Outcome-Relevant Mechanisms of Innate and Acquired Resistance to Third-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective in acquired resistance (AR) to early-generation EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. However, efficacy is marked by interindividual heterogeneity. We present the molecular profiles of pretreatment and post-treatment samples from patients treated with third-generation EGFR TKIs and their impact on treatment outcomes. METHODS: Using the databases of two lung cancer networks and two lung cancer centers, we molecularly characterized 124 patients with EGFR p.T790M-positive AR to early-generation EGFR TKIs. In 56 patients, correlative analyses of third-generation EGFR TKI treatment outcomes and molecular characteristics were feasible. In addition, matched post-treatment biopsy samples were collected for 29 patients with progression to third-generation EGFR TKIs. RESULTS: Co-occurring genetic aberrations were found in 74.4% of EGFR p.T790-positive samples (n = 124). Mutations in TP53 were the most frequent aberrations detected (44.5%; n = 53) and had no significant impact on third-generation EGFR TKI treatment. Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) amplifications were found in 5% of samples (n = 6) and reduced efficacy of third-generation EGFR TKIs significantly (eg, median progression-free survival, 1.0 months; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.72 v 8.2 months; 95% CI, 1.69 to 14.77 months; P ≤ .001). Genetic changes in the 29 samples with AR to third-generation EGFR TKIs were found in EGFR (eg, p.T790M loss, acquisition of p.C797S or p.G724S) or in other genes (eg, MET amplification, KRAS mutations). CONCLUSION: Additional genetic aberrations are frequent in EGFR-mutant lung cancer and may mediate innate and AR to third-generation EGFR TKIs. MET amplification was strongly associated with primary treatment failure and was a common mechanism of AR to third-generation EGFR TKIs. Thus, combining EGFR inhibitors with TKIs targeting common mechanisms of resistance may delay AR.

Crizotinib treatment for patients with EGFR mutation positive NSCLC that acquire cMET amplification after EGFR TKI therapy results in short-lived and heterogeneous responses.

PURPOSE: Next to secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, cMET amplification plays an important role in mediating acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) treatment. Crizotinib, a dual ALK and cMET inhibitor, can induce responses in patients with EGFR mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that acquire cMET amplification after EGFR TKI treatment. However, little is known about the duration of response and post-progression resistance mechanisms. Here, we report on the clinical outcome of a series of patients with cMET-driven resistance to EGFR TKIs, treated with crizotinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients with EGFR mutation positive NSCLC that acquired cMET amplification after EGFR TKI treatment were treated with crizotinib 250 mg twice daily, as monotherapy (n = 2) or in combination with an EGFR TKI (n = 6). RESULTS: Four out of eight patients (50%) showed a partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.4 (95% CI 1.2-5.0) months. Responses were short-lasting with a median PFS of 3.5 (95% CI 1.4-5.2) months in patients with a PR. Median overall survival was 5.9 (95% CI 1.3-6.0) months and not statistically different between responders and non-responders (p = 0.37). All but one patient tolerated crizotinib treatment well. Heterogeneous responses were seen in patients with progressive disease as best response with a marked size decrease of the biopsied (cMET amplification positive) lesion and progression of other lesions. cMET amplification was not always mutually exclusive with other EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms. Post-progression biopsies were negative for cMET amplification. CONCLUSION: Crizotinib treatment for patients with EGFR mutation positive NSCLC that acquire cMET amplification after EGFR TKI treatment results in short-lived and often heterogeneous responses, possibly due to subclonality of cMET-driven resistance and co-occurrence of other EGFR TKI resistance mechanisms.

Afatinib and Cetuximab in Four Patients With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion-Positive Advanced NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: EGFR exon 20 insertions comprise 4% to 9% of EGFR mutated NSCLC. Despite being an oncogenic driver, they are associated with primary resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We hypothesized that dual EGFR blockade with afatinib, an irreversible EGFR TKI, and cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against EGFR, could induce tumor responses. METHODS: Four patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive NSCLC were treated with afatinib 40 mg once daily and cetuximab 250 mg/m2 to 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. RESULTS: All patients had stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung harboring an EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation. Previous lines of treatment consisted of platinum doublet chemotherapy (n = 4) and EGFR TKI (n = 2). Three of four patients showed a partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). Median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval: 0.0 - 14.2 months; range 2.7 months - 17.6 months). Toxicity was manageable with appropriate skin management and dose reduction being required in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dual EGFR blockade with afatinib and cetuximab may induce tumor responses in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive NSCLC.

Pharmacotherapy for treatment of lung cancer in the elderly.

INTRODUCTION: The chance for elderly patients with NSCLC to receive chemotherapy decreases significantly with age. In addition, older patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials. Consequently, due to the paucity of data, evidence-based decisions with regard to chemotherapy treatment strategies in the elderly are lacking. AREAS COVERED: We performed a literature search to identify mainly randomized trials focusing on treatment of NSCLC in older patients with chemotherapy and targeted therapy, toxicity and quality of life. In conclusion, the efficacy of regular chemotherapy and targeted therapy seems quite similar in older patients compared to their younger counterparts, with increased toxicity, but acceptable. However, these data are mostly derived from subgroup analyses and highly selected fit patients, which may not represent the general older population. EXPERT OPINION: Further research is necessary to investigate the role of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients, before the start of a chemotherapeutic treatment. Proteomic tests can have potential in the future, if these tests turn out to be able to separate patients with advanced NSCLC into groups with better or worse outcomes. It can be of special interest for the elderly population, to prevent unnecessary side effects of a possible inferior treatment.

Quantification of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: different parameters correlated to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

AIMS: Different methods to substage extraprostatic extension (EPE) were correlated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 157 consecutive RP specimens with EPE were completely embedded. Twenty-three patients with adjuvant therapy or detectable postoperative PSA levels were excluded, leaving 134 patients for BCR analysis. Data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses. In univariate analysis, maximal radial distance (RD) was associated with BCR as continuous (P = 0.006) and dichotomous (P = 0.002) parameters. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of BCR were preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (P = 0.006), Gleason score (P = 0.001), positive surgical margins (P = 0.005), maximal RD dichotomized at 0.6 mm [= one high-power field (HPF)]; hazard ratio (HR) 3.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-7.85; P = 0.004), total RD (P = 0.009) and EPE quantification according to Epstein (P = 0.002) and to Wheeler (P = 0.004). The 5-year risk of BCR was 20% (95% CI 0.65-0.94) in patients with RD ≤ 0.6 mm and 47% (95% CI: 0.41-0.65) with RD > 0.6 mm. The restriction of focal EPE in no more than two slides (Epstein and Wheeler) gave no better results. CONCLUSIONS: Maximal RD dichotomized at one HPF is an objective method to subdivide EPE and a strong, independent predictor for BCR after RP. Its use is recommended for substaging pT3a in future TNM classifications.