The use of cangrelor in a complex vascular patient: A case report.

Medical decision-making surrounding high risk surgical procedures requires extensive consideration about the potential risks and benefits to the patient, including implications for concomitant medications and therapies. Managing cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery is essential for safe and effective patient care. In instances where cardiac revascularization is needed prior to surgery, antiplatelet medication is also needed which can complicate future surgical procedures. This case report describes a patient who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent placement, who also needed urgent treatment for expanding thoracic abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). Standard practice for endovascular repair of a TAAA includes placement of a lumbar drain to decrease the risk of spinal cord ischemia, however dual antiplatelet therapy is contraindicated. Cangrelor is the only intravenous platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor currently available. The use of Cangrelor, a short-acting P2Y12 inhibitor, was successfully utilized as a bridge in the setting of a patient requiring dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and further surgical intervention. This medication may improve outcomes for this subset of patients.

The Use of Cranial Aneurysm Clips for Repair of Incidental Lumbar Durotomy: Operative Technique and Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Incidental durotomy is a common complication of posterior lumbar spine surgery; however, effective and durable methods for primary repair remain elusive. Multiple existing techniques have previously been reported and extensively described, including sutured repair and the use of nonpenetrating titanium clips. The use of cranial aneurysm clips for primary repair of lumbar durotomy serves as a safe and effective alternative to obtain watertight closure of a dural tear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients at a single institution who underwent primary repair of an incidental lumbar durotomy with the use of an aneurysm clip during open posterior lumbar surgery between 2012 and 2023. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative metrics were collected and examined to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel technique. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included for analysis. Four patients underwent durotomy repair with an aneurysm clip alone, 27 patients were repaired with an aneurysm clip and fibrin glue, and 20 patients underwent repair with an aneurysm clip, fibrin glue, and a collagen dural substitute. Three patients (5.9%) reported headaches: 2 (3.9%) with pseudomeningocele and 1 (2%) with wound leakage. Two patients (3.9%) had treatment failure with a return to the operating room for repair of a cerebrospinal fluid leak. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, we report the largest series of patients undergoing primary repair of incidental durotomy with the use of an aneurysm clip. Use of an aneurysm clip is noted to be a safe, quick, and effective method of primary repair compared with existing repair techniques such as sutured repair or nonpenetrating titanium clips.

Lumbar Drain Use during Middle Fossa Approaches for Nonneoplastic Pathology of the Skull Base.

Introduction The middle fossa craniotomy (MFCs) is commonly utilized for spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, encephaloceles, and superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). This study compares postoperative outcomes of MFCs with and without LD use. Methods A retrospective cohort study of adults over the age of 18 years presenting for the repair of nonneoplastic CSF leak, encephalocele, or SSCD via MFC from 2009 to 2021 was conducted. The main exposure of interest was the placement of an LD. The primary outcome was the presence of postoperative complications (acute/delayed neurologic deficit, meningitis, intracranial hemorrhage, and stroke). Secondary outcomes included operating room (OR) time, length of stay, recurrence, and need for reoperation. Results In total, 172 patients were included, 96 of whom received an LD and 76 who did not. Patients not receiving an LD were more likely to receive intraoperative mannitol ( n = 24, 31.6% vs. n = 16, 16.7%, p = 0.02). On univariate logistic regression, LD placement did not influence overall postoperative complications (OR: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-2.02, p = 0.28), CSF leak recurrence (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.25-2.29, p = 0.61), or need for reoperation (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.48-4.96, p = 0.51). While OR time was shorter for patients not receiving LD (349 ± 71 vs. 372 ± 85 minutes), this difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.07). Conclusion No difference in postoperative outcomes was observed in patients who had an intraoperative LD placed compared to those without LD. Operative times were increased in the LD cohort, but this difference was not statistically significant. Given the similar outcomes, we conclude that LD is not necessary to facilitate safe MCF for nonneoplastic skull base pathologies.

American Rhinologic Society expert practice statement part 1: Skull base reconstruction following endoscopic skull base surgery.

The goal of this American Rhinologic Society expert practice statement (EPS) is to summarize the best available evidence for technical factors that optimize outcomes in skull base reconstruction following endoscopic skull base surgery for intradural pathologies. These topics include the use of free mucosal grafts versus vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flaps; the use of autologous versus synthetic grafts; and the roles of lumbar drains, dural sealants, and nasal packing. This EPS was developed following the recommended methodology and approval process as previously outlined. As there are a myriad of techniques and limited agreement on the accepted principles of skull base reconstruction, this EPS aims to summarize the existing evidence and provide clinically meaningful guidance on these divergent practices. Following a modified Delphi approach, five statements were developed, four of which reached consensus and one of which reached near consensus. These statements and the accompanying evidence are summarized along with an assessment of future needs.

Natural History, Pathophysiology, and Recent Management Modalities of Intraventricular Hemorrhage.

Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a clinical challenge observed among 40-45% of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) cases. IVH can be classified according to the source of the hemorrhage into primary and secondary IVH. Primary intraventricular hemorrhage (PIVH), unlike secondary IVH, involves only the ventricles with no hemorrhagic parenchymal source. Several risk factors of PIVH were reported which include hypertension, smoking, age, and excessive alcohol consumption. IVH is associated with high mortality and morbidity and several prognostic factors were identified such as IVH volume, number of ventricles with blood, involvement of fourth ventricle, baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score, and hydrocephalus. Prompt management of patients with IVH is required to stabilize the clinical status of patients upon admission. Nevertheless, further advanced management is crucial to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with intraventricular bleeding. Recent treatments showed promising outcomes in the management of IVH patients such as intraventricular anti-inflammatory drugs, lumbar drainage, and endoscopic evacuation of IVH, however, their safety and efficacy are still in question. This literature review presents the epidemiology, physiopathology, risk factors, and outcomes of IVH in adults with an emphasis on recent treatment options.

Invasive Pressure Monitors: Leveling the Playing Field.

Invasive pressure monitors are ubiquitous in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. This technology allows beat-to-beat assessment of central venous, pulmonary, and arterial blood pressures during surgery, procedural interventions, and critical care. Education is commonly focused on the procedural aspects and the complications associated with the initial placement of these monitors without instruction on the technical concepts required for obtaining accurate data. Anesthesiologists must understand the fundamental concepts on which measurements are made to effectively use invasive pressure monitors, including pulmonary artery catheters, central venous catheters, intra-arterial catheters, external ventricular drains, and spinal or lumbar drains. This review will address important gaps in knowledge surrounding leveling and zeroing of invasive pressure monitors, emphasizing the impact of varied practice patterns on patient care.

Criteria for Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion in Retractorless Sphenoid Wing Meningioma Surgery: A Technical Report.

Objective Sphenoid wing meningiomas (SWMs) can present surgical challenges, in that they are often obscured by overlying brain, encase critical neurovascular structures, and obliterate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cisterns. While brain retraction can enable access, its use can have potentially deleterious effects. We report the benefits and outcomes of the criteria we have developed for use of cerebrospinal diversion to perform retractorless surgery for SWMs. Design Technical report. Setting Yale School of Medicine and Yale New Haven Hospital. Participants Between May, 2019 and December, 2020, ten consecutive patients were included who met the presented criteria for SWM surgery with preoperative lumbar drain (LD) placement. Main Outcome Measures Length of hospital stay, surgical complications, and extent of resection. Results We have developed the following criteria for LD placement in patients with SWMs such that LDs are preoperatively placed in patients with tumors with one or more of the following criteria: (1) medial location along the sphenoid wing, (2) vascular encasement resulting in obliteration of the optic carotid cistern and/or proximal sylvian fissure, and/or (3) the presence of associated edema. CSF release, after craniotomy and sphenoid wing removal, allowed for optimization of exposure, leading to the maximal safe extent of tumor resection without brain retraction or any complications. Conclusions Preoperative LD placement is effective in allowing for maximal extent of resection of SWMs and may be considered in cases where local CSF release is not possible. This technique is useful in those tumors located more medially, with encasement of the vasculature and/or associated with edema.

From Research to Clinical Practice: Long-Term Impact of Randomized Clinical Trial Examining the Effect of Lumbar Drains on Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Rates Following Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are associated with increased risk of postoperative CSF leaks despite multilayered reconstruction with vascularized tissue. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining the use of perioperative lumbar drains (LD) in high-risk skull base defects identified a significant reduction in postoperative CSF leak incidence (21.2 vs. 8.2%; p = 0.017). This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of the selective use of CSF diversion, for patients with intraoperative CSF leaks involving endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to the skull base. Method Consecutive endoscopic endonasal surgeries of the skull base from a pre-RCT cohort and post-RCT cohort were compared. The following case characteristics between the two cohorts were examined: patient age, body mass index (BMI), rate of revision surgery, tumor histology, use of CSF diversion, and vascularized reconstruction. The primary measured outcome was postoperative CSF leak. Results The pre-RCT cohort included 76 patients and the post-RCT cohort included 77 patients, with dural defects in either the anterior or posterior cranial fossa (pituitary and parasellar/suprasellar surgeries excluded). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative CSF leak in the post-RCT cohort (27.6 vs. 12.9%; p = 0.04). On subgroup analysis, there was a trend toward improvement in CSF leak rate of the anterior cranial fossa (19.2 vs. 10.5%; p = 0.27), whereas CSF leak rates of the posterior cranial fossa were significantly reduced compared with the pre-RCT cohort (41.4 vs. 12.8%; p = 0.02). Conclusion This study demonstrates that the integration of selective CSF diversion into the reconstructive algorithm improved postoperative CSF leak rates.

Lumber drain morbidity in endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery.

The purpose of this study is to describe the morbidity in patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) with and without intra-operative lumbar drain (LD) placement. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing ESBS from July 2018 to August 2020 at a tertiary academic skull base surgery program was conducted. Those with LD placement for aiding in suprasellar dissection and/or for CSF diversion following skull base repair were included. LD-related medical and technical complications were combined as composite outcomes to assess overall event rates in those with and without LD. 104 patients were included. Of the 104 participants, 64 (61.5%) had LD placed. Of these 64, 1 (0.96%) and 2 (1.9%) experienced postoperative medical (hypophysitis) and related technical (2 blood patches) complications, respectively. There was one case of postoperative CSF leak (in LD group) and no cases of DVT/PE or meningitis. LD use was not associated with increased risk of any complication (p = 0.165) compared to those without LD. There were no significant differences in rates of postoperative epistaxis (p = 0.427), readmission (p = 0.629), or reoperation (p = 0.165) between groups. Female sex was the only predictor of increased overall complication rates in patients with LD (OR, 1.122, 95% CI, 1.010-1.247, p = 0.032). Our findings suggest judicious use of a LD in endoscopic skull base surgery within a reasonable time does not increase the incidence of overall medical or technical complications, readmission, and reoperation.

The effects of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion on post-operative CSF leak following extended endoscopic anterior skull base surgery.

There is a paucity of high quality evidence regarding the routine placement of lumbar drain (LD) in reducing post-operative (op) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak after extended endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection of anterior skull base lesions. In this study, we sought to compare the incidence of post-op CSF leak between patients with upfront LD insertion and those without it. This was a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted over a period of 5 years with patients undergoing extended endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery randomly assigned to either LD insertion at the time of surgery, or no LD placement. Thirty-eight patients with anterior skull base tumors were accrued from three tertiary hospitals of Melbourne. Post-op leak was confirmed by ß2-transferrin-positive rhinorrhea, and/or worsening pneumocephalus on brain imaging. Skull base defect size and pedicled nasoseptal flap viability were assessed on post-op CT and MRI, respectively. There was no significant difference in post-op CSF leak incidence between the two subgroups (12.50% in LD arm vs. 9.10% in no LD arm). Patients with LD insertion however, demonstrated substantially raised complication rates, longer hospital lengths of stay and lower subjective quality of life measures at 12 months compared with those without LD. In conclusion, routine placement of LD at the time of surgery for extended anterior skull base trans-nasal approach did not reduce the risk of post-op CSF leak. Discretion is warranted when using LD as an adjunct due to its associated morbidities, prolonged hospital stay and adverse effect on patients' subjective outcome measures.

Prevention and management of spinal cord ischemia following aortic surgery: A survey of contemporary practice.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. We aim to characterize current practices pertaining to SCI prevention and treatment across Canada. METHODS: Two questionnaires were developed by the Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative and the Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care Society targeting aortic surgeons and intensivists. A list of experts in the management of patients at risk of SCI was developed, with representation from each of the Canadian centers that perform complex aortic surgery. RESULTS: The response rate was 91% for both intensivists (21/23), and from cardiac and vascular surgeons (39/43). Most surgeons agreed that staging is important during endovascular repair of extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (60%) but not for open repair (34%). All of the surgeons felt prophylactic lumbar drains were effective in reducing SCI, whereas only 66.7% of intensivists felt that lumbar drains were effective (P < .001). There was consensus among surgeons over when to employ lumbar drains. A majority of surgeons preferred to keep the hemoglobin over 100 g/L if the patient demonstrated loss of lower-extremity function, whereas most intensivists felt a target of 80 g/L was adequate (P < .001). Management of perioperative antihypertensives, use of intraoperative adjuncts, and management of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the presence of a lumbar drain, were highly variable. CONCLUSIONS: We observed some consensus but considerable variability in the approach to SCI prevention and management across Canada. Future studies focused on the areas of variability may lead to more consistent and improved care for this high-risk population.

Ruptured Suprasellar Dermoid Cyst Treated With Lumbar Drain to Prevent Postoperative Hydrocephalus: Case Report and Focused Review of Literature.

Background: Ruptured intracranial dermoid cysts are extremely rare. Standard treatment consists of endonasal decompression or craniotomy with evacuation and copious irrigation of subarachnoid spaces to remove any disseminated cystic contents. Disseminated fat particles in the subarachnoid space may be the cause of further sequalae, including the subsequent development of chemical meningitis and hydrocephalus. Here, we present a case of ruptured suprasellar dermoid cyst treated with craniotomy for emergent optic nerve decompression, followed by postoperative hydrocephalus successfully treated with lumbar drain. Case description: We describe a 30-year-old man with a history of migraines who presented with acute onset of headache, photophobia, nausea, vomiting, and vision loss in the left eye. Head CT and brain MRI demonstrated a ruptured suprasellar dermoid cyst with associated mass effect on the optic nerves and frontal lobes as well as fat attenuation material within the subarachnoid spaces. The patient underwent left frontotemporal craniotomy for cyst resection and developed non-obstructive hydrocephalus on postoperative day 1, refractory to external ventricular drainage. Placement of a lumbar drain cleared the subarachnoid space of debris derived from the ruptured dermoid cyst, and the hydrocephalus resolved. The patient did not require permanent CSF diversion. Conclusions: Intracranial dermoid cysts are uncommon, and rupture is a rare event. Standard surgical treatment with craniotomy for evacuation may leave disseminated dermoid contents and fat particles throughout the subarachnoid spaces. We highlight a case of ruptured suprasellar dermoid cyst with postoperative communicating hydrocephalus treated with lumbar drain when external ventricular drain (EVD) was ineffective. Review of the current literature reveals inconsistent findings on the effects of remaining fat particles. In cases with clinical evidence of increased intracranial pressure due to non-obstructive hydrocephalus attributable to chemical meningitis, temporary lumbar drainage is an option to be considered before committing the patient to permanent shunting.

External lumbar drainage in progressive pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterized by increased intracranial pressure despite normal cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging findings. Initial management is typically medical; however, nearly 10% of children will eventually require surgery for persistent headache and/or vision loss. External lumbar drainage, which is a considerably safer treatment option, has not been adequately analyzed in children with medically refractory IIH. METHODS: The authors conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of children with medically refractory IIH who had undergone external lumbar drain (ELD) placement because of worsening papilledema, reflected as increased retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT) testing. The main outcome measures were effects of external lumbar drainage on papilledema resolution, symptoms, and vision. RESULTS: The authors analyzed the medical records of 13 children with IIH (11 girls, mean age 15.0 ± 2.3 years) whose mean CSF opening pressure was 45.5 ± 6.8 cm H2O. In all children, the average global RNFL thickness in both eyes significantly increased at ELD placement (right eye 371.8 ± 150.2 µm, left eye 400.3 ± 96.9 µm) compared with presentation thickness (right eye 301.6 ± 110.40 µm, left eye 350.2 ± 107.7 µm) despite acetazolamide medical therapy (20-30 mg/kg/day), leading to ELD placement after 9.5 ± 6.9 days (range 3-29 days). After ELD insertion, there was headache resolution, gradual and continuous improvement in optic disc thickness, and preservation of good vision. CONCLUSIONS: ELD placement in children with medically refractory IIH who demonstrated worsening papilledema with increased RNFL thickening on OCT testing typically results in symptom relief and disc edema resolution with good visual outcome, often preventing the need for additional definitive surgeries that carry greater failure and morbidity risks.

MEDICOLEGAL CORNER. Failure to replace obstructed lumbar drain after thoracic-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair leads to paraplegia.

BACKGROUND: To avoid spinal cord ischemia following endovascular/open thoracic-abdominal aortic aneurysm (T-AAA) repair, lumbar drains (LDs) are placed to reduce intraspinal pressure, and increase spinal perfusion pressure. Here, we present a medicolegal case in which a critical care (CC) physician knew that the LD was obstructed following a T-AAA repair, but did not replace it until the patient became paraplegic. The patient was left with permanent sphincter loss, and a severe paraparesis. METHODS: A geriatric patient with multiple medical/cardiovascular comorbidities first underwent an endovascular T-AAA (Crawford Type II T-AAA) repair several years ago. Due to continued expansion of the aneurysm, the patient now required an open T-AAA repair. RESULTS: Prior to the open T-AAA surgery, a prophylactic LD was placed. Postoperatively, the patient required a second emergency operation to repair a leaking intercostal artery anastomosis. The next morning, the CC physician clearly documented the drain was obstructed, but chose to follow the patient; 3.5 hours later, the patient became paraplegic. The LD was replaced after the patient was first sent to MRI to rule out a spinal cord hematoma, resulting in a total delay of more than 6.5 h from when the CC physician first became aware of the non-functioning LD. The patient later regained only partial function, remaining significantly paraparetic with total loss of bowel/bladder function. CONCLUSION: LD for endovascular/open T-AAA repairs reduce spinal fluid pressure, increase spinal cord perfusion pressures, and limits the frequency (i.e. 2.3-2.6%) of resultant spinal cord ischemia/paralysis. Here, despite the CC physician's failure to replace an obstructed LD after an open T-AAA, repair, the jury rendered a defense verdict.

Lumbar Drains for Vascular Procedures: An Institutional Protocol Review and Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Aortic disease requiring open or endovascular repair may result in spinal cord injury in approximately 2%-10% of patients. Cerebrospinal fluid diversion using lumbar drains (LDs) has been validated as a protective measure to mitigate this complication. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study analyzed the implementation of a standardized protocol and subsequent educational intervention for LDs for aortic vascular procedures over a 4-year period. RESULTS: In 2016-2019, 45 patients had LDs placed for open or endovascular procedures; group 1 included 19 patients with LDs placed before protocol implementation, and group 2 included 26 patients with LDs placed as per the institutional protocol. Demographics and procedural details in both groups were similar. However, there was a significant difference in the number of patients who had emergent versus planned placement of the LD (group 1, 89.5%; group 2, 50%; P < 0.01), volume of cerebrospinal fluid drained (group 1, 453 mL; group 2, 197 mL; P < 0.01), and compliance with 10 mL/hour drainage recommendation (group 1, 68.4%; group 2, 100%; P < 0.01). In group 1, 5 (31.6%) patients experienced neurological complications compared with only 1 (3.8%) in group 2. LD-related complications occurred 3 patients (15.8%) in group 1, whereas none occurred in group 2. Survey results suggested increased health care worker protocol familiarity with educational interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an institutional protocol for LDs for open or endovascular procedures is feasible and beneficial. Educational modules improve familiarity among all health care providers, which can improve patient care and complication avoidance.

The Use of Cangrelor Infusions After Endovascular Aortic Repair With Prophylactic Lumbar Drain Placement.

Perioperative lumbar drains commonly are placed for spinal cord protection in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair. However, the logistics of postoperative neuraxial drain removal is challenging in the presence of systemic antithrombotic therapy. This retrospective case series describes the novel use of cangrelor infusions in this high-risk setting. All lumbar drains were placed preoperatively, and descriptive data were collected including cangrelor infusion duration, time to lumbar drain removal after the infusion discontinuation, clinical course, and overall patient outcomes. There were no neurologic complications associated with lumbar drain insertion or removal, and median time to lumbar drain removal was 150 minutes after cangrelor infusion discontinuation. While further study is needed to validate its efficacy and safety, this case series highlights the promise of cangrelor infusions for systemic antithrombotic therapy in the cardiovascular/surgical intensive care unit.

Telemetric monitoring in idiopathic intracranial hypertension demonstrates intracranial pressure in a case with sight-threatening disease.

The understanding of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) is increasing with the directed use of intracranial telemetric ICP monitors. This case uniquely observed ICP changes by telemetric monitoring in a patient with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), who developed rapid sight-threatening disease. A lumbar drain was inserted, as a temporising measure, and was clamped prior to surgery. This resulted in a rapid rise in ICP, which normalised after insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. This case highlighted the utility of the ICP monitor and the lumbar drain as a temporising measure to control ICP prior to a definitive procedure as recommended by the IIH consensus guidelines.