Barriers to Incident Reporting by Physicians: A Survey of Surgical Residents and Attending Physicians.

Objectives Incident reporting is vital to a culture of safety; however, physicians report at an alarmingly low rate. This study aimed to identify barriers to incident reporting among surgeons at a quaternary care center. Methods A survey was created utilizing components of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) validated survey on patient safety culture. This tool was distributed to residents and attending physicians in general surgery and urology at a single academic medical center. Responses were de-identified and recorded for data analysis using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) database tool (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States). Results We received 39 survey responses from 116 residents and attending physicians (34% response rate), including nine urologists and 30 general surgeons (24 attendings, 15 residents). Residents and attendings feel the person is being written up and not the issue (67%) and that there is a lack of feedback after changes are implemented (64%), though most believe adequate action is taken to address patient safety concerns (72%). Most do not report near-misses (64%), only significant adverse events (59%). Residents are likely to stay silent when patient safety events involve those in authority (60%). Faculty feel those in authority are open to patient safety concerns (67%), though residents feel neutral (47%) or disagree (33%). Conclusion Underreporting of incidents among physicians remains multifaceted and complex, from fear of retaliation to lack of feedback. Residents tend to feel less comfortable addressing authority figures when concerned about patient safety. While misunderstanding still exists about the applications and utility of incident reporting, a focus on quality over quantity could afford more meaningful progress toward high reliability in healthcare.

Critical airway-related incidents and near misses in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of a critical incident reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Many serious adverse events in anaesthesia are retrospectively rated as preventable. Anonymous reporting of near misses to a critical incident reporting system (CIRS) can identify structural weaknesses and improve quality, but incidents are often underreported. METHODS: This prospective qualitative study aimed to identify conceptions of a CIRS and reasons for underreporting at a single Swiss centre. Anaesthesia cases were screened to identify critical airway-related incidents that qualified to be reported to the CIRS. Anaesthesia providers involved in these incidents were individually interviewed. Factors that prevented or encouraged reporting of critical incidents to the CIRS were evaluated. Interview data were analysed using the Framework method. RESULTS: Of 3668 screened airway management procedures, 101 cases (2.8%) involved a critical incident. Saturation was reached after interviewing 21 anaesthesia providers, who had been involved in 42/101 critical incidents (41.6%). Only one incident (1.0%) had been reported to the CIRS, demonstrating significant underreporting. Interviews revealed highly variable views on the aims of the CIRS with an overall high threshold for reporting a critical incident. Factors hindering reporting of cases included concerns regarding identifiability of the reported incident and involved healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: Methods to foster anonymity of reporting, such as by national rather than departmental critical incident reporting system databases, and a change in culture is required to enhance reporting of critical incidents. Institutions managing a critical incident reporting system need to ensure timely feedback to the team regarding lessons learned, consequences, and changes to standards of care owing to reported critical incidents. Consistent reporting and assessment of critical incidents is required to allow the full potential of a critical incident reporting system.

Surgical Safety Does Not Happen By Accident: Learning From Perioperative Near Miss Case Studies.

Adverse surgical events cause negative patient health outcomes and harm that can often overshadow the safe and effective patient care provided daily by nurses as members of interprofessional healthcare teams. Near misses occur far more frequently than adverse events and are less visible to nurse leaders because patient harm is avoided due to chance, prevention, or mitigation. However, near misses have comparable root causes to adverse events and exhibit the same underlying patterns of failure. Reviewing near misses provides nurses with learning opportunities to identify patient care weaknesses and build appropriate solutions to enhance care. As the operating room is one of the most complex work settings in healthcare, identifying potential weaknesses or sources for errors is vital to reduce healthcare-associated risks for patients and staff. The purpose of this manuscript is to educate, inform, and stimulate critical thinking by discussing perioperative near miss case studies and the underlying factors that lead to errors. Our authors discuss 15 near miss case studies occurring across the perioperative patient experience of care and discuss barriers to near miss reporting. Nurse leaders can use our case studies to stimulate discussion among perioperative and perianesthesia nurses in their hospitals to inform comprehensive risk reduction programs.

Association between near miss maternal with sociodemographic factors and health assistants / Associação entre o near miss materno com fatores sociodemográficos e assistenciais de saúde

Abstract Objectives: evaluate the association between the maternal near miss rate (TNMM) and sociodemographic and health care factors. Methods: this is an aggregated, cross- sectional epidemiological survey, with regression analysis and spatial analysis, with the units of analysis being the 399 municipalities that make up the four health macro- regions in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Data from the years 2018 to 2021 were obtained through the state maternal near miss report and monitoring system. Results: the state's total TNMM was 6.4 per 1,000 live births, with an increasing trend during the studied period (p<0.001). Sociodemographic and healthcare factors were not associated with TNMM, except for municipalities with a higher degree of urbanization (β adjusted=0.022; CI95%=0.002-0.041) and located in the northern health macro-region (β adjusted=12.352; CI95%= 10.779-15.099), demonstrated by clusters with high and positive associations (high-high). Conclusion: the lack of association with sociodemographic and care factors may be due to their low effect on near miss, or the underreporting of near miss cases in the state. The differences found can be justified by the organization of health services and the intense regionalization of municipalities belonging to the macronorth, which have a better near miss report culture.

Resumo Objetivos: avaliar a associação existente entre a taxa de near miss materno (TNMM) com fatores sociodemográficos e assistenciais de saúde. Métodos: trata-se de uma pesquisa epidemiológica agregada, transversal, com análises de regressão e análise espacial, sendo as unidades de análise os 399 municípios que compõem as quatro macrorregiões de saúde do estado do Paraná, Brasil. Os dados provenientes dos anos de 2018 a 2021 foram obtidos por meio do sistema estadual de notificação e monitoramento do near miss materno. Resultados: a TNMM total do estado foi de 6,4 por 1.000 nascidos-vivos, com tendência de aumento no período estudado (p<0,001). Fatores sociodemográficos e assistenciais não se associaram com a TNMM, exceto municípios com maior grau de urbanização (β ajustado=0,022; IC95%= 0,002-0,041) e localizados na macrorregião norte de saúde (β ajustado=12,352; IC95%= 10,779; 15,099), demonstrado por clusters com associações altas e positivas (high- high). Conclusão: a ausência de associação com os fatores sociodemográficos e assistenciais podem decorrer do baixo efeito dos mesmos sobre o near miss, ou à subnotificação de casos de near miss materno no estado. As diferenças encontradas podem ser justificadas pela organização dos serviços de saúde e intensa regionalização dos municípios pertencentes à macronorte, os quais apresentam melhor cultura de notificação de near miss.

Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding in "Near Miss" neonates in Brazil

Abstract Objective To assess the association between sociodemographic and perinatal factors and hospital practices to encourage exclusive breastfeeding in near miss neonates in maternity hospitals. Methods This is a prospective cohort of live births from the survey "To be born in Brazil" conducted between 2011 and 2012. The weighted number of newborns who met the neonatal near miss criteria was 832. Exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge and 45 days after delivery were dependent variables of the study. The sociodemographic and perinatal factors of the puerperal women and hospital practices to encourage breastfeeding were independent variables. The data were analyzed with Poisson regression and set with p value<0.05. Is exclusive breastfeeding in neonatal near misses associated with factors related to sociodemographic conditions, maternal characteristics and the organization of health services? Results Data from 498 women and their children were analyzed. Mothers with incomplete primary education were more likely (36%) to have exclusive breastfeeding (RR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.06-1.74) at discharge. Women who did not offer the breast to the newborn in the joint accommodation (65%) were less likely to be breastfeeding exclusively (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.56-0.75) at discharge. Variables that increased the probability of exclusive breastfeeding after 45 days of delivery were primiparity (RR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.08-1.69) and having the newborn in the delivery room (RR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.12-3.24). Conclusion Exclusive breastfeeding in neonatal near misses was associated with maternal characteristics and important hospital practices, such as being breastfed in the joint accommodation and the newborn being in the mother's lap in the delivery room.

Near miss neonatal em capital do Centro-Oeste brasileiro: estudo caso-controle / Near miss neonatal in the capital of the Brazilian Midwest: a case-control study

Resumo Objetivou-se analisar fatores associados ao near miss neonatal em Cuiabá, Mato Grosso. Estudo caso-controle de nascidos vivos em capital do Centro-Oeste brasileiro, de janeiro de 2015 a dezembro de 2018, com 931 casos e 1.862 controles. Os dados foram coletados no Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos e no Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade. As variáveis foram organizadas seguindo o modelo hierárquico. A associação foi analisada por meio de regressão logística, com nível de significância de 5%. Os dados foram expressos em odds ratio (OR) bruta e ajustada e respectivos intervalos de confiança (IC95%). Mantiveram-se associados ao near miss neonatal: mães com duas (OR = 1,63; IC95%: 1,01-2,63) ou três ou mais gestações anteriores (OR = 1,87; IC95%: 1,09-3,21), sem nenhum filho (OR = 2,57; IC95%: 1,56-4,24) ou com um filho vivo ao nascer (OR = 1,53; IC95%: 1,04-2,26), gravidez múltipla (OR = 4,57; IC95%: 2,95-7,07), menos de seis consultas de pré-natal (OR = 2,20; IC95%: 1,77-2,72), partos realizados em hospitais públicos/universitários (OR = 2,25; IC95%: 1,60-3,15) e filantrópicos (OR = 1,62; IC95%: 1,16-2,26), apresentação não cefálica (OR = 2,71; IC95%: 1,87-3,94) e trabalho de parto não induzido (OR = 1,47 IC95%: 1,18-1,84).

Abstract We aimed to analyze factors associated with neonatal near-miss in Cuiabá, State of Mato Grosso, Brazil by performing a case-control study of live births in a capital city of central-western Brazil from January 2015 to December 2018 that included 931 cases and 1,862 controls. Data were obtained from the Live Births Information System and the Mortality Information System and variables were organized according to the hierarchical model. Association was analyzed by logistic regression with a 5% significance level. Data were expressed as crude and adjusted odds ratio (OR) and respective confidence intervals (95%CI). The following factors were associated with neonatal near miss: mothers with two (OR = 1.63; 95%CI: 1.01-2.63) or three or more previous pregnancies (OR=1.87; 95%CI: 1.09-3.21), without any live children (OR = 2.57; 95%CI: 1.56-4.24 ) or one live child at birth (OR = 1.53; 95%CI: 1.04-2.26), multiple pregnancy (OR = 4.57; 95%CI: 2.95-7.07), fewer than six prenatal consultations (OR = 2.20; 95%CI: 1.77-2.72), whose deliveries took place in public/university hospitals (OR = 2.25; 95%CI: 1.60-3.15) or philanthropic hospitals (OR = 1.62; 95%CI: 1.16-2.26), with non-cephalic presentation (OR = 2.71 95%CI: 1.87-3.94) and uninduced labor (OR = 1.47; 95%CI: 1.18-1.84).

Entre a busca por assistência e sua efetivação: peregrinação de gestantes e puérperas com quadro de Near Miss Materno / Between the search for assistance and its realization: the peregrination of pregnant and postpartum women with Maternal Near Miss

Resumo Este estudo, de caráter misto e sequencial exploratório, objetivou identificar padrões relacionados a trajetória de mulheres gestantes e puérperas que evoluíram para situações de risco, desde sua chegada em um primeiro serviço de assistência até sua admissão em uma maternidade terciária. A fase quantitativa analisou 1.703 prontuários e registros de internação de mulheres assistidas em três maternidades terciárias da Região Metropolitana de Fortaleza, no Ceará, entre 2010 e 2019. Na fase qualitativa, realizada entre janeiro e setembro de 2020, participaram 14 mulheres sobreviventes ao Near Miss Materno (NMM), por meio da Entrevista Narrativa Autobiográfica de Schütze. Os achados desvelam como atrasos relacionados aos profissionais e ao sistema de saúde contribuíram para a peregrinação de gestantes e puérperas e, consequentemente, para os quadros de NMM. A peregrinação destas mulheres associa-se a problemas nas estruturas da rede de atenção e dos serviços de saúde. Assim, fazem-se necessários o uso de ferramentas de acompanhamento da qualidade do serviço prestado pelos profissionais de saúde, os processos assistenciais bem estabelecidos, as estruturas físicas e as Redes de Atenção à Saúde (RAS), que suportem o seguimento desses processos.

Abstract This mixed-method and sequential exploratory study aims to identify patterns related to the trajectory of pregnant and puerperal women who evolved to risk situations, from arrival in a first care service to admission to a tertiary maternity hospital. The quantitative phase analyzed 1,703 medical records and hospitalization records of women assisted in three tertiary maternity hospitals in the Metropolitan Region of Fortaleza, Ceará, from 2010 to 2019. The qualitative phase was conducted from January to September 2020 with 14 women survivors of Maternal Near Miss (MNM), using Schütze's Autobiographical Narrative Interview. The findings reveal how delays related to professionals and the health system contributed to the pilgrimage of pregnant and postpartum women and, consequently, to the MNM cases. The peregrination of these women is associated with problems in the structures of the Care Network and the services. Thus, it becomes necessary to use tools to monitor the quality of the service provided by health professionals and to provide well-established care processes, physical structures, and the healthcare networks that support the follow-up of these processes.

Prevalência e desfechos materno-fetais de pacientes internadas por amniorrexe prematura no pré-termo no Hospital Universitário da Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí nos anos de 2020 e 2021 / Prevalence and maternal-fetal outcomes in patients hospitalized with preterm premature rupture of membranes at the University Hospital of Jundiaí's Medical School in the years 2020 and 2021

Objetivo: Atualizar a estatística do serviço, reconhecendo a prevalência de amnior- rexe prematura no pré-termo e seus principais desfechos materno-fetais. Méto- dos: Estudo transversal realizado pela análise de prontuários médicos de pacien- tes internadas devido a amniorrexe prematura no pré-termo e de seus respectivos conceptos no Hospital Universitário da Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí durante o período de janeiro de 2020 a dezembro de 2021. Resultados: Participaram da pesquisa 161 pacientes e 166 conceptos, resultando em uma prevalência de 2,12% no período estudado, com intervalo de confiança de 95% (1,80-2,47). Entre os des- fechos maternos, 2,5% das gestantes compunham critérios para near miss mater- no; enquanto entre os desfechos fetais, o resultado foi de 54,8% dos conceptos apresentando complicações, sendo as mais prevalentes a síndrome do desconfor- to respiratório (36,3%), icterícia (39,5%), baixo peso (27,5%) e hipoglicemia (24,2%). Além disso, 40,4% necessitaram de internação na unidade de terapia intensiva, 22,9% foram classificados como near miss neonatal e 4,4% foram a óbito. Conclu- são: Os resultados seguiram os padrões nacionais e internacionais esperados para prevalência de amniorrexe prematura no pré-termo e seus desfechos materno-fe- tais, com alta porcentagem de internações e complicações neonatais e baixa taxa de complicações maternas.

Objective: To update service statistics, recognizing the preva- lence of the pathology and its main outcomes. Methods: Cros- s-sectional study carried out through the analysis of medical records of patients hospitalized due to preterm premature rup- ture of membranes and their respective fetuses at the Univer- sity Hospital of Jundiaí's Medical School during the period from January 2020 to December 2021. Results: A total of 161 patients and 166 fetuses participated in the research, resulting in a pre- valence of 2.12% in the period studied with 95% confidence in- terval (1.80-2.47). About the outcomes, 2.5% of the pregnant wo- men composed the criteria for maternal near miss; as for the fetus, complications evolved in 54.8% of the fetuses, the most prevalent being respiratory distress syndrome (36.3%), jaundice (39.5%), low birth weight (27.5%) and hypoglycemia (24.2%). In addition, 40.4% required admission to the intensive care unit, 22.9% were neonatal near miss and 4.4% died. Conclusion: The results followed the expected national and international standards for the prevalence of preterm premature rupture of membranes and its maternal and fetal outcomes, with a high percentage of hospitalizations and neonatal complications, and a low rate of maternal complications.

Unveiling medication errors in liver transplant patients towards enhancing the imperative patient safety.

Background: Medication errors (MEs) are a significant healthcare problem that can harm patients and increase healthcare expenses. Being immunocompromised, liver-transplant patients are at high risk for complications if MEs inflict harmful or damaging effects. The present study reviewed and analyzed all MEs reported in Liver Transplant Patients. Methods: All MEs in the Liver Transplant Patients admitted between January 2016 to August 2022 were retrieved through the computerized physician order entry system, which two expert pharmacists classified according to the type and severity risk index. Results: A total of 314 records containing 407 MEs were committed by at least 71 physicians. Most of these errors involved drugs unrelated to managing liver-transplant-related issues. Antibiotic prescriptions had the highest mistake rate (17.0%), whereas immunosuppressants, routinely used in liver transplant patients, rank second with fewer than 14% of the identified MEs. The most often reported MEs (43.2%) are type-C errors, which, despite reaching patients, did not cause patient harm. Subgroup analysis revealed several factors associated with a statistically significant great incidence of MEs among physicians treating liver transplant patients. Conclusion: Although a substantial number of MEs occurred with liver transplant patients, the majority are not related to liver-transplant medications, which mainly belonged to type-C errors. This could be attributed to polypharmacy of transplant patients or the heavy workload on health care practitioners. Improving patient safety requires adopting regulations and strategies to promptly identify MEs and address potential errors.

Prevalence of neonatal near miss in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal near miss (NNM) applies to cases where newborns almost died during the first 28 d of life but survived life-threatening conditions following birth. The most vulnerable time for infant survival is the neonatal stage, corresponding to almost 50% of deaths occurring at <5 y of age. No study indicates the overall pooled prevalence of NNM in Africa. Thus this review aimed to estimate the overall pooled prevalence of NNMs in Africa. METHODS: Articles were retrieved through a comprehensive search strategy using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative, Cochrane Library and Google Search. Data extraction was done independently by all authors. Forest plots and tables were used to represent the original data. The statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. There was heterogeneity between the included articles. Therefore the authors used a meta-analysis of random effects to estimate the aggregate pooled prevalence of NNM in Africa. Funnel plot and Egger regression test methods were used to assess possible publication bias. R software version 3.5.3 and R studio version 1.2.5003 were used to analyse the data. The guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was used to publish this article. The review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration ID: CRD42021290223). RESULTS: Through an exhaustive search, we found 835 articles. However, we considered only eight full-text articles to be included in this meta-analysis. The analysis of included studies showed that the overall pooled prevalence of NNM in Africa was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16 to 44). The subgroup analysis by study year showed that the prevalence of NNM from 2012-2015 and 2018-2019 was 36% (95% CI 23 to 49) and 20% (95% CI 1 to 39), respectively. CONCLUSION: This finding suggests that the pooled prevalence of NNM is high in Africa as compared with other studies. Therefore the government and other stakeholders working on maternal and child health should assist in the design of interventions and strategies for improving the quality of neonatal care.

Identification errors in medical research: Privacy at all costs?

In laboratory medicine, a misidentified patient sample can lead to an incorrect tissue diagnosis, a potentially fatal blood transfusion error or other serious adverse events. Although well characterised in routine patient care, the overall impacts of misidentification errors in the clinical research setting are less conspicuous but potentially greater, with downstream effects that may extend beyond care at an individual level. When data discrepancies or queries arise in clinical trial data then a data clarification form (DCF) is issued to the researcher by the overseeing trial coordinator or sponsor. Higher rates of DCF's are sometimes used as a crude surrogate marker of poorer trial quality. However, data is scarce on misidentification rates in clinical trials. In five clinical trials involving 822 histology or blood specimens analysed by our pathology department, DCF's were issued for 21% (174) of specimens. Amongst these 67% (117 / 174) were related to sample identification. Although these errors were recognised before data was compromised or an adverse event occurred, they highlight an alarming lack of stringency of use of patient identifiers in the research setting. We therefore propose the use of an appropriate number of de-identified data points and a formalised specimen accession process as employed in routine care to mitigate misidentification errors and their impact in clinical research. Increased recognition in the research community of the likely effect of truncating or reducing the number of patient identifiers is needed to minimise misidentification errors in the research setting.

Neonatal near miss and mortality and associated factors: cohort study of births in the city of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil / Near miss e mortalidade neonatal e fatores associados: estudo de coorte de nascimentos do município do Rio de Janeiro, RJ

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with neonatal near miss and mortality of the live birth cohort in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 2015. Methods: Population-based retrospective cohort of live births (LB) of single pregnancy with 0-27 days of follow-up. Data were obtained from the Brazilian Live Birth and Mortality Information Systems. Logistic regressions with the analytical strategy of hierarchical determination were used for cases of near miss and deaths separately. Results: The cohort was composed of 85,850 LB. For every one thousand LB, about 16 were cases of near miss and six died. Maternal level of education, skin color, and age and adequacy of prenatal care were associated with neonatal near miss; for deaths, presentation of LB at delivery, birth weight, gestational age, and five-minute Apgar score are added. Conclusions: Besides confirming the effect of low birth weight, prematurity, and asphyxia on neonatal death, socioeconomic vulnerability markers - low education level and brown or black skin colors - were associated with neonatal death and near miss. Absent or inadequate prenatal care showed a strong association with both outcomes, being stronger for neonatal death. Investments in the quality of prenatal care and reduction of disparities in health care are necessary in Rio de Janeiro.

Resumo Objetivo: Investigar fatores associados aos near miss e óbito neonatais na coorte de nascidos vivos do município do Rio de Janeiro (RJ), 2015. Métodos: Coorte retrospectiva de base populacional de nascidos vivos de gravidez única com seguimento de até 27 dias. Dados obtidos dos Sistemas de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos e sobre Mortalidade. Foram usadas regressão logística e estratégia analítica de determinação hierárquica separadamente para casos de near miss e óbitos. Resultados: Coorte composta de 85.850 nascidos vivos. Para cada mil nascidos vivos, 16 foram casos de near miss e seis evoluíram para óbito. Escolaridade, cor da pele e idade maternas e adequação do pré-natal estiveram associadas ao near miss neonatal; para óbitos, acrescenta-se apresentação do NV no parto, peso, idade gestacional e Apgar no 5º minuto. Conclusões: Além de confirmar o efeito do baixo peso, da prematuridade e da asfixia no óbito neonatal, variáveis marcadoras de vulnerabilidade socioeconômica — baixa escolaridade e cor da pele parda ou preta — mostraram-se associadas ao óbito e ao near miss neonatal. Pré-natal ausente ou inadequado mostrou forte associação com ambos os desfechos, mais intensa para o óbito. Investimentos na qualificação do pré-natal e na redução das desigualdades na saúde são necessários no Rio de Janeiro.

Normalization of deviance in pediatric hospital: perception of health workers / Normalización de la desviación en hospital pediátrico: percepción de trabajadores de salud / Normalização do desvio em hospital pediátrico: percepção de trabalhadores de saúde

ABSTRACT Objective: To know the perception of health workers about the phenomenon of normalization of deviance in a pediatric hospital. Method: Exploratory, descriptive, and qualitative study conducted in a public pediatric hospital in northeastern Brazil in 2021. An in-depth interview was applied to 21 health workers, submitted to Thematic Categorical Content Analysis in the MAXQDA® Software. Results: 128 context units emerged from the content analysis. These data were presented in three analytical categories, which address conceptions about normalization of deviance, examples and contributing factors. The omission of the practice of hand hygiene and the correct use of personal protective equipment,and turning off alarms stand out as the main deviance perceived by health workers. As contributing factors, human factors and organizational factors prevailed. Conclusion: Workers perceive the normalization of deviance as negligence, recklessness, and violations of good practices, with consequences for patient safety.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Conocer la percepción de los trabajadores de la salud sobre el fenómeno de la normalización de la desviación en un hospital pediátrico. Método: Estudio exploratorio, descriptivo y cualitativo realizado en un hospital pediátrico público en el noreste de Brasil en 2021. Se aplicó una entrevista en profundidad a 21 trabajadores de la salud, sometidos al Análisis de Contenido Categórico Temático en el Software MAXQDA®. Resultados: 128 unidades de contexto surgieron del análisis de contenido. Estos datos se presentaron en tres categorías analíticas, que abarcan conceptos sobre la normalización de la desviación, ejemplos y factores contribuyentes. La omisión de la práctica de la higiene de manos y el uso correcto de los equipos de protección personal y el apagado de alarmas se destacan como las principales desviaciones percibidas por los trabajadores de la salud. Como factores contribuyentes prevalecieron los factores humanos y los factores organizacionales. Conclusión: Los trabajadores perciben la normalización de la desviación como negligencia, imprudencia y violación de las buenas prácticas, con consecuencias para la seguridad del paciente.

RESUMO Objetivo: Conhecer a percepção de trabalhadores de saúde sobre o fenômeno da normalização do desvio em um hospital pediátrico. Método: Estudo exploratório, descritivo e qualitativo realizado em hospital público pediátrico do nordeste brasileiro em 2021. Aplicou-se entrevista em profundidade a 21 trabalhadores de saúde, submetida à Análise de Conteúdo Categorial Temática no Software MAXQDA®. Resultados: Emergiram 128 unidades de contexto da análise de conteúdo. Esses dados foram apresentados em três categorias analíticas, as quais abordam concepções sobre normalização do desvio, exemplos e fatores contribuintes. Destacam-se a omissão da prática de higienização das mãos e do uso correto dos equipamentos de proteção individual, e o desligamento de alarmes como principais desvios percebidos pelos trabalhadores de saúde. Como fatores contribuintes, preponderaram os fatores humanos e os fatores organizacionais. Conclusão: Os trabalhadores percebem a normalização do desvio como negligência, imprudência e violações de boas práticas, com consequências para a segurança do paciente.

Biovigilância e notificação de eventos adversos na doação e transplante de órgãos: revisão sistemática / Biovigilancia y notificación de eventos adversos en la donación y trasplante de órganos: revisión sistemática / Biosurveillance and reporting of adverse events in organ donation and transplantation: a systematic review

Resumo Objetivo Sintetizar e avaliar criticamente as evidências científicas oriundas de estudos observacionais sobre sistemas de biovigilância e notificação de eventos adversos na doação e transplante de órgãos. Métodos Revisão sistemática de estudos observacionais seguindo as recomendações das Diretrizes Metodológicas (REBRATS) e Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Foram incluídos estudos primários e relatos de caso conduzidos sobre biovigilância e/ou eventos adversos na doação e/ou transplante de órgãos, sem restrição de data de publicação ou idioma. Foram utilizadas seis bases de dados eletrônicas para a realização das buscas na literatura científica: - Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) (via PubMed), Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus e a biblioteca eletrônica Scielo. Realizou-se também busca de dados nas seguintes bases secundárias: Notify - World Health Organization (WHO), Organização Pan-Americana de Saúde (OPAS) e Google Scholar. Para a avaliação da qualidade dos estudos foi utilizada a ferramenta MINORS. Resultados Foram identificados 551 estudos, após as etapas de avaliação, foram incluídos oito deles para a revisão sistemática. Estes foram divididos entre resultados, processos e estratégias de prevenção de eventos adversos. Quanto a classificação da qualidade dos estudos, dois obtiveram classificação boa. Conclusão Os resultados apontam a ocorrência de eventos adversos ocorridos em alguma etapa do processo de doação e transplante de órgãos e tecidos, como: reações adversas relacionadas a medicamentos; neurotoxicidade; aumento do tempo de hospitalização; reintervenções cirúrgicas; queda; coma; óbito; falha ou perda do enxerto. Destaca-se que os eventos adversos possivelmente ainda são subnotificados.

Resumen Objetivo Sintetizar y evaluar críticamente las evidencias científicas provenientes de estudios observacionales sobre sistemas de biovigilancia y notificación de eventos adversos en la donación y trasplante de órganos. Métodos Revisión sistemática de estudios observacionales guiada por las recomendaciones de las Directrices Metodológicas (REBRATS) y Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Se incluyeron estudios primarios y relatos de caso realizados sobre biovigilancia o eventos adversos en la donación o trasplante de órganos, sin restricción de fecha de publicación o idioma. Se utilizaron seis bases de datos electrónicas para realizar las búsquedas en la literatura científica: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) (via PubMed), Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus y la biblioteca electrónica Scielo. También se realizó la búsqueda de datos en las siguientes bases secundarias: Notify - World Health Organization (WHO), Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) y Google Scholar. Para evaluar la calidad de los estudios se utilizó la herramienta MINORS. Resultados Se identificaron 551 estudios y, luego de las etapas de evaluación, se incluyeron ocho en la revisión sistemática, que fueron divididos entre resultados, procesos y estrategias de prevención de eventos adversos. Respecto a la clasificación de la calidad de los estudios, dos obtuvieron una clasificación buena. Conclusión Los resultados indican casos de eventos adversos ocurridos en alguna etapa del proceso de donación y trasplante de órganos y tejidos, como: reacciones adversas relacionadas con medicamentos, neurotoxicidad, aumento del tiempo de hospitalización, reintervenciones quirúrgicas, caída, coma, fallecimiento, falla o pérdida del injerto. Se destaca que los eventos adversos probablemente aún son subnotificados.

Abstract Objective To synthesize and critically evaluate the scientific evidence from observational studies on biosurveillance systems and adverse event reporting in organ donation and transplantation. Methods Systematic review of observational studies following the recommendations of the Methodological Guidelines (REBRATS) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Primary studies and case reports on biosurveillance and/or adverse events in organ donation and/or transplantation, without restriction of publication date or language were included. Six electronic databases were used in the scientific literature search: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) (via PubMed), Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus and the electronic library Scielo. A data search was also performed in the following secondary databases: Notify - World Health Organization (WHO), Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and Google Scholar. The MINORS tool was used to assess the quality of studies. Results 551 studies were identified, and after the evaluation steps, eight of them were included in the systematic review. These were divided into results, processes and strategies for preventing adverse events. Regarding the classification of the quality of studies, two obtained a good classification. Conclusion The results indicate the occurrence of adverse events at some stage of the organ and tissue donation and transplantation process, such as: adverse drug-related reactions; neurotoxicity; longer length of hospital stay; surgical reinterventions; falls; coma; death; graft failure or loss. The fact that adverse events are possibly still underreported is noteworthy.

Factors associated with neonatal near miss in a Midwest capital in Brazil / Fatores associados ao near miss neonatal em uma capital do Centro-Oeste do Brasil

Abstract Objectives: to estimate neonatal near miss rates and investigate sociodemographic, obstetric, childbirth, and neonate factors residing in a Midwest capital city. Methods: observational cohort study of live births from Cuiabá in the period of 2015 to 2018, with data from the Sistemas de Informações sobre Mortalidade e sobre Nascidos Vivos (Mortality and Live Birth Information Systems). The neonatal near miss rate was calculated according to sociodemographic, obstetric, childbirth, and neonate variables. Logistic regression model was adjusted to analyze the factors associated with neonatal near miss. Results: the neonatal near miss rate was 22.8 per thousand live births and the variables showed an association with the outcome were: maternal age 35 years or older (OR=1.53; CI95%=1.17-2.00), having fewer than six prenatal consultations (OR=2.43; CI95%=2.08-2.86), non-cephalic fetal presentation (OR=3.09; CI95%=2.44-3.92), multiple pregnancy (OR=3.30; CI95%=2.57- 4.23), no live birth (OR=1.62; CI95%=1.34-1.96) or one live birth (OR=1.22; CI95%=1.00-1.48), delivery in public/university hospital (OR=2.16; CI95%=1.73-2.71) and philanthropic hospital (OR=1.51; CI95%=1.19-1.91) and non-induced labor (OR=1.50; CI95%=1.25-1.80). Conclusion: the neonatal near miss rate was 3.04 cases for each death, and neonatal near miss was influenced by maternal characteristics, obstetric history, type of birth hospital, and delivery care organization.

Resumo Objetivos: estimar as taxas de near miss neonatal e investigar os fatores sociodemográficos, obstétricos, do parto e dos neonatos residentes em uma capital do Centro-Oeste. Métodos: estudo observacional de coorte de nascidos vivos de Cuiabá no período de 2015 a 2018, com dados dos Sistemas de Informações sobre Mortalidade e sobre Nascidos Vivos. Foi calculada a taxa de near miss neonatal conforme as variáveis sociodemográficas, obstétricas, do parto e dos neonatos. Modelo de regressão logística foi ajustado para analisar os fatores associados ao near miss neonatal. Resultados: a taxa de near miss neonatal foi 22,8 por mil nascidos vivos e as variáveis que apresentaram associação com o desfecho foram: idade materna de 35 anos ou mais (OR=1,53; IC95%=1,17-2,00), realizar menos de seis consultas de pré-natal (OR=2,43; IC95%=2,08-2,86), apresentação fetal não cefálica (OR=3,09; IC95%=2,44-3,92), gravidez múltipla (OR=3,30; IC95%=2,57-4,23), nenhum filho nascido vivo (OR=1,62; IC=1,34-1,96) ouum filho nascido vivo (OR=1,22; IC95%=1,00-1,48), parto em hospital público/universitário (OR=2,16; IC95%=1,73-2,71) e filantrópico (OR=1,51; IC95%=1,19-1,91)e trabalho de parto não induzido (OR=1,50; IC95%=1,25-1,80). Conclusão: a taxa de near miss neonatal foi de 3,04 casos para cada óbito, sendo que o near miss neonatal foi influenciado pelas características maternas, histórico obstétrico, tipo do hospital do nascimento e organização da assistência ao parto.

Factors associated with severe maternal, fetuses and neonates' outcomes in a university hospital in Rio de Janeiro State / Fatores associados a desfechos graves maternos, fetais e neonatais em um hospital universitário do estado do Rio de Janeiro

Abstract Objectives: to estimate the burden of parturients, fetuses and neonate's severe morbidity and mortality and investigate the association between maternal and their conceptus outcomes. Methods: retrospective cohort of 546 parturients and their conceptus in a university hospital, reference for high-risk pregnancy, in the metropolitan region II of Rio de Janeiro State from 2015 to 2017. We classified parturients according to obstetric morbidity (OM) in direct, indirect, or mixed, and their outcomes as: 1) no severity, 2) severe complication (SC), 3) critical intervention/Intensive Care Unit, and 4) greater severity -maternal near-miss (MNM) or death. We evaluated the conceptus as neonatal near-miss (NNM) and fetal and neonatal deaths. We estimated morbimortality indicators and associated factors (multinomial logistic regression). Results: OM was frequent: 29.3% indirect, 22.3% direct, and 15.8% mixed. There were eight cases of NMM, seven with direct MO. Among the conceptus: 7.5% were NNM cases and 4.4%, deaths. The risk of severe maternal outcomes was 16.8 and neonatal, 102.6/1000 live births. Mixed race, inadequate prenatal care, CG and NMM/death, were associated with NNM. Inadequate prenatal care and maternal NM/death were associated with conceptus deaths. Conclusion: even in a reference unit, sociodemographic, and health care inequalities negatively affect mothers and, consequently, their children.

Resumo Objetivos: estimar a carga de morbidade grave e mortalidade em parturientes, fetos e neonatos e investigar a associação entre os desfechos maternos e de seus conceptos. Métodos: coorte retrospectiva de 546 parturientes e seus conceptos no hospital universitário referência para gravidez de alto risco da região metropolitana II do estado do Rio de Janeiro (ERJ), de 2015 a 2017. Classificamos as parturientes segundo morbidade obstétrica (MO) em direta, indireta e mista, e seus desfechos como: 1) sem gravidade, 2) complicação grave (CG), 3) intervenção crítica/ Unidade Terapia Intensiva e 4) maior gravidade-near miss materno (NMM) ou óbito. Avaliamos os conceptos quanto a near miss neonatal (NMN), óbitos fetais e neonatais. Estimamos indicadores de morbimortalidade, e fatores de associação (regressão logística multinomial). Resultados: MO foi frequente: 29,3% indiretas, 22,3% diretas e 15,8% mista. Ocorreram oito casos de NMM, sete com MO direta. Entre os conceptos,7,5% foram casos de NMN e 4,4%, óbitos. O risco de desfecho grave materno foi 16,8 e neonatal, 102,6 p/1000 nascidos vivos. Estiveram associados ao NMN: cor parda, pré-natal inadequado, CG e NMM/óbito; e ao óbito do concepto: pré-natal inadequado e NMM/óbito. Conclusão: mesmo em situação de referência, desigualdades sociodemográficas e assistenciais afetam negativamente mães e, consequentemente, seus conceptos.

Obstetric and neonatal adverse events and association with care models: a cohort study / Eventos adversos obstétricos y neonatales y asociación con modelos de atención: un estudio de cohorte / Eventos adversos obstétricos e neonatais e associação com os modelos de assistência: um estudo coorte

ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the prevalence of practices in childbirth care, obstetric and neonatal adverse events and their association with care models in three public health services. Method: this is a prospective cohort study carried out with 548 dyads, postpartum women and their newborns, whose pregnancy was of usual risk and vaginal birth, admitted to hospital in three public services, one with an exclusive care model by nurse-midwives (service A), one with a collaborative model involving obstetric doctors and nurses (service B) and one with an exclusive medical care model (service C). Initially, an interview was carried out with participants, and a second contact was carried out 42 days after birth to complement the collection of the adverse event outcome. Results: in service A, no woman underwent the Kristeller maneuver, episiotomy, directed pushing or more than one vaginal examination per hour. Meanwhile, in service C, 19.3%, 39.9%, 77.1% and 26.3% of women underwent these interventions, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 19.2% of the dyads. Occurrence of adverse events was associated with not using partograph (p=0.001; OR: 11.03; CI: 2.64-45.99) and episiotomy (p=0.042; OR: 1.72; CI: 1. 02-2.91). The mean probability of experiencing an adverse event was 5% in service A, 21% in service B and 24% in service C. Conclusion: adverse events had a lower mean probability of occurrence in the service exclusively operated by nurse-midwives, in which greater application of recommendations for labor and birth care was identified.

RESUMEN Objetivo: analizar la prevalencia de prácticas en la atención del childbirth, eventos adversos obstétricos y neonatales y su asociación con los modelos de atención en tres servicios públicos de salud. Método: estudio de cohorte prospectivo realizado con 548 binomios, puérperas y sus recién nacidos, cuyo embarazo fue de riesgo habitual y childbirth vaginal, hospitalizados en tres servicios públicos, uno con modelo de atención exclusiva por enfermeras obstétricas (servicio A), otro con modelo colaborativo. modelo con la labor de médicos y enfermeras obstetras (servicio B) y otro con un modelo de asistencia médica exclusiva (servicio C). Inicialmente se realizó una entrevista a los participantes y se realizó un segundo contacto a los 42 días del nacimiento para complementar la recopilación del resultado del evento adverso. Resultados: en el servicio A ninguna mujer fue sometida a maniobra de Kristeller, episiotomía, pujo dirigido o más de un examen vaginal por hora. Mientras tanto, en el servicio C, el 19,3%, 39,9%, 77,1% y 26,3% de las mujeres se sometieron a estas intervenciones, respectivamente. Los eventos adversos ocurrieron en el 19,2% de los binomios. La aparición de eventos adversos se asoció con la no utilización del partographa (p=0,001; OR: 11,03; IC: 2,64-45,99) y episiotomía (p=0,042; OR: 1,72; IC: 1,02-2,91). La probabilidad promedio de experimentar un evento adverso fue del 5% en el servicio A, del 21% en el servicio B y del 24% en el servicio C. Conclusión: los eventos adversos tuvieron menor probabilidad promedio de ocurrencia en el servicio operado exclusivamente por enfermeras obstétricas, en el que se identificó mayor aplicación de las recomendaciones de asistencia al childbirth y nacimiento.

RESUMO Objetivo: analisar a prevalência de práticas na atenção ao parto, eventos adversos obstétricos e neonatais e sua associação com modelos assistenciais em três serviços de saúde públicos. Método: estudo coorte prospectivo realizado com 548 binômios, puérperas e seus recém-nascidos, cuja gestação foi de risco habitual e o parto vaginal, internados em três serviços públicos, sendo um com modelo de assistência exclusivo por enfermeiras obstetras (serviço A), um com modelo colaborativo com atuação de médicos e enfermeiras obstetras (serviço B) e um com modelo de assistência exclusiva médica (serviço C). Inicialmente, foi realizada uma entrevista com as participantes e um segundo contato foi realizado após 42 dias do parto para complementar a coleta do desfecho evento adverso. Resultados: no serviço A, nenhuma mulher foi submetida à manobra de Kristeller, episiotomia, incentivos a puxos dirigidos ou mais de um toque vaginal por hora. Enquanto, no serviço C, 19,3%, 39,9%, 77,1% e 26,3% das mulheres foram submetidas a essas intervenções, respectivamente. Os eventos adversos ocorreram em 19,2% dos binômios. A ocorrência dos eventos adversos foi associada ao não uso do partograma (p=0,001; OR: 11,03; IC: 2,64-45,99) e episiotomia (p=0,042; OR: 1,72; IC: 1,02-2,91). A probabilidade média de apresentar algum evento adverso foi de 5% no serviço A, 21% no serviço B e 24% no serviço C. Conclusão: os eventos adversos apresentaram menor probabilidade média de ocorrência no serviço com atuação exclusiva de enfermeiras obstetras, no qual se identificou maior aplicação das recomendações para assistência ao parto e nascimento.

Percepción de enfermería sobre la notificación de eventos adversos en cuidados intensivos pediátricos / Nurses' Perceptions about Adverse Event Reporting in Pediatric Intensive Care

Introducción: La notificación de eventos adversos es reflejo de la calidad asistencial de enfermería y de la cultura de seguridad. Objetivo: Identificar la percepción de enfermería sobre la notificación de eventos adversos en cuidados intensivos pediátricos. Métodos: Estudio cualitativo, de tipo investigación convergente asistencial, realizado en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital Provincial Pediátrico "José Luis Miranda", Cuba, de octubre a diciembre del año 2022. Participaron 38 enfermeras, por medio de entrevista informal, observación participante y grupo de discusión. Los datos recogidos en el proceso investigativo fueron organizados por analogía de información y analizados de forma cualitativa, ello incluyó el descubrimiento, codificación y relativización de la información, lo cual permitió identificar categorías, codificar estas categorías y establecer relaciones. Resultados: Los participantes percibían que la notificación de eventos adversos se realizaba de forma verbal al jefe de equipo de enfermería. La ausencia de notificación ocurría por desconocimiento de los aspectos de la cultura de seguridad, temor a sanciones y no existencia de un sistema de notificación. Como parte de las estrategias para la notificación de eventos adversos los enfermeros sugirieron la realización de talleres y cursos formativos sobre cultura de seguridad, crear un ambiente laboral no punitivo que favorezca el análisis y aprendizaje de cada error. Conclusión: Los profesionales de enfermería perciben que se notifican de forma espontánea los eventos adversos en cuidados intensivos, existe la necesidad de formar al personal en cultura de seguridad del paciente y diseñar un sistema de vigilancia de eventos adversos(AU)

Introduction: Adverse event reporting is a reflection of nursing care quality and safety culture. Objective: To identify nurses' perception about adverse event reporting in pediatric intensive care. Methods: A qualitative study, of convergent care research type, was carried out in the intensive care unit of Hospital Provincial Pediátrico José Luis Miranda, in Cuba, from October to December 2022. Thirty-eight nurses participated in an informal interview, with participant observation and a discussion group. The data collected in the research process were organized by information analogy, as well as qualitatively analyzed. This included the discovery, coding and relativization of the information, which allowed to identify and code these categories, as well as establishing relationships. Results: The participants perceived that adverse event reporting was done verbally to the head nurse. The lack of reporting was due to lack of knowledge about safety culture aspects, fear of sanctions and the nonexistence of a reporting system. As part of the strategies to encourage adverse events reporting, the nurses suggested holding workshops and training courses on safety culture, as well as creating a nonpunitive working environment that favors the analysis and learning from each error. Conclusion: Nursing professionals perceive that adverse events in the intensive care settings are reported spontaneously. There is a need to train such staff based on a patient safety culture and to design an adverse event surveillance system(AU)

Morbimortalidade materna no Brasil e a urgência de um sistema nacional de vigilância do near miss materno / Maternal morbidity and mortality in Brazil and the urgency of a national surveillance system for maternal near miss / La morbimortalidad materna en Brasil y la urgencia de un sistema nacional de vigilancia del near miss materno

A Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) recomenda a análise dos casos de morbidade materna severa/near miss materno como complemento às análises das mortes de mães, dado que a incidência é mais elevada e os fatores preditivos dos dois desfechos são semelhantes. Tendo em vista que as razões de mortalidade materna, no Brasil, têm se mantido constantes apesar do compromisso firmado durante a Assembleia Geral da Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU), em 2015, o objetivo deste artigo é propor um sistema nacional de vigilância de near miss materno. Propõe-se a inclusão dos eventos near miss materno na Lista Nacional de Notificação Compulsória de Doenças, Agravos e Eventos de Saúde Pública, por meio da compatibilização dos critérios diagnósticos de near miss materno, informados pela OMS, com os códigos da Classificação Internacional de Doenças (CID) para identificação dos casos. Tendo em vista que a vigilância em saúde se faz baseada em diversas fontes de informações, a notificação poderia ser feita pelos profissionais dos serviços de saúde tão logo fosse identificado um caso confirmado ou suspeito. A partir do estudo dos fatores associados aos desfechos, espera-se a avaliação mais qualificada dos serviços voltados à assistência obstétrica e consequente implementação de políticas mais eficientes de prevenção não apenas do óbito materno, mas de eventos que podem tanto causar sequelas irreversíveis à saúde da mulher quanto aumento do risco de óbito fetal e neonatal.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the analysis of severe maternal morbidity/maternal near miss cases as complementary to the analysis of maternal deaths since the incidence is higher and the predictive factors of the two outcomes are similar. Considering that the reasons for maternal mortality in Brazil have remained constant despite the commitment made during the General Assembly of the United Nations in 2015, this article aims to propose a nationwide maternal near miss surveillance system. We propose the inclusion of maternal near miss events in the National List of Compulsory Notification of Diseases, Injuries, and Public Health Events, via the compatibility of the diagnostic criteria of maternal near miss, informed by the WHO, with the codes of the International Classification of Diseases for the identification of cases. Considering that health surveillance is based on several sources of information, notification could be made by health service professionals as soon as a confirmed or suspected case is identified. With the study of the factors associated with the outcomes, we expect a qualified evaluation of the services focused on obstetric care and consequent implementation of more efficient policies to prevent not only maternal death but also events that can both cause irreversible sequelae to women's health and increase the risk of fetal and neonatal death.

La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) recomienda el análisis de los casos de morbilidad materna grave/near miss materno como complemento a los análisis de las muertes maternas, dado que la incidencia es más elevada y los factores predictivos de los dos resultados son similares. Teniendo en vista que las razones de mortalidad materna, en Brasil, se han mantenido constantes a pesar del compromiso firmado durante la Asamblea General de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas, en el año 2015, el objetivo de este artículo es proponer un sistema de vigilancia de near miss materno de alcance nacional. Se propone la inclusión de los eventos de near miss materno en la Lista Nacional de Notificación Obligatoria de Enfermedades, Agravios y Eventos de Salud Pública, por medio de la compatibilización de los criterios diagnósticos de near miss materno; informados por la OMS, con los códigos de la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades para identificación de los casos. Teniendo en vista que la vigilancia en salud se basa en diversas fuentes de Informaciones, la notificación podría ser hecha por los profesionales de los servicios de salud, tan pronto fuese identificado un caso confirmado o sospechoso. Se espera que el estudio de los factores asociados a los resultados conduzca a una evaluación más calificada de los servicios de atención obstétrica y a la consecuente implementación de políticas más eficientes de prevención no solo de la muerte materna; sino de eventos que pueden tanto causar secuelas irreversibles a la salud de la mujer como aumento del riesgo de muerte fetal y neonatal.

Maternal Near Miss in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus / Near miss materno em pacientes com lupus eritematoso sistêmico

Abstract Objective Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may cause irreversible organ damage. Pregnancy with SLE may have severe life-threatening risks. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in patients with SLE and analyze the parameters that contributed to cases of greater severity. Methods This is a cross-sectional retrospective study from analysis of data retrieved from medical records of pregnant women with SLE treated at a University Hospital in Brazil. The pregnant women were divided in a control group without complications, a group with potentially life-threatening conditions (PLTC), and a group with maternal near miss (MNM). Results The maternal near miss rate was 112.9 per 1,000 live births. The majority of PLTC (83.9%) and MNM (92.9%) cases had preterm deliveries with statistically significant increased risk compared with the control group (p = 0.0042; odds ratio [OR]: 12.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-96.6 for the MNM group and p = 0.0001; OR: 4.84; 95%CI: 2.2-10.8 for the PLTC group). Severe maternal morbidity increases the risk of longer hospitalization (p < 0.0001; OR: 18.8; 95%CI: 7.0-50.6 and p < 0.0001; OR: 158.17; 95%CI: 17.6-1424,2 for the PLTC and MNM groups, respectively), newborns with low birthweight (p = 0.0006; OR: 3.67; 95%CI: 1.7-7.9 and p = 0.0009; OR: 17.68; 95%CI: 2-153.6) for the PLTC and MNM groups, respectively] as well as renal diseases (PLTC [8.9%; 33/56; p = 0.0069] and MNM [78.6%; 11/14; p = 0.0026]). Maternal near miss cases presented increased risk for neonatal death (p = 0.0128; OR: 38.4; 95%CI: 3.3-440.3]), and stillbirth and miscarriage (p = 0.0011; OR: 7.68; 95%CI: 2.2-26.3]). Conclusion Systemic lupus erythematosus was significantly associated with severe maternal morbidity, longer hospitalizations, and increased risk of poor obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Resumo Objetivo Lúpus eritematoso sistêmico (LES) pode causar danos irreversíveis aos órgãos. A gravidez com LES pode ter riscos para condições ameaçadoras à vida. O presente estudo teve como objetivo determinar a prevalência de MMG em pacientes com LES e analisar os parâmetros que contribuíram para os casos de maior gravidade. Métodos Trata-se de um estudo transversal retrospectivo a partir da análise de dados obtidos de prontuários de gestantes com LES atendidas em um Hospital Universitário no Brasil. As gestantes foram divididas em grupo controle sem intercorrências, grupo com condições potencialmente ameaçadoras a vida (CPAV) e grupo com near miss materno (NMM). Resultados A taxa de NMM foi de 112,9 por 1.000 nascidos vivos. A maioria dos casos de CPAV (83,9%) e NMM (92,9%) teve partos prematuros com risco aumentado estatisticamente significativo em comparação com o grupo controle (p = 0,0042; odds ratio [OR]: 12,05; intervalo de confiança [IC]: 1,5-96,6 para o grupo NMM e p = 0,0001; OR: 4,84; IC95%: 2,2-10,8 para o grupo CPAV). MMG aumenta o risco de maior tempo de internação (p < 0,0001; OR: 18,8; IC95%: 7,0-50,6 e p < 0,0001; OR: 158,17; IC95%: 17,6-1424,2 para os grupos CPAV e NMM, respectivamente), recémnascidos com baixo peso (p = 0,0006; OR: 3,67; IC95%: 1,7-7,9 e p = 0,0009; OR: 17,68; IC95%: 2-153,6 para os grupos CPAV e NMM, respectivamente), bem como doenças renais (CPAV: 58,9%; 33/56; p = 0,0069 e NMM: 78,6%; 11/14; p = 0,0026)]. Os casos de NMM apresentaram risco aumentado para óbito neonatal (p = 0,0128; OR: 38,4; IC95%: 3,3-440,3), natimorto e aborto espontâneo (p = 0,0011; OR: 7,68; IC95%: 2,2-26,3). Conclusão Lúpus eritematoso sistêmico foi significativamente associado à morbidade materna grave, internações mais longas e risco aumentado de desfechos obstétricos e neonatais ruins.