Interobserver variability in target definition for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation.

Background: Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a potential new therapy for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). The arrhythmogenic substrate (target) is synthesized from clinical and electro-anatomical information. This study was designed to evaluate the baseline interobserver variability in target delineation for STAR. Methods: Delineation software designed for research purposes was used. The study was split into three phases. Firstly, electrophysiologists delineated a well-defined structure in three patients (spinal canal). Secondly, observers delineated the VT-target in three patients based on case descriptions. To evaluate baseline performance, a basic workflow approach was used, no advanced techniques were allowed. Thirdly, observers delineated three predefined segments from the 17-segment model. Interobserver variability was evaluated by assessing volumes, variation in distance to the median volume expressed by the root-mean-square of the standard deviation (RMS-SD) over the target volume, and the Dice-coefficient. Results: Ten electrophysiologists completed the study. For the first phase interobserver variability was low as indicated by low variation in distance to the median volume (RMS-SD range: 0.02-0.02 cm) and high Dice-coefficients (mean: 0.97 ± 0.01). In the second phase distance to the median volume was large (RMS-SD range: 0.52-1.02 cm) and the Dice-coefficients low (mean: 0.40 ± 0.15). In the third phase, similar results were observed (RMS-SD range: 0.51-1.55 cm, Dice-coefficient mean: 0.31 ± 0.21). Conclusions: Interobserver variability is high for manual delineation of the VT-target and ventricular segments. This evaluation of the baseline observer variation shows that there is a need for methods and tools to improve variability and allows for future comparison of interventions aiming to reduce observer variation, for STAR but possibly also for catheter ablation.

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation: A multicenter pre-post intervention safety evaluation of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator function.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) appears to be beneficial in selected patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, high-dose radiotherapy used for STAR-treatment may affect functioning of the patients' implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) by direct effects of radiation on ICD components or cardiac tissue. Currently, the effect of STAR on ICD functioning remains unknown. METHODS: A retrospective pre-post multicenter study evaluating ICD functioning in the 12-month before and after STAR was performed. Patients with (non)ischemic cardiomyopathies with therapy-refractory VT and ICD who underwent STAR were included and the occurrence of ICD-related adverse events was collected. Evaluated ICD parameters included sensing, capture threshold and impedance. A linear mixed-effects model was used to investigate the association between STAR, radiotherapy dose and changes in lead parameters over time. RESULTS: In total, 43 patients (88% male) were included in this study. All patients had an ICD with an additional right atrial lead in 34 (79%) and a ventricular lead in 17 (40%) patients. Median ICD-generator dose was 0.1 Gy and lead tip dose ranged from 0-32 Gy. In one patient (2%), a reset occurred during treatment, but otherwise, STAR and radiotherapy dose were not associated with clinically relevant alterations in ICD leads parameters. CONCLUSIONS: STAR treatment did not result in major ICD malfunction. Only one radiotherapy related adverse event occurred during the study follow-up without patient harm. No clinically relevant alterations in ICD functioning were observed after STAR in any of the leads. With the reported doses STAR appears to be safe.

Case report: First-in-human combined low-dose whole-heart irradiation and high-dose stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for immunosuppressive refractory cardiac sarcoidosis and ventricular tachycardia.

Background: Cardiac sarcoidosis is associated with heart failure, conduction abnormalities, and life-threatening arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia (VT). Radiotherapy has been suggested as a treatment for extra-cardiac sarcoidosis in patients refractory to immunomodulatory treatment. Methods: The effectiveness and safety of low-dose whole-heart radiotherapy for therapy refractory cardiac sarcoidosis were evaluated in a pre- and post-intervention case report comparing the 54 months before and after treatment. Immunomodulatory low-dose whole-heart irradiation as sarcoidosis treatment consisted of a 2 × 2 Gy scheme. Additionally, high-dose single-fraction stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation of 1 × 20 Gy was applied to the pro-arrhythmic region to manage the ventricular tachycardia episodes. Cardiac sarcoidosis disease activity was measured by hypermetabolic areas on repeated fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG)-PET/computed tomography (CT) scans and by evaluating changes in ventricular tachycardia episodes before and after treatment. Results: One patient with therapy refractory progressive cardiac sarcoidosis and recurrent ventricular tachycardia was treated. The cardiac sarcoidosis disease activity showed a durable regression of inflammatory disease activity from 3 months onwards. The [18F]FDG-PET/CT scan at 54 months did not show any signs of active cardiac sarcoidosis, and a state of remission was achieved. The number of sustained VT episodes was reduced by 95%. We observed that the development of moderate aortic valve regurgitation was likely irradiation-related. No other irradiation-related adverse events occurred, and the left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable. Conclusion: We report here for the first time on the beneficial and lasting effects of combined immunomodulatory low-dose whole-heart radiotherapy and high-dose stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation in a patient with therapy refractory cardiac sarcoidosis and recurrent VT.

Importance of Systematic Diagnostic Testing in Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation: Results From the Dutch iVF Registry.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (iVF) is a diagnosis of exclusion. Systematic diagnostic testing is important to exclude alternative causes for VF. The early use of "high yield" testing, including cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), exercise testing, and sodium channel blocker provocation, has been increasingly recognized. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the importance and consistency of systematic diagnostic testing in iVF. METHODS: This study included 423 iVF patients from 11 large secondary and tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands. Clinical characteristics and diagnostic testing data were ascertained. RESULTS: IVF patients experienced the index event at a median age of 40 years (IQR: 28-52 years), and 61% were men. The median follow-up time was 6 years (IQR: 2-12 years). Over the years, "high yield" diagnostic tests were increasingly performed (mean 68% in 2000-2010 vs 75% in 2011-2021; P < 0.001). During follow-up, 38 patients (9%) originally labeled as iVF received an alternative diagnosis. Patients in whom "high-yield" diagnostic tests were consistently performed during the initial work-up received an alternative diagnosis less frequently during follow-up (HR: 0.439; 95% CI: 0.219-0.878; P = 0.020). Patients who received an alternative diagnosis during follow-up had a worse prognosis in terms of cardiac death (P = 0.012) with a trend toward more implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy (P = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS: Although adherence to (near) complete diagnostic testing in this population of iVF patients increased over the years, patients with iVF still undergo varying levels of diagnostic evaluation. The latter leads to initial underdiagnosis of alternative conditions and is associated with a worse prognosis. Our results underscore the importance of early systematic diagnostic assessment in patients with apparent iVF.

Non-invasive stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia: results of the prospective STARNL-1 trial.

AIMS: Stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) is suggested as potentially effective and safe treatment for patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the current prospective knowledge base and experience with STAR is limited. In this study we aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of STAR. METHODS AND RESULTS: The StereoTactic Arrhythmia Radiotherapy in the Netherlands no.1 was a pre-post intervention study to prospectively evaluate efficacy and safety of STAR. In patients with therapy-refractory VT, the pro-arrhythmic region was treated with a 25 Gy single radiotherapy fraction. The main efficacy measure was a reduction in the number of treated VT-episodes by ≥50%, comparing the 12 months before and after treatment (or end of follow-up, excluding a 6-week blanking period). The study was deemed positive when ≥50% of patients would meet this criterion. Safety evaluation included left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary function, and adverse events. Six male patients with an ischaemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled, and median age was 73 years (range 54-83). Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 38% (range 24-52). The median planning target volume was 187 mL (range 93-372). Four (67%) patients completed the 12-month follow-up, and two patients died (not STAR related) during follow-up. The main efficacy measure of ≥50% reduction in treated VT-episodes at the end of follow-up was achieved in four patients (67%). The median number of treated VT-episodes was reduced by 87%. No reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction or pulmonary function was observed. No treatment related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: STAR resulted in a ≥ 50% reduction in treated VT-episodes in 4/6 (67%) patients. No reduction in cardiac and pulmonary function nor treatment-related serious adverse events were observed during follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register-NL7510.

Standardizing the Cardiac Radioablation Targeting Workflow: Enabling Semi-Automated Angulation and Segmentation of the Heart According to the American Heart Association Segmented Model.

Purpose: Cardiac radioablation has evolved as a potential treatment modality for therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia. To standardize cardiac radioablation treatments, promote accurate communication and target identification, and to assess toxicity, robust, and reproducible methods for angulation and cardiac segmentation are paramount. In this study, we developed and evaluated a tool for semiautomated angulation and segmentation according to the American Heart Association 17-segment model. Methods and Materials: The semiautomated angulation and segmentation of the planning-computed tomography (CT) was based on an in-house developed tool requiring placement of only 4 point-markers and a rotation matrix. For angulation, 2 markers defining the cardiac long-axis were placed: at the cardiac apex and at the center of the mitral valve. A rotation matrix was derived that angulates the CT volume, resulting in the cardiac short axis. Segmentation was subsequently performed based on marking the 2 left ventricular hinge points. To evaluate reproducibility, 5 observers independently placed markers in planning CTs of 6 patients. Results: The root mean square of the standard deviation for the angulation and segmentation marker positions were ≤0.5 cm. The 17 segments were subsequently generated and compared between the observers resulting in a median Dice coefficient of 0.8 (interquartile range: 0.70-0.87) and a median of the mean Hausdorff distance of 0.09 cm (interquartile range: 0.05-0.17). The interquartile ranges of Euler angles α and ß, determined by the angulation markers, was less than 3 degrees for all patients except one. For the γ angle, determined by the hinge point markers, the interquartile range was up to 12 degrees. Conclusions: In this study a method for semiautomatic angulation and segmentation of the heart for cardiac radioablation according to the American Heart Association Segmented Model is presented and evaluated. Based on our results we believe that the segmentation is reproducible and that it can be used to promote communication between radiation oncology and cardiology, enables cardiology-oriented targeting and permits focused toxicity evaluations.

Cardiac radioablation-A systematic review.

Failure of drugs and catheter ablation procedures for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias is still extremely relevant. Recently, stereotactic body radiotherapy has been introduced to treat therapy refractory patients. In this systematic review (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42019133212), we aimed to summarize electrophysiological and histopathological effects of radioablation in animals, patients, and extracted and perfused hearts. A systematic search was performed in OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) from inception to September 2019. Identified records were independently screened for eligibility by 2 reviewers. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed using the SYRCLE, ROBINS-I, or Murad tool and tailored to the different study designs. We included 13 preclinical and 10 clinical publications. Large heterogeneity in study designs prompted a narrative synthesis approach. Baseline, (pre-)procedural details, outcome, target tissue analyses, and safety data were extracted and summarized. In animal studies evaluating electrophysiological parameters, radioablation induced a reduction in voltage/potential amplitude or bidirectional block in target areas in 93.2% of animals. Atrioventricular block (first to third degree) was induced in 78.3% of animals, and in studies evaluating ventricular arrhythmia inducibility, 75% reduction was achieved. In patients, predominantly ventricular tachycardias were targeted with >85% reduction in arrhythmia episodes during follow-up with an encouraging short-term safety profile. Preclinical and clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of radioablation is limited in both quantity and quality. The results of radioablation for therapy refractory patients with ventricular tachycardia are promising, but further research is needed.