[Renal colic]. / Steinkolik.

INTRODUCTION: Renal colic accounts for 5-10% of all emergency department visits, making it a common condition in acute medicine. The typical clinical presentation is an early indication of urolithiasis. DIAGNOSIS: Diagnostic measures include laboratory tests, ultrasound, and low-dose noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scans. Kidney, ureter, bladder (KUB) plain film radiography has been widely replaced by low-dose noncontrast CT with similar radiation dosage. In special patient groups such as children or pregnant women, ionizing radiation should be avoided if possible. TREATMENT: General measures involve pain management (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, opioids) and empirical antibiotic treatment for suspected bacterial infection. Depending on the location/size of the stone, pharmacological stone expulsion therapy may be considered. In cases of obstructive pyelonephritis or acute renal insufficiency, early urinary drainage (JJ stent/nephrostomy) is recommended. Definitive stone removal may be performed primarily in some cases (rather small and rather distal ureterolithiasis). It is common to schedule stone removal as a secondary intervention.

Damage-associated molecular patterns as a mechanism of sevoflurane-induced neuroinflammation in neonatal rodents.

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia is inevitable for pediatric patients undergoing surgery, though volatile anesthetic agents may cause neuroinflammation and neurodevelopmental impairment; however, the underlying pathophysiology remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the neuroinflammation mechanism in developing rat brains associated with sevoflurane exposure time, by identifying the specific damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) pathway and evaluating the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in alleviating neuroinflammation. METHODS: A three-step experiment was conducted to investigate neuroinflammation induced by sevoflurane. First, the exposure time required for sevoflurane to cause neuroinflammation was determined. Next, the specific pathways of DAMPs involved in neuroinflammation by sevoflurane were identified. Finally, the effects of NSAIDs on sevoflurane-induced neuroinflammation were investigated. The expression of various molecules in the rat brain were assessed using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, western blot analysis, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: In total, 112 rats (aged 7 days) were used, of which six rats expired during the experiment (mortality rate, 5.3%). Expression of CD68, HMGB-1, galectin-3, TLR4, TLR9, and phosphorylated NF-κB was significantly increased upon 6 h of sevoflurane exposure. Conversely, transcriptional levels of TNF-α and IL-6 significantly increased and IFN-γ significantly decreased after 6 h of sevoflurane exposure. Co-administration of NSAIDs with sevoflurane anesthesia significantly attenuated TNF-α and IL-6 levels and restored IFN-γ levels. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, 6 h of sevoflurane exposure induces neuroinflammation through the DAMPs pathway, HMGB-1, and galectin-3. Co-administration of ibuprofen reduced sevoflurane-induced neuroinflammation.

Risk of cardiovascular disease associated with long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of cardiovascular disease associated with long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in a large real-world ankylosing spondylitis (AS) cohort. METHODS: This nationwide population-based cohort study used data from the Korean National Health Insurance Database. Patients aged ≥18 years old who were newly diagnosed with AS without prior cardiovascular disease between January 2010 and December 2018 were included in this study. Controls without AS were randomly selected by age, sex, and index year. The primary outcome was cardiovascular disease, a composite outcome of ischemic heart disease, stroke, or congestive heart failure. Long-term use of NSAIDs was defined as use of NSAIDs for >365 cumulative defined daily doses. The association between long-term use of NSAIDs and incident cardiovascular disease was examined in both AS and non-AS populations. RESULTS: Among 19 775 patients with AS and 59 325 matched controls without AS, there were 1,663 and 4,308 incident cases of cardiovascular disease, showing an incidence of 16.9 and 13.8 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Long-term use of NSAIDs was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease in non-AS controls (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.48-1.82). In contrast, long-term use of NSAIDs did not increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in AS patients (aHR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.94-1.20; adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use). CONCLUSION: Prolonged NSAID treatment in AS patients may not be as harmful as in the general population regarding cardiovascular risk.

Structural disease modification in axial spondyloarthritis.

"Disease modification" in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) seeks to not only alleviate clinical symptoms but also alter the disease's natural course by impeding new bone formation. Recent years have witnessed the effectiveness of treatments, including biologics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, in managing axSpA symptoms. Emerging evidence points toward their potential impact on slowing structural disease progression. This comprehensive review centers on the pivotal role of inhibiting new bone formation in axSpA disease modification. It delves into the significance of imaging techniques for assessing disease progression and explores the disease-modifying properties of available axSpA treatments, encompassing NSAIDs, TNF inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors. This article offers valuable insights into the evolving landscape of disease modification strategies in axial spondyloarthritis, highlighting the multifaceted approaches used to attain these objectives.

Impact of lifestyle and socioeconomic position on use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: A population-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: Lifestyle and socioeconomic position may confound the link between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cardiovascular events, if associated with NSAID use. We examined this association. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of all adult first-time responders to the Danish National Health Surveys of 2010, 2013, or 2017 without an NSAID prescription within 3 months before survey completion (n = 407 395). Study exposures were weight, smoking status, alcohol consumption, binge drinking frequency, physical activity level, marital status, highest achieved level of education, income, and employment status. We used a Cox model to compute hazard ratios of time to first redemption of an NSAID prescription and a cumulative odds model to compute odds ratios (ORs) of redeeming one additional NSAID prescription in the year after survey completion. RESULTS: Total follow-up time was 1 931 902 years. The odds of redeeming one additional NSAID prescription in the year after survey completion varied within all categories of lifestyle and socioeconomic position. The largest ORs were observed within categories of weight (1.70, 95% CI: 1.65-1.74 for obesity vs. normal weight), smoking status (1.24, 95% CI: 1.21-1.27 for current vs. never use), and education (1.44, 95% CI: 1.39-1.49 for primary or other vs. university or higher education). The Cox model showed consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Markers of unhealthy lifestyle and low socioeconomic position were associated with initiation and prolonged NSAID use. Consideration of lifestyle and socioeconomic markers as potential confounders in NSAID studies is therefore recommended.

Prescription medication use of United States military service members by therapeutic classification.

Background: This cross-sectional study investigated the prevalence of, and factors associated with, filled prescription medications (FPMs) among United States (US) service members (SMs). Methods: A stratified random sample of active duty SMs from the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy was obtained from military workforce records. Participants (n = 26,680) completed a questionnaire on demographics, physical characteristics, and lifestyle factors and approved access to their FPM for the previous 6 months. FPMs were obtained from the military Pharmacy Data Transaction Service that included all prescription medications dispensed at military medical treatment facilities, abroad, at retail pharmacies in the US, and/or through mail-order programs. Results: About two-thirds (65%) of SMs had ≥1 FPM in the 6 months surveillance period. Central nervous system (CNS) agents had the highest prevalence (41%), followed by anti-infective agents (20%), eye/ear/nose/throat preparations (20%), gastrointestinal drugs (18%), autonomic drugs (17%), skin and mucous membrane agents (13%), antihistamine drugs (12%), respiratory tract agents (12%) and cardiovascular drugs (9%). Among CNS agents, overall prevalence of dispensed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) was 30%. The odds of any FPM was independently associated with female gender, older age, higher body mass index, former tobacco use (smoking and smokeless tobacco), lower alcohol consumption, and was highest among Army, lowest among Marine Corps personnel. Conclusion: In this sample of SMs, dispensing of prescription medication was high, especially NSAIDs, but dispensing of cardiovascular drugs was much lower compared to the general US population, likely because of the younger age and higher level of physical activity of SMs.

Aspirin versus placebo on estrogen levels in postmenopausal women: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Estrogen is involved in the pathogenesis of breast and gynecological cancers. Regular use of aspirin reduces estrogen levels. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of aspirin on estrogen levels in postmenopausal women. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group trial was conducted on postmenopausal women referred to an outpatient clinic at a women's hospital in Tehran. Volunteers were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 100 mg/day or placebo for 6 weeks. Estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and testosterone levels at baseline and at the end of the intervention were measured by ELISA. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, independent samples t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Twenty-seven and 28 participants were finally analyzed in the aspirin and placebo groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in body mass index (BMI), age, or menopausal years. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.002) in the amount of  change in estradiol levels of the intervention group (median=- 3.5 pg/ml) compared to the control group (median=1.5 pg/ml). In contrast, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding testosterone and SHBG levels (p = 0.58, p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Since low doses of aspirin may decrease estradiol levels, it could be considered a promising adjunctive therapeutic candidate in postmenopausal women to decrease BC incidence. However, further studies with larger sample sizes, measurements of estrogen levels and its related compounds in different time points accompanied by long-term follow-ups are needed to better elucidate the potential mechanisms by which nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) negatively affect breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRCT201012195397N1. Date of first registration: 03/01/2011.

Granulocyte and monocyte/macrophage apheresis for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory arthropathies: case reports.

Drug therapy of immune-mediated inflammatory arthropathies is not always satisfactory, and there is a risk of adverse events. Granulocyte and monocyte/macrophage apheresis (GMA) is a non-pharmacological therapeutic option that is beneficial and very well tolerated. GMA involves passing blood through a column with cellulose acetate beads to remove increased and activated myeloid lineage cells and improve the cytokine profile. The technique reduces pain and inflammation. We present four clinical reports that illustrate the clinical uses of GMA with the medical device Adacolumn® in patients with different backgrounds and immune-mediated inflammatory arthritis. The results were positive, and no adverse events were reported.

Recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence after thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: A nationwide population-based study.

PURPOSE: This large-scale nationwide population-based study aimed to determine the recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). METHODS: This retrospective study used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database to identify individuals who underwent VATS for PSP from 2007 to 2014. All patients were followed up until December 31, 2017. Study variables included demographic characteristics, intensive care unit admission, lung resection status, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and hospital level. The primary outcome was 1-year recurrence, and the secondary outcomes were the 1-year rate of reintervention for recurrence and overall recurrence rate. RESULTS: During the study period, 6654 patients underwent VATS for PSP (average age: 23.2 years, 89.1% male), including 910 patients (13.7%) who experienced recurrence within 1 year and 531 patients (8.0%) who required reintervention within 1 year. The overall recurrence rate was 24.8%, with an average follow-up time of 6.7 years. Age ≤18 years and the use of NSAIDs, especially ketorolac, were significant risk factors for 1-year recurrence and overall recurrence. Younger age was a risk factor for 1-year reintervention. In subgroup analysis, NSAID use was a significant risk factor for 1-year recurrence, 1-year reintervention, and overall recurrence in pediatric patients but not in adult patients. CONCLUSIONS: In Taiwan, the 1-year recurrence rate was 13.7% after VATS for PSP. Younger age and the use of NSAIDs, especially ketorolac, were significant risk factors for short- and long-term recurrence after VATS for PSP.

Does the administration of meloxicam before head and neck radiotherapy reduce the risk of mandibular osteoradionecrosis? An animal model study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the administration of meloxicam before head and neck radiotherapy reduces the risk of mandibular osteoradionecrosis in rats. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty male Wistar rats were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 10) according to the meloxicam administration and radiation therapy: control (C), irradiated (I), single dose of meloxicam (M1), single dose of meloxicam and irradiated (M1I), triple dose of meloxicam (M3), triple dose of meloxicam and irradiated (M3I). Meloxicam was administrated (20 mg/kg per dose) 1 h before the radiation therapy (single dose of 20 Gy) and 24 h and 48 h after the radiation therapy for groups with two additional doses. Ten days after the radiation therapy, the three right mandibular molars were extracted from all rats, who were euthanatized after 21 or 35 days (n = 5 per group). The mandibles were assessed by macroscopic evaluation and micro-CT analysis. RESULTS: The right hemimandibles of the irradiated groups revealed macroscopic signs of osteoradionecrosis, and those of the non-irradiated groups revealed complete gingival healing. A significant delay in alveolar socket healing in all irradiated groups was observed in the micro-CT assessment regardless meloxicam treatment. CONCLUSION: The administration of meloxicam before head and neck radiotherapy does not reduce the risk of mandibular osteoradionecrosis when associated to dental extractions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Since meloxicam has been shown to be a potential radiation-protective agent, and osteoradionecrosis physiopathology is believed to be related to an inflammatory process, possible interactions are relevant to be investigated.

An Overview of Cancer Prevention: Chemoprevention and Immunoprevention.

Cancer prevention encompasses a broad spectrum of strategies designed to lower the chance of developing cancer and reduce the morbidity of established cancer. There are three levels of cancer prevention. Eliminating or mitigating cancer risk factors by adopting healthy behaviors and lifestyles, such as avoiding tobacco and alcohol use, exercising, eating a healthy diet, and applying sunscreen to protect against UV exposure, belongs to primary prevention and is the easiest and most effective way of preventing cancer for the general public. Secondary prevention includes screening to identify precancerous lesions and taking intervention measures to prevent disease progression to malignancy. Tertiary prevention refers to reducing or controlling the symptoms and morbidity of established cancer or the morbidity caused by cancer therapy. For high-risk populations, chemopreventive agents, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators (including tamoxifan and raloxifene) in breast cancer prevention and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aspirin) in colorectal cancer prevention, and immunoprevention using human papillomavirus and hepatitis B virus vaccines in infection-related cancers have shown clear clinical benefits of reducing cancer incidences. In this review, we will summarize the current status of cancer prevention, focusing on the major agents that are clinically used for chemoprevention and immunoprevention.

Prevalence of Gastrointestinal and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Disease.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available about the proportion of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal disease (DLSD) who have gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. Many DLSD patients are prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that are known to carry risks to the GI and CV systems by increasing GI bleeding and thromboembolic events. This study aimed to measure the prevalence of GI and CV risk in patients with DLSD and to ascertain whether the prescription of NSAIDs is in line with current guidelines. METHODS: This study included 153 patients with symptomatic DLSD who were planning to undergo lumbar spinal surgery. The GI profile was checked using the GI Standardized Calculator of Risk for Event system and CV risk was evaluated using the presence of metabolic syndrome. The conformity of the prescription of NSAIDs was investigated according to the recommendations in current guidelines. RESULTS: More than half of the patients (59.5%) had high or very high GI risk, and 66% of the patients were diagnosed with metabolic syndrome, which corresponds with CV risk. The rate of simultaneous GI and CV risk was 40.5% (n = 62 / 153; gastrointestinal Standardized Calculator of Risk for Event, > high and metabolic syndrome, yes). The actual prescription of NSAIDs was not in accordance with current guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Two out of 3 patients had GI or CV risk factors, and approximately 40% of patients had both. Detailed assessment of GI and CV risk in patients with DLSD by using effective evaluation tools is mandatory for optimal medical treatment.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis as a cause of non-Helicobacter pylori, non-gastrotoxic drug ulcers in children.

BACKGROUND: While Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) ulcers has declined recently, H. pylori-negative and/or gastrotoxic drug-negative peptic ulcers (HNGN-PU) has increased. This study aimed to analyze the etiology of peptic ulcers in children and the differences in clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and histopathologic findings of peptic ulcers according to etiology, including eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EoGE). METHODS: In total, 255 children (157 boys and 98 girls) with peptic ulcers were recruited. The subjects were categorized into 5 groups according to the etiology of the ulcer: 1) H. pylori infection (n = 51); 2) gastrotoxic drugs (n = 18); 3) idiopathic (n = 144); 4) systemic disease (n = 23); 5) EoGE (n = 19). Clinical data were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Age at diagnosis, ulcer recurrence, atopic dermatitis history, white blood cell count, blood eosinophil count, platelet count, serum albumin level, iron level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein level differed significantly among the 5 groups (all p < 0.05). Regarding endoscopic findings, multiple ulcers and gastric mucosal nodularity differed among the 5 groups (all p < 0.05). When comparing the EoGE ulcer group with the others, EoGE group revealed older ages (p = 0.022), higher rates of ulcer recurrence (p = 0.018), atopic dermatitis history (p = 0.001), and both blood and tissue eosinophilia (both p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EoGE ulcers constituted 10.2% of HNGN-PU in pediatric patients. In children with HNGN-PU, peripheral eosinophilia, ulcer recurrence, and atopic dermatitis history might imply EoGE, necessitating thorough investigation of tissue eosinophils during endoscopic biopsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A total of 255 children was retrospectively registered between between July 2003 and April 2017.

Alergia e intolerancia a antiinflamatorios no esteroideos en pediatría / Allergy and intolerance to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children

Los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos son ampliamente recetados en niños. Constituyen la segunda causa de reacciones a medicamentos en pediatría después de los antibióticos betalactámicos; sin embargo, solo una parte de estas son reacciones de hipersensibilidad. La prevalencia de dichas reacciones a antiinflamatorios no esteroideos en niños es del 0,3 % y aumenta al 5 % en asmáticos.Los mecanismos fisiopatológicos involucrados (inhibición de la ciclooxigenasa, hipersensibilidad mediada por inmunoglobulina E, linfocitos T reactivos y/o afectación de la inmunidad innata) darán lugar a diferentes entidades clínicas con sintomatología dispar.La confusión con síntomas propios de procesos virales y la variabilidad clínica hacen del diagnóstico de certeza un verdadero desafío. Una historia clínica detallada, análisis de laboratorio, pruebas cutáneas y de provocación controlada permitirán definir estrategias para cada paciente en particular sin etiquetar como alérgico a un niño que no lo es ni exponer a riesgos innecesarios a quien está sensibilizado.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely prescribed in children. They are the second cause of drug ́s reactions in pediatrics after beta-lactam antibiotics, however only a part of them are hypersensitivity reactions. The prevalence of these reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children is 0.3 %, increasing to 5 % in asthmatics.The different physiopathological mechanisms involved (inhibition of cyclooxygenase, immunoglobulin E-mediated hypersensitivity, reactive T lymphocytes and/or disturbance of innate immunity) will cause different clinical entities with diverse symptoms.The confusion between the common symptoms of a viral infection and a hypersensitivity reaction, and the variability of the clinical presentations make diagnosis a real challenge.A detailed clinical history, laboratory, skin and controlled provocation tests will provide strategies for each patient, without labeling a child who is not an allergic one, or taking unnecessary risks with those who are sensitized.

The effect of naproxen patches on relieving orthodontic pain by evaluation of VAS and IL-1β inflammatory factor: a split-mouth study

ABSTRACT Introduction: Pain related to orthodontic tooth movement is common and cause dissatisfaction and discomfort. Objective: The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of naproxen patches in pain control during orthodontic tooth separation, by means of visual analogue scale (VAS) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β) levels in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). Methods: In this split-mouth triple-blind clinical trial, with 40 patients following separation, 5% naproxen or placebo patches were randomly placed on the upper right or left first molars every 8 hours. Pain intensity scores were determined after 2 and 6 hours, sleep time, 24 hours, days 2, 3 and 7 by the patients using a 100-mm VAS ruler. IL-1β levels in GCF were evaluated by ELISA at baseline, 1 and 24 hours and 7 days. Paired samples t-tests and two-way repeated measures ANOVA analysis of variance with a significance level of 0.05 were applied. Results: A total number of 30 patients (13 males and 17 females) finished the trial. Significant differences were found in pain scores (p< 0.0001) and IL-1β levels (p= 0.047) between naproxen and placebo groups. Lower pain scores were reported for the patients using naproxen patches at all time points, except 1 hour after separation. IL-1β levels were lower for the patients using naproxen patches only 1 hour after separation (p= 0.047). The peak of pain scores and IL-1β levels were calculated at 24 hours. Conclusion: In the light of VAS scores and IL-1β levels, naproxen patches reduced the pain caused by separator placement.

RESUMO Introdução: a dor relacionada à movimentação dentária ortodôntica é comum e causa insatisfação e desconforto. Objetivo: o presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a eficácia de curativos de naproxeno no controle da dor durante a separação ortodôntica dos dentes, por meio de escalas visuais analógicas (EVA) e dos níveis de interleucina 1β (IL-1β) no fluido crevicular gengival (FCG). Métodos: neste ensaio clínico, triplo-cego, boca dividida, com 40 pacientes após a separação dos dentes, foram aplicados, de forma aleatória, curativos com naproxeno a 5% ou placebo, nos primeiros molares superiores, direito ou esquerdo, a cada 8 horas. Os escores de intensidade da dor foram registrados pelos pacientes após 2 e 6 horas, durante o sono, após 24 horas, 2, 3 e 7 dias, usando uma EVA de 100 mm. Os níveis de IL-1β no FCG foram avaliados pelo ELISA no momento inicial, e após 1 e 24 horas e 7 dias. Foram aplicados testes t para amostras pareadas e ANOVA de duas vias para medidas repetidas, com nível de significância de 0,05. Resultados: no total, 30 pacientes (13 homens e 17 mulheres) terminaram o ensaio clínico. Diferenças significativas foram encontradas nos escores de dor (p< 0,0001) e níveis de IL-1β (p= 0,047) entre os grupos naproxeno e placebo. Índices mais baixos de dor foram relatados pelos pacientes que usaram curativos de naproxeno em todos os tempos avaliados, com exceção de 1 hora após a separação. Os níveis de IL-1β foram menores nos pacientes que usaram os curativos de naproxeno apenas 1 'hora após a separação (p= 0,047). Os picos dos escores de dor e dos níveis de IL-1β foram registrados 24 horas após a separação. Conclusão: considerando-se os escores das EVAs e os níveis de IL-1β, pode-se concluir que os curativos de naproxeno reduziram a dor causada pela instalação dos separadores ortodônticos.

Tolerância ao paracetamol em crianças com hipersensibilidade não seletiva aos anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais / Tolerance to paracetamol in children with non-selective hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Introdução: Os anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais (AINEs) estão envolvidos na maior parte das reações de hipersensibilidade a drogas na América Latina. Objetivos: Avaliar a tolerância ao paracetamol em crianças com história sugestiva de hipersensibilidade não seletiva aos AINEs. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de análise de dados de pacientes pediátricos atendidos em ambulatório especializado no período de julho de 2011 a julho de 2017. Os dados foram analisados e registrados em questionário padronizado adaptado. As reações foram classificadas como seletivas ou não seletivas. Pacientes com história clínica a um único AINE foram submetidos a teste de provocação oral (TPO) com o ácido acetilsalicílico para definição da seletividade ou não da reação. TPO com paracetamol foi realizado em todos os que relataram reação ao mesmo. Resultados: A maior parte dos pacientes tinha hipersensibilidade não seletiva a AINEs. A dipirona foi implicada em todos os casos, seguida do ibuprofeno (78%) e do paracetamol (51%). Todos os pacientes com história de hipersensibilidade seletiva foram provocados com outro AINE inibidor forte de COX-1, que não aquele implicado em sua história, e todos demonstraram tolerância. Os 22 pacientes cuja história apontava envolvimento do paracetamol foram submetidos a TPO e todas as provocações resultaram negativas. O etoricoxibe foi testado como droga alternativa em oito pacientes e se demonstrou ser uma opção segura (todas as provocações negativas). Conclusão: Apesar da elevada frequência de relato de reações ao paracetamol, a maioria das crianças tolera o composto que é, sem dúvida alguma, alternativa segura frente à hipersensibilidade não seletiva aos AINEs.

Introduction: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the group of drugs most frequently involved in hypersensitivity reactions in Latin America. Objectives: To evaluate tolerance to paracetamol in children with non-selective hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs. Methods: Clinical records of children treated at a specialized outpatient clinic from July 2011 to July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The data were registered in a specific questionnaire and reactions were defined as selective or non-selective. The diagnosis was confirmed by oral drug provocation test with acetylsalicylic acid in patients with only one NSAID implicated in clinical history to confirm whether the hypersensitivity reaction was selective. Tolerance to paracetamol was also evaluated through drug provocation tests. Results: Most of the cases were classified as non-selective hypersensitivity reactions. Dipirone was implicated in all the cases, followed by ibuprofen (78%) and paracetamol (51%). All patients with selective hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs underwent a drug provocation test with an alternative COX-1 inhibitor and all of them tolerated it. Twenty-two patients were tested with paracetamol and all of them had negative results. Tolerance to etoricoxib was also evaluated through drug provocation tests, all negative. Conclusion: Paracetamol can be considered a great alternative drug in children with non-selective hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs.

Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis: From Prognostication to Disease Modification.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pain, functional limitation, and spinal damage are the three main domains that have significant impact on various aspects of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). RECENT FINDINGS: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed a beneficial effect of non-steroid ant-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and biologic treatments on pain and function. The effect of available treatments on spinal damage is still of interest and is being studied. In this article, we review the literature on radiographic progression in axSpA. We discuss the natural course of spinal progression, predictors of spinal damage, and the effect of lifestyle changes and medications on radiographic progression in axSpA.

Peritonsillar infiltration of lidocaine with adrenaline is associated with increased risk of secondary post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES: In order to evaluate the safety of tonsillectomy among children, we retrospectively studied the incidence of post-operative complications, adverse events and their association with peri-operative medication. METHODS: Data were collected from the medical records of 691 patients aged 1-16 years, including details of post-operative complications (any unplanned contact with the hospital), analgesics, dexamethasone, 5-HT3 antagonists, local anaesthetic and haemostatic agents. RESULTS: Recovery was complicated in 13.6 per cent of patients, of whom 8.4 per cent were re-admitted to the ward. The most common complication was post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage, experienced by 7.1 per cent of patients. Re-operation under general anaesthesia (for grade III post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage) was required by 4.2 per cent of patients. Peritonsillar infiltration of lidocaine with adrenaline increased the risk of post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage (odds ratio = 4.1; 95 per cent confidence interval = 2.1 to 8.3). CONCLUSION: Every seventh paediatric patient experienced a complicated recovery after tonsillectomy, caused by post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage in most cases. Local peritonsillar infiltration of lidocaine with adrenaline was associated with an increased risk of post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage.

Comparison of Preoperative and Postoperative Parecoxib Administration for Pain Control Following Major Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized, double-blind controlled trial. PURPOSE: Here, we aim to compare the efficacy and safety of pain control between pre- and postoperative parecoxib administration in patients who have undergone major spine surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Several studies have compared the efficacy of pre- and postoperative administration of parecoxib, which led to inconclusive results owing to variation in operative time. Preincisional parecoxib administration reduces inflammatory response in major spine surgery requiring longer operative time; however, it may not reduce pain as much as parecoxib administration immediately after surgery would. METHODS: Totally, 127 patients who underwent major spine surgery were randomly divided into three groups: pre-group, which received 40 mg parecoxib before skin incision and at 12 and 24 hours after the first dose; post-group, which received the same dose at wound closure and at 12 and 24 hours after the first dose; and control group, which did not receive any parecoxib. Efficacy and safety of parecoxib were measured based on pain score, morphine consumption, and side effects from both morphine and parecoxib at 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Initial postoperative pain score, postoperative pain score at rest, and accumulative morphine consumption at 24 hours after surgery were similar between the pre- and post-groups. Despite the significantly lower pain score and morphine consumption in both pre- and post-groups compared with the control group, cumulative morphine consumption at 24 hours after surgery was reduced by approximately 50% in the pre-group and 46% in the post-group compared. Analgesic-related complication incidence was similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The timing of parecoxib administration, either before or after major spinal surgery, did not affect the safety and analgesic efficacy of pain management.