[Paraneoplastic syndromes]. / Paraneoplastische syndromen.

A paraneoplastic syndrome is a phenomenon or complex of symptoms that can occur with malignancy, without this being the result of tumour cells in the affected area. In this article, we describe the following paraneoplastic syndromes: thrombophlebitis migrans, clubbing, pemphigus, acanthosis nigricans, blue fingers, dermatomyositis, and myasthenia gravis.

[Overtreatment of premalignant and malignant skin lesions.] / Overbehandeling van premaligne en maligne huidafwijkingen.

The incidence of malignant and premalignant skin lesions has been increasing in recent decades. It concerns a spectrum of lesions, from relatively benign to highly malignant disease. The nomenclature does not always do justice to the biological character of the specific condition. We have to pay attention to avoid unnecessary diagnostics, overtreatment of conditions with little chance of progression of disease, and unnecessary follow-up. Besides better understanding about the biology of the various premalignant and malignant skin lesions, renaming of some of the conditions can be of help. The concept of applying the term 'indolent lesion of epithelial origin' for this purpose may be beneficial.

Dermatological exposure to coal tar and bladder cancer risk: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Coal tar ointments are used as treatment of various skin diseases, especially psoriasis and eczema. These ointments contain several carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Metabolites of these polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are excreted in the urine and therefore, dermatological use of coal tar may be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between dermatological use of coal tar ointments and bladder cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based case-control study was conducted including 1,387 cases diagnosed with bladder cancer and 5,182 population controls. Information on the use of coal tar, history of skin disease, and known risk factors for bladder cancer was obtained through postal questionnaires. Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the risk of bladder cancer after coal tar treatment, adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, duration of smoking, and intensity of smoking. RESULTS: The use of coal tar ointments was approximately equal among cases and controls (3.8% vs. 3.0%, respectively). Dermatological application of coal tar was not significantly associated with bladder cancer (adjusted odds ratio = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.93-2.01). An inverse association between bladder cancer and a history of skin disease was observed (adjusted odds ratio = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61-0.90). CONCLUSION: This is the first study with a specific aim to study the association between the use of coal tar preparations and bladder cancer. The results suggest that there is no reason for safety concerns with respect to the risk of bladder cancer after the use of coal tar preparations in dermatological practice.

Coal tar induces AHR-dependent skin barrier repair in atopic dermatitis.

Topical application of coal tar is one of the oldest therapies for atopic dermatitis (AD), a T helper 2 (Th2) lymphocyte-mediated skin disease associated with loss-of-function mutations in the skin barrier gene, filaggrin (FLG). Despite its longstanding clinical use and efficacy, the molecular mechanism of coal tar therapy is unknown. Using organotypic skin models with primary keratinocytes from AD patients and controls, we found that coal tar activated the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), resulting in induction of epidermal differentiation. AHR knockdown by siRNA completely abrogated this effect. Coal tar restored filaggrin expression in FLG-haploinsufficient keratinocytes to wild-type levels, and counteracted Th2 cytokine-mediated downregulation of skin barrier proteins. In AD patients, coal tar completely restored expression of major skin barrier proteins, including filaggrin. Using organotypic skin models stimulated with Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-13, we found coal tar to diminish spongiosis, apoptosis, and CCL26 expression, all AD hallmarks. Coal tar interfered with Th2 cytokine signaling via dephosphorylation of STAT6, most likely due to AHR-regulated activation of the NRF2 antioxidative stress pathway. The therapeutic effect of AHR activation herein described opens a new avenue to reconsider AHR as a pharmacological target and could lead to the development of mechanism-based drugs for AD.

No increased risk of cancer after coal tar treatment in patients with psoriasis or eczema.

Coal tar is an effective treatment for psoriasis and eczema, but it contains several carcinogenic compounds. Occupational and animal studies have shown an increased risk of cancer after exposure to coal tar. Many dermatologists have abandoned this treatment for safety reasons, although the risk of cancer after coal tar in dermatological practice is unclear. This large cohort study included 13,200 patients with psoriasis and eczema. Information on skin disease and treatment, risk factors, and cancer occurrence was retrieved from medical files, questionnaires, and medical registries. Proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate differences in cancer risk by treatment modality. Patients treated with coal tar were compared with a reference category of patients treated with dermatocorticosteroids (assumed to carry no increased cancer risk). The median exposure to coal tar ointments was 6 months (range 1-300 months). Coal tar did not increase the risk of non-skin malignancies (hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.09), or the risk of skin cancer (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.69-1.72). This study has sufficient power to show that coal tar treatment is not associated with an increased risk of cancer. These results indicate that coal tar can be maintained as a safe treatment in dermatological practice.

Uptake of pyrene in a breast-fed child of a mother treated with coal tar.

A woman was treated for atopic dermatitis with coal tar containing ointments. Coal tar containing ointments contain genotoxic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Over a period of 50 days the accumulated dose of different coal tar containing ointments treatments corresponded to 993 mg of pyrene and 464 mg of benz[a]pyrene. During this treatment she gave breast milk to her 3-month-old daughter. Analysis of urine samples from the breast-fed child showed elevated levels of urinary excretion of a metabolite of pyrene (1-hydroxypyrene, 1-OHP). These levels were in the same range as urinary excretion levels of this metabolite observed in the mother's urine. As no pyrene was observed in breast milk at a limit of determination of 0.0035 micromol/L, transfer of pyrene from mother to child via breast milk is not likely. Also, a low level of 1-hydroxypyrene observed in the mother's milk did not account for the observed urinary excretion levels in the child. It must therefore be assumed that pyrene was transferred from mother to child via another route, presumably direct skin-to-skin or skin-to-mouth contact. Dermatologists should inform their patients who receive treatment with coal tar containing ointments of the risk of transfer of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by skin-to-skin or skin-to-mouth contact.

Coal tar in dermatology.

Coal tar is one of the oldest treatments for psoriasis and eczema. It has anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antipruritic and antimitotic effects. The short-term side effects are folliculitis, irritation and contact allergy. Coal tar contains carcinogens. The carcinogenicity of coal tar has been shown in animal studies and studies in occupational settings. There is no clear evidence of an increased risk of skin tumors or internal tumors. Until now, most studies have been fairly small and they did not investigate the risk of coal tar alone, but the risk of coal tar combined with other therapies. New, well-designed, epidemiological studies are necessary to assess the risk of skin tumors and other malignancies after dermatological use of coal tar.

Treatment policy for psoriasis and eczema: a survey among dermatologists in the Netherlands and Belgian Flanders.

Today, many therapies are available for the treatment of psoriasis and eczema. One of the oldest topical therapies is coal tar. Coal tar has been used for decades, but over the past years, the use of coal tar has decreased for several reasons, including the supposed carcinogenicity of coal tar. We investigated the current and past treatment policies for psoriasis and eczema with special emphasis on the use of tar products; a postal survey was conducted among all dermatologists in two European countries: the Netherlands (n = 360) and the Flemish speaking part of Belgium (Flanders) (n = 328). This study was conducted as part of the ongoing LATER-study ("Late effects of coal tar treatment in eczema and psoriasis; the Radboud study"). All practising dermatologists received a questionnaire. Dermatologists were asked to describe their treatment policies in mild/moderate psoriasis, severe psoriasis, mild/moderate eczema and severe eczema. The response rate to the questionnaire was 62.5% for the Dutch dermatologists and 45.7% for the Flemish dermatologists. Almost all dermatologists prescribe topical corticosteroids. In eczema, most of the dermatologists prescribe the recently introduced calcineurin inhibitors (95%). Coal tar is a second choice topical therapy. Dutch dermatologists mainly use tar in the treatment of eczema (72% vs. 48% in Flanders), whereas in Flanders, tar is mainly prescribed in psoriasis (60% vs. 41% in Holland). Flemish dermatologists very frequently prescribe PUVA in psoriasis (93% vs. 63%). Topical treatment, especially topical corticosteroids, is the mainstay in psoriasis and eczema. Coal tar still is an important (second choice) therapy for the topical treatment of psoriasis and eczema, but its use varies from country to country. Despite the carcinogenicity of PUVA, this photochemotherapy is frequently prescribed by dermatologists, mainly in Flanders.

The effect of treatment on quality of life in psoriasis patients.

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease with substantial impact on patients' social and relational ways of living and subsequently on their quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with short contact dithranol treatment, UVB phototherapy or inpatient dithranol treatment. HRQoL was evaluated in an open randomized multicentre study by appliance of the Dutch short form of the Sickness Impact Profile and the Psoriasis Disability Index; 250 patients were included. Successful short contact dithranol treatment and UVB phototherapy both led to a comparable improvement in HRQoL immediately after treatment until the end of the follow-up (maximum 1 year). Inpatients experienced a more impaired HRQoL and showed no significant improvement in HRQoL directly following treatment. At the end of the study HRQoL became comparable for all treatment groups. All three treatments led to substantial improvement in HRQoL; however, patients treated by short contact treatment or UVB showed a better HRQoL than inpatients.

Highly increased urinary 1-hydroxypyrene excretion rate in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with topical coal tar.

Coal tar preparations, as used in dermatological practice, contain numerous polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of which many are proven animal carcinogens. Increased urinary 1-hydroxypyrene excretion in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with topical coal tar preparations has been demonstrated. Little is known about the relationship between the dermal uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the one hand and the amount of tar applied to the skin, the total body area affected, the condition of the epidermal barrier and the severity of the dermatitis on the other. We compared urinary 1-hydroxypyrene excretion rate with these variables. The urinary 1-hydroxypyrene excretion rate was highly dependent on the total amount of tar applied to the skin and the total body area affected, and less on the severity of the atopic dermatitis or the condition of the epidermal barrier. Exposure to therapeutic doses of coal tar leads to much higher rates of urinary 1-hydroxypyrene excretion than occupational exposure. Because of the potential carcinogenicity of coal tar, as clearly demonstrated both in animal studies and from occupational exposure, careful consideration should be given to the use of coal tar preparations in dermatological practice. However, the risk of short-term high exposure is unknown. Restriction of the use of coal tar should be based on epidemiological studies and/or appropriate risk models taking into account its relative safety established over many years of clinical use.