The utility of GLUT1 as a diagnostic marker in cutaneous vascular anomalies: A review of literature and recommendations for daily practice.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of GLUT1 as an immunohistochemical marker in the diagnostics of cutaneous vascular anomalies. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies on GLUT1 staining patterns in cutaneous vascular lesions. Data was grouped according to the latest ISSVA classification for vascular anomalies. RESULTS: Vascular tumors: GLUT1 staining was positive in 368/386 (95%) of infantile hemangiomas. Congenital hemangiomas (16 cases) and kaposiform hemangioendotheliomas (62 cases) were all negative for GLUT1. Angiosarcomas were GLUT1 positive in 12/39 (31%) and epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas in 2/27 (7%) of cases. Vascular malformations: All vascular malformations (33 arteriovenous malformations, 16 capillary malformations, 64 lymphatic malformations, 54 venous malformations, 3 venous-lymphatic malformations and 3 capillary venous-lymphatic malformations) were negative for GLUT1 staining. Unclassified vascular anomalies: Angiokeratomas were GLUT1 positive in 1/15 (7%) and verrucous hemangiomas in 71/100 (71%) of cases. Microvenular hemangiomas were negative for GLUT1 in all 9 cases. CONCLUSIONS: GLUT1 can be used as an additional diagnostic tool in cutaneous vascular lesions. A negative GLUT1 stain renders a diagnosis of infantile hemangioma unlikely. A positive GLUT1 stain excludes vascular malformations and is suggestive of infantile hemangioma. One must be cautious, however, that the final diagnosis is made through interpretation of all clinical and diagnostic features, and not based on GLUT1 staining alone.

The Epidemiology and Clinicopathological Features of Basal Cell Carcinoma in Patients 80 Years and Older: A Systematic Review.

Importance: The number of very elderly (≥80 years) is rapidly growing worldwide. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are common in this age group and treatment is often challenging in this population. Objective: Obtaining an overview of the epidemiology and clinicopathological features of BCC in the very elderly to guide clinicians and policy makers. Evidence Review: A systematic review of literature was performed using PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and the Cochrane Library. Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction was performed by 2 independent reviewers. For quality assessment (including the risk of bias) the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist was used, combined with the Quality Rating Scheme for Studies and Other Evidence. Data were described though a narrative synthesis and tabulation. Findings: Of 13 628 studies identified, 83 studies were included and quality assesment was performed for 76 studies; 27 studies (representing >350 000 patients) were found that included age-specific incidence rates of BCC in the very elderly. High and increasing incidence rates of BCC in the very elderly were found ranging from 13 to 12 112 per 100 000 person-years, strongly depending on factors like study population and clinical setting. Basal cell carcinoma in the very elderly were more common in men, mostly of the nodular subtype, and located in the head and neck region. Interpretation and generalization of the data was limited by the heterogeneity of study populations, methods, and outcomes. Data concerning impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and prognostication were scarce. Conclusions and Relevance: The incidence of BCC among the very elderly is high and increasing. Epidemiologic and clinicopathological data from current literature provide only limited guidance in clinical decision making owing to heterogeneity and scarcity. Future research should focus more specifically on BCC in the very elderly, together with prognostication and their relation with HRQoL in both the short and longer term.