Visceral Fat and Anastomotic Leakage After Colon Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: Visceral fat is considered a risk for postoperative complications in colon cancer surgery. However, the association with anastomotic leakage as the most worrisome complication is not clear mainly because of underpowered studies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of visceral fat as a continuous variable on anastomotic leakage in a large cohort of colon cancer resections. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. SETTINGS: This study used data of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit of the years 2011 through 2014 from 8 Dutch teaching hospitals. Visceral fat was assessed on the routine preoperative abdominal CT scan. PATIENTS: A total of 2370 patients underwent colon cancer resection with primary anastomosis. There were 2011 patients operated electively and 359 in an emergency setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of visceral fat on anastomotic leakage after multivariable analysis was measured. RESULTS: Visceral fat was associated with anastomotic leakage in the elective colon resection group (n = 2011) but not in emergency colon resections (n = 359). Significant confounding was found for type of resection, BMI, and sex. The association of male sex and BMI as previously reported risk factors for anastomotic leakage was explained by visceral fat. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective character and missing clinical data of known risk factors for anastomotic leakage, like smoking history and certain medication. CONCLUSIONS: The independent association of visceral fat with anastomotic leakage was confined to the elective colon cancer resection group. The previously reported associations of male sex and BMI with anastomotic leakage were explained by visceral fat. Visceral fat-associated comorbidities did not influence anastomotic leakage, suggesting that its effect on colon anastomotic healing is local rather than systemic. Future risk analysis for anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery should contain visceral fat values and consider subgroup differences. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B396. ADIPOSIDAD VISCERAL Y FUGA ANASTOMTICA EN CASOS DE RESECCIN DE CNCER DE COLON: ANTECEDENTES:La acumulación de grasa visceral se considera como un factor de riesgo en caso de complicaciones postoperatorias de cirugía de cáncer de colon. Sin embargo, la asociación con la fuga anastomótica como la complicación más preocupante no está clara principalmente debido a los estudios de bajo impacto disponibles.OBJETIVO:Analizar el efecto de la adiposidad visceral como una variable contínua sobre la fuga anastomótica en una gran cohorte de resecciones de cáncer de colon.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte multicéntrico retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Se utilizaron los datos de la Auditoría Colorrectal Quirúrgica Holandesa entre los años 2011 y 2014 en 8 hospitales de enseñanza de los Paises bajos. La grasa visceral fué evaluada por medio de la tomografía computada abdominal preoperatoria de rutina.PACIENTES:Un total de 2370 pacientes fueron sometidos a resección de cáncer de colon con anastomosis primaria. 2011 pacientes fueron operados electivamente y 359 en situación de emergencia.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El efecto de la adiposidad visceral en la fuga anastomótica después del análisis multivariable.RESULTADOS:La grasa visceral se asoció con la fuga anastomótica en el grupo de resección electiva de colon (n = 2011) pero no en las resecciones de emergencia (n = 359). Se encontraron factores de confusión significativos para el tipo de resección, el índice de masa corporal y el género. La adiposidad visceral explica la asociación del género masculino y el índice de masa corporal como factores de riesgo reportados previamente en los casos de fugas anastomóticas.LIMITACIONES:Carácter retrospectivo del estudio y la falta de datos clínicos de factores de riesgo conocidos para la fuga anastomótica, como los antecedentes de tabaquismo y el consumo de ciertos medicamentos.CONCLUSIONES:La asociación independiente de la adiposidad visceral con la fuga anastomótica se limitó al grupo de resección electiva por cáncer de colon. Las asociaciones previamente reportadas de género masculino e índice de masa corporal con fuga anastomótica se explicaron por la grasa visceral. Las comorbilidades asociadas a la grasa visceral no influyeron en la fuga anastomótica, lo que sugiere que la cicatrisación anastomótica obedece más a un factor local que a un factor sistémico. Un análisis de riesgos previsibles para fugas anastomóticas en casos de resección de cáncer de colon deben involucrar los valores de la adiposidad visceral y considerar las diferencias entre subgrupos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B396. (Traducción-Dr Xavier Delgadillo).

Effects of perioperative intravenous ω-3 fatty acids in colon cancer patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The postoperative inflammatory response contributes to tissue healing and recovery but overwhelming inflammation is associated with postoperative complications. n-3 (ω-3) PUFAs modulate inflammatory responses and may help to prevent a proinflammatory cascade. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the effects of perioperative intravenous n-3 PUFAs on inflammatory cytokines in colon cancer surgery. METHODS: This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Forty-four patients undergoing elective colon resection for nonmetastasized cancer were randomly assigned to 2 intravenous n-3 PUFA or saline control infusions the night before and the morning after surgery. Blood was sampled at 6 perioperative time points for changes in cytokines in serum and in LPS-stimulated whole blood samples and leukocyte membrane fatty acid profiles. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received saline and 21 patients received n-3 PUFAs. Patient and operation characteristics were equal between groups, except for open resection (saline n = 5 compared with n-3 PUFA n = 0, P = 0.056). Ex-vivo IL-6 after LPS stimulation was significantly higher in the n-3 PUFA group at the first day after surgery (P = 0.014), but not different at the second day after surgery (P = 0.467). White blood cell count was higher in the n-3 PUFA group at the fourth day after surgery (P = 0.029). There were more patients with infectious complications in the n-3 PUFA group (8 compared with 3, P = 0.036). There were no overall differences in serum IL-6, IL-10, C-reactive protein, and length of stay. The administration of n-3 PUFAs resulted in rapid increases in leukocyte membrane n-3 PUFA content. CONCLUSIONS: In the n-3 PUFA group a clear relation with serum and LPS-stimulated cytokines was not found but, unexpectedly, more infectious complications occurred. Caution is thus required with the off-label use of a perioperative intravenous n-3 PUFA emulsion as a standalone infusion in the time sequence reported in the present study in colon resections with primary anastomosis. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02231203.

Four Weeks of Preoperative Omega-3 Fatty Acids Reduce Liver Volume: a Randomised Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Weight loss before bariatric surgery with a low-calorie diet (LCD) has several advantages, including reduction of liver volume and an improved access to the lesser sac. Disadvantages include performing surgery in a state of undernutrition, side effects, costs and patient compliance. Omega-3 fatty acids may serve as an alternative to reduce liver steatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomised controlled open-label trial was done to compare the effects of a LCD with Modifast (800 kcal/day) during 2 weeks with 2 g of omega-3 fatty acids a day and a normal diet (2000 kcal/day) during 4 weeks. Total liver volume (TLV) and volume of the left liver lobe (LLL), visceral fat area (VFA) and muscle area (SMA) at the L3-L4 level were measured with MRI before and after preoperative treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-two morbidly obese women undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB) were recruited. In both groups, there was a significant decrease in LLL, TLV and VFA. For LLL and TLV reduction, the LCD had a significantly larger effect (p < 0.05). Only in the LCD group was there a significant decrease in SMA with significantly more side effects and worse compliance. CONCLUSION: Both the LCD and omega-3 diet reduced LLL, TLV and VFA. The LCD outperformed the omega-3 diet in LLL and TLV reduction, but induced significant loss of SMA and had worse compliance due to more side effects. Omega-3 fatty acids may provide a safe and more patient-friendly alternative for a LCD and further research is indicated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02206256).

Perioperative management of obstructive sleep apnea in bariatric surgery: a consensus guideline.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is increasing worldwide, with over 500,000 cases performed every year. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is present in 35%-94% of MBS patients. Nevertheless, consensus regarding the perioperative management of OSA in MBS patients is not established. OBJECTIVES: To provide consensus based guidelines utilizing current literature and, when in the absence of supporting clinical data, expert opinion by organizing a consensus meeting of experts from relevant specialties. SETTING: The meeting was held in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: A panel of 15 international experts identified 75 questions covering preoperative screening, treatment, postoperative monitoring, anesthetic care and follow-up. Six researchers reviewed the literature systematically. During this meeting, the "Amsterdam Delphi Method" was utilized including controlled acquisition of feedback, aggregation of responses and iteration. RESULTS: Recommendations or statements were provided for 58 questions. In the judgment of the experts, 17 questions provided no additional useful information and it was agreed to exclude them. With the exception of 3 recommendations (64%, 66%, and 66% respectively), consensus (>70%) was reached for 55 statements and recommendations. Several highlights: polysomnography is the gold standard for diagnosing OSA; continuous positive airway pressure is recommended for all patients with moderate and severe OSA; OSA patients should be continuously monitored with pulse oximetry in the early postoperative period; perioperative usage of sedatives and opioids should be minimized. CONCLUSION: This first international expert meeting provided 58 statements and recommendations for a clinical consensus guideline regarding the perioperative management of OSA patients undergoing MBS.

Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.

Unequivocal international guidelines regarding the diagnosis and management of patients with acute appendicitis are lacking. The aim of the consensus meeting 2015 of the EAES was to generate a European guideline based on best available evidence and expert opinions of a panel of EAES members. After a systematic review of the literature by an international group of surgical research fellows, an expert panel with extensive clinical experience in the management of appendicitis discussed statements and recommendations. Statements and recommendations with more than 70 % agreement by the experts were selected for a web survey and the consensus meeting of the EAES in Bucharest in June 2015. EAES members and attendees at the EAES meeting in Bucharest could vote on these statements and recommendations. In the case of more than 70 % agreement, the statement or recommendation was defined as supported by the scientific community. Results from both the web survey and the consensus meeting in Bucharest are presented as percentages. In total, 46 statements and recommendations were selected for the web survey and consensus meeting. More than 232 members and attendees voted on them. In 41 of 46 statements and recommendations, more than 70 % agreement was reached. All 46 statements and recommendations are presented in this paper. They comprise topics regarding the diagnostic work-up, treatment indications, procedural aspects and post-operative care. The consensus meeting produced 46 statements and recommendations on the diagnostic work-up and management of appendicitis. The majority of the EAES members supported these statements. These consensus proceedings provide additional guidance to surgeons and surgical residents providing care to patients with appendicitis.