Survival and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty in children with proximal tibial osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for correcting limb-length discrepancy after limb-salvage reconstruction for proximal tibial osteosarcoma in children have several limitations. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, complications, prognosis, and clinical outcomes of reconstruction using hemiarthroplasty after tumor resection in pediatric patients with proximal tibial osteosarcoma. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive retrospective analysis of the data of pediatric patients with osteosarcoma of the proximal tibia who underwent surgery between December 2008 and November 2018 at our center. We enrolled 49 consecutive patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty. The cruciate ligaments of all patients were reconstructed using special spacers, and the medial and lateral collateral ligaments of the knee and joint capsule were reconstructed using a mesh. Postoperatively, if the unequal length of both lower limbs exceeded 4 cm or knee instability occurred, a second-stage surgery was performed for limb lengthening and replacing the distal femoral prosthesis. We analyzed the oncological prognosis, complications of hemiarthroplasty, postoperative stability, and postoperative function. RESULTS: The follow-up period ranged between 11 and 159 months, with a median of 84 (62, 129) months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83.2%. Thirty-nine patients survived at the end of the follow-up period with 34 prostheses (87.2%). The overall prosthesis survival rate was 87.4% after 5 years, indicating the long-term benefits of the procedure. Limb length was measured in 28 adult patients. The average limb-length discrepancy was 33 ± 15 mm with a median of 33 mm (21, 47); the femur and tibia caused a discrepancy of 8.5 ± 9.9 mm and 24.8 ± 15.5 mm, respectively. The patients had 30-135° of knee motion, with a mean of 82 ± 24°. The femoral tibial angle was greater on the affected side than on the healthy side, with a mean difference of 4.5°±3.6°. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 25 ± 3. Five patients underwent second-stage distal femoral prosthesis replacement, with mean MSTS scores of 24 ± 2 and 28 ± 1 before and after second-stage surgery, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hemiarthroplasty in children reduces limb-length discrepancy in adulthood by rebuilding cruciate ligaments, lateral collateral ligaments, and the joint capsule, thereby improving knee stability.

Mapping Staphylococcus aureus at Early and Late Stages of Infection in a Clinically Representative Hip Prosthetic Joint Infection Rat Model.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to be a devastating complication following total joint replacement surgeries where Staphylococcus aureus is the main offending organism. To improve our understanding of the disease pathogenesis, a histological analysis of infected peri-implant tissue in a hip PJI rat model was utilized to assess S. aureus spread and tissue reaction at early and late stages of infection. Sprague-Dawley rats were used and received a left cemented hip hemiarthroplasty using a 3D-printed titanium femoral stem. The rats received an intra-articular injection of S. aureus Xen36. These infected rats were sacrificed either at 3 days post-infection (early-stage infection) or at 13-days post-infection (late-stage infection). The femoral and acetabular tissues of all animals were harvested at euthanasia. Histological analysis for the harvested tissue was performed using immunohistochemistry, hematoxylin and eosin, as well as Masson's trichrome stains. Histological examination revealed significant quantitative and qualitative differences in peri-implant tissue response to infection at early and late stages. This hip PJI rat model identified clear histologic differences between early and late stages of S. aureus infection and how quickly bacterial infiltration could occur. These findings can provide insight into why certain surgical strategies like debridement and antibiotics may be associated with high failure rates.

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty With a Calcar Stem for the Management of a Failed Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation Asia (PFNA2) in a Case of Geriatric Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture.

Intertrochanteric (IT) femur fractures in the elderly population comprise a major part of geriatric trauma and fractures. There are various modalities of surgical management, ranging from intramedullary fixation and extramedullary fixation to even replacing the hip joint. Apart from the surgeon's choice, other factors, such as geriatric age, bone quality and osteoporosis, medical comorbidities, life expectancy, pre-operative ambulatory status, muscle strength, type and pattern of fracture, and mental health of the patient, play vital roles in determining the ideal modality of management and the long-term outcome. The present case is a 75-year-old lady who had an IT fracture due to a domestic fall, managed surgically with a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation Asia (PFNA2) for an unstable fracture. She presented with blade back-out on the 11th day postoperatively. The patient was investigated thoroughly, and infection was ruled out. She was managed by the removal of the nail, followed by a cemented calcar-replacing bipolar hemiarthroplasty for an unstable comminuted IT fracture. The patient was ambulatory with a walker by the seventh postoperative day and without a walker by the sixth week, and she was self-sufficient in her activities of daily living. Every geriatric IT fracture must be evaluated thoroughly for contributing factors, such as osteoporosis and fracture pattern, to predict outcomes, and a tailor-made strategy of surgical management and stepwise physiotherapy must be provided to the patient for the best results.

Chondrosarcoma in Proximal Humerus: The First Reported Case in Lebanon and the Middle East of a Female Treated with MUTARS® Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty.

Introduction: The incidence of chondrosarcomas is relatively high as it comes second to multiple myeloma as the most common primary malignant bony neoplasms in adults. They tend to occur mostly in the axial skeleton. Hence, they rarely develop in the proximal humerus. Although imaging can aid in the diagnosis of chondrosarcoma, histopathology is the cornerstone that correlates with prognosis and guides us toward the most appropriate treatment modality. Surgical treatment is the best option for chondrosarcomas as most of them are resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It is really challenging to settle on one surgical technique for proximal humerus chondrosarcomas as surgeons must balance between saving the patient from the oncological process and maintaining a good function of the shoulder joint. Case Report: We present herein a rare case, the first in Lebanon, of chondrosarcoma hitting the left proximal humerus of a 62-year-old lady successfully managed by operative resection and reconstruction with a cemented shoulder hemiarthroplasty using the Modular Universal Tumor and Revision System (MUTARS®) system. Conclusion: Chondrosarcomas are relatively rare. Their resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy in addition to their proximal humerus localization is troublesome for both the patient and the surgeon. Hence, a relatively new technique (first in Lebanon and the Middle East), the MUTARS shoulder hemiarthroplasty is found to have promising results on terms of morbidity and mortality for the patient when indicated and properly done.

Revision rates of one new and two established hemiarthroplasty heads: a comparative cohort study from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.

INTRODUCTION: The anatomical Lubinus SPII-stem is commonly used in hemi-arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures (FNF), combined with either the bipolar Variocup, the Unipolar Head (UH) and a newly introduced unipolar Modular Trauma Head (MTH). Similar constructs like the MTH are reported to have risk of corrosion and wear. This is the first publication evaluating the MTH. AIM: To describe the revision rate of the SPII-stems/heads which were divided into 3 groups (Variocup, UH, MTH). The head types are compared by their rate of revision at 2 years, due to any cause and to dislocation. Revision and mortality rates up to 10 years are reported. METHODS: This observational cohort study based on prospectively registered data from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register included 33,059 patients with hemiarthroplasty 2005-2021 due to FNF. SPII-stems combined with Variocup (n = 7,281), UH (n = 23,980), MTH (n = 1,798) were included. The follow-up ended at 10 years for Variocup and UH, for MTH at 2 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses was used, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Patients were censored at death or at the end of the study (31 December 2021). RESULTS: The 2-year revision rate regardless of cause was similar between the groups: after Variocup 3.5% (CI, 3.1-4.0), UH 3.1% (CI, 2.9-3.4), MTH 3.5% (CI, 2.6-4.5).At 10 years, the Variocup and UH had similar revision rates; 4.6% (CI, 4.0-5.2) and 5.0% (CI, 4.4-5.6).For revision due to dislocation at 2 years Variocup 2.3% (CI, 1.9-2.7) had an inferior outcome compared to UH 1.5% (CI, 1.3-1.7). The MTH had an intermediate outcome, 1.7% (CI, 1.0-2.3). Variocup had a higher dislocation related revision rate, until the 10th year.The 2-year-mortality was 36% (CI, 35-37) after Variocup, 43% (CI, 42-43) after UH and 44% (CI, 41-47) after MTH. CONCLUSIONS: The hemi-heads have comparable revision rates within 2 and 10 years. The new MTH performs similar to the standard UH. The bipolar Variocup is associated with more revisions due to dislocation.

Radiologic evaluation of the healing of the greater tubercle after humeral hemiarthroplasty with Aequalis-fracture-implants for proximal humeral fracture: a retrospective cohort study in 45 shoulders.

INTRODUCTION: Development and use of specific anatomic prosthesis for shoulder's fracture aimed to reach the best rate of consolidation of the greater tubercle, which means a cuff restitution to improve functional results. The lack of bone healing of the tubercles suggested the use of a fenestrated humeral implant with interposition of a bone graft in the metaphyseal part of the prosthesis. This characteristic of specific implant, have few reports in the literature, leading us to the current retrospective study aiming: 1) to evaluate the healing rate of the greater tubercle after implantation of fracture dedicated anatomic implant, which includes a fenestration in the prosthetic metaphysis for the addition of a cortico cancellous graft, 2) to asses on patients with proximal humerus fractures, the bone healing of the greater tubercle close to the intraprosthetic bone graft. HYPOTHESIS: The specific "implant-fracture" can achieve a high rate of bone healing of the humeral greater tubercle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2020, fifty-one patients were operated on by implantation of fracture dedicated implant for proximal humerus fracture. Six were excluded (2 operated for revision, 2 operated after 3 weeks, 1 died, 1 without follow-up). In total 45 patients were included in radiological analysis, clinical analysis had been performed on 23/45 patients at the longest follow up, the other 22/45 were only analyzed on radiographies. Mean-aged 66 years (range, 47 years -88 years), 25/45 (56%) of women, with 3-4-parts fractures according to Neer's classification. The techniques of tubercle fixation were isolated cerclages of combined horizontal cerclages and vertical sutures. Position and healing of the greater tubercle was controlled through antero-posterior and lateral X-Rays views at the longest follow-up (mean 50 months, range 3-193 months). Peroperative techniques of fixation, clinical and functional outcomes were noted and correlated to the radiologic position of the greater tubercle and the graft evolution. Factors associated with healing and anatomic position had been investigated. RESULTS: The rate of greater tubercle healing was 32/45 (73%). Factors significantly associated with greater tuberosity consolidation were higher age (p = 0.04) and the addition of a vertical osteosuture to the horizontal suture of the greater tubercle (p = 0.01). The rate of anatomic position of the greater tubercle was 15/45 (33%) of cases. When the fixation of the tuberosity was made with vertical suture, good position of the tuberosity was observed in 68% (17/24) at the longest follow-up. DISCUSSION: Our results were in accordance with the literature, but the current study underlined there were two types of factors influencing tubercle healing in the literature: the technique of fixation of the tubercle and the patient's age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level IV cohort study without control group.

Hemiarthroplasty vs. internal fixation for nondisplaced femoral neck fracture in mainland China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Objective: Nondisplaced femoral neck fractures constitute a substantial portion of these injuries. The optimal treatment strategy between internal fixation (IF) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) remains debated, particularly concerning cost-effectiveness. Methods: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov decision model to compare HA and IF in treating nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients in China. The analysis was performed from a payer perspective with a 5-year time horizon. Costs were measured in 2020 USD, and effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses, including one-way and probabilistic analyses, were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. The willingness-to-pay threshold for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was set at $11,083/QALY following the Chinese gross domestic product in 2020. Results: HA demonstrated higher cumulative QALYs (2.94) compared to IF (2.75) but at a higher total cost ($13,324 vs. $12,167), resulting in an ICER of $6,128.52/QALY. The one-way sensitivity analysis identified the costs of HA and IF as the most influential factors. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that HA was more effective in 69.3% of simulations, with an ICER below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $11,083 in 58.8% of simulations. Conclusions: HA is a cost-effective alternative to IF for treating nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients in mainland China.

Mid- to long-term outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as revision procedure for failed hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture.

BACKGROUND: Insufficient tuberosity healing is the most common reason for poor outcome after treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) using hemiarthroplasty (HA). In these cases, revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can improve function and reduce pain in the short term, however, long-term results remain scarce. Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological mid- to long-term results in patients with a revision RTSA after failed HA for PHF. METHODS: In this retrospective study all patients that received a revision to RTSA after failed fracture HA between 2006 and 2018 were included. A total of 49 shoulders in 48 patients (38 female, 10 male; mean age 82 ± 9 years) were identified in our database. A total of 20 patients (17 female, 3 male; mean age was 79 ± 9 years) were available for follow-up examination after a mean time period of approximately eight years (3-14 years) after revision surgery. At final follow-up, patients were assessed using a subjective shoulder value (SSV), range of motion (ROM), visual analogue score (VAS), the Constant Score (CS) and the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: At final follow-up, mean CS was 55 ± 19 (19-91), VAS averaged 3 ± 3 (0-8) and mean SSV was 61 ± 18% (18-90%). Mean SF-12 was 44 (28-57) with a mean physical component summary (PCS) of 38 (21-56) and a mean mental component summary (MCS) of 51 (29-67). On average active forward flexion (FF) was 104° (10-170°), active abduction (ABD) was 101° (50-170°), active external rotation (ER) was 19° (10-30°) and active internal rotation (IR) of the lumbosacral transition was reached. Three patients presented with a periprosthetic humeral fracture after RTSA implantation and underwent a reoperation (15%) during follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Revision RTSA results in promising clinical results in patients after initial failed HA after PHF. A complication and reoperation rate of 15% is tolerable in consideration of satisfactory functional and psychological outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Stemless Anatomic and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients under 55 years of age with Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: An analysis of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry at five years.

BACKGROUND: Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in young patients poses challenging treatment decisions. Arthroplasty options have different failure profiles and implant survivorship patterns. This registry study aims to analyze the cumulative per cent revision rate (CPR) of different types of arthroplasties conducted for primary osteoarthritis in patients under 55 years of age. METHODS: This comparative observational national registry study included all shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in patients under 55 years of age undertaken between January 1st, 2005, and December 31st, 2022. Partial hemi resurfacing and hemi stemless procedures were excluded. The cumulative percentage of revision (CPR) was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for gender. Reasons for revision of each type of arthroplasty and cumulative incidence of revision diagnoses were analyzed. RESULTS: 2111 primary shoulder arthroplasties were compared. Glenoid erosion is the predominant cause of revision for humeral resurfacing (29.8%) and hemiarthroplasty (35.5%). Instability is the predominant cause of revision for stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), while loosening is the predominant cause of revision for stemless ATSA. The 6-year CPR is 12.8% for humeral resurfacing (HRA), 14.1% for hemiarthroplasty (HA), 12.4% for stemmed (ATSA), 7.0% for stemless ATSA, and 6.5% for (RTSA). Stemmed ATSA had a higher revision rate than RTSA (entire period HR=2.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16, 3.57), p=0.012). In contrast, the revision rate of stemless ATSA was not different from RTSA (HR =1.05 (95% CI 0.51, 2.19), p=0.889). Males outnumber females for all shoulder arthroplasty categories. DISCUSSION: RTSA and stemless ATSA are viable options in young patients with primary osteoarthritis. Their short-to medium-term revision rates are comparable to those of older patients and lower than those associated with HRA, HA, and stemmed ATSA. CONCLUSION: In the predominantly male patient population under the age of 55, reverse shoulder arthroplasty and stemless ATSA have a lower short-term revision risk than stemmed ATSA.

Comparative analysis of the quality of the cement mantle in hip hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture between three different surgical approaches: a single-center retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Achieving the initial stability of implants is necessary for hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA), especially in elderly patients, and this can be achieved with a cement mantle of quality. The direct anterior approach (DAA) for HHA lately has shown positive results. However, evidence is lacking of HHA in elderly patients with osteoporosis after femoral neck fracture (FNF). This study compares differences in cement mantle quality after HHA, its complications, radiological outcomes and functional status in elderly patients with FNF intervened through different approaches. METHODS: A non-interventional, retrospective case-control study was conducted. 150 cases were selected based on the surgical approach (DAA, DLA and PLA) in a 1:1:1 proportion between 2018 and 2019. Under 75 years old suspicion or confirmation of a pathological fracture were excluded. Antibiotic-loaded cement was utilized. Cement preparation involved vacuum centrifugation and standard instructions for preparation canal and filling, and prosthesis placement were followed. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in cement mantle quality, radiological outcomes, and the majority of the postoperative complications and functional status considering the surgical approach (p > 0.05). However, the DAA was associated significantly with shorter hospital stays (8.3 days vs 11.3 and 13 days for DLA and PLA) a decrease in postoperative blood transfusion (22% vs 34% and 53%), and lower rate of loss of walking (8% vs 20% and 28.6%). CONCLUSION: The DAA for HHA in patients with FNF provides a high-quality cement mantle, similar to other approaches. Also, the DAA shows advantages like shorter hospital stays and lower transfusion rates in elderly patients.

Management strategies for neglected simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures: Case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures are rare and challenging, often occurring due to high-energy trauma in younger adults or low-energy trauma compounded by metabolic issues in elderly populations. Neglected cases, particularly in the context of narcotic addiction and limited access to healthcare, present unique management dilemmas. This study aims to contribute insights into the clinical presentation, management strategies, and outcomes of two neglected simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two cases: a 65-year-old woman and a 45-year-old man, both with a history of narcotic addiction, who presented with neglected simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures. Both cases demonstrated significant pain and functional impairment necessitating surgical intervention. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Treatment involved one-stage bilateral hip hemiarthroplasty, which successfully restored function without postoperative complications during follow-up periods of 14 and 16 months. Discussion includes the challenges of diagnosing and managing neglected fractures in vulnerable populations, emphasizing the importance of early recognition and tailored surgical approaches. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests the efficacy of one-stage bilateral hip hemiarthroplasty in managing neglected simultaneous bilateral femoral neck fractures due to narcotic addiction. However, variability in outcomes across different surgical techniques highlights the need for individualized treatment plans based on patient-specific factors.

The Superior Approach in Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: A Comparative Analysis with the Posterior Approach.

Purpose: The concept of a superior approach (SA) involves the use of a tissue-sparing posterior approach (PA), with exposure of the piriformis muscle and gluteus medius/minimus muscles. The objective of this study was to clarify the features of hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) using a SA in regard to early recovery and mid-term outcomes, with a comparison of the outcomes of SA-HAs and HAs using a PA (PA-HAs). Materials and Methods: A total of 120 HAs for treatment of primary femoral neck fracture with a healthy opposite hip joint were performed in our hospital from 2013 to 2018. Propensity score matching in regard to age, sex, body mass index, walking ability before injury, place of residence, time to surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status was performed for 79 patients with SA-HAs and 41 patients with PA-HAs. The final analysis included 34 patients who underwent SA-HAs and 34 patients who underwent PA-HAs. Results: The duration of surgery was 57.1 minutes and 72.1 minutes (P=0.001) for SA-HAs and PA-HAs, respectively. The scores for walking ability at postoperative one week were 4.9±1.4 and 4.2±1.0 (P=0.021) for SA-HAs and PA-HAs, respectively. The Barthel index (BI) at the start of rehabilitation was 26.2±18.7 and 17.4±16.3 (P=0.042) for SA-HAs and PA-HAs, respectively. The 4-year complication-free survival rates were 74.2% and 56.3% for SA-HAs and PA-HAs, respectively (P=0.310). Conclusion: SA-HA can be performed without torsion of the muscles and ligaments around the hip joint. Early recovery of walking ability and BI was a significant feature of SA-HAs.

Enhanced Surgical Techniques in Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Guide for Surgeons Based on Modification of the McFarland and Osborne Approach to the Hip.

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of various approaches in hip arthroplasties introduces distinct advantages and complications. Notably, widely adopted methods such as the posterior approach have been linked to elevated rates of posterior hip dislocations and iatrogenic sciatic nerve injuries, while the lateral approach has been associated with superior gluteal nerve injuries. In this study, we propose a refined modification of the McFarland and Osborne approach, aiming to amalgamate the most favorable aspects of prior modifications of the lateral approach to the hip. Additionally, our contribution extends to providing a comprehensive stepwise guide for the exposure and closure processes in cases of bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement. This modification not only offers potential advantages to seasoned orthopedic surgeons but also serves as a valuable resource for young Turks venturing into hip surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 14 patients with femoral neck fractures underwent surgery using the modified McFarland and Osborne approach and were followed up for a period of six months. The functional outcome was analyzed by the Modified Mobility and Aids Scoring Matrix. RESULTS: Seven of the 14 patients attained pre-injury status with respect to the Mobility and Aids scoring matrix. six patients had a fall of 1, and one patient had a fall of 2, as compared to pre-injury status. CONCLUSION: Our research suggests that this method serves as a superior alternative to conventional approaches, demonstrating notable advantages in terms of dissection difficulty, reduced risk to neurovascular structures, and minimized post-operative hip dislocations. Additionally, it exhibits a favorable outcome, enabling a return to pre-injury levels of activity.

Hemoglobin level, degree of mobilization, and pneumonia are associated with the development of postoperative delirium in cemented hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture.

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to identify independent prognostic factors for developing a postoperative delirium (POD) in patients suffering from a proximal femoral neck fracture and treated by implantation of a hemiprosthesis. METHODS: A retrospective study, including patients with hip hemiarthroplasty due to a femoral neck fracture between 2011 and 2020 was performed. Demographic data, preexisting conditions, intra-/postoperative complications, mobilization and laboratory results were extracted from the patients' charts. The different parameters were analyzed comparing patients with and without POD. RESULTS: 412 patients, mean age of 81 ± 9.58 years were included, 66.5% (n = 274) were female, 18.2% (n = 75) of them developed a POD. Significantly higher incidence of POD was associated with older age (p < 0.001), lower level of haemoglobin (p < 0.001), higher post-surgery interleukin 6 (IL 6) level (p = 0.008), higher postoperative level of leukocytes (p = 0.01). Patients with POD received more units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) (p = 0.007). Patients with no mobility limitations pre-operatively developed POD less frequently (p = 0.01), whereas suffering from pneumonia (p = 0.03) or limited mobility postoperatively increased the risk of POD (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study could help to identify patients with a risk for developing POD after a hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures. As a consequence, frequent controls of Hb, IL 6 and leucocytes levels to avoid anemia and infections, as well as the well surgical treatment to guarantee a good postoperative outcome.

Patient Satisfaction Following Non-Operative Treatment of Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Case-Control Study.

Introduction: A minority of geriatric hip fracture patients pursue non-operative treatment. Compared with surgical patients, non-operative patients have higher mortality rates. However, patient satisfaction following non-operative vs operative treatment has not been investigated extensively. The purpose of this study was to compare satisfaction among non-operatively vs operatively treated hip fracture patients. Methods: We identified patients aged 60+ years with proximal femur fractures treated over a 10-year period. Excluded were patients with isolated greater/lesser trochanteric fractures. Patients or relatives were asked to complete a 6-question survey about their treatment satisfaction. Results: Survey responses from 56 operative and 28 non-operative patients were recorded. Overall, 91.1% of operative and 82.1% of non-operative patients were satisfied with their treatment course (P = 0.260). However, only 71.4% of non-operative patients were satisfied with treatment option explanations vs 83.9% of operative patients (P = 0.014). While only 64.3% of non-operative respondents were satisfied with the ultimate treatment outcome (vs 85.7% of operative patients, P = 0.025), 89.3% of patients in each cohort would choose the same treatment plan again. Discussion: Our findings highlight the complexity of defining patient satisfaction, particularly in a geriatric hip fracture population. Unlike previous studies, we chose a direct approach to quantifying patient satisfaction by asking participants specifically about satisfaction with treatment outcome and the overall treatment course. Additional survey questions were then included to assess factors considered important in treatment satisfaction, such as health care provider treatment explanations, post-treatment mobility, and palliative care service involvement. Conclusions: We identified significant differences between non-operatively and operatively treated geriatric hip fracture patients regarding satisfaction with the explanation of treatment options, and ultimate treatment outcomes. There was no significant difference in overall satisfaction with the treatment course or likelihood of choosing the same treatment again. Further research investigating patient satisfaction following geriatric hip fracture treatment is warranted.

Impact of Intraoperative Femoral Fractures During Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures.

BACKGROUND: There have been several studies on intraoperative femoral fractures (IFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty, but it is not well understood how this complication affects the patient population undergoing cemented hemiarthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the impact of IFFs sustained during cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were treated for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association 31B fractures with cemented hemiarthroplasty between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2021, at a single academic level 1 trauma center. An initial cohort was constructed of all patients who sustained an IFF during their surgery, yielding 31 patients after excluding those who sustained a pathologic fracture or had incomplete data. These patients were matched 1:2 on age, sex, and body mass index to patients in a control cohort. The primary outcome measure was implant failure. Secondary outcome measures included complications, all-cause mortality, and radiographic outcomes (subsidence, femoral component loosening, acetabular wear, and heterotopic ossification) postoperatively. RESULTS: Subsequent implant revision was required in 3.2% (n = 1) of patients who sustained an IFF and 1.6% (n = 1) of patients who did not. After adjusting for comorbidities, there was no observed excess risk of implant failure in the fracture cohort when compared to the control cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30, P = 0.740). There was no observed excess risk of morbidity (HR = 0.69, P = 0.621) or all-cause mortality (HR = 0.23, P = 0.330). Radiographic outcomes also did not significantly differ between the 2 cohorts (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fractures during cemented hemiarthroplasty do not contribute to an increased risk of secondary surgery, morbidity, or mortality after surgery. They also do not adversely affect radiographic outcomes postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

No Differences in Major In-Hospital Outcome Metrics When Comparing the Direct Lateral Approach to the Posterior Approach for Hemiarthroplasties After Traumatic Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Introduction: The surgical approach of hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures remains debated. The study objective was to compare in-hospital outcomes for geriatric displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty based on surgical approach (direct lateral vs. posterior approach). Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included geriatric patients (≥60 y/o) admitted 7/1/2016-3/31/2020 treated with hemiarthroplasty. Outcomes included: operative time (incision to closure), length of stay (HLOS), and blood loss volume (mL). The Harding direct lateral approach was compared to the posterior approach; P < .05. Results: There were 164 patients (59% direct lateral, 41% posterior). Patients treated with the direct lateral approach had an advanced directive (P = .03), dementia, (P = .03), or were functionally dependent (P = .03) more often than patients treated with the posterior approach. Time to surgery was comparable between groups (P = .52). The direct lateral approach was associated with a shorter operative time (2.3 vs. 2.8 h, P = .03), a longer HLOS (5.0 vs. 4.0 days, P < .01), and a lower median volume of blood loss (50 vs. 100 mL, P = .01), than the posterior approach, respectively. In a stratified analysis, for those who were not functionally dependent, did not have dementia or an advanced directive, the direct lateral approach led to a longer HLOS (P = .03) and shorter operative time (P = .04) than the posterior approach. Whereas among those who were functionally dependent, had dementia or had an advanced directive, the direct lateral approach led to less blood loss (P = .02) than the posterior approach. Discussion: While those treated with the direct lateral approach lost significantly less blood, they had a significantly longer HLOS than those treated with the posterior approach. Comorbidities significantly modified outcomes, which may suggest their presence could assist with treatment decisions. Conclusions: This study found neither approach, the direct lateral nor posterior, to be superior. Surgical approach could remain physician preference.

Clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty in patients with bowel ostomies.

INTRODUCTION: The influence of prior colostomy or ileostomy on patients undergoing joint arthroplasty remains poorly understood. Our study aimed to assess whether patients with an ostomy undergoing hip and knee arthroplasties have worse postoperative outcomes and increased rates of revisions. METHOD: A single-center, retrospective review of patients with a history of bowel ostomy who underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2012 to 2021. A total of 24 THAs, 11 HAs, and 25 TKAs in patients with open small or large bowel stoma were identified. A ten-to-one propensity score match was utilized to establish cohorts with comparable demographics but no prior ostomy procedure. RESULTS: Patients with stomas undergoing elective THA showed greater 90-day ED visits (20.0 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.009), 90-day all-cause readmissions (20.0 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.009), 90-day non-orthopedic readmissions (10.0 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), 90-day readmissions for infection (5.0 vs. 0.5%, P = 0.043), all-cause revisions (15.0 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), revisions for PJI (5.0 vs. 0%, P = 0.043), and revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (10.0 vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with stomas undergoing non-elective hip arthroplasties exhibited a longer mean LOS (12.1 vs. 7.0 days, P < 0.001) and increased 90-day all-cause readmissions (40.0 vs. 17.3%, P = 0.034), 90-day orthopedic readmissions (26.7 vs. 6.0%, P = 0.005), all-cause revisions (13.3 vs. 2.0%, P = 0.015), revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (6.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.002), and revisions for aseptic loosening (6.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in readmission or revision rates between ostomy patients undergoing TKA and a matched control group. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing hip arthroplasties with an open stoma are at an increased risk of hospital encounters and revisions, whereas TKA patients with stomas are not at increased risk of complications. These findings emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing the unique challenges associated with this patient population.

Total elbow arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of distal humerus fractures in the elderly: Experience from a tertiary referral centre.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear consensus on whether total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) is superior for treating distal humerus fractures in the elderly. This study analysed the functional outcomes and re-operation rates following TEA and HA for intra-articular distal humerus fractures in patients aged ≥65 years. METHODS: 19 patients (TEA = 12, HA = 7) treated between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Mean age was 73 years and mean follow-up was 46 months. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick-DASH (Q-DASH), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS), and EQ-5D. Complications requiring re-operation were recorded. RESULTS: HA showed superior outcomes in MEPS (93.6 vs 75.0, p = 0.0339), Q-DASH (13.3 vs 31.3, p = 0.0182), OES (41.7 vs 33.2, p = 0.0346), SF-12 PCS (55.5 vs 36.9, p = 0.0008) and EQ-5D (83 vs 67, p = 0.0023). One HA patient required revision to TEA for prosthetic joint infection. One TEA patient required revision for a periprosthetic ulna fracture. CONCLUSION: HA provides better functional outcomes compared to TEA in the treatment of distal humerus fractures in the elderly. Data is limited by selection bias and low patient numbers with a multicentre randomised controlled trial warranted.

Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty as a Treatment Modality for Pathological Fracture in the Proximal Femur Metastasis Without the Recurrence of Primary Breast Cancer: A Case Report.

Metastatic lesions in the proximal femur are well-known in the literature and are important since they can progress to pathological fractures and impair the patient's mobility. We present the case of a middle-aged female with a history of breast carcinoma 20 years ago, who experienced diffuse chronic hip pain for the past two months. Radiographs, MRI, and PET scans revealed a metastatic lesion in her proximal femur. After consulting with an oncologist, it was determined that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was unnecessary. The treatment strategy was dependent on the preoperative general health condition, the life expectancy, amount of metastasis, bone quality, pathological fractures and factors affecting the union and capacity to ambulate the patient postoperatively. The patient underwent a cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty to excise all metastatic tissue and provide a painless, functional, and mobile joint. Bipolar hemiarthroplasties articulate at two levels, and this dual-bearing design is believed to reduce acetabular wear. The bipolar hemiarthroplasty also eliminated the risk of complications associated with the acetabular component, which would necessitate early revision surgery. Modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty is a good modality of replacement associated with fewer complications and improves quality of life.