A comparison between Boston brace and European braces in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients: a systematic review based on the standardised Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) inclusion criteria for brace treatment.

PURPOSE: To compare the Boston brace and European braces using a standardised Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) inclusion criteria for brace treatment as well as consensus recommendations for treatment outcome. METHODS: This was a systematic review that was carried out using MeSH terminology in our search protocol in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov and Web of Science database between 1976 and 29th of Jan 2023. All studies that were included in this review had applied fully/partially the SRS inclusion criteria for brace wear. Outcome measures were divided into primary and secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: 3830 literatures were found in which 176 literatures were deemed relevant to the study once duplicates were removed and titles and abstracts were screened. Of these literatures, only 15 had fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. 8 of the studies were Level IV studies, 5 were Level III studies and 2 studies were Level I studies (1 prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) and 1 Quasi-RCT). The percentage of patients who avoided surgery for European braces ranged from 88 to 100%, whereas for Boston brace ranged from 70 to 94%. When treatment success was assessed based on the final Cobb angle > 45°, approximately 15% of patients treated with European braces had treatment failure. In contrast, 20-63% of patients treated with Boston brace had curves > 45° at skeletal maturity. The BrAIST study used a cut-off point of 50° to define failure of treatment and the rate of treatment failure was 28%. Curve correction was not achieved in most patients (24-51% of patients) who were treated with the Chêneau brace and its derivatives. However, none of the patients treated with Boston brace achieved curve correction. CONCLUSION: Boston brace and European braces were effective in the prevention of surgery. In addition, curve stabilisation was achieved in most studies. Limitation in current literature included lack of studies providing high level of evidence and lack of standardisation in terms of compliance to brace as well as multidisciplinary management of brace wear.

Nighttime versus Fulltime Brace Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Which Brace to Choose? A Retrospective Study on 358 Patients.

The purpose of this study is to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of fulltime Boston Brace (BB) and Providence Nighttime Brace (PNB) treatments in moderate scoliotic curves (20-40°) at a single institution and to carry out analyses for different subgroups. Inclusion criteria: idiopathic scoliosis, age ≥ 10 years, curve 20-40°, Risser ≤ 3 or Sanders stage ≤ 6 and curve apex below T6 vertebra. Exclusion criteria: incomplete radiological or clinical follow-up and previous treatment. The primary outcome was failure according to the SRS outcome assessment: increase in main curve > 5° and/or increase in main curve beyond 45° and/or surgery. The subgroup analyses were secondary outcomes. In total, 249 patients in the PNB and 109 in the BB groups were included. The BB showed a higher success rate compared to the PNB (59% and 46%, respectively) in both crude and adjusted comparisons (p = 0.029 and p = 0.007, respectively). The subgroup analyses showed higher success rates in pre-menarchal females, thoracic curves and curves > 30° in the BB group compared to the PNB group. Based on the findings, fulltime braces should be the treatment of choice for more immature patients and patients with larger and thoracic curves while nighttime braces might be sufficient for post-menarchal females and patients with lumbar and smaller curves.

Radiographic Outcomes of Immobilization using Boston Brace for Pediatric Spondylolysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Spondylolysis is a common cause of lower back pain during youth. The aim of this study is to report the bony union rate and risk factors for non-union of the lumbar spondylolysis of pediatric patients treated with a rigid thoracolumbosacral orthosis (Boston brace). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 68 children (mean age = 13.9 years) treated for spondylolysis with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis. Patient charts and imaging studies were evaluated to identify the bony union rate of the spondylolysis after a minimum of 3 months of immobilization (mean = 4.2 months). Laterality, grade, level, and presence of high signal intensity in the magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated as prognostic factors. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients presented with 110 defects. Of them, 46 (42%) were incomplete fractures, 38 (35%) complete fractures, and 26 (24%) pseudoarthrosis. Of these defects, 38 (82.6%), 11 (28.9%), and 0 (0.0%) had bony union at the end of the treatment (p < 0.001). Unilateral defects healed significantly better than bilateral ones (relative risk = 1.71, 95% confidence interval = 1.16-2.54, 17/26 (65%) vs 32/84 (38%), p = 0.014). High signal intensity in the magnetic resonance images before the treatment predicted healing (relative risk = 13.24, 95% confidence interval = 1.93-91.01, 48/87 (55%) vs 1/24 (4.3%), p < 0.001). The level of the spondylolysis (L5 vs above L5) did not affect the healing rate. CONCLUSION: The union rates of spondylolysis with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis were similar as compared to earlier studies done with a low thoracolumbosacral orthosis. The grade of the defect, laterality, and presence of high signal intensity increased the probability of bony union. A high thoracolumbosacral orthosis (underarm) does not seem to improve the healing rate of pediatric spondylolysis defects.

Efficacy of bracing in skeletally immature patients with moderate-severe idiopathic scoliosis curves between 40° and 60°.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-series. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of bracing in skeletally immature patients with moderate-severe idiopathic scoliosis (IS) curves ≥ 40°. BACKGROUND: In contrast to prior beliefs, the recent studies have reported successful outcomes with brace treatment may occur in some patients with moderate-severe scoliosis ≥ 40°. Despite other encouraging case-series, non-operative treatment is rarely attempted and the efficacy of bracing large curves remains uncertain. METHODS: 100 skeletally immature children (mean 11.8 ± 2.36 years; range 6.1-16.5) with IS ≥ 40° were identified. 80 were adolescent IS (80%) and 20 juvenile IS (20%). The Risser plus score was used to evaluate skeletal maturity. 66 children were Risser 0 (66%). SRS-SOSORT outcome guidelines were used: > 5° progression, stabilization between - 5° and 5° and, > 5° improvement. RESULTS: Mean initial Cobb was 45° ± 3.9° (range 40°-59°), with in-brace and  % correction of 30° ± 8.7° (range 7°-48°) and 34 ± 17.5% (range 2-84%), respectively. 57 progressed (57%), 32 stabilized (32%), and 11 improved (11%) after a median of 1.8 years (IQR 1.2-2.9). Open triradiate cartilage at presentation (p = 0.005) and less in-brace correction (p = 0.009) were associated with progression. 58 children (58%) underwent surgery after a mean of 3.0 years (range 0.7-7.3). Surgical patients were younger (11.2 vs. 12.7 years; p = 0.003), more often Risser 0 (79% vs. 48%; p < 0.001); however, presented with similar curves (45° vs. 44°; p = 0.31). Open triradiate cartilage at presentation (OR 15.3; 95% CI 4.3-54.6; p < 0.001) and less in-brace correction (p = 0.03) increased the likelihood of surgery. All 20 JIS patients avoided temporary growth rods, with 18 (90%) eventually requiring surgery. CONCLUSION: Non-operative treatment was successful in 42% of children. Risk factors for surgery were younger age, open triradiates, and less in-brace correction. Bracing can be effective in delaying surgery until skeletal maturity in patients with curves ≥ 40°. Patients should be counseled on the risks and benefits of bracing and surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.