Successful Sperm Retrieval and Clinical Pregnancies Following Micro-TESE and ICSI Treatments in Patients with Nonobstructive Azoospermia Due to Various Etiologies.

(1) Background: Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) etiologies affect the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) and the clinical outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI); (2) Methods: We investigated seven NOA etiologies. The SRR and clinical outcomes of 627 patients were analyzed between November 2017 and July 2022 in the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of China International Trust and Investment Corporation-Xiangya (CITIC-Xiangya); (3) Results: The overall SRR was 39.4% (247/627). The SRR according to NOA etiologies were: Y chromosome azoospermia factor c microdeletions (26/46, 56.5%), Klinefelter syndrome (KS), 36/85, 42.4%), idiopathic (110/398, 27.6%), cryptorchidism (20/29, 69.0%), chromosome anomalies (7/13, 53.9%), orchitis (45/50, 90.0%), and cancer (3/6, 50.0%). The SRR were different for spermatogonia arrest (26/96, 27.1%), maturation arrest (76/177, 42.9%), and SCOS (30/80, 37.5%) according to histological examinations. The clinical pregnancy rate was similar among the NOA etiologies. The high-quality embryo rate differed between successful (54.7%) and unsuccessful (40.9%) pregnancies. Moreover, the successfully pregnant women (28.99 years) were younger than the unsuccessfully pregnant ones (30.92 years); (4) Conclusions: The SRR from patients with NOA was associated with the etiology and histological categories, while the clinical outcome was associated with the high-quality embryo rate and the female partner's age.

Incidental seminoma in nonobstructive azoospermia: a case report.

Objective: To report on the incidental finding of invasive seminoma in a patient with nonobstructive azoospermia during microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Design: Case report. Patients: A single patient diagnosed with nonobstructive azoospermia underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction, and an incidental finding of invasive seminoma was made upon histopathological analysis. Results: An incidental discovery of invasive seminoma was observed in the sample pathology obtained during the microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Consequently, the patient underwent further diagnostic workup and a radical orchiectomy. Conclusions: Men with male factor infertility are at increased risk of testicular cancer. As such, it is imperative to incorporate a thorough physical examination and relevant imaging into their diagnostic process. Additionally, it is advisable to include histopathological analysis for all individuals undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

Feasibility of high-frequency ultrasound for seminiferous tubule assessment and correlation of B-mode imaging with pathological findings in the testis in azoospermia.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) for assessing seminiferous tubules and to understand high-resolution B-mode images of the testes in cases of azoospermia. METHODS: We verified how the histopathological images of testicular biopsy specimens can be observed using HFUS images and measurement analysis of seminiferous tubules was performed to 28 testes of 14 cases with azoospermia who underwent preoperative ultrasound and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE). The population consisted of obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), including Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS), and the other pathologies. Statistical verification of differences in seminiferous tubule diameters among preoperative ultrasound examination, ultrasound examination of pathological specimens, and histopathological specimens. We also examined the imagingpathology correlation via a case series presentation, aiming to identify imaging markers of testicular pathology and determine the possibility of predicting each condition. RESULTS: A comparison between HFUS images and histopathology from the same biopsy specimens suggested that ultrasonography could be seen as stereoscopic images due to its significantly greater slice thickness. The diameters of tubules were generally larger in pathological tissues as compared to ultrasonographic findings in OA and SCOS, but not in the other conditions. Comparisons provided insights into the predictability of SCOS and revealed imaging findings such as gaps between tubules and decreased diameter reflective of testicular damage. CONCLUSION: Seminiferous tubules can be observed however the diameter of seminiferous tubules varies in imaging and histopathology depending on the pathology. Imaging findings that reflect testicular damage and the predictability of SCOS were revealed in this study, but further verification is required.

Predictors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed initial TESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze and summarize the predictive factors of successful sperm extraction in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the factors predicting the result of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who failed the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for literature that described the characteristics of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failing the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction published prior to June 2022. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included four retrospective studies with 332 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent a failed initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction and three retrospective studies with 177 non-obstructive azoospermia patients who underwent a failed conventional testicular sperm extraction. The results were as follows: among non-obstructive azoospermia patients whose first surgery was microdissection testicular sperm extraction, younger patients (standard mean difference: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.55 to -0.01) and those with smaller bilateral testicular volume (standard mean difference: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.15), lower levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (standard mean difference: -0.86, 95% CI: -1.18 to -0.54) and luteinizing hormone (standard mean difference: -0.68, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.19), and whose testicular histological type was hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.30-9.53) were more likely to retrieve spermatozoa successfully, while patients with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (odds ratio: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73) were more likely to fail again in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Additionally, in patients who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after a failed initial conventional testicular sperm extraction, those with testicular histological type of hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 30.35, 95% CI: 8.27-111.34) were more likely to be successful, while those with maturation arrest (odds ratio: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.83) rarely benefited. CONCLUSION: We found that age, testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, hypospermatogenesis, Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, and maturation arrest were valuable predictors of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction, which will assist andrologists in clinical decision-making and minimize unnecessary injury to patients.

Evaluating the Predictive Value of Diagnostic Testicular Biopsy for Sperm Retrieval Outcomes in Men with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia.

BACKGROUND: Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) presents a challenge in male infertility management. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of diagnostic testicular biopsy (DTB) in predicting sperm retrieval success via therapeutic testicular biopsy (TTB) and to understand the role of systemic inflammation in microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 50 NOA males who underwent mTESE at the University of Ioannina's Department of Urology from January 2017 to December 2019. All participants underwent thorough medical evaluations, including semen analyses and endocrinological assessments. RESULTS: DTB did not detect spermatozoa in half of the patients who later showed positive sperm findings in TTB. Preoperative variables, such as age, plasma levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), total testosterone (TT), prolactin (PRL), estradiol (E2), and inflammation biomarkers (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-eosinophil ratio (MER)), were not consistently predictive of sperm retrieval success. Notably, TTB-negative patients had elevated NLR and PLR values, suggesting a possible link between systemic inflammation and reduced sperm retrieval during mTESE. CONCLUSIONS: The findings question the necessity of an initial DTB, which might provide misleading results. A negative DTB should not deter further TTB or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) attempts. The study emphasizes the need for further research to refine diagnostic approaches and deepen the understanding of factors influencing sperm retrieval in NOA patients, ultimately enhancing their prospects of biological parenthood.

Stepwise mini-incision microdissection testicular sperm extraction in NOA patients with a history of cryptorchidism: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Although the orchiopexy is recommended for cryptorchidism to preserve male fertility, non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) may occur in adulthood. Fortunately, a great many of azoospermic men may obtain sperm by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). Due to the potential injuries caused by testicular diagnostic biopsy and vascular damage at the time of orchidopexy, minimal invasiveness is particularly important during mTESE, aims to reduce the surgical damage and avoids secondary testicular failure. This comparative study aims to investigate the efficacy of stepwise mini-incision mTESE technique by comparison with standard mTESE in the treatment of NOA patients with a history of cryptorchidism. RESULTS: A total of 73 mTESE procedures were divided into two groups: Group 1 included 37 cases performed by stepwise mini-incision mTESE, while Group 2 included 36 cases with standard mTESE. The overall sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in the two groups was 68.5% (50/73), with no significant difference in SRR between Group 1 (78.4%, 29/37) and Group 2 (58.3%, 21/36) (P = 0.1). In addition, 46.0% of the patients (17/37) obtained sperm in the first mini-incision step in Group 1, which was also equal to an overall SRR in Group 2 (58.3%, 21/36) (P = 0.3). The operation time in Group 1 (72.6 ± 33.9 min) was significantly shorter than that in Group 2 (90.4 ± 36.4 min) (P = 0.04). Patients with an orchidopexy age no more than 10 years old had a higher SRR (79.5%, 31/39) than others (55.9%, 19/34) (P = 0.03). There were no postoperative complications including wound infection, scrotal hematoma, persistent pain, and testicular atrophy during a follow-up period of at least 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study suggests that the stepwise mini-incision mTESE could be a promising approach for sperm retrieval in NOA men with a history of cryptorchidism. While the technique may potentially reduce operation time and surgical invasiveness, further research is needed to validate these findings on a larger scale. The results also suggest that age at orchidopexy may affect SRR and have important implications for the management of cryptorchidism.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Bien que l'orchidopexie soit recommandée en cas de cryptorchidie afin de préserver la fertilité masculine, une azoospermie non obstructive (NOA) peut survenir à l'âge adulte. Heureusement, un grand nombre d'hommes azoospermiques peuvent obtenir des spermatozoïdes lors d'une extraction de spermatozoïdes testiculaire par microdissection (mTESE). En raison des potentielles lésions causées par la biopsie diagnostique testiculaire et des lésions vasculaires survenant au moment de l'orchidopexie, une approche minimalement  invasive est particulièrement importante pendant la mTESE;  elle vise à réduire les dommages chirurgicaux et à éviter une insuffisance testiculaire secondaire. La présente étude comparative a pour but d' étudier l'efficacité de la mTESE par mini-incision par étapes en comparaison avec la mTESE standard dans le traitement des patients NOA qui ont des antécédents de cryptorchidie. RéSULTATS: Au total, 73 procédures de mTESE ont été divisées en deux groupes: le Groupe 1 comprenait 37 cas effectués avec la mTESE par mini-incision par étapes, tandis que le Groupe 2 comprenait 36 cas réalisés par la mTESE standard. Le taux global de récupération de spermatozoïdes (SRR) dans les deux groupes était de 68, 5% (50/73), sans différence significative de SRR entre le Groupe 1 (78, 4%, 29/37) et le Groupe 2 (58, 3%, 21/36) (P = 0,1). De plus, 46% des patients (17/37) ont obtenu des spermatozoïdes lors de la première étape de mini-incision dans le Groupe 1, ce qui était identique au SRR global dans le Groupe 2 (58%, 21/36) (P = 0,3). Le temps opératoire du Groupe 1 (72, 6 ± 34 min) était significativement plus court que celui du Groupe 2 (90, 4 ± 36 min) (P = 0,04). Les patients dont l'orchidopexie avait été réalisée au plus tard à l'âge de 10 ans avaient un SRR plus élevé (79, 5%, 31/39) que les autres (55, 9%, 19/34) (P = 0,03). Il n'y a pas eu de complications postopératoires, que ce soit infection de la plaie, hématome scrotal, douleur persistante, ou atrophie testiculaire pendant une période de suivi d'au moins 6 mois. CONCLUSIONS: Notre étude suggère que la mTESE par mini-incision par étapes pourrait être une approche prometteuse pour la récupération de spermatozoïdes chez les hommes NOA ayant des antécédents de cryptorchidie. Bien que la technique puisse potentiellement réduire le temps d'opération et le caractère invasif du geste chirurgical, des recherches supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour valider ces résultats à plus grande échelle. Les résultats suggèrent également que l'âge à l'orchidopexie peut affecter le SRR et avoir des implications importantes pour la prise en charge de la cryptorchidie.

Prediction of microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcomes of azoospermic patients post-chemotherapy using cyclophosphamide equivalent dose.

PURPOSE: We determined the sperm retrieval rate in men with persistent azoospermia post-chemotherapy in relation to cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED), a unit for quantifying alkylating agent exposure. METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed of 1098 patients diagnosed with non-obstructive azoospermia who had undergone microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) between January 2010 and 2021 at our institution. Twenty-three patients with a prior history of chemotherapy were included in the study. Oncological data, chemotherapy regime, and dosage were reviewed. The pretreatment hormone profile, CED, and mTESE outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Testicular spermatozoa were successfully retrieved from 11 patients (47%). The mean patient age was 37.3 years (range, 27-41 years), and mean time interval from chemotherapy to mTESE, 11.8 years (range, 1-45 years). Patients exposed to alkylating agents had significantly lower sperm retrieval rates than those not exposed to alkylating agents (1/9, 11% vs. 10/14, 71%, p = 0.009). No men with CED > 4000 mg/m2 (n = 6) had viable sperm in the testes during mTESE. Moreover, patients diagnosed with testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors had a favorable sperm retrieval rate (67%) compared to patients with lymphoma (20%) or leukemia (33%). CONCLUSION: Patients with permanent azoospermia post-chemotherapy have a lower testicular sperm retrieval rate when the chemotherapy regimen included alkylating agents. In cases where patients have undergone more intensive gonadotoxic treatments, such as higher CED, the likelihood of successful sperm retrieval is low. It is advisable to counsel such patients using the CED model prior to considering surgical sperm retrieval.

Histological and immunohistochemical outcomes after microdissection TESE in contrast with hormonal profile, testis volume and genetics in patients with azoospermia.

A limited number of individuals with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) may recover spermatozoa through traditional testicular sperm extraction (TESE) techniques. There is an ongoing debate over the effectiveness of microdissection TESE compared to standard TESE methods. Microdissection TESE (micro-TESE) techniques enable the identification of spermatogenesis foci in non-obstructive forms of azoospermia. Only histological examination can provide an objective and definitive assessment of the testicular phenotype. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between histopathological findings after microdissection TESE (micro-TESE) and the predictive role of various factors in determining the success of sperm retrieval. We evaluated 24 patients with azoospermia who underwent micro-TESE and considered the patient's hormonal profile, testis ultrasound, genetic evaluation, histology, and immunohistology (PLAP antibody) of collected testis biopsies. The preoperative blood FSH level, in conjunction with other parameters, may aid in the prediction of micro-TESE success. Sensitivity increases, and specificity decreases with higher FSH levels. Furthermore, testicular volume and FSH levels are typically normal in patients with maturation arrest. In conclusion, hormones, ultrasound evaluation of the testicles, testis volume, and available genetic tests have a predictive value in differentiating obstructive azoospermia (OA) from NOA with various sensitivity and specificity rates. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation establishes the testicular phenotype accurately and guides patient management.

Circulating microRNAs in seminal plasma as predictors of sperm retrieval in microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

Background: Because of focal spermatogenesis in some nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients, testicular spermatozoa can be retrieved by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to achieve successful fertilization. Currently, testicular biopsy is widely performed for the prognosis of micro-TESE; however, it might miss foci with active spermatogenesis because of the 'blind manner' of puncture, highlighting the needs for biomarkers that could indicate actual spermatogenesis conditions in the testis. Thus, we screened microRNAs in the seminal plasma for potential biomarkers to provide a non-invasive and reliable preoperative assessment for micro-TESE. Methods: We screened the seminal plasma microRNAs from NOA patients with and without sperm retrieval (n=6 in each group) together with fertile men (n=6) by RNA sequencing, and the selected microRNAs were validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Next, a predictive model was established by performing ordered logistic regression using the qPCR data of 56 specimens, and the predictive accuracy of this model was evaluated using 40 more specimens in a blind manner. Results: Four microRNAs (hsa-miR-34b-3p, hsa-miR-34c-3p, hsa-miR-3065-3p, and hsa-miR-4446-3p) were identified as biomarkers, and the predictive model Logit = 2.0881+ 0.13448 mir-34b-3p + 0.58679 mir-34c-3p + 0.15636 mir-3065-3p + 0.09523 mir-4446-3p was established by machine learning. The model provided a high predictive accuracy (AUC =0.927). Conclusions: We developed a predictive model with high accuracy for micro-TESE, with which NOA patients might obtain accurate assessment of spermatogenesis conditions in testes before surgery.

Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Versus Multiple Needle-pass Percutaneous Testicular Sperm Aspiration in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgical extraction of testicular spermatozoa is needed in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) who wish to become biological fathers. Based on available uncontrolled studies with unspecific patient selection, microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE), having a sperm retrieval rate (SRR) of 50%, is considered the most efficient sperm retrieval procedure. However, no randomized clinical trials for comparison of different sperm retrieval procedures exist. Testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) is simple and commonly used, and we hypothesized that this technique using multiple needle passes would give similar SRRs to mTESE. OBJECTIVE: To compare mTESE and multiple needle-pass TESA in men with NOA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized clinical trial was performed between June 2017 and April 2021, with inclusion of 100 men with NOA from four centers in Denmark and Sweden. All participants received treatment at the same institution. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to mTESE (n = 49) or multiple needle-pass TESA (n = 51). Patients with failed multiple needle-pass TESA proceeded directly to salvage mTESE. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was SRR. Secondary outcomes included complications and changes in reproductive hormones after surgery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Spermatozoa were retrieved in 21/49 (43%) men after mTESE and in 11/51 (22%) men after multiple needle-pass TESA (rate difference -0.21; 95% confidence interval -0.39 to -0.03; p = 0.02). The combined SRR for multiple needle-pass TESA + salvage mTESE was 15/51 (29%). No complications occurred after multiple needle-pass TESA only, while 5/89 (6%) men having mTESE experienced a complication requiring surgical intervention. Overall, no statistically significant differences in reproductive hormones were observed between groups after 6 mo. Limitations include the low number of patients in secondary outcome data. CONCLUSIONS: In direct comparison, SRR was higher in mTESE than in multiple needle-pass TESA. PATIENT SUMMARY: Men with azoospermia need surgical extraction of spermatozoa to become biological fathers. In this randomized trial, we compared two surgeries (microdissection testicular sperm extraction [mTESE] and testicular sperm aspiration [TESA]) and found that mTESE gives a higher sperm retrieval rate than multiple needle-pass TESA.

Systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio are predictors of sperm presence in microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the value of the haematologic inflammatory parameters in predicting sperm retrieval rates during microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE).159 patients diagnosed with non-obstructive azoospermia were included in the study. After excluding the patients that do not fit the inclusion criteria, age, smoking status, body-mass index, serum luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, total testosterone levels and neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet counts were recorded. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index were calculated. The primary outcome was defined as the presence of spermatozoa during the procedure and the association between the candidate predictors and primary endpoint were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Then, a baseline model from age, smoking, body-mass index and hormonal levels was built. Ratios and indexes were included, respectively, and were compared by multivariate analyses. Each of all three parameters was an independent predictor of obtaining spermatozoa during micro-TESE procedure (all p < 0.001). Even though all three parameters were significant, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index stood out as more powerful than platelet-lymphocyte ratio (p < 0.08, p < 0.08 respectively). Additionally, adding these parameters individually to the baseline model significantly empowered the predictive value (all p < 0.001). Using haematologic inflammatory parameters in the prediction of sperm presence during microdissection testicular sperm extraction may be helpful when consulting the patient with having a better foresight of the procedural outcomes.

A preliminary study of sperm identification in microdissection testicular sperm extraction samples with deep convolutional neural networks.

Sperm identification and selection is an essential task when processing human testicular samples for in vitro fertilization. Locating and identifying sperm cell(s) in human testicular biopsy samples is labor intensive and time consuming. We developed a new computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) system, which utilizes deep learning for near human-level performance on testicular sperm extraction (TESE), trained on a custom dataset. The system automates the identification of sperm in testicular biopsy samples. A dataset of 702 de-identified images from testicular biopsy samples of 30 patients was collected. Each image was normalized and passed through glare filters and diffraction correction. The data were split 80%, 10%, and 10% into training, validation, and test sets, respectively. Then, a deep object detection network, composed of a feature extraction network and object detection network, was trained on this dataset. The model was benchmarked against embryologists' performance on the detection task. Our deep learning CASA system achieved a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.741, with an average recall (AR) of 0.376 on our dataset. Our proposed method can work in real time; its speed is effectively limited only by the imaging speed of the microscope. Our results indicate that deep learning-based technologies can improve the efficiency of finding sperm in testicular biopsy samples.

[Fatherhood achieved in a case of nonobstructive azoospermia with Kennedy's disease via microdissection testicular sperm extraction and ICSI: A case report and literature review].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of biological fatherhood in nonobstructive azoospermia patient with Kennedy's disease and review the relevant literature. METHODS: A twenty-eight man complaining of weakness in the lower extremities for a year underwent physical and laboratory examinations and was found with azoospermia. At the request of the patient for assisted reproduction, we performed microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE). RESULTS: Physical examination showed grade-4 and grade-4+ muscular strength in the proximal and distal lower extremities, respectively. The levels of Creatine kinase (CK), serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) of the patient were 432 U/L,18.1IU/L,10.4 IU/L and 8.6 nmo/L, respectively. The peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity was significantly decreased. Examination of the androgen receptor (AR) gene revealed 56 CAG repeats in exon 1, which confirmed Kennedy's disease. The patient was found with testicular atrophy and mild gynecomastia but normal seminal plasma biochemical parameters and peripheral karyotype and no Y chromosome microdeletion. Some sperm were found in micro-TESE though none in the previous testicular biopsy. Immunoradiometric assay showed a serum ß-HCG level of 873 IU/L at 2 weeks and ultrasonography manifested clinical pregnancy at 4 weeks after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). At 38 weeks and 2 days of gestation, a healthy boy was born by caesarean in a local hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Nonobstructive azoospermia patients with Kennedy's disease can achieve biological fatherhood via micro-TESE and ICSI.

"Second-look" Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia Following Histopathological Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) is considered the gold standard method for surgical sperm retrieval among patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between histopathological findings after failed microTESE procedure and outcomes of the "second-look" procedure and to provide insight into the most common histopathological patterns after testicular biopsy within our population. METHODS: The retrospective study included 33 selected patients with NOA, who had undergone unsuccessful sperm retrieval. The diagnosis of NOA was made after the assessment of the patient's history data, a physical examination, semen analysis, the hormonal profile, and genetic studies. After negative sperm retrieval, histopathological report has been analyzed for "second-look" microTESE attempt. RESULTS: Five testicular histopathological patterns were found: hypospermatogenesis (9,1%), Sertoli cell-only syndrome (43%), germ cell maturation arrest (15%), seminiferous tubule hyalinization (15%), mixed pattern (21%). Y-microdeletions were detected in 5 patients, of which 3 patients showed AZFc region deletions. Only 3 patients (9,1%) underwent a "second-look" procedure after the evaluation of histopathological reports. After the stimulation therapy and "second-look" procedure, we had a positive outcome in a single patient (33,3%). Mean FSH value in patients with confirmed spermatogenesis was 17.26±3.11IU/l, while mean FSH value in patients without presence or germ cell statistically significantly exceeded and was 24.28±4.71IU/L (p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Histopathological reports following the microTESE procedure are obligatory for the proper selection of patients who are candidates for the "second-look" microTESE attempt. Patients with Sertoli cell-only syndrome and hypospermatogenesis particularly can benefit from the "second-look" procedure.

A panel of extracellular vesicle long noncoding RNAs in seminal plasma for predicting testicular spermatozoa in nonobstructive azoospermia patients.

STUDY QUESTION: Whether the testis-specific extracellular vesicle (EV) long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in seminal plasma could be utilized to predict the presence of testicular spermatozoa in nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients? SUMMARY ANSWER: Our findings indicate that the panel based on seminal plasma EV lncRNAs was a sensitive and specific method in predicting the presence of testicular spermatozoa and may improve clinical decision-making of NOA. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The adoption of sperm retrieval techniques, especially microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE), in combination with ICSI has revolutionized treatment for NOA. However, there are no precise and noninvasive methods for predicting whether there are testicular spermatozoa in NOA patients before mTESE. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: RNA sequencing was performed on seminal plasma EVs from 6 normozoospermic men who underwent IVF due to female factor and 5 idiopathic NOA patients who failed to obtain testicular spermatozoa by mTESE and were diagnosed as having Sertoli cell-only syndrome by postoperative pathology. A biomarker panel of lncRNAs was constructed and verified in 96 NOA patients who underwent mTESE. Decision-making process was established based on the panel in seminal plasma EVs from 45 normozoospermia samples, 43 oligozoospermia samples, 62 cryptozoospermia samples, 96 NOA samples. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: RNA sequencing was done to examine altered profiles of EV lncRNAs in seminal plasma. Furthermore, a panel consisting of EV lncRNAs was established and evaluated in training set and validation sets. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A panel consisting of nine differentially expressed testis-specific lncRNAs, including LOC100505685, SPATA42, CCDC37-DT, GABRG3-AS1, LOC440934, LOC101929088 (XR_927561.2), LOC101929088 (XR_001745218.1), LINC00343 and LINC00301, was established in the training set and the AUC was 0.986. Furthermore, the AUC in the validation set was 0.960. Importantly, the panel had a unique advantage when compared with models based on serum hormones from the same group of NOA cases (AUC, 0.970 vs 0.723; 0.959 vs 0.687, respectively). According to the panel of lncRNAs, a decision-making process was established, that is when the score of an NOA case exceeds 0.532, sperm retrieval surgery may be recommended. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: In the future, the sample size needs to be further expanded. Meanwhile, the regulatory functions and mechanism of lncRNAs in spermatogenesis also need to be elucidated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: When the score of our panel is below 0.532, subjecting the NOA patients to ineffective surgical interventions may not be recommended due to poor sperm retrieval rate. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871110, 81971314 and 81971759); the Guangdong Special Support Plan-Science and Technology Innovation Youth Top Talents Project (2016TQ03R444); the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2016B030230001 and 201707010394); the Key Scientific and Technological Program of Guangzhou City (201604020189); the Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou (201806010089); the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements Project of Sun Yat-sen University (80000-18843235) and the Youth Teacher Training Project of Sun Yat-sen University (17ykpy68 and 18ykpy09). There are no competing interests related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Sperm retrieval success and testicular histopathology in idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia.

Prior studies have investigated sperm retrieval rates in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) secondary to specific etiologies, yet most cases of NOA are idiopathic. We compared sperm retrieval rates and testicular histopathology in idiopathic NOA (iNOA) and nonidiopathic NOA (niNOA). We performed a retrospective review of men with NOA who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) between 2000 and 2016. Men with no history of malignancy or cryptorchidism and negative genetic evaluation were considered idiopathic. Multivariable regression determined the association between idiopathic etiology and primary outcomes of sperm retrieval and active spermatogenesis on histopathology. Among 224 men, 86 (38.4%) were idiopathic, 75 (33.5%) were nonidiopathic, and 63 (28.1%) did not undergo genetic testing. Median age and serum testosterone were higher among iNOA or no testing versus niNOA. Median follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) was lower among iNOA or no testing versus niNOA. A higher proportion of iNOA or no testing versus niNOA had a clinical varicocele. Sperm retrieval rates were similar between iNOA, niNOA, and no testing (41.8% vs 48.0% vs 55.6%, respectively; P = 0.255). Active spermatogenesis was seen in a higher proportion of iNOA or no testing versus niNOA (31.4% and 27.0% vs 16.0%, P = 0.073). On multivariaile analysis, iNOA was not associated with sperm retrieval or spermatogenesis (P = 0.430 and P = 0.078, respectively). Rates of sperm retrieval and spermatogenesis on testis pathology were similar in men with iNOA and niNOA. These data will be useful to clinicians in preoperative counseling for men with NOA and negative genetic evaluation.

Modified stepwise mini-incision microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a useful technique for patients with a history of orchidopexy affected by non-obstructive azoospermia.

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), which is defined as the absence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate secondary to impaired spermatogenesis within the testis, may be caused by a variety of etiologies, including varicocele-induced testicular damage, cryptorchidism, prior testicular torsion, post-pubertal mumps orchitis, gonadotoxic effects from medications, genetic abnormalities, chemotherapy/radiation, and other unknown causes currently classified as idiopathic (Cocuzza et al., 2013). The microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) technique involves a meticulous microsurgical exploration of the testicular parenchyma to identify and selectively extract larger seminiferous tubules that carry a higher probability of complete spermatogenesis (Schlegel, 1999). The Cornell group evaluated the efficacy of micro-TESE in 152 NOA patients with an associated history of cryptorchidism. In their series, spermatozoa were successfully retrieved in 116/181 attempts (64%), and the resulting pregnancy rate was 50% with a delivery rate of 38% (Dabaja and Schlegel, 2013). Franco et al. (2016) described a stepwise micro-TESE approach in NOA patients, which was considered to reduce the cost, time, and effort associated with the surgery. Alrabeeah et al. (2016) further reported that a mini-incision micro-TESE, carried through a 1-cm equatorial testicular incision, can be useful for micro-TESE candidates, particularly in patients with cryptozoospermia. We conducted a retrospective study of 20 consecutive NOA patients with a history of orchidopexy from May 2015 to March 2017.

Microscopic testicular sperm extraction or post-operative sperm reversal in functional Leydig cell tumor: case report.

Leydig cell tumors are rare testicular tumors in adults. Hormonal activity is found in 20% of the cases with endocrine abnormalities, which may result in azoospermia. The appropriate management to achieve oncologic control and simultaneously obtain sperm remains a challenge. A patient sought assistance with fertility after a diagnosis of azoospermia accompanied by unilateral suspected Leydig cell tumor. The patient underwent unilateral orchidectomy along with microscopic testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) for sperm identification. Rare teratospermia was found during mTESE, hormones tended to be normal, and sperm reversal appeared postoperatively. Postoperative semen examination revealed oligozoospermia, and the parameters decreased further after 3 months. The androgen rebound effect promoted sperm level over the baseline within 3 months after surgery. The anticipated sperm reversal postoperatively rather than mTESE during routine orchidectomy achieved sperm acquisition. This case particularly highlights the androgen rebound effect, which elevated the sperm level beyond baseline within 3 months after surgery. Sperm cryopreservation is thus strongly recommended 3 months postoperatively and no more than 4 months.

Are predictive factors in sperm retrieval and pregnancy rates present in nonobstructive azoospermia patients by microdissection testicular sperm extraction on testicle with a history of orchidopexy operation?

The aim in this study is to evaluate predictive factors on sperm retrieval and pregnancy rates by microdissection testicular sperm extraction in non obstructive azoospermia patients with a history of orchidopexy operation. A total of 148 patients were included, and their medical files were evaluated. Data related to possible predictive factors on sperm retrieval and pregnancy rates such as age at orchidopexy operation, unilateral or bilateral presence of undescended testis before orchidopexy, testis volumes and hormone levels were statistically analysed. It revealed that the mean ages in patients with unilateral and bilateral orchidopexy operations were 35.37 (±4.84) and 33.94 (±5.91) respectively. Mean testis volume in the unilateral orchidopexy group was 7.59 (±3.12) ml on the right testis and 7.37 (±2.86) ml on the left testis. Mean FSH levels were detected as 22.71 (±11.86) mIU/ml in the unilateral group and 28.19 (±12.40) mIU/ml in the bilateral group. In our study, we have shown that the age at which patients undergo orchidopexy and the unilateral or bilateral presence of cryptorchidism has no correlation with sperm retrieval and pregnancy rates.

Klinefelter syndrome: From pediatrics to geriatrics.

BACKGROUND: Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is one of the major causes of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) is often performed to retrieve sperm. Infertility specialists have to care for KS patients on a lifelong basis. METHODS: Based on a literature review and our own experience, male infertility treatment and KS pathophysiology were considered on a lifelong basis. MAIN FINDINGS: Patients diagnosed early often have an increased number of aberrant X chromosomes. Cryptorchidism and hypospadias are often found, and surgical correction is required. Cryopreservation of testicular sperm during adolescence is an issue of debate because the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in KS patients decreases with age. The SRR in adult KS patients is higher than that in other patients with NOA; however, low testosterone levels after micro-TESE will lower the general health and quality of life. KS men face a number of comorbidities, such as malignancies, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, bone disease, and immune diseases, which ultimately results in increased mortality rates. CONCLUSION: A deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of KS and the histories of KS patients before they seek infertility treatment, during which discussions with multidisciplinary teams are sometimes needed, will help to properly treat these patients.