Letter of recommendation characteristics associated with interview offer to a vascular surgery residency program.

BACKGROUND: Letters of recommendation (LORs) are considered by program directors (PDs) to be an integral part of the residency application. With the conversion of USMLE Step 1 to a binary pass/fail outcome, LORs will likely have higher important in the application process moving forward. However, their utility in securing an interview for a particular applicant remains undetermined. This study aims to identify the applicant and LOR characteristics associated with an interview invitation. METHODS: Letter writer (n=977) characteristics were abstracted from applications (n=264) to an individual integrated vascular surgery residency program over 2 application cycles. A validated text analysis program, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, was used to characterize LOR content. Applicant, letter writer, and LOR characteristics associated with an interview invitation was determined using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Letter writers were 70.9% vascular surgeons (VS), 23.7% PDs, and 45.4% professors. Applicants offered an interview were more likely to come from a top 50 medical school (35.2% vs 25.8%, p=0.013) and an institution with a home vascular program (45.5% vs 34.1%, p=0.006). Alpha Omega Alpha membership was significantly associated with interview offer (28.4%, p<0.001). A greater proportion of letters from VS was associated with an interview offer (p <0.001) compared with letter writers of other specialties. One or more PD letters was significantly associated with an interview offer (79.55% vs 20.45%, p=0.008), whereas number of letters from APDs was not significantly associated with interview offer. Letters written by away institution faculty were significantly associated with interview offer (75%, p<0.001), whereas nonclinical letters were not. Presence of one or more letters from a chair (57.95% vs 42.05%, p=0.015) or chief (67.05% vs 32.95%, p=0.028) was significantly associated with interview offer. Letters for applicants offered an interview had more references to research and teaching, which were more common in letters written by VS. Letters written by PDs were more likely to use assertive, advertising language in favor of applicants. There were no significant applicant, letter writer, or LOR characteristics associated with a top 20 rank. CONCLUSION: Successful applicants were more likely to have LORs written by VS, PDs, and those of higher academic rank with references to research and teaching.

Author's response to Letter-to-the-Editor from Chang JS. concerning: "Benefit of respiratory gating in the Danish Breast Cancer Group partial breast irradiation trial".

We appreciate Chang JS.'s interest in the article: "Benefit of respiratory gating in the Danish Breast Cancer Group partial breast irradiation trial". The author's response corroborates the statements and comments of Chang JS.

Cracking the code: interpreting content and phrases used in maternal-fetal medicine fellowship letters of recommendation.

BACKGROUND: Letters of recommendation for Maternal-Fetal Medicine(MFM) fellowship are a critical part of the applicant selection process. However, data regarding best practices for how to write LOR for MFM is limited. Similarly, within letters of recommendation, differences in the "code" or meaning of summative words/phrases used at the end of letters of recommendation are seen between surgery, pediatrics, and medicine. However, data regarding code MFM Letters of recommendation are quite limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe what Maternal-Fetal Medicine program directors value in letters of recommendation for fellowship applicants and how PDs interpret commonly used summative words/phrases. STUDY DESIGN: After IRB exemption, subject matter experts developed an e-survey querying the importance of various letters of recommendation "best practices" described by other specialties. Content and face validation were performed prior to dissemination. This cross-sectional survey was administered to MFM program directors in February 2023. The primary outcome was the relative importance of letters of recommendation content areas. Secondary outcomes included the strength of each summative "code" phrase. Descriptive analysis was performed and principal component analysis (PCA) was then used to reduce the list of phrases to their underlying dimensions. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 29.0. RESULTS: Of 104 MFM program directors sent the survey, 70 (67%) responded. MFM program directors reviewed an average of 78 applications (SD, 30) with 60% writing ≥3 letters/year. Ninety-one percent of respondents noted that letters of recommendation are important/very important in shaping impressions of an applicant. Respondents reported the depth of interaction with an applicant, the applicant's specific behavior traits, the applicant's abilities and a summative statement including strength of the recommendation as important content for MFM fellowship letters of recommendation. Letter length, use of bold/italics, and restating the applicant's curriculum vitae were considered not important. Following PCA with varimax rotation, 14 specific phrases used in letters of recommendation were reduced to 5 themes: high qualitative assessments, average qualitative assessments, objective metrics, exceeding expectations and grit. These themes accounted for 64.6% of the variance in the model (KMO 0.7, Bartlett's Test of Sphericity p<.01). Phrases that respondents considered positive included: "Top 5%," "Want to keep," and "highest recommendation," (all mean score≥4.5/5), while "expected level," "showed improvement," and "2nd quartile" were negatively associated code words (all mean score <2.5/5). CONCLUSION: MFM program directors reported that descriptions of an applicant's abilities, behavior traits, and depth of the writer's interactions with the applicant were all important components of an MFM fellowship letters of recommendation. Letter length, bold/italics, and highlights from the CV were not important. A clear "code" emerged regarding summative phrases included in letters of recommendation. Dissemination of these data might help less experienced letter writers send a clearer message and ensure all letter writers have a shared mental model.

Changes and challenges in the residency application process in obstetrics and gynecology.

Faculty career advisors who guide applicants applying to obstetrics and gynecology residency programs need updated information and resources, given the constant changes and challenges to the residency application process. Initial changes included standardization of the application timeline and interview processes. More recent changes included the utilization of a standardized letter of evaluation, initiation of program signaling, second look visit guidelines, and updated sections in the Electronic Residency Application Service. Challenges in advising include the unmatched applicant and the applicant who is couples matching in the era of program signaling. Additional considerations include applying with the current status of reproductive health law restrictions and preparing for a new residency application platform. The Undergraduate Medical Education Committee of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics provides this updated guide of the prior 2021 resource for advisors to increase confidence in advising students, boost professional fulfillment with advising activities, and aid in satisfaction with advising resources. This guide covers the continuing challenges and future opportunities in the resident application process.

Exploring predictive markers for liver failure post-hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

This letter to the editor addresses the study titled "Predictive value of NLR, Fib4, and APRI in the occurrence of liver failure after hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma" by Kuang et al in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. The study acknowledges the comprehensive patient data analysis while suggesting that there is a need for further discussion on the clinical applicability of these markers across diverse patient populations. This letter recommends prospective studies for validation and considers the influence of confounding factors. This finding underscores the significance of this study in improving hepatocellular carcinoma management.

Optimization of a standardized letter of recommendation for faculty who wish to support candidates applying to surgical training programs.

Letters of recommendation (LORs) play an important role in applicant selection for graduate medical education programs. LORs may be of increasing importance in the evaluation of applicants given the recent change of the USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail scoring and the relative lack of other objective measures by which to differentiate and stratify applicants. Narrative letters of recommendation (NLORs), although widely used, have certain limitations, namely variability in interpretation, introduction of gender/race bias, and performance inflation. Standardized letters of recommendation (SLOR) have been proposed as a potential corrective to these limitations. We conducted a series of semi-structured interviews and focus groups to gather perspectives from letter writers and readers to inform methods for improving information elicited by SLORs from which we collected and analyzed data using the constant comparative method and a process of iterative coding. We applied our findings to the development of a novel SLOR for use in surgical residency program applications and were subsequently invited to help revise existing SLORs for a surgical post-graduate training program.

Differences in discharge letter content: oncologists' vs. home care physicians' needs.

PURPOSE: To compare the details, oncologists include in discharge letters with what home care physicians need. Although discharge letters are important to share patients' information for home palliative care, few studies have compared the details, especially patients' emotions, regarding what oncologists include in discharge letters and home care physicians' needs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted by sending anonymous, self-administered questionnaires to 500 certified oncologists (OCs) and 500 directors of home care supporting clinics (HCs) in Japan between March and May 2023. The survey considered 20 potential items found in discharge letters, and compared rates of OCs including these items and HCs needs. RESULTS: Of 310 valid responses, 186 were from OCs (average age: 47.7; 29 females) and 124 from HCs (average age: 55.4; 9 females). Major items with lower inclusion rates for OCs included patients' emotions regarding medical conditions (58.4% in OCs vs. 92.6% in HCs, p < 0.001), families' emotions regarding medical conditions (60.0 vs. 92.6%, respectively, p < 0.001), patients' perceptions regarding medical conditions (84.9 vs. 94.3%, respectively, p = 0.011), families' perceptions regarding medical conditions (84.3 vs. 95.1%, respectively, p = 0.004), and potential late-onset treatment-related adverse events (79.3 vs. 92.6%, respectively, p = 0.002). Conversely, OCs included patients' activities of daily living more frequently (96.2 vs. 90.2%, respectively, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Transitioning to home-based palliative care may necessitate accurate information and consideration of patients' and families' perceptions and emotions regarding medical conditions in discharge letters for continuous provision of high-quality care.

Letter-only discharge process for virtual fracture clinic, a safe alternative to telephone discharge, outcomes and 12 month follow up for 1140 patients.

Telephone consult has become the accepted discharge method for virtual fracture clinic (VFC) within the United Kingdom. Telephone consultations are time consuming; many orthopaedic units lack the resources and staff to deliver large numbers of daily telephone consultations which may block the development of an effective VFC. Our study aim was to validate a letter only VFC discharge process for safety and efficacy. A letter only discharge VFC was instigated in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020). No ethical approval was required, the protocol was designed as a phased service evaluation and improvement project after change in practice. After smaller pilot audits, a comprehensive review of discharges outcomes from the VFC August-September 2021 (Phase 1) and January-March 2022 (Phase 2) was completed. Electronic letters, AE (accident and emergency) attendances and PACS database images (radiography and scans) taken over a 12 month follow up were analysed for failed discharges and adverse outcomes. Of 4810 patients reviewed in VFC, 1140 were discharged (24%). Mean patient age; 35 years (range 2-98), two thirds of patients were adults (>16 years). 116 (10%) returned with symptoms related to their initial presentation usually within the first few weeks via contact with the VFC helpline. Of the returning patients 65 were discharged again with the same advice, 48 underwent further imaging (CT/ MRI/ US scanning). 6 patients (0.5%) underwent surgery for problems relating to the initial injury; 2 knee meniscal repair/debridement, 1 ACL reconstruction, 1 fixation fifth metatarsal non-union, 2 shoulder arthroscopy. All surgeries were performed on elective timescales between 4 and 12 months after injury. Discharging letters detailed rehabilitation and symptom resolution timeframes. Our approach did not result in high return rates or adverse events (unexpected operations) in comparison to published traditional telephone discharge VFC. Units with limited staffing resources wishing to implement a VFC could safely adopt this approach as an alternative to telephone discharge.

Applicant Perceptions of Postinterview Communication During the 2022 to 2023 Neurosurgery Recruitment Cycle: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and describe neurosurgery applicant perceptions of the postinterview communication (PIC) process during the US residency match. METHODS: A voluntary and anonymous postmatch web-based survey was developed and sent to 209 candidates who applied to 1 academic neurosurgery practice during the 2022-2023 recruitment cycle, approximately 1 week following match day. Survey questions focused on their perceptions of and participation behaviors with PIC and how this impacted their final rank list. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (37.3%) of the 209 candidates responded to the survey. Sixty-four (84.2%) respondents reported submitting a letter of intent (LOI) to their number 1 ranked program. Sixty-one (82%) felt pressured to send a LOI to improve their rank status, fearing that it may harm them if they did not. Fifty-four (73.0%) respondents felt pressured to send an early LOI despite not seeing the program in person to communicate interest before programs certified their rank lists. Fourteen (18.9%) respondents agreed that a second look experience impacted their rank list enough to where they regretted an early LOI. Fifty-five (76.4%) respondents disagreed that second-look attendance had no impact on their rank status with a program. Fifty (71.4%) respondents agreed that PIC causes undue stress during the match process. Sixty-one (84.7%) respondents agreed that aspects of PIC require universal guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the perceptions of PIC and behaviors of neurosurgery applicants during the US residency match process. Standardized PIC practices may help to ensure transparency and relieve stress for applicants during the match process.

Language Patterns in Letters of Recommendation for Residency Applicants in Otolaryngology.

OBJECTIVE: Assess for gender and race patterns in agentic and communal language used in letters of recommendation for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residency applicants. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective content analysis. SETTING: Applications from OHNS applications at a single training institution for the 2019 and 2020 match cycles. METHODS: A total of 2283 letters of recommendation for 611 OHNS applicants were analyzed. Applicant and letter writer gender, applicant race and ethnicity, and applicant characteristics including United States Medical Licensing Examination® Step 1 score, research productivity, and medical school rank were extracted. Agentic and communal word use from the letters of recommendation was compared across applicant and writer characteristics using multilevel negative binomial regression modeling. RESULTS: Letter writers use a greater rate of agentic terms when describing applicants who self-identify as Asian (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.16, p < .01) or "Other/not reported" (IRR = 1.23, p < .01) as compared to white applicants. Further, standardized letters of evaluation had significantly more communal language and less agentic language. Although there was an increase in communal language in letters for female applicants compared to male applicants, these gender differences disappeared in the multivariate model. CONCLUSION: Multivariate analysis demonstrated no significant gender-based patterns in the communal or agentic language in letters of recommendation for OHNS residency applicants. However, letters for applicants identifying as Asian or "other/not reported" had more frequent use of agentic terms. Future studies should investigate other components of residency applications to assess how gender and race bias might unfairly influence an applicant's chances at a given program.

Predictive factors of post-operative apathy in patients with diffuse frontal gliomas undergoing awake brain mapping.

Patients with diffuse frontal gliomas often present with post-operative apathy after tumour removal. However, the association between apathy and tumour removal of gliomas from the frontal lobe remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing post-operative apathy after tumour removal in patients with diffuse frontal gliomas. We compared the demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with and without post-operative apathy in a cohort of 54 patients who underwent awake brain mapping for frontal gliomas. The frequency of clinical parameters such as left-sided involvement, high-grade tumour types (WHO grades III, IV), main tumour location in the anterior cingulate gyrus (ACC) and/or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) was significantly greater in the apathetic group compared to the non-apathetic group. The apathetic group scored significantly lower on neuropsychological assessments such as the Letter Fluency Test among the Word Fluency Tests than the non-pathetic group (p = .000). Moreover, the scores of Parts 3, and 3-1 of the Stroop test were significantly lower in the apathetic group than those in the non-apathetic group (p = .023, .027, respectively). Multivariate model analysis revealed that the appearance of post-operative apathy was significantly related to side of the of lesion [left vs. right, hazard ratio (HR) = 8.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-46.96, p = .021], location of the main tumour in the frontal lobe (ACC/DLPFC/OFC vs. others, HR = 7.99, 95% CI = 2.16-29.59, p = .002), and the Letter Fluency Test (HR = .37, 95% CI = .15-.90, p = .028). Post-operative apathy is significantly associated with ACC and/or DLPFC and OFC in the left hemisphere of diffuse frontal gliomas. Apathy in frontal gliomas is correlated with a decline in the Letter Fluency Test scores. Therefore, this instrument is a potential predictor of post-operative apathy in patients with diffuse frontal gliomas undergoing awake brain mapping.

Language Differences by Race on Letters of Recommendation for the Pediatric Surgery Match.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate if there is any significant linguistic difference in LoR based on applicant's race/ethnicity. DESIGN: Retrospective review of applications to pediatric surgery fellowship at a single institution (2016-2020). Race was self-reported by applicants. LoR were analyzed via the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software program. SETTING: Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida USA. A free-standing tertiary pediatric hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric surgery fellowship applicants from 2016 to 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1086 LoR from 280 applicants (52% female) were analyzed. Racial distribution was Caucasians 62.1%, Asian 12.1%, Hispanics 7.1%, multiracial 6.4% African Americans 5%, and other/unknown 7.1%. Letter writers were largely male (84%), pediatric surgeons (63%) and professors (57%). There was no difference in LoR word count across races. LoR for female multiracial candidates contained higher use of affiliation and negative emotion terms compared to Hispanic females (p = 0.002 and 0.048, respectively), and past focus terms when compared to Caucasian and Asian female applicants (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Religion terms were more common in LoR for Asian females when compared to Caucasian females (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates linguistic differences in LoR for pediatric surgery training programs based on applicant race/ethnicity. While differences are present, these do not suggest overt bias based on applicants race or ethnicity.

Testing behavioral economics messages to increase non-responders' participation in organized colorectal cancer-screening programs: A randomized controlled trial.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of behavioral economic-inspired messages on participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. We conducted a randomized-controlled trial involving 11,505 non-responders to the CRC screening programs in Florence, Rome, and Turin in 2020. Participants aged 54-70 years were randomly assigned to four conditions. Individuals in the control conditions received a standard invitation letter while the three intervention groups included an additional paragraph featuring either i. normative feedback [F] message (giving feedback that invited subjects did not participate); ii. Minority norm [MN] message (only a minority did not participate); iii. F+ MN message (combining both messages). The primary outcome was the screening participation rate 90 days after the invitation was completed. A multivariate analysis was conducted adjusting for gender, age and birthplace. Overall, screening participation rates were 5.3% in the control condition, 7.0% in the F, 8.2% in the MN, and 7.4% in the F + MN arms (p = 0.002). Invited subjects in the MN arm were more likely to participate (adjusted Odds Ratio[aOR] = 1.38; 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI,1.13-1.68]), particularly those aged 54-59 years (aOR = 1.52; 95%CI:1.16-1.98), and 60-64 (aOR = 1.57; 95%CI:1.62-; 95%CI: 1.06-2.48). Additionally, individuals aged 60-64 invited in F and F + MN arms demonstrated a higher likelihood of participation (aOR for F arm = 1.60; 95%CI: 1.06-2.41; aOR for F + MN arm = 1.99; 95%CI: 1.35-2.92). The inclusion of MN and/or F messages in the invitation letter increased participation among previous non-responders <65 years. Behavioral economics is a promising area of interest for enhancing CRC screening participation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registration number: ISRCTN11841256.